UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle

Overview Briefing

UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

Agenda
• Purpose
• Overview
• Mission Statement
• Capability Discussion
• Background
• Program Summary
• Program Execution
• Concept of Operations Summary
• Program Schedule
• Strategy Objectives
• Cost, Schedule, Performance
• Industry Concepts
• International
• Overview
• Approach
• Partnerships / Collaboration
• Participation Schedule
• Summary

~2~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

To provide a program overview of the US Joint Light



Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) program

~3~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

Overview

~4~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

MISSION:
Jointly develop, produce, field and sustain
safe, reliable, suitable and effective family of
Joint Light Tactical Vehicles

VISION:
JLTV – Providing our Joint Warfighter
with the very best in light tactical vehicle
payload, protection and performance

Product Manager JLV~ 28 Apr 2009 ~5~ UNCLASSIFIED

 UNCLASSIFIED

Capability gaps within existing fleet are the result of an Transportability

imbalance in protection, payload, and performance within a
transportable vehicle

CE

PR
AN

OT
M

EC
OR
MUST BE

TIO
RF
BALANCED

PE

N
FOR MISSION
REQUIREME
NTS
Current fleet mix:


PAYLOAD
 Protection: fixed protection in light vehicles
 Require inherent and supplemental armor, scalable to mission


 Payload: supplemental armor reduces useable payload

 Require a design that supports armor, warriors, mission equip, C4, cargo

 Performance: supplemental armor degrades all elements
 Require a design that supports mobility, reliability & maintainability at gross vehicle weight &
transport at essential combat configuration

 Transportability:current platforms lack armor design flexibility to allow full range of
transportability
 Require a design which enables Rotary and Fixed Wing Air, Sea, Overland transport


The JLTV vehicles built will address this imbalance & meet
DoD goals for costs & long-term sustainability

~6~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

Program Governance
•OSD / ARMY / NAVY
•Program Certification & Milestone Decisions
Material Development
•PEO CS & CSS / PM JCSS / PM JLTV
•Program Management
•Milestone Documentation Development

Requirements Development
•CASCOM / MCCDC
•CDD Development & Staffing for Approval
Industry
•BAE Systems – Ground Systems
•Lockheed Martin Owego
•General Tactical Vehicles
Science & Technology
•TARDEC / ONR
•Technology Development
•Trade Studies to Support Requirements Development
International Participants
•Countries: Australia, Israel & Canada
•PA: Australia
•Pending PA / Technical Discussions: Israel
•Data Exchange Agreements: Canada & UK

~7~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

JLTV FoV emphasizes:



 Adaptability
 Interoperability
 Enhances expeditionary responsiveness to the Joint Warfighter
 Increase maneuver capability
 Provides outstanding scalable protection at a much lower weight
 Maritime Prepositioning Force (MPF): Helo &Sealift transportable
 Achieves unprecedented levels of commonality
 Almost no service unique requirements


Program Tenets = Lower Life-Cycle Costs

~8~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/majorsys/jltv/jltv.htm

Solutions in Payload Categories A, B & C

Payload: 3,500 lbs Payload: 4000/ 4500 lbs Payload: 5,100 lbs

(Concept)

(Concept) (Concept)

1 of multiple sub-configurations shown 1 of multiple sub-configurations shown

~9~ UNCLASSIFIED
 Commonality within FoV w/
UNCLASSIFIED

Trailers
JLTV Cat B, IC.

JLTV to be designed for commonality beyond major components, to include

repair parts, tools, training, system design, maintenance procedures and
sources of supply

~10~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

PAYLOAD CATEGORY A PAYLOAD CATEGORY B PAYLOAD CATEGORY C

Payload: 3,500 Payload: 4000/ 4500 lbs Payload: 5,100 lbs

Performance: Exceed HMMWV Performance: Exceed HMMWV Performance: Exceed HMMWV
Transport: 1x EAT* CH 47/53 Transport: 1x EAT* CH 47/53 Transport: 1x EAT* CH 47/53
2x IAT** C130 1x IAT** C130 1x IAT** C130
Sub-Configurations Sub-Configurations Sub-Configurations
General Purpose Infantry Carrier, Fire Team (6 Shelter Carrier / Utility /Prime Mover
Mobility Seat)-Army/USMC (2 Seat) - Army/USMC
(4 Seat) - Army/USMC
Reconnaissance (6 Seat) - Army Ambulance (3 seat + 4 Litter) -
Army/USMC
C2OTM (4 Seat) – Army/USMC

Heavy Guns Carrier (MP, Patrol,

TARDEC Escort) (4 Seat+ Gunner)-
Concept Example
Army/USMC ONR & TARDEC
Concept Examples
ITAS (TOW) Carrier (4 Seat)
Army/USMC
Utility (2 Seat) – USMC

Ambulance (3 Seat+2 Litters)

Army/USMC
* EAT: External Air Transport
** IAT: Internal Air Transport
Concept Examples
ONR & TARDEC
Program focus during Technology
Development Phase is on these
key configurations build key
vehicles, 1 A, 2 B, 1 C

Trailers for each payload category to

have equivalent payload and mobility
to support prime movers.

~11~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

Tech Development Phase



 Full and open competition for 3 Cost Type contracts

 Prototypes from each Payload Category (including Trailers)
 Designs for the entire FoV
 Developmental Test, limited Operational Test, Limited Live Fire & RAM miles
 Potential Off-Ramp to MS C for select sub-configurations


Engineering, Manufacturing & Development Phase (Notional)



 Full and open competition to award 2 contracts

 TDP Data rights addressed in RFP
 TRL 6 or higher required in RFP
 Cost or Fixed Price type contracts


Production Phase (Notional)



 Restricted competition (SDD Contractors only), down select to one contractor

 Focused incentives (Reliability Growth, Maintenance Man-hour Reduction, Fuel Efficiency,
Life Cycle O&S Reduction, Accelerated Deliveries)
 RFP to include requirement for TDP (Re-competition, Spares, Engineering Efforts, Etc.)
 TDP CLIN executed post Production Verification Test
 Fixed Priced type contract for LRIP and FRP

~12~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

Requirem ent s
 JLTV DRAFT CDD 2.7a: Content & Structure
• Purpose: Display the content & logical alignment of JLTV capabilities by


KPP within the requirements hierarchy
• Requirement Summary: JLTV Requirements Hierarchy
 - FoV KPPs: 7
 - FoV KSAs: 3
 - FoV Tier 2: 34
 - FoV Tier 3: 30 Tier 1: JLTV KPPs (Red)
 - FoV Tier 4: 36 JLTV KSAs (Red)
 - MRV Tier 3-4: 25 Tier 2: Critical Attributes
 - FoV Other System Attributes (Para 15): 5 (Capabilities) Which Underpin
the JLTV KPPs (Blue)
• The hierarchy displays the requirement title,
Tier 3: Key Capabilities
 requirement ID, and a generic description. Supporting a Critical
Operational Issue (Green)

Tier 4: Remaining Required

Capabilities (Yellow)

~13~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
JLTV Key Performance Parameters
KPP Measure
(CDD v2.7a)
6.1.1 (T) The JLTV FoV (at GVW) shall achieve the NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) Reference Mobility Model (NRMM) Trafficability
Mobility Prediction Summary per the table below. Trafficability varies between MRVs, as identified in separate annexes. (O) See separate Annexes
6.1.2 (T)JLTV FoV shall be transportable worldwide by air and sea modes to support strategic deployment and operational maneuver in accordance
Transportability with service concepts and programs. Additional MRV-specific items identified in separate annexes.
(O) See separate annexes
6.1.3 (T) JLTV FoV shall achieve interoperability through seamless integration of Joint and Service C4I systems installed or mounted on the vehicle.
Net-Ready The system (JLTV with installed/mounted C4I systems) must fully support the execution of critical operational activities identified in the joint and
system integrated architectures and the system must satisfy the technical requirements for Net-Centric military operations and include
1) DISR mandated GIG IT standards and profiles identified in the TV-1,
2) DISR mandated GIG KIPs identified in the KIP declaration table,
3) NCOW RM Enterprise Services
4) Information assurance requirements including availability, integrity, authentication, confidentiality, and non-repudiation, and issuance of
an Interim Approval to Operate (IATO) by the Designated Approval Authority (DAA), and
5) Operationally effective information exchanges; and mission critical performance and information assurance attributes, data correctness,
data availability, and consistent data processing specified in the applicable joint and system integrated architecture views.
(O) Threshold = Objective

6.1.4 (T) The JLTV shall have scalable protection with inherent and supplemental armor protection against direct fire and IED threats. See Appendix
Force D (classified) for the Threshold Values. Increment II shall provide Increment I protection while returning 25% increased payload (can be
Protection applied to payload increase, curb weight reduction, or increased mobility).
(O) See Appendix D (classified) for Objective Values. Increment II: Threshold = Objective
6.1.5 (T) Integrated structure with crush resistant roof to support 150% of GVW.
Survivability (O) Integrated structure with crush resistant roof to support 200% of GVW.
6.1.6 (T) JLTV shall provide a mobile, versatile platform capable of effectively transporting essential mission role equipment, weapons and mounts,
Payload the vehicle occupants and their associated sustainment loads in accordance with functional concepts as specified in separate annexes.
(O) See separate annexes
6.1.7 (T) JLTV shall have an operational availability Ao of 95% at service specified field level Maintenance Ratios
Availability (O) JLTV should have an operational availability Ao of 98% at service specified field level Maintenance Ratios

Product Manager JLTV~ New Zealand

~14~ UNCLASSIFIED 3 Oct 08
 UNCLASSIFIED
JLTV Key System Attribute (CDD
v2.7a)
KSA Measure

6.2.1 Ownership (T) JLTV FOV shall have an Ownership Cost equal to or less than $14.293 B for Increment I quantities defined for
Costs the Army and Marine Corps.
(O) JLTV FOV should have an Ownership Cost equal to or less than $12.423 B for Increment I quantities defined
for the Army and Marine Corps.
6.2..2 Overall (T) JLTV FoV shall have a Mean Miles Between Operational Mission Failure (MMBOMF) of 6170 for Payload
Materiel Categories A, C and D / 4500 for Category B. Increment II: 11700 MMBOMF.
Reliability (O) JLTV FoV should have a Mean Miles Between Operational Mission Failure (MMBOMF) of 11700 for all
categories. Increment II: 15,150 MMBOMF.
6.2.3 Fuel (T) Increment I: JLTV FoV shall achieve 60 ton-miles per gallon. Increment II: 65 ton-miles per gallon; or reduce
Efficiency by 10% the gallons/hour fuel consumption rate at idle speed of predecessor vehicle (HMMWV).
(O) Increment I: JLTV FoV should achieve 65 ton-miles per gallon. Increment II: 72 ton-miles per gallon; or
reduce by 25% the gallons/hour fuel consumption rate at idle speed of predecessor vehicle (HMMWV).

Product Manager JLTV~ New Zealand

~15~ UNCLASSIFIED 3 Oct 08
 UNCLASSIFIED
MRAP Cat 1 / JLTV Cat B / HMMWV
Dimensions (pictures are approximately to scale)
Dimensions (pictures are approximately to scale)

MRAP – IMG
(IMG used as example)

120 Max Height for

76 C130 Transport
(92 - Combat Ht) 75 (102)

90.5
99
96

153 159 130

254
220 196

~16~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

Program Execution

~17~ UNCLASSIFIED
 Concept of Operations
UNCLASSIFIED

Summary
Synopsis of the Central Idea
JLTV to provide scalable C4I and adaptable levels of protected mobility to Fire
Teams and Combat Support teams.

Adaptable: Protected Mobility:

•Varying levels of protection in response to •Exceeds current TWV payload & tactical
mission threat mobility
•Expeditionary vehicle family •Increase protection (especially EFP & IED)
•Over full range of operations / conditions through scalable armor
•Returns payload currently traded for armor
Network-Ready / Interoperable
•Space, weight, power claims for C4I Increased commonality:
systems •JLTV to be designed for commonality
beyond major components, to include repair
Resilient: parts, tools, training, system design,
•Designed to enter harms way & return forces maintenance procedures and sources of
safely supply
•Adapts light fleet to the IED / Counter
Insurgency paradigm
•Retains Major Combat Operations capability

Increases maneuver capacity:

•Provides protected mobility on the modern JLTV Tech Demo: CAD models of JLTV FoV

battlefield
Sources: JLTV CDD, CONOPS, & OMS/MP

~18~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

JLTV Program Schedule

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2

Engineering and Manufacturing

Technology Development Phase Development & Demonstration Production & Deployment Phase
TD Ktr EMD Ktr Prod
Awards CDD JROC RFP Awards JROC RFP Award

MS B DRR Proposals MS C FRP IOC

Proposals
Design/Fab Design/Fab LRIP

Coupon Testing Coupon Test Full Rate Production

Ballistic Cab Test Ballistic Cab Test

Production Qualification Testing
RAM & Performance Test RAM & Performance Test

Prototype Ballistic Testing System Level Live Fire & AFES Testing FUSL & MOTE*

Test Report Test Report Test Report

Analyses &
Final Final Reporting
CDD Staffing CPD Staffing

CDD Refinement Initial CDD Approved CPD Initial CPD Approved

for EMD CDD Staffing Refinement CPD Staffing

Gov't SOW/ Gov't

SRR SRR CDR SRR
IBR CDR IBR TRR

SOW & PDR TRR PDR PRR OTRR PCA

Ktr Mid MDA MDA Mid MDA MDA
SRR Review Review Reveiw Review

*Full-Up System Live Fire Test (FUSL) and Multi Service Operational Test & Evaluation (MOTE)

Joint Program Schedule v1.0

Dated: 3 March 08

~19~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

TD Exit Criteria
A Robust TD Phase will result in
Low Risk EMD Investment for International Participation
 Linkage with Evaluation of Alternatives
 KTRs are open to design a solution that meets the performance requirements
 KTRs will demonstrate potential solutions which will inform and mature CDD
requirements


 Systems Engineering
 SEP was approved by DAE
 Integrate the Government SEP requirements into a contractor SE Management
Plan which describes how KTRs will execute SE


 Acquisition
 Goal of TD is to ensure the best family of demonstrators is mature in terms of
supporting technology readiness and full system integration
 Government rights on technical data will be a consideration in the EMD selection


 Performance Goals
 Technology Development Phase
 Establish technology maturity of at least TRL 6 prior to MS B
 Substantiating the reliability requirements


 Engineering Manufacturing & Development Phase

 Demonstrate the CDD KPPs and KSAs
 Demonstrating the reliability requirements

~20~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

DCMA will assist the PM in monitoring contractor performance

and advising on its ability to meet contractual cost,
schedule and performance objectives.

 Cost
 Each contractor will receive their allocated contract award
 No other funding will be allocated
 Cost performance will be monitored by CDRL submittals


 Schedule
 Each contractor will be required to submit an Integrated Master Schedule
(IMS)
 No additional time will be allowed to successfully complete the contract
requirements
 Schedule performance will be monitored by CDRL submittals


 Performance
 Compliance matrices, trade studies, TPMs, testing and analyses will be
used to assess the capabilities of the proposed system solution
 An integrated teaming approach will be used to achieve best possible
system solution
 Knowledge Point reviews (government only) will be used to holistically to
assess requirements achievability for SDD

~21~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

Lockheed Martin , as of 29 Oct 08

General Tactical Vehicles, as of 29 Oct 08

BAE Systems/ Navistar, as of 29 Oct 08

~22~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

Lockheed – JLTV Concept

~23~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

GTV – JLTV Concept

~24~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

BAE – JLTV Concept

~25~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

International

~26~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

International Overview
 JLTV JPO is working with the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Defense
Exports and Cooperation (DASA DE&C).


 International participation in the JLTV program will reduce overall program risk through
the testing and evaluation of additional prototype vehicle.


 JLTV initiated partnerships with Australia, the United Kingdom, Israel, and Canada, and
has provided information to other NATO partners.


 JLTV JPO determined that the best approach to meet the need for international
cooperation, support the OSD’s competitive prototyping policy, and reduce program
risk, was to have foreign participants contribute to the TD phase and, by combining
resources, increase the number of prototypes fabricated.


 The JLTV program office, in coordination with DASA-DE&C, is developing an

international strategy for future program phases and will invite nations to identify
their interest for joining the JLTV program in the near future.


~27~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

 TD Phase
 Objective: DAE compliance and risk reduction
 Bi-lateral country agreements
 Minimal requirements divergence
 Integrated system
 CPP
 Additional test assets


 EMD Phase
 Objectives:
 Reduce cost, schedule, technical risk
 Potential to leverage international expertise
 Strengthen production potential
 Posture JLTV as best value international LTV solution
 Bilateral or multilateral agreements
 Minimal requirements divergence
 Integrated system
 Fully integrated office staff (CPP, LNO, or TPO)
 Additional test assets


~28~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
TD International Participants
•Australian Project Arrangement
•Signed 21 Jan 2009
•Funds 9 prototypes and companion trailers
•Funds design and development of steering mechanism (RH and LH)
and weapons mount
•Places 4 Australian Cooperative Project Personnel at the JPO
•Maximum influence prior to PDR
•Reliability and performance testing
•Equitable contributions

•Israel
•Participation under Technical Working Group

•United Kingdom
•Participation under Technical Working Group

•Canada
•Participation under a Technical Working Group
•

~29~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

2008 2009 2010 2011

FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012
Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
Post
Protest CDD RFP
TDAward ATP IBR PDR CDR TRR JROC Milestone B

SOWM
/SRR Mid MDAReview MDA
Proposals

PMR PMR PMR PMR PMR PMR PMR

Coupon Testing

Ballistics Cab Test

RAM and Performance Testing

Prototype Ballistic Testing

Test Report

KP1 KP2 KP3 KP4 KP5 KP6 KP7

CDDRefinement Initial CDD Final CDD

CDDApproved

International Agreement(s)

Intent declared Technical Discussions -----------------------------------------------------------

------ -------------------------------------------------- COD

INTL Conf Evaluations International documentation development

TD Program Schedule v1.0

Dated: 3 March 09

~30~ UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

Summary
•Multiple contracts awarded on 29 Oct 2008 – Lockheed Martin,
BAE, GTV
•
•Start of Work Meetings (SOWMs) completed Mar 09 for all OEMs
•
•Integrated Baseline Reviews (IBRs) will be conducted in Apr / May
09
•
•Currently design and build of prototype vehicles is ongoing and
on schedule; program is on track to complete a robust TD phase
•
•International opportunity for participation in the JLTV EMD phase
forthcoming
•
•

~31~ UNCLASSIFIED