3 - Report Card
3 - Report Card
3 - Report Card
lender
;VCS., lNC.
ATCLOSING
P&l (Fully Amortizing) / lnsurance / HOA Consumer Credit lender Housing Lender Back Debt Actual Housing n/a 390.00
So.oo
DOCUMENTS NEEDED
1. Appraisal -
triage recommended.
2, Copies of docs
not close.
3. Review of public records
Borrower Empl
lFilletman /
to evidence refinance of subject property on an annual basis. 4. Provide any contracts and payments 39t6 /s204=75.25% 3976 / s2o4=75.25% that were made for the construction Borr. Assets not Captured product. Did borrower lose money because the loan did not close?
1. The borrower appears to have the victim of predatory, financially harmful and potentially fraudulent
lending practices.
Hard/Soft/Hybrid
n/a
lndex nla Margin n/a Fully lndexed Rate Rounding Factor n/a
to his race.
3. The appraisal appears
to have been
4%/ts
TRIAGE REPORT/ BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENTED FINDINGS: 1. The borrower appears to have been preyed upon, on a regular basis, by the mortgage company that originated the borrower's lst mortgage. According to the borrower, the mortgage company called him on an annual basis and encouraged him to refinance his mortgage, According to the borrower, he paid off any credit card debt that accumulated during the year. Clearly, each time a borrower refinances, the loan balance must be increased to facilitate the repayment of the debt and the closing costs, thus effectively increasing the borrower's financial liability over time. The practice in which the lender appears o have been engaged is called "Equity Stripping" and is considered to be one of the most serious, destructive and predatory practices that a lender can commit, as it effectively decimates all of a borrower's equity over time, 2. The lender appears to have granted a loan that the borrower could not reasonably repay. The loan application reflects that the borrower's income and assets were not verified as the income and asset sections on the final loan application are blank. A review of the borrower's tax returns indicates that over 75% of the borrowers income had to be devoted to the repayment of the mortgage. Which such a significant portion of the borrower's income going to the repayment of the debt solely,
anyminorincreaseintheborrower'sdebtincreaseshisriskof enteringintodefault. Thelenderappearstohavebeenengagedinpracticesthattheborrowerto engage in money management practices that cannot be sustained over time, are irresponsible and are unsound. According to the borrower, when he was no longer to refinance his home, the consumer credit debt that he had been used to repaying via cash out refinance through this lender, outpaced his capacity to repay and as a result, the borrower is facing the very real threat of foreclosure and losing all of the financial investment he has made in his home. 3. The appraised value of the subject property appears to have been greatly overstated to insure the granting of the mortgage loan. The estimated value of the home per the loan application is $580K. An on-line check of the home's value indicates that the most probably market value of the home totaled S503K. The borrower's LTV, instead of being 81% appears to have been closer to 94%. Ihe underwriter recommends that the borrower's appraisal be procured and subjected to the triage process to determine if the methodology used to establish the subject's value for the loan, was sound, and if the value the lender used to grant credit was supported. 4. The borrower indicated that he was actually seeking additional money that was to be used for building construction purposes. The lender apparently convinced the borrower to apply for a 1st lien with one lender, and then unbeknownst to that lender, attempt to secure subordinate financing with another lender, The proceeds of the 2nd loan were to be used to facilitate building construction. The borrower advised that he was approved for credit, and a closing date for the 2nd mortgage was set. He arrived at the appointed hour and place where the closing of the 2nd mortgage was to take place, but the closing agent did not show up. The underwriter does not know if the borrower had made any down payments, paid for plans, specs or construction cost breakdowns. lf the borrower paid for construction related services, and lost money as a result of the irresponsible actions of the closing agent and lender, the evidence should be brought forth. 5. Potential securitization issues (securitization report already performed, no additional review is required). Loan sold immediately to Countrywide via forward
commitment.
N,-ltolts
charlge
$,'sqft :l:06
;r-: u:'
Last tr 1: cl aterl
r:;rj.
1
Zeslilnate r
Rerrt Zestimate
?
I5:1.,l'iltl 'l/tni.,
:t ;i
1".i.
:i-1:
1t
i.
+51rj
?CC
ii,;:r.-i
$'{ "5'l
il 1
1,..r'*r
,:
- ll l
h. ,'.,.
':
+ql I
! I ::ii1I
Ourlrer Ccllnlnelrt
'
F,:st a ccnrnrenl
Shour
() rhr. ho-.
i
l3DEI
f'levr Ysrl.:
IeEti:-rate i[1
Zesti*rat*
1'o
r:hanrgei
i
^-/rJ
555r:rk
sifrll.
55
1
r:rli
r_l
s-l I
i.+
F-
r:r l-,:
asEegs,rrent Hay Ol"r 2OOg O This hr-,mer Ea:tl'let'frrk: I 12fl8: l'leyr Ysrk:r
s4 5tlrl.:
Tar: csicl
S-liUl-:
S.1 1r:rl,:
Fage i'ie',';s
$5t:r-?l.r
Tirne period
1 -r
.1
r:rrtt
s::4:1,:
lt
if ggl.i
S49[tl.:
,, .-
S j: 5 rlrl:
i,ear
_-:
:i
r_r
f.:
>: II-rts-
5:9l-rl.: 5iIt-tl-,: