Theory of Market Socialism
Theory of Market Socialism
Theory of Market Socialism
1.Definition
Market socialism is an ES that combines public/social ownership
of capital and market allocation.
Public ownership of non-labor factors of production
Decentralized decision making structure (firms & hhlds)
Decentralized information structure
Coordination by markets
Both material and non-material rewards
The most famous theoretical model of mkt socialism is the trial and
error model proposed by the polish economist Oscar Lange
2. Theoretical FoundationsThe Lange Model
Combines public ownership and a trial & error approach to determine output and
equilibrium
State owns non-labor factors of production and consumer goods are allocated by
market (state ownership and resource allocated by markets)
A more centralized version of market socialism
Three decision-making levels
The CBP sets the prices and would adjust prices to equilibrium until
supply=demand
Households supply labor
The CPB allocates social dividends (rents and profits):
to finance investment to achieve growth goals (state control over investment& the rate
of econ growth)
to achieve distributional goals (with state ownership, the rate & direction of econ
activity would be determined in large by state; distribution will be more even)
State control over savings and investment would reduce cyclical instability
Computationally inefficient
Unmanageable in practiceinformation needs too great; many tasks of the
CPB leads to large bureaucracy
what motivates managers to follow the rules?
what motivates managers of perfectly competitive firms to follow the
P=MC rule? Or to use resources efficiently;
How to make mrkts work when private individuals do not own capital.
Lack of managerial incentives
The Langes model has sparkled great interest b/c most existing
socialist systems use a crude form of trial and error for the setting of
prices at least for the consumer.
the workers must pay a fee, and the fee should not be minimal, but should reflect
the scarcity, or opportunity cost
market coordination
Closer to a true market system than the Lange version of market socialism
prices set by markets, not by planners
From these characteristics is clear that the objective of the labor-managed firm
will be different from a capitalist firm or centrally planned firm
Under capitalism, profit-max; centrally planned-the objective derives from the
preferences of planners, communist party but not the workers.
If labor and capital are the only two inputs, the production function, which shows
the relationship between output and inputs, is: Q = f (L, K)
8
Thus, to maximize per worker dividend, the firm must employ just that quantity
of labor such that the VMP of labor is equal to the per worker dividend Y/L.
10
misallocation of labor
Ward argues that if two cooperatives, producing identical product, use different
technologies there will be misallocation of labor that would not occur if the two
firms were capitalist.
if VMPL = w and all firms face same wage, then all firms VMPL will be the
same
no such mechanism to equate VMPs in market socialism
if VMP1 > VMP2 then greater value can be produced by reallocating labor from
Enterprise 2 to Enterprise 1
motivation of managers
When the cooperative hires professional management how to motivate to follow
the rules
12
b. Economic Growth
Relatively high rates of growth since the earnings from capital will go back into economy, but
need to consider if there is pressure on the state to put social dividends into current
consumption and subsidy
Not sure of high investment rates
?
c. Efficiency
Individual participation in decision making, lack of monopoly, attention to externalities;
therefore more efficient than capitalism
However motivation problems
?
d. Stability
Greater econ stability since the state will have greater control over the investment rate
But if it is difficult to adjust prices to equilibrium, macroecon instabilities associated with13
nonequilibrium prices might be experienced