If 12397
If 12397
If 12397
https://crsreports.congress.gov
U.S. Army’s Maneuver Short-Range Air Defense (M-SHORAD) System
kW laser has enjoyed success against a variety of drones, M-SHORAD battalions—the 5th Battalion, 4th Defense
but according to Army program officials, “challenges Artillery in Germany and the 4th Battalion, 60th Air Defense
remain” in terms of defending against rockets, artillery, and Artillery at Fort Sill, OK—Army officials reportedly noted
mortars. Army plans called for M-SHORAD Increment 2 to that the Army is currently in the process of fielding to the
start a user assessment beginning in the fourth quarter of 6th Battalion, 56th Air Defense Artillery at Fort Cavazos,
FY2023, running through the first quarter of FY2024. TX, and plans to activate a fourth M-SHORAD battalion at
Reportedly, the Army now plans to choose a few designs Fort Liberty, NC in the third quarter of FY2025.
from an existing group of vendors to compete to develop
what it calls its Enduring High Energy Laser (HEL) system
FY2025 Budgetary Information
for short-range air defense in early 2025. The Army plans Table 1. FY2025 M-SHORAD Budget Request
to fund teams through design and development and then Procurement RDT&E
select a winner to build an enduring HEL in the first quarter ($M) ($M) Quantity
of FY2026. M-SHORAD $69.091 — —
Soldier Observations on DE M-SHORAD Deployed Increment 1
to the Middle East for Testing M-SHORAD — $88.480 —
Reportedly, according to Army officials, in February 2024 Increment2
the Army deployed four Stryker-mounted 50 kW laser M- M-SHORAD — $204.880 —
SHORAD prototypes to the Middle East for soldiers to test Increment 3
the system’s performance against aerial threats. Initial Sources: Procurement: Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY)
soldier feedback was characterized as “not overwhelmingly 2025 Budget Estimates, March 2024, Army Justification Book, Volume 1 of
positive,” with officials suggesting “results from the lab 1 Missile Procurement, Army. RDT&E: Department of Defense Fiscal
environment and test ranges are very different from the Year (FY) 2025 Budget Estimates, March 2024, Army Justification Book
tactical environment.” Volume 2b of 2 Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army RDT&E
− Volume II, Budget Activity 4B.
M-SHORAD Increment 3
The Army reportedly plans for M-SHORAD Increment 3 to Notes: $ M = million dollars; RDT&E = Research Development Test
incorporate the FIM-92 Stinger replacement missile—the & Evaluation; Quantity = procurement quantity.
Next Generation Short Range Interceptor—into the Considerations for Congress
Increment 1 system. In addition, these plans call for the Oversight questions Congress could consider include the
Increment 1 30 mm automatic cannons to receive the XM following.
1223 Multi-Mode Proximity Airburst munition (MMPA),
which features a multipurpose munition that can be Lessons Learned from the Russo-Ukraine Conflict
employed against air, ground, and personnel targets. In The ongoing Ukrainian conflict has featured the use of a
March 2023, the Army reportedly selected Lockheed variety of military and commercial UASs employed in both
Martin and Raytheon Technologies to develop competing kinetic and non-kinetic roles. In addition to both fixed and
prototypes of a Next-Generation Short-Range Interceptor. rotary wing air threats, loitering munitions have also been
The Army has indicated it is planning for a technology employed, reportedly with considerable effect. Lessons
demonstration in FY2024, an operational demonstration in learned related to the employment of the aforementioned
FY2026, and a production decision by FY2027. systems may inform current and future development of all
four M-SHORAD Increments. Congress may consider what
Army Issues a Request for Information for efforts have been undertaken by the Army to incorporate
M-SHORAD Increment 4 lessons learned into M-SHORAD design.
On May 8, 2024, the Army issued a request for information
(RFI) for M-SHORAD Increment 4, stating that this 2024 Army Force Structure Transformation
capability is to focus on delivering “air defense capability Initiative and M-SHORAD
to support dismounted maneuver.” M-SHORAD Increment On February 27, 2024, the Army released a white paper,
4 is to include capabilities that can be transported on a C- Army Force Structure Transformation, outlining plans to
130 aircraft and that are air-droppable and sling load transform the force. Regarding M-SHORAD, the Army
capable. It is also to be capable of integration onto stated it would add four additional M-SHORAD battalions.
platforms such as the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV)
Reportedly, Army officials noted on June 14, 2024, that the
and/or a robotic vehicle. The Army has requested RFI
four additional battalions would be activated in the Army
responses from industry by July 16, 2024, and that industry
National Guard “assuming they are funded across the
provide solutions that would deliver capabilities in the near
Program Objective Memorandum (POM) between FY2026
term (FY2027 to FY2028), mid term (FY2030 through
and FY2030.” Given the Army’s new transformation plans,
FY2032), and the far term (beyond FY2035).
Congress might seek to clarify the Army’s plans for the
Army Names M-SHORAD Vehicle and four new Army National Guard M-SHORAD battalions
Program Update including the timeline for unit activations and where the
On June 14, 2024, the Army reportedly renamed the units will be stationed.
M-SHORAD the “SGT STOUT” in honor of Sergeant
Mitchell William Stout, an Air Defense Artillery soldier Andrew Feickert, Specialist in Military Ground Forces
who won the Congressional Medal of Honor during the IF12397
Vietnam War. In addition to the Army’s first two
https://crsreports.congress.gov
U.S. Army’s Maneuver Short-Range Air Defense (M-SHORAD) System
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress.
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.