Behavioral and Experimental Economics: Chapter Outline
Behavioral and Experimental Economics: Chapter Outline
Behavioral and Experimental Economics: Chapter Outline
Experimental Economics
17
Chapter Outline
17.1
When Human Beings Fail
to Act
the Way Economic
Models Predict
(Insert image of text cover)
17.2
Does Behavioral
Economics Mean Everything
Weve Learned
Is Useless?
17.3
Testing Economic
Theories with
Data:
Experimental Economics
17.4 Conclusions and the Future
of Microeconomics
17-1
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/Syverson
1/e
Introduction
17
17-2
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/Syverson
1/e
Introduction
17
17-3
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/Syverson
1/e
17.1
17
17-4
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/Syverson
1/e
17.1
17
17-5
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/Syverson
1/e
17.1
17
17-6
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/Syverson
1/e
17.1
17
17-7 1/e
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson
17.1
17
17-8
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/Syverson
1/e
Application
17
Commitment Markets
Ian Ayers and Dean Karlan (economists at Yale) formed
a business based on helping people follow through with
their commitments
StickK.com helps people stick with their
commitments through the use of a couple of techniques
that have been shown to work in experiments
17.1
17
17.1
17
17-11
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/Syverson
1/e
17.1
17
Endowment-effect bias: some firms offer free trials and moneyback guarantees, knowing that biased consumers will experience
an inflated personal value once they own an item
Anchoring bias: a firm might artificially inflate the base price of a
good and then advertise a 50-percent off sale. By anchoring in
the consumers mind the idea that the good is worth the original
inflated price, the half-price good looks like a bargain.
Mental accounting: salespeople ask consumers how much they
are willing to pay for a good. Knowing this, salespeople are likely to
get every bit a consumer has allocated to a purchase (and
sometimes more)
17-12
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/Syverson
1/e
Application
17
17.1
17
17.2
17
17-15
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/Syverson
1/e
17.2
17
17.2
17
Experimental Economics
There are three types of experimental approaches used in
economics
Lab experiment: Test of an economic theory in a laboratory setting
People (often undergraduates looking for a bit of extra money) are
brought into a controlled laboratory setting and asked to perform
tasks
Benefits: can control for many things
Drawbacks: unlike lab mice, people know when they are being
experimented on, a recognition that may alter outcomes; stakes
are often lower than in the real world; tasks are unfamiliar
17-17
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/Syverson
1/e
17.2
17
Experimental Economics
Natural experiment: A randomization or near-randomization that
arises by happenstance
Oftentimes, policies or other changes affect people in a randomized
way that allows economists to investigate questions using field
data
Financial-aid packages that have hard GPA cutoffs allow economists
to investigate how aid affects school performance by considering
people just above and below the threshold
Field experiment: Research method in which randomizations are
carried out in real-world settings
Avoids biases that might arise in the lab, but field experiments are
often expensive to conduct, and they must still abide by human
subject research guidelines and informed consent rules
17-18
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/Syverson
1/e
17.4
17