Reading Material Mod 1 Introduction to Projects
Reading Material Mod 1 Introduction to Projects
Reading Material Mod 1 Introduction to Projects
Introduction
A project is a group of unique, interrelated activities that are planned and executed in a
certain sequence to create a unique product or service, within a specific time frame, budget
and the client’s specifications. Some of the characteristics of the tasks that qualify to be a
project are: uniqueness, specificity of goal, sequence of activities, specified time and
interrelatedness. Projects are carried out under many resource constraints and their success
depends on the ability of the manager to manage these constraints effectively. Project
management is the application of the knowledge, skills, tools and techniques to project
activities in order to meet or exceed stakeholder needs and expectations.
Every project has a set of activities that are unique, which means it is the first time that an
organization handles that type of activity. These activities do not repeat in the project under
similar circumstances i.e., there will be something different in every activity or even if the
activity is repeated, the variables influencing it change every time.
The successful project management is all about structure, control, sufficient attention to detail
and continuously driving action. The role of the project manager is to understand enough
project management to apply its structure and ensure that project is successfully completed
within the time and cost required. The things you must do as a project manager are:
1. Ensure there is a clear understanding why a project is being done, and what it will
produce.
2. Plan the project – to understand how long it will take and how much it will cost.
3. Manage the project – to ensure that as the project progresses, it achieves the
objectives you have defined within the time and cost specified.
4. Complete the project properly – to make sure everything produced by the project is of
the quality expected and works as required.
Project Management has emerged because the characteristics of our turn-of-the-century
society demand the development of the new methods of management. Of the many forces
involved, three are paramount:
1. The exponential expansion of the human knowledge;
2. The growing demand for a broad range of complex, sophistically, customized goods
and services; and
3. The evolution of worldwide competitive markets for the production and consumption
of Notes goods and services.
All three forces combine to mandate the use of terms to solve problems that used to be
solvable by individuals. These three forces combine to increase greatly the complexity of
goods and services produced plus the complexity of the process used to produced them and
all this in turn leads to the need for more sophisticated systems to control both outcomes and
processes.
As the techniques of project management were developed, the use of project organization
began to spread. Private construction firms found that project organization was helpful on
smaller projects, such as the building of a warehouse or an apartment complex. Automotive
companies used project organization to develop new automobile models. Both General
Electric and Pratt & Whitney used project organization to develop new jet aircraft engines for
airlines, as well as the Air Force. Project management has even been used to develop new
models of shoes and ships.
More recently, the use of project management by international organizations, and especially
organizations producing services rather than products, has grown rapidly. Advertising
campaigns, global mergers, and capital acquisitions are often handled as projects, and the
methods have spread to the non-profit sector. Functions, weddings, fund drives, election
campaigns, parties, recitals etc. all make use of the principles of project management. Most
striking has been the widespread adoption of project management techniques for the
development of computer software.
Project Manager and his Responsibilities
According to Project Management Institute (PMI): “Project Management is the application of
knowledge, skills, tools and techniques to project activities in order to meet or exceed
stakeholder needs and expectations”.
Project Management is quite often the province and responsibility of an individual project
manager. This individual seldom participates directly in the activities that produce the end
result, but rather strives to maintain the progress and productive mutual interaction of various
parties in such a way that overall risk of failure is reduced.
A project manager is often a client representative and has to determine and implement the
exact needs of the client based on knowledge of the firm he/she is representing. The ability to
adapt to the various internal procedures of the contracting party, and to form close links with
the nominated representatives, is essential in ensuring that the key issues of cost, time, quality
and above all client satisfaction, can be realized. Any type of product or service - buildings,
vehicles, electronics, computer software, financial services, etc. - may have its
implementation overseen by a project manager and its operations by a product manager.
The project manager needs to be an HRD expert who can motivate the workforce by training
and promoting leadership among them, and boost their morale by incentives and promotions.
He has to be conversant with the principles of organisation, and be a good judge of people
who has the ability to place the right man in the right job at the right time.
Social issues: A project can only be successful when there is no conflict between the
management and the local populace. Right from the acquisition of the project land to
recruitment to organisation to infrastructural facilities, the management has to interact with
the social fabric of the locale. It can only ensure a smooth functioning at the project site if
there is a ‘co operational’, and not a ‘confrontational’ environment. The management can
display its cordiality to the locals by, for instance, recruiting ‘the sons of the soil’ in the
workforce, which will not only be conducive to reciprocal cordiality of the populace, but
might actually make good business sense in employing labour that is familiar with the locale
and the conditions prevalent at the project site.
PM as a Profession
Not all project managers are equally competent. Not all project managers have the ability to
run programs, establish PMOs, strategically align project portfolio’s, recover big projects, or
manage risk effectively. Not every doctor is capable of heart surgery. But doctor’s get paid
for being Notes doctors, have demonstrated considerable training and understanding, have
spent thousands of hours mastering their jobs. Doctor’s are professionals.
By any definition, Project Management is a profession.
It should be obvious to the reader that project management is a demanding job. Planning and
controlling the complexities of a project’s activities, schedule, and budget would be difficult
even if the project had the highest claim on the parent organization’s knowledge and
resources, and if the PM had full authority to take any action required to keep the project on
course for successful completion. Such is never the case, but all is not lost because there are
tools available to bring some order to the chaos of life as a PM—to cope with the difficulties
of planning and the uncertainties that affect budgets and schedules. Also, as we have
indicated, it is possible to compensate for missing authority through negotiation. Mastering
the use of project management tools requires specialized knowledge that is often acquired
through academic preparation, which is to say that project management is a profession. The
profession comes complete with career paths and an excellent professional organization.
The Project Management Institute (PMI) was founded in 1969. By 1990, the PMI had 7500
members. It grew to 17,000 by 1995, but five years later membership had exploded to more
than 64,000. By November 2009, the PMI had more than 300,000 members worldwide. The
exponential growth of the PMI is the result of the exponential growth in the use of projects
and PMs as a way of getting things done.
Example: A senior vice president of an international chemical firm installed project
management as a way of controlling the workloads on his technical specialists and on a few
overloaded facilities—project management having tools to handle the allocation of scarce
resources. In another instance, a new CEO of a large hospital mandated that all non-routine,
one time operations be managed as projects so that she could have information on the nature
and status of all such activities.
Initiation Phase
The initiation phase is the beginning of the project. In this phase, the idea for the project is
explored and elaborated. The goal of this phase is to examine the feasibility of the project. In
addition, decisions are made concerning who is to carry out the project, which party (or
parties) will be involved and whether the project has an adequate base of support among
those who are involved.
In this phase, the current or prospective project leader writes a proposal, which contains a
description of the above-mentioned matters. Examples of this type of project proposal include
business plans and grant applications. The prospective sponsors of the project evaluate the
proposal and, upon approval, provide the necessary financing. The project officially begins at
the time of approval. Questions to be answered in the initiation phase include the following:
(a) Why this project?
(b) Is it feasible?
(c) Who are possible partners in this project?
(d) What should the results be?
(e) What are the boundaries of this project (what is outside the scope of the project)?
In the initiation phase, the project partners enter a (temporary) relationship with each other.
To prevent the development of false expectations concerning the results of the project; it
makes sense to explicitly agree on the type of project that is being started:
(a) A research and development project;
(b) A project that will deliver a prototype or ‘proof of concept’; and
(c) A project that will deliver a working product.
The choice for a particular type of project largely determines its results.
Example: A research and development project delivers a report that examines the
technological feasibility of an application. A project in which a prototype is developed
delivers all of the functionalities of an application, but they need not be suitable for use in a
particular context (e.g. by hundreds of users). A project that delivers a working product must
also consider matters of maintenance, instructions and the operational management of the
application.
Definition Phase
After the project plan (which was developed in the initiation phase) has been approved, the
project enters the second phase: the definition phase. In this phase, the requirements that are
associated with a project result are specified as clearly as possible. This involves identifying
the expectations that all of the involved parties have with regard to the project result. How
many files are to be archived? Should the metadata conform to the Data Documentation
Initiative format, or will the Dublin Core (DC) format suffice? May files be deposited in their
original format, or will only those that conform to the Preferred Standards be accepted? Must
the depositor of a dataset ensure that it has been processed adequately in the archive, or is this
the responsibility of the archivist? Which guarantees will be made on the results of the
project? The list of questions goes on and on.
Design Phase
The list of requirements that is developed in the definition phase can be used to make design
choices. In the design phase, one or more designs are developed, with which the project result
can apparently be achieved. Depending on the subject of the project, the products of the
design phase can include dioramas, sketches, flow charts, site trees, HTML screen designs,
prototypes, photo impressions and UML schemas. The project supervisors use these designs
to choose the definitive design that will be produced in the project. This is followed by the
development phase. As in the definition phase, once the design has been chosen, it cannot be
changed in a later stage of the project.
In a young, very informal company, the design department was run by an artist. The term
design department was not accurate in this case; it was more a group of designers who were
working together. In addition, everyone was much too busy, including the head of the
department.
One project involved producing a number of designs, which were quite important to the
success of the project. A young designer on the project team created the designs. Although
the head of the design department had ultimate responsibility for the designs, he never
attended the meetings of the project team when the designs were to be discussed. The project
leader always invited him, and sent him e-mails containing his young colleague’s sketches,
but the e-mails remained unanswered. The project leader and the young designer erroneously
assumed that the department head had approved the designs. The implementation phase
began. When the project was nearly finished, the result was presented to the department head,
which became furious and demanded that it be completely redone. The budget, however, was
almost exhausted.
Development Phase
During the development phase, everything that will be needed to implement the project is
arranged. Potential suppliers or subcontractors are brought in, a schedule is made, materials
and tools are ordered, and instructions are given to the personnel and so forth. The
development phase is complete when implementation is ready to start. All matters must be
clear for the parties that will carry out the implementation.
In some projects, particularly smaller ones, a formal development phase is probably not
necessary. The important point is that it must be clear what must be done in the
implementation phase, by whom and when.
Implementation Phase
The project takes shape during the implementation phase. This phase involves the
construction of the actual project result. Programmers are occupied with encoding, designers
are involved in developing graphic material, contractors are building, and the actual
reorganization takes place. It is during this phase that the project becomes visible to outsiders,
to whom it may appear that the project has just begun. The implementation phase is the doing
phase, and it is important to maintain the momentum.
In one project, it had escaped the project teams’ attention that one of the most important team
members was expecting to become a father at any moment and would thereafter be
completely unavailable for about a month. When the time came, an external specialist was
brought in to take over his work, in order to keep the team from grinding to a halt. Although
the team was able to proceed, the external expertise put a considerable dent in the budget.
At the end of the implementation phase, the result is evaluated according to the list of
requirements that was created in the definition phase. It is also evaluated according to the
designs.
Example: Tests may be conducted to determine whether the web application does indeed
support Explorer 5 and Firefox 1.0 and higher. It may be determined whether the trim on the
building has been made according to the agreement, or whether the materials that were used
were indeed those that had been specified in the definition phase. This phase is complete
when all of the requirements have been met and when the result corresponds to the design.
Follow-up Phase
Although it is extremely important, the follow-up phase is often neglected. During this phase,
everything is arranged that is necessary to bring the project to a successful completion.
Examples of activities in the follow-up phase include writing handbooks, providing
instruction and training for users, setting up a help desk, maintaining the result, evaluating the
project itself, writing the project report, holding a party to celebrate the result that has been
achieved, transferring to the directors and dismantling the project team.
The central question in the follow-up phase concerns when and where the project ends.
Project leaders often joke among themselves that the first ninety per cent of a project
proceeds quickly and that the final ten per cent can take years. The boundaries of the project
should be considered in the beginning of a project, so that the project can be closed in the
follow-up phase, once it has reached these boundaries.
It is sometimes unclear for those concerned whether the project result is to be a prototype or a
working product. This is particularly common in innovative projects in which the outcome is
not certain. Customers may expect to receive a product, while the project team assumes that it
is building a prototype. Such situations are particularly likely to manifest themselves in the
follow-up phase. Consider the case of a software project to test a very new concept.
There was some anxiety concerning whether any results would be produced at all. The
project eventually produced good results. The team delivered a piece of software that worked
well, at least within the testing context. The customer, who did not know much about IT,
thought that he had received a working product. After all, it had worked on his office
computer. The software did indeed work, but when it was installed on the computers of fifty
employees, the prototype began to have problems, and it was sometimes instable.
Project Environment
Today, there is a growing awareness and concern for the impact of infrastructure and facility
construction on the physical environment. Fortunately, today’s technological disciplines
responsible for such work are becoming attuned to the idea of mitigating the adverse impacts
of their projects. Certainly the project manager needs to be similarly concerned about the
project’s technology, and manage accordingly. This applies to both the implementation and
shorter term practical construction impacts of the project as well as its conceptual
development and consequent long term impacts. However, today’s project manager also
needs to be attuned to the cultural, organizational and social environments of the project.
Understanding this environment includes identifying the project stakeholders and their ability
to affect its successful outcome. This means working with people to achieve the best results,
especially in the highly technical and complex environments such as those involving modern
day construction projects. Therefore, it is essential that the project manager and his or her
project team are comfortable with, and sympathetic towards, their cultural, organizational and
social surroundings.
This leads to the possibility of influencing the project environment in a positive way, for the
better reception of the change which the project is designed to introduce.
Example: Peoples’ typical resistance to change will no doubt be evident amongst some of the
stakeholders. Others may have vested interests or personal or group agendas which are only
indirectly related to the project. If these can be identified in good time, they may be dealt
with proactively and in such a way that the corresponding risks, which are otherwise likely to
undermine the success of the project, can be significantly reduced. Failure to take such an
approach will inevitably lead to a less than optimum project outcome.