Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 48 views

    Pavement Quality Data Collection and Analysis

    Uploaded by

    angemonax
    This document summarizes a study that compares pavement density measurements using the Pavement Quality Indicator Model 301 (PQI 301) and the conventional coring method. The PQI 301 provides instantaneous density readings in three seconds, while the coring method requires extracting core samples and laboratory analysis. The study involves using both methods to test asphalt pavement sites in Malaysia and analyzing the data to determine the correlation between the two measurement techniques and compare results to specifications. The expected outcome is a comparison of density readings and percentage compactions from the PQI 301 and coring method to evaluate the relationship between the two testing processes.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Pavement Quality Data Collection and Analysis

    Uploaded by

    angemonax
    48 views21 pages
    This document summarizes a study that compares pavement density measurements using the Pavement Quality Indicator Model 301 (PQI 301) and the conventional coring method. The PQI 301 provides instantaneous density readings in three seconds, while the coring method requires extracting core samples and laboratory analysis. The study involves using both methods to test asphalt pavement sites in Malaysia and analyzing the data to determine the correlation between the two measurement techniques and compare results to specifications. The expected outcome is a comparison of density readings and percentage compactions from the PQI 301 and coring method to evaluate the relationship between the two testing processes.

    Original Description:

    Pavement Quality Data Collection and Analysis

    Original Title

    Slide Pre Thesis

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a study that compares pavement density measurements using the Pavement Quality Indicator Model 301 (PQI 301) and the conventional coring method. The PQI 301 provides instantaneous density readings in three seconds, while the coring method requires extracting core samples and laboratory analysis. The study involves using both methods to test asphalt pavement sites in Malaysia and analyzing the data to determine the correlation between the two measurement techniques and compare results to specifications. The expected outcome is a comparison of density readings and percentage compactions from the PQI 301 and coring method to evaluate the relationship between the two testing processes.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    48 views21 pages

    Pavement Quality Data Collection and Analysis

    Uploaded by

    angemonax
    This document summarizes a study that compares pavement density measurements using the Pavement Quality Indicator Model 301 (PQI 301) and the conventional coring method. The PQI 301 provides instantaneous density readings in three seconds, while the coring method requires extracting core samples and laboratory analysis. The study involves using both methods to test asphalt pavement sites in Malaysia and analyzing the data to determine the correlation between the two measurement techniques and compare results to specifications. The expected outcome is a comparison of density readings and percentage compactions from the PQI 301 and coring method to evaluate the relationship between the two testing processes.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 21

    Pavement Quality Data Collection and

    Analysis
    MUHAMMAD ZULFIKRI B. MOHD
    ZAKY
    (4071044351)

    Correlation between Pavement Quality
    Indicator 301(PQI) and Conventional Method
    (Coring Method)

    Background Of Study

    Currently, most paving contractors determine
    density of asphalt pavements by the collection
    of core samples. It takes more time to know
    the result of quality pavement.
    By using PQI 301, the contractors just need
    the in-situ test and take just around 3 second
    to know the result about quality of asphalt
    A study is to evaluate and compare between
    nonnuclear density devices, the Pavement
    Quality Indicator (PQI) Model 301 and coring
    method.
    This study needs testing and analyses of
    certain projects to determine average
    coefficients for the relationships between
    uncorrected gauge measurements and core
    densities.

    Problem Of Statement

    During construction of hot-mix asphalt
    pavements, density measurements are taken
    at various stages to monitor the effect of the
    rollers and ensure proper compaction.
    The most commonly used method for
    measuring density is coring. The coring
    method requires licensing, training, and
    specialized storage due to the samples within
    the equipment.
    Objective Of The Study

    To compare the density between this 2
    method(cores and PQI)
    To compare the tests result with the JKR
    requirement.
    To obtain the optimum density and
    percentage of compaction with comparison
    JKR requirement.

    Scope Of Study

    First, a literature search was conducted to assess
    what information was currently available on this
    topic.
    The data collected on the test sections by each
    process and the participating PQI equipment and
    then evaluated in a statistical analysis.
    The main focus of the data collected on the test
    sections was the pavement condition information
    and the quality of the data reading, as these were
    the main functions performed by the PQI
    equipment.


    Area Of Study
    Malaysia East
    Jalan Karak Lama
    Bentong Raub
    Tranum Bypass (Raub)

    Malaysia South
    Lebuh AMJ (Merlimau Muar)


    Research Methodology

    Site Selection
    Pavement Testing
    Pavement Quality
    Indicators 301
    (PQI)

    Coring Method

    In-situ test
    Analysis and
    Calculation
    Analysis and
    Calculation

    Density &
    Percentage
    Compaction
    Density & Percentage
    Compaction data refer
    mix design from quarry

    Correlation
    between PQI and
    Coring Method
    Design
    Fulfills the standard requirements and pass all the tests

    Test for SSD
    Conclusion and Recommendations
    Compare the
    result with
    JKR
    specification
    requirement
    s

    Compare the
    result with
    JKR
    specification

    Analysis and
    Calculation

    Analysis and
    Calculation

    Pavement Quality Indicators (PQI 301)
    PQI 301 is a Pavement
    Quality Indicator designed
    and built to take quick,
    accurate measurements of
    hot mix asphalt density.
    PQI 301 takes accurate
    density readings in three
    seconds.


    Operation Of The PQI

    The Pavement Quality Indicator is designed with
    several useful modes of operation.
    Each mode of operation is accessed through the
    keypad controls.
    The number, letter and arrow keys have several
    functions. The immediate function is shown by
    the text in the display panel.
    Pressing a key causes the PQI to beep indicating
    that the keystroke has been entered.

    Display Panel PQI 301


    Functions:
    1)Density

    2)%Compaction

    3)Temperature Sensing

    4) Moisture Sensing


    Operational Specifications PQI 301

    Segregation: Identifies variations in material density
    associated with segregation.
    Continuous: Instantaneous density, temperature and
    moisture readings.
    Average: Averages five (5) readings and stores data
    including date and time. Stores 99 records.
    Single: Allows the operator to collect data then
    manually record data off the material under test.
    Reading time three (3) seconds.
    Coring Method
    The standard test procedure is used for collecting
    samples of pavement.
    Samples of pavement collected using the coring
    method may be used to evaluate various
    characteristics of pavement for construction
    quality control testing, quality assurance testing
    and product acceptance testing.
    Core samples may also be used for research
    testing purposes.

    Coring Method(cont)
    The standard core sample diameter for this
    test procedure will be 101.6 mm or 152.4 mm.
    Generally, the maximum thickness of
    pavement to be sampled will be 250 mm.


    Analysis And Calculation

    THICK:55
    MTD:2350


    TIME TEMP H20 DENSITY

    COMPACTION%
    9.00 am 28 6.8 2192 93.3%


    5.7 2161 92.0


    7.1 2181 92.8


    6.3 2188 93.1


    6.8 2198 93.5


    2184




    Samples of raw data for PQI

    Km : 19070-
    19440











    TIME POINT DENSITY COMPACTION
    4.00 pm 1 2343 99.9%

    2 2392 102.0

    3 2403 102.4

    4 2282 97.3

    5 2323 99.0


    2348.6

    rejuvenator 0.5 %
    rejuvenator 0.3 %



    D.O.T : 3 / 9 / 2010


    Thickness : 50mm


    Slow-Lane = LHS


    MTD : 2346 kg

    Km : 18640 -
    19040

    Samples of raw data for PQI

    Sample data for coring method
    CORING LOCATION : TRANUM BYPASS DATE LAID:
    TYPE OF MIX : DATE OF CORING:
    DATE OF TESTING:
    Thickness Bulk Volume (cc) Bulk Density Marshall Density Average Density
    Chainage
    Destination
    Form
    (mm) In Air SSD In Water (cc) (gm/cc) (gm/cc) (%)
    (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 6 7 (8) = (6) - (7) (9) = (5) / (8) (10) (11) = (9)/(10) (11)
    7 2.241
    44.0 706.6 710.6 391.3
    319.3 2.213
    2.328
    95.1
    8 2.200
    37.0 577.1 579.5 314.8
    264.7 2.180
    2.328
    93.7
    9 2.205
    52.0 865.6 869.3 473.1
    396.2 2.185
    2.328
    93.8
    10 2.224
    37.0 577.9 581.1 318.1
    263.0 2.197
    2.328
    94.4
    SAMPLE NO
    CORING LOCATION WEIGHT (mm)
    Core Density
    26/10/2010
    27/10/2010
    Calculation

    For calculation section, it refers to coring
    sample and doing analysis in laboratory and
    calculates all the collected data.
    In this study, we use CDM/MARSHALL TEST
    calculation to determine the density of coring
    samples.
    Also use Bulk Specific Gravity (ASTM D2726) and
    Maximum Theoretical Specific Gravity (ASTM D2041)


    Expected Outcome

    This expected outcome can conclude by this way:

    The correlation by PQIs method and coring
    method by referring raw data collection and
    analysis in laboratory.
    Comparison between density reading for PQIs
    and density that we will get by laboratory
    process.
    Also comparison the percentage compaction by
    both methods that will achieve the objective of
    this study limitations.

    THE END

    You might also like