Komatsu V3 - 13.9
Komatsu V3 - 13.9
Komatsu V3 - 13.9
Presented by:
Agenda
Case Summary Company History Komatsu (1984) & Strategy External analysis:
PESTEL Analysis Industry Analysis 6 forces
Internal Analysis:
SWOT Analysis
Recommendations
Company History
Japanese Company, headquartered in Tokyo, Osaka Started out as specialized producer of mining equipments In Post-war era moved to Industrial EME (earth-moving equipment) 1960s Licensing Agreement with International Harvester and BucyrusErie Started with TQC (Total Quality Control) Exports to sales reached 55% in 1975
Company Strategy
Focus on manufacturing excellence : Total Quality Control (TQC)
PESTEL Analysis
Political: Political Instability in traditional Source Countries Good Relationship with Eastern Bloc. Signed contract with Soviet Union. Local Government Pressures
Currency movements : Yen/Dollar Exchange Rates US Recession in 1980s leading to fall in Construction Companys Economical: contracts.
Social
Developing Countries were more Labour oriented Financing was to be provided to Developing Countries for EMEs Dealers were reluctant to become exclusive because they didnt have a brand image.
PESTEL Analysis
Technological:
Technology was with American EME manufacturers Technology to increase Fuel Efficiency was major concern Country-wise Different Industry Standards
Environmental:
Legal:
Different Legal Requirements in different countries to safeguard the workers working on EMEs. Trade restrictions & restrictive practises.
6 Forces Model
Rivalry
Caterpillar with good sales and distribution network and good foothold in US market. High barriers to entry Government policies
New Entrants
Substitution:
6 Forces Model
Supplier power
International Harvester and Bucyrus-Erie : technology suppliers supplied on the price of restriction on Export
Buyer power
Developing economies had bidding market. Developing Economies was Labor Intensive Price sensitivity Financing was prior need
Government
For South East Asia and Africa importing machines involved countertrade Ronald Reagans Embargo gave Soviet Contracts to Komatsu Japan opened EME Industry to International Capital
Opportunities
Cash strapped International Harvester Different Countries had different mining operating Environments Siberian Natural Resource Project Reagan Administrations embargo
Threats
Dealers reluctant to become exclusive due to narrow product line Slowing demand of Construction Equipment Currency Movement: Yen/Dollar Rate Fluctuation
Technological Access for the price of Export Restriction
Strengths
Good R&D base (5.8 % spending on R&D). Total Quality Control (TQC), PDCA and Management by Policy Philosophy. Relatively efficient and cost effective Labor as compared to CAT.
Weaknesses
No essential Technical knowhow
Competition
7 manufacturers of the EME account for 90% of the dollar sales worldwide Komatsu steadily gaining Market share. International Harvester used Co operative competition.
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00% 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Caterpillar J.I.Case Deere Komatsu Fiat-Allis International Harvester
Clark
1/2
Continued..
2/2
Geographic sales: