Presentation
Presentation
Presentation
two limitations to my study. The first was =.157, p<.01. There was also a significant Clemente, F., & Sauer, W. J. (1976). Life satisfaction in the United States.
Social Forces, 54(3), 621-631.
the world value survey is correlational, regression which was also positive. Social https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/josf 54&div=54&g_
sent=1&casa_token=yPGvfgWooIoAAAAA:ZfNl3mkSGIDholIWV7p_oOY-
but it cannot prove causal relationships status positively predicted life satisfaction, b = y2Cobx GUFU
between social class and life .363, p<.01. There was a significant correlation EOxkm9JwkR5qYpKx1R9sEmU20ab5iGAlOSZ6dE&collection=journals
Fors Connolly, F., & Johansson Sevä, I. (2018). Social status and life
satisfaction. The next was the selection between life satisfaction and social class r satisfaction in context: A comparison between Sweden and the USA.
of variables were limited as the world (88573) = .157, p<.01. These results did confirm International Journal of Wellbeing, 8(2), 110-134. https://www.diva-
portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1269170/FULLTEXT01.pdf
value survey items are not handcrafted my hypothesis that the higher social class you Kapteyn, A., Smith, J. P., & Van Soest, A. (2010). Life satisfaction.
International differences in well-being, 70-104.
by me and was done by other are the more satisfied you are with life. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/35314/1/593350510.pdf
researchers.