Directors Duties
Directors Duties
Directors Duties
Directors
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Malaysia: Code on Corporate Governance 2000 and 2007 Intro Para 1.3- The Code aims to set out principles and best practices on structures and processes that companies may use in their operations towards achieving the optimal governance framework. Intro Para 4.1 Compliance (cross reference to paragraph 15.26 KLSE Listing requirements)
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Board of directors (BOD) - managing the companys business - Table A art 73 Para 4.72 of CGRE pg. 96 the ultimate responsibility for the board is to create value for shareholders and therefore what is in the best interests of the company should also be in the best interest of the owners [shareholders]
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
The powers include power to borrow money, to handle the financial affairs, to sign cheques, promissory notes etc., to appoint the companys agents Table A art 74-77 Code: Part 2 AA I & para. 4.17 responsibilities incl. reviewing & adopting a strategic plan etc.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Definition
S. 4(1)
Types of Directors
Executive director normally referred to as full-time director Non-executive director sometimes referred to as a part-time director Managing director The alternate director like a proxy but is a full director De facto director informal director (any person occupying the position of directorby whatever name called) Shadow director a puppeteer (a person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors are accustomed to act.)
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S 122 (1) at least 2 directors, 1 a resident S 122(3) The first directors named in the Memorandum Further appointments Articles; typically, through AGM
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S 138(1) a director may assign his office to another (for public listed companies it has to be approved by a special resolution) S 123(1) consent to be appointed is required Table A art 91 appointment of MD Appointments to the Board: Part 1 IV V; Part 2 VIII-XIII Code: Part 4 p 4.18 Chairman; CEO 4.23 independent 4.24non-executive
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
a human; of full age & capacity - S 122(2) Table A art 71 share qualification to be obtained within 2 months (s 124 (4)) or resigns (s 124(3)) S 127 any defect in appointment does not annul the acts
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S 125(1) - Undischarged Bankrupts Not fit to manage a limited liability company- Re Altim Pty Ltd [1968] 2 NSWLR 762 Offender is penalised but the capacity to act for the company is not deprived s 127
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S 130 automatic disqualification/or by court order for 5 years for a person convicted of offences in connection of the promotion formation or management of a corporation; or any offence involving fraud or dishonesty: due to untrustworthiness S 130A disqualification by court order for a person who was a director of 2 companies which went liquidation within 5 years of one another and were insolvent at the time of liquidation: due to the unfitness to manage effectively
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S 129 Age limit of 70 for public cos. Unless reelected under s 129 Resignation Table A art 72(e) by notice Retirement in rotation- Table A art 72 Or for a specified period; upon the happening of specified events. Eg Re consolidated Nickel Mines [1914] 1 Ch 883; Re Zinotty Properties [1984] 3 All ER 754 122(6) retirement is subject to the requirement of minimum 2 directors in office
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Removal Table A art 69: by special resolution Amounting to a breach if under a contract of service: Southern Foundaries v Shirlaw [1940] 2 All ER 445; No contract no compensation: Dato Khalid v Kelantan Match Factory (1981) 1 CLJ 171; A contract for life is subject to a satisfactory performance : Khoo Chiang Poh v Cosmic Insurance (unreported)
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S 137(1) no compensation is required Unless under a contract of service approved by the GM - s 137(5)(b) Payment is approved by the GM - s 137(1)(a) Alternatively by way of pension not > the last 3 years of emoluments - s 137(5)(d) Unless the agreement is a consideration made before the appointment s 137(5)(e)
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Efficiency arguments call for centralised management Board of Directors Rules developed in common law for directors, at first, by analogy with the rules applying to trustees Directors duties: duties of loyalty and duties of care. The main risks which shareholders run when management of the company is delegated to the board. Duties of loyalty: based on fiduciary principles Duties of skill and care: based on the principles of the law of negligence.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
1. Company? The interests of a company, as an artificial person, cannot be distinguished from the interests of the persons who are interested in it. Per Nourse LJ in Brady v Brady [1988] BCLC 20 at 40 Evershed MR in Greenhalgh v Ardene Cinemas [1951] Ch 286 2. Shareholders? (members) have the strongest incentive to monitor the board effectively. The duties are owed to the shareholders collectively as a whole, not individually.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
3. Creditors As the company nears insolvency, the interests at stake are those of creditors. West Marcia Safetywear Ltd v Dodd [1988] BCLC 250 cf. Re Welfab Engineers Ltd [1990] BCLC 833: when insolvency threatens, the directors may not take a course of action which will leave the creditors in a worse position, but they are not bound to give creditors interests absolute priority
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Dictum of Street CJ in Kinsela v Russel Kinsela Pty Ltd (in liq) (1986) 4 NSWLR 222. The creditors become prospectively entitled, through the mechanism of liquidation, to displace the power of the directors and the shareholders to deal with he companys assets. But, the directors do not owe any duties to the creditors individually: Re Pantone 485 Ltd [2002] 1 BCLC 266. The creditors are as a group where their interests constituting the companys interests as insolvency approaches.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
4. Employees and other stakeholders? 5. The Community? 6. Society? 7. Commercially justifiableto what extent is this important?
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Section 131(1) provides that: every director of a company who is in any way, whether directly or indirectly, interested in a contract or proposed contract with the company, shall, as soon as practicable after the relevant facts have come to his knowledge, declare the nature of his interest at a meeting of the directors of the company
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Section 131(4) Declaration of interest may be made by: General notice given to the directors At the directors meeting or Director takes reasonable steps to ensure it is brought up and read at the next directors meeting
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S131(2) provides that a director does not have to declare his interest in a company contract if the interest is of him being a shareholder or creditor of a corporation, which is interested in a contract or proposed contract (related party transactions) with the company and where such interest may be regarded as not material.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
According to Tan Bok Seong v Sin Be Seng & Co (Port Weld) Sdn Bhd [1995] 4 CLJ 795, if the director proves that the other directors are aware of his interest, then, that director need not formally declare his interest.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S131(7B) CA 1965 provides that: Where a contract or proposed contract is entered into in contravention of this section, the contract or proposed contract shall be voidable at the instance of the company except if it is in favour of any person dealing with the company for any valuable consideration and without actual notice of the contravention.
S131(8) Penalty: Imprisonment for seven years or one hundred and fifty thousand ringgit or both
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Subject to Section 131, a director of a company who is in any way, whether directly or indirectly, interested in a contract entered into or proposed to be entered into by the company shall be counted only to make a quorum at the board meeting but shall not participate in any discussion while the contract or proposed contract is being considered at the board meeting and shall not vote on the contract or proposed contract.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Interested directors merely sign their presence to make a quorum, and then excuse themselves from the meeting. They need not be physically present at the meeting Section 131A does not apply to private companies. Therefore, the situation where all directors, due to their interest, are conflicted out from voting does not arise.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S131A(3)
where a contract or proposed contract is entered into in contravention of subsection (1), shall be voidable at the instance of the company except if it is in favour of any person dealing with the company for a valuable consideration and without actual notice of the contravention
S131A(4)
A director who knowingly contravenes this section shall be guilty of an offence against this Act Penalty: Imprisonment for five years or one hundred and fifty thousand ringgit or both.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S131(B)
(1) The business and affairs of a company must be managed
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S131B places the functions and powers of the Board of Directors on a statutory footing. The duties of Board of Directors are now clarified.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Old Section 132(1): In the discharge of duties, director shall at all times:-
AND
Act honestly Use reasonable diligence
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S132(1) is contrary to the common law position because: (a) At common law, a director must comply with both the best interest of the company requirement and also with the proper purpose test. (b) There is no requirement that the director had acted fraudulently or with deliberate intent to obtain personal advantage.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
New S132(1) :A director of a company shall at all times exercise his powers: In good faith in the companys best interest
AND
For proper purpose
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
an officer or agent or officer of the Stock Exchange who commits a breach of this section shall be(a) liable to the company for any profit made by him or for any damage suffered by the company as a result of the breach; and (b) guilty of an offence against this Act Penalty: Imprisonment for five years or thirty thousand ringgit
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Position before Section 132(1A) The duty to act with care and skill is derived from common law.
The old Section 132(1) is silent as to the standard of care, and skill required of a director. It merely prescribes that a director has a duty to act honestly and use reasonable diligence.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
The Common Law Position The leading decision is Re City Equitable Fire Insurance Co Ltd (1925) CH407 where it was held that In discharging the duties of his position...a Director must ...act honestly; but he must also exercise some degree of both skill and diligence.. so long as a Director acts honestly he cannot be made responsible in damages unless guilty of gross or inculpable negligence in a business sense.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
In the UK, the law has moved towards an objective assessment of the standard of care required of directors, as reflected in section 174 of the UK Companies Act 2006 which codifies Norman v Theodore Goddard (1991) BCLC 1028 and Re DJan of London Ltd (1993) BCC 646
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Despite these developments, the position in Malaysia remained to be Re City Equitable Fire Insurance, as the court in Abdul Mohd Khalid v Datuk Haji Mustapha Kamal (2003) 5CLJ 85, had cited obiter Re City Equitable Fire Insurance as the applicable authority for directors duty of care and skill.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Problems with the subjective test: There is no minimum objective standard required of a director. Since the subjective standard of care varies according to the skill a director has, a director with no specific skill or expertise need not be accountable.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
The position today: Section 132(1A) Companies Act 1965 provides that a director of a company shall exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence with: (a) the knowledge, skill and experience which may reasonably be expected of a director having the same responsibilities; and (b) any additional knowledge, skill and experience which the director in fact has.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
where a director has additional knowledge, skill and experience, that director will be assessed against a reasonable person who has that additional knowledge, skill and experience. The actual knowledge and experience of a director is to be considered in addition to the minimum standard.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Mischief behind the Business Judgment Rule Sections 131, 132C, 132D, 132E, 133, 133A, provide for sanctions that follow if a director breaches his duties. As a result, an honest director is discouraged from engaging in vigorous business activities. This hampers maximum investment returns.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Where a Director has made a genuine business judgment in good faith, he will be protected from liability for negligence even if these judgments turned out badly. Courts are badly equipped and should not substitute its judgment for that of the directors. The Malaysian model is taken from: S180(2) Australian Corporations Act 2001
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S132(1B) of the Malaysian Companies Act 1965 provides that:A director who makes a business judgment is deemed to meet the requirements of the duty under subsection (1A) and the equivalent duties under the common law and in equity if the director-
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S132(1B) CA 1965
(a) makes the business judgment in good faith for proper purpose; (b) does not have a material personal interest in the subject matter of the business judgment;
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
(c) Is informed about the subject matter of the business judgment to the extent the director reasonably believes to be appropriate under the circumstances; and (d) Reasonably believes that the business judgment is in the best interest of the company
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S132(1C) permits the director to rely on expert advice but that reliance would only be considered reasonable if the director has made an independent assessment of the reports, advice, opinions and data received from the experts and consultants employed to provide them.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
The Company Law Reform Steering Group does not contemplate a statutory Business Judgment Rule.
The duties of directors in UK is now expressed in very broad terms as reflected in S172 and S173(1) of the UK Companies Act 2006.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Otis & Co. v Pennsylvania R.Co., 61 F. Supp. 905 (D.C Pa. 1945) The federal district court ruled that: mistakes or errors in the exercise of honest business judgment do not subject the officers and directors to liability for negligence in the discharge of their appointed duties
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
In Aronson v. Lewis, (1984) the Court affirmed that the Business Judgment Rule is: "a presumption that in making a business decision.. Directors.. acted on an informed basis, in good faith and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interest of the company..
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
For the rule to apply, the director must: i) have made a decision; ii) be free of self interest in the judgment; iii) adopt the decision under informed basis; and iv) have rational basis for the decision
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Vita Health Laboratories Pte Ltd and Others v Pang Seng Meng [2004] 4 SLR 162; [2004]SGHC 158 1. The court should be slow to interfere with commercial decisions taken by directors and should not substitute its own decisions in place of those made by honest directors.
2. ..it is not the function of the court to punish and censure director, who have, in good faith made incorrect commercial decisions..
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Section 132(1E) provides that: A director, who was appointed by virtue of his
position as an employee of a company, or who was appointed by or as a representative of a shareholder, employer or debenture holder, shall act in the best interest of the company and in the event of any conflict between his duty to act in the best interest of the company and his duty to his nominator, he shall not subordinate his duty to act in the best interest of the company to his duty to his nominator
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
The phrase shall not subordinate his duty under Section 132(1E) is worded in the negative.
Therefore, as a final result, the companys best interest will prevail over the interest of the nominator.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
ii)Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie Bros (1854) 1 Macq 461 Conflict arose when the company enters into a contract, arrangement or transaction in which a director has interest in, and that director does not disclose his interest to the company.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
iv) Avel Consultants Sdn Bhd v Mohd Zain Yusof [1995] 4 MLJ 146 Conflict arose where a director uses or exploits an asset (including business opportunity and corporate information) treated as the companys property, for his own purpose or the purpose of any one else (other than the company
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
iv) Meehan v Malaysian Government Officers Cooperative Housing Society [1978] 1 MLJ 149 Held: conflict arose where a director receives a benefit in some other way in connection with the exercise of his powers as a director (e.g., bribe)
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
v) Yukilon Manufacturing Sdn Bhd v Dato Wong Gek Meng & Ors [1998] 7 MLJ 551 Held: conflict arose where a director competes with the company.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
The Position in Malaysia The old S132(1) CA 1965 provides that: A director shall at all times act honestly and use reasonable diligence in the discharge of his duties of his office The old S132(1) does not expressly refer to the common law situations of conflict.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
The new S132(2) amounts to a restatement of the common law conflict of interest situation.
It assists directors in appreciating situations of conflict which may cause them to act in breach of their duty to the company.
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
existence of adequate insider trading provisions under the Securities Industries Act 1983 (now consolidated under the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007)
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
Section 132C -Approval of company required for disposal by directors of companys undertaking or property S132E -Substantial property transaction by director or substantial shareholder Section 134 - Register of Directors Shareholdings etc S140 and Directors and Officers Insurance (D&O Insurance)
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY
S145A - Location of Annual General Meeting S167A - System of Internal Control S172A - Duty to inform upon ceasing to hold office as an auditor S 74 - Scope of Auditors Duties S174A - Auditors and other persons to enjoy qualified privilege in certain circumstances
SUNWAY UNIVERSITY