Bhuvaneshwari vs Prashanth Kumar.
Bhuvaneshwari vs Prashanth Kumar.
Bhuvaneshwari vs Prashanth Kumar.
NC: 2024:KHC:10782
WP No. 18433 of 2023
R
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
BEFORE
BETWEEN:
BHUVANESHWARI
W/O BHARATH P
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
R/AT 3/53 KADYA HOUSE
MADAPPADY POST,
SULLIA TALUK - 572 218.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI B.S. SACHIN, ADV.)
AND:
PRASHANTH KUMAR
S/O ANNU GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/AT ANTHARA HOUSE
KADIRUDYAVARA VILLAGE
BELTHANGADY TALUK - 574 228.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 29.12.2022 IN CC NO.343 OF
2021 ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BELTHANGADY,
DK DISTRICT PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY
ALLOW XEROX COPY OF UNREGISTERED AGREEMENT OF SALE DTD
23.3.2021 TO BE MARKED IN EVIDENCE AND FURTHER PASS SUCH
OTHER AND FURTHER RELIEFS.
ORDER
Counsel for the accused had requested the Trial Court to permit
Trial Court vide the order impugned rejected the prayer made
2666.
For the reason that the complainant had admitted his signature
the Trial Court to permit him to mark the Photostat copy of the
document.
that the other side had admitted the signature on the Photostat
primary evidence was made and also about his custody of the
original.
not required if the foundation for the same is laid in the plaint
herein.
under:
10. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid said case has
Sd/-
JUDGE
KK