Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 661 views

    Marginal Teacher

    Uploaded by

    Andy Acuin
    This document discusses marginal teachers and outlines principles for evaluating them. It defines three types of marginal teachers: Type I are questioned unfairly, Type II perform poorly but respond to supervision, and Type III perform poorly and ignore supervision. The administrator is responsible for proper supervision and evaluation, while the teacher must improve with guidance. Finally, it presents nine principles from Cangelosi for fair evaluation, focusing on clear criteria, teacher involvement, valid measurements, and proper documentation to protect teacher integrity.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Marginal Teacher

    Uploaded by

    Andy Acuin
    661 views19 pages
    This document discusses marginal teachers and outlines principles for evaluating them. It defines three types of marginal teachers: Type I are questioned unfairly, Type II perform poorly but respond to supervision, and Type III perform poorly and ignore supervision. The administrator is responsible for proper supervision and evaluation, while the teacher must improve with guidance. Finally, it presents nine principles from Cangelosi for fair evaluation, focusing on clear criteria, teacher involvement, valid measurements, and proper documentation to protect teacher integrity.

    Original Description:

    slide presentation for marginal teacher concept

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document discusses marginal teachers and outlines principles for evaluating them. It defines three types of marginal teachers: Type I are questioned unfairly, Type II perform poorly but respond to supervision, and Type III perform poorly and ignore supervision. The administrator is responsible for proper supervision and evaluation, while the teacher must improve with guidance. Finally, it presents nine principles from Cangelosi for fair evaluation, focusing on clear criteria, teacher involvement, valid measurements, and proper documentation to protect teacher integrity.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    661 views19 pages

    Marginal Teacher

    Uploaded by

    Andy Acuin
    This document discusses marginal teachers and outlines principles for evaluating them. It defines three types of marginal teachers: Type I are questioned unfairly, Type II perform poorly but respond to supervision, and Type III perform poorly and ignore supervision. The administrator is responsible for proper supervision and evaluation, while the teacher must improve with guidance. Finally, it presents nine principles from Cangelosi for fair evaluation, focusing on clear criteria, teacher involvement, valid measurements, and proper documentation to protect teacher integrity.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    of 19

    Marginal Teachers

    RIGHT VS. RESPONSIBILITIES

    Prepared by:
    Andy Williams Acuin

    I. Classification of Marginal
    Teachers
    II. Rights VS.
    Responsibilities
    III. Formulated
    Principles of
    Cangelosi

    Marginal Teachers
    are teachers who are no longer
    neophytes but whose teaching
    Competence remains unsatisfactory and are, therefore,
    considered for dismissal.

    I. Classification of Marginal Teachers


    Type I
    Type II
    Type III

    I. Classification of Marginal Teachers


    Type I. Teachers who have been
    designated marginal because unwarranted concerns about their instructional method have been
    raised.

    Type II. Teachers whose teaching


    performance is ineffective,
    but who are responsive to
    instructional supervision.

    Type III. Teachers whose classroom


    performance is ineffective,
    and who are not responsive
    to instructional supervision.

    Rights VS.
    Responsibilities

    What are the rights


    and responsibilities of
    the administrator?
    What are the rights
    and responsibilities of
    the teacher?

    Responsibility of the Administrator

    To see to it that competent


    instructional
    supervision
    and
    formative evaluations are made
    available to the teacher in
    preparation
    for
    summative
    evaluation--- Cangelosi (1991)

    Duty to continually evaluate


    teachers

    To supervise and provide


    remedial intervention
    measures to address
    inadequate performance
    in the classroom.

    On the other hand


    Teacher must
    show a marked
    improvement in
    performance
    when given
    adequate
    guidance and
    support.

    According to Marczely (2001


    As long as the
    supervisor provides
    effective supervision, there
    is no need to worry about
    legal issues.

    Formulated Principles of
    Cangelosi

    1. Summative evaluations should focus


    on logical and empirical bases that are
    found in professional literature.
    2. Criteria for evaluation should be made
    public and explained clearly to the
    beginning teacher as a precondition of
    employment.
    3. The beginning teacher should be
    involved in procedural decisions in the
    summative evaluation process.

    4. Summative evaluations should be based


    upon valid and reliable measurement
    instruments.
    5. School administrators should provide
    effective instructional supervision to give
    beginning
    teacher
    reasonable
    opportunities to succeed in the classroom.
    6. Evaluation outcomes should not be shared
    with unauthorized persons in order to
    confidentiality of the process, and to
    protect the honor and integrity of the
    teacher.

    7. Evaluators should provide the teacher a


    copy of the complete results submitted to
    the decision-makers.
    8. Evaluation process should be consistent
    with acceptable published professional
    standards..
    9. The process must be documented
    property and show adherence to the
    procedure prescribed by law.

    TEACHERS AS PROFESSIONALS
    Duly licensed professionals who
    possess dignity and reputation with high
    moral values as well as technical and
    professional competence. In the practice
    of their noble profession, they strictly
    adhere to observe, and practice this set
    of ethical and moral principles, standard
    and values.
    (Preamble, Code of Ethics for
    Professional Teachers)

    -END-

    You might also like