Leadership: Chapter 6 - Contingency Theory
Leadership: Chapter 6 - Contingency Theory
Leadership: Chapter 6 - Contingency Theory
Leadership
Overview
Contingency Theory Approach Perspective Leadership Styles Situational Variables
Research Findings of Leader Style Effectiveness
Contingency theory is a leader-match theory (Fiedler & Chemers, 1974) Tries to match leaders to appropriate situations Leaders effectiveness depends on how well the leaders style fits the context Fiedlers generalizations about which styles of leadership are best and worst are based on empirically grounded generalizations
Leadership Styles
Leadership styles are described as: Task-motivated (Low LPCs)
Leaders are concerned primarily with reaching a goal
Leader Style Measurement Scale (Fiedler) Least Preferred Co-Worker (LPC) Scale
High LPCs = Relationship-motivated Low LPCs = Task-motivated
Contingency Model
Definition
Situations going smoothly Situations out of control Situations with some degree of certainty; not completely in or out of leaders control
High
Research Findings of Leader Style Effectiveness Reasons for leader mismatch ineffectiveness:
LPC style doesnt match a particular situation; stress and anxiety result Under stress, leader reverts to less mature coping style learned in earlier development Leaders less mature coping style results in poor decision making and consequently negative work outcomes
By assessing the 3 situational variables, any organizational context can be placed in one of the 8 categories represented in the Contingency Theory Model
After the nature of a situation is determined, the fit between leaders style and the situation can be evaluated Overall Scope By measuring Leaders LPC score and the 3 situational variables, it is possible to predict whether a leader will be effective in a particular setting
Middle LPCs
If individuals style matches appropriate category in the model, leader will be effective If individuals style does not match appropriate category in the model, leader will not be effective
Strengths
Empirical support. Contingency theory has been tested by many researchers and found to be a valid and reliable approach to explaining how to achieve effective leadership. Broadened understanding. Contingency theory has broadened the scope of leadership understanding from a focus on a single, best type of leadership (e.g., trait approach) to emphasizing the importance of a leaders style and the demands of different situations. Predictive. Because Contingency theory is predictive, it provides relevant information regarding the type of leadership that is most likely to be effective in particular contexts.
Strengths
Not an all-or-nothing approach. Contingency theory contends that leaders should not expect to be effective in every situation; thus companies should strive to place leaders in optimal situations according to their leadership style. Leadership profiles. Contingency theory supplies data on leadership styles that could be useful to organizations in developing leadership profiles for human resource planning.
Criticisms
Fails to fully explain why leaders with particular leadership styles are more effective in some situations than others Criticism of LPC scale validity as it does not correlate well with other standard leadership measures Cumbersome to use in real-world settings
Fails to adequately explain what should be done about a leader/situation mismatch in the workplace
Application
Useful in answering a multitude of questions about the leadership of individuals in various types of organizations Helpful tool to assist upper management in making changes to lower level positions to ensure a good fit between an existing manager and a certain work context