Regular Exam Jan - Sols
Regular Exam Jan - Sols
Regular Exam Jan - Sols
Regular Exam
Answer 2 questions; at least one from 1 and 2; at least 1 from 4 and 5.
a) (7 marks) Consider a production function of the form y = αx1 + βx2, with α > 0 and β > 0.
i. Carefully sketch the isoquant map for this technology.
A: Straight lines with slope –α/ β.
b) (3 marks) Let y = f (x1, x2) be a constant returns-to-scale production function. Show that if the average
product of x1 is rising, the marginal product of x2 is negative.
A: The average product of x1 (AP1) is rising if and only if the derivative of AP1 with respect to x1 is positive. If we
compute the derivative of AP1 and check when it is greater than 0, we obtain f1 > f/ x1, where f1 is the derivative
of f with respect to x1. Now, constant returns to scale implies f = f1 x1 + f2 x2. Then, f2 x2= f-f1 x1 < f - f = 0. Thus, f2
x2 <0, which implies f2 < 0 as x2 > 0.
Consider a homogeneous product duopoly. Each firm produces its output using only labour as an input into
production. Firm 1 has the production function q1 = 3L1,
where q1 denotes firm 1’s output, and L1 denotes firm
1’s labour input. Similarly, firm 2’s production function is q2 = 2L2. Labour costs w = 4 per unit, and market
(inverse) demand for the product is P = 42 − Q, where P is price and Q = q1 + q2.
Solutions:
a) P1(L1, L2) = (42 - 3L1 -2L2) 3L1 - 4L1 and P2(L1, L2) = (42 - 3L1 -2L2) 2L2 - 4L2
b) Let us solve the game by backwards induction. Solving firm 2’s profit maximization problem, i.e. choosing L2
to maximize P2(L1, L2), the first order condition is 84 -6L1*-8L2* – 4 = 0 óL2* = 10 – (3/4) L1*. Substituting L2*
into 1’s profit function, we have: P1(L1) = [42 - 3L1 -2(10 – (3/4) L1)] 3L1 - 4L1 óP1(L1) = [22 – (3/2) L1)] 3L1 - 4L1.
The first order condition of 1’s profit maximization problem is 66 – 9 L1* – 4 = 0 ó L1*=62/9. Therefore, L2* =
10 – (3/4)(62/9) = 10 – 31/6 = 29/6. So, Q* = 3*62/9 + 2*29/6 = 91/3 and P* = 35/3.
Then, maximum profit for firm 1 is P1(L1*, L2*) = (35/3)*62/3 – 4*62/9 = 31*62/9 = 1922/3.
Advanced Microeconomics 7th of February of 2019
Doutoramento in Economics Duration: 90 minutes
c) When firms solve their profit maximization problems simultaneously, the first-order condition of firm 1 is
L1* = 61/9 –L2*/3 and of firm 2 is L2* = 10 – (3/4) L1*. Solving the system of equations, we obtain L1*=124/27
and L2*=59/9. It follows that Q* = 242/9 and P*=136/9. Then, P1(L1*, L2*) = (136/9)*124/9 – 4*124/27 =
124/81, which is lower than the profit in the sequential version.
In general, the first mover always prefers (weakly) the sequential game. In fact, it can always reproduce the
simultaneous move solution by choosing, in the sequential game, just as it would in its simultaneous version.
(In this case, firm 1 could choose L1=124/27 in the sequential version, which would lead firm 2 to choose
L2*=59/9, and thus firm 1 would obtain the same profit as in the simultaneous move game.)
Discuss the existence of a pooling equilibrium in an insurance market with asymmetric information, namely how
this is affected by signalling and screening.
Can there be a common explanation for preference reversal and matching-choice disparity? Discuss.
Advanced Microeconomics 7th of February of 2019
Doutoramento in Economics Duration: 90 minutes
ser mitigados?