MATP Session-14
MATP Session-14
MATP Session-14
Session-14
1
Discussion Points
1. Income-Expenditure Model
2. Equilibrium Income
3. Consumption Function
4. Multiplier
The Income-Expenditure Model
• Y fell by 26%
• P fell by 22%
At equilibrium output
y*, output equals
planned expenditures,
C + I.
Adjustment to Equilibrium Output
An Aggregate Consumption
Function
The aggregate consumption
function shows the level of
aggregate consumption at
each level of aggregate
income.
The upward slope indicates
that higher levels of income
lead to higher levels of
consumption spending.
The Keynesian Theory of Consumption
marginal propensity to consume (MPC)- That fraction of a change in
income that is consumed, or spent.
C
marginal propensity to consume slope of consumption function
Y
S≡Y–C
The triple equal sign means that this equation is an identity, or something
that is always true by definition.
MPC + MPS ≡ 1
Because the MPC and the MPS are important concepts, it may help to
review their definitions.
Aggregate Aggregate
Income, Y Consumption, C
0 100
80 160
100 175
200 250
400 400
600 550
800 700
1,000 850
The Keynesian Theory of Consumption
Deriving the Saving Function from the
Consumption Function
Because S ≡ Y – C, it is easy to derive
the saving function from the
consumption function.
A 45° line drawn from the origin can be
used as a convenient tool to compare
consumption and income graphically.
At Y = 200, consumption is 250.
The 45° line shows us that consumption
is larger than income by 50.
Thus, S ≡ Y – C = −50.
At Y = 800, consumption is less than
income by 100.
Thus, S = 100 when Y = 800.
Y − C = S
AGGREGATE AGGREGATE AGGREGATE
INCOME CONSUMPTION SAVING
0 100 -100
80 160 -80
100 175 -75
200 250 -50
400 400 0
600 550 50
800 700 100
1,000 850 150
The Keynesian Theory of Consumption
Households with higher wealth are likely to spend more, other things
being equal, than households with less wealth.
If a firm overestimates how much it will sell in a period, it will end up with
more in inventory than it planned to have.
Increasing the interest rate, ceteris paribus, is likely to reduce the level of
planned investment spending. When the interest rate falls, it becomes
less costly to borrow and more investment projects are likely to be
undertaken.
Planned Investment Schedule
Planned investment
spending is a negative
function of the interest rate.
An increase in the interest
rate from 3 percent to 6
percent reduces planned
investment from I0 to I1.
Other Determinants of Planned Investment
The decision of a firm on how much to invest depends on, among other
things, its expectation of future sales.
For now, we will assume that planned investment simply depends on the
interest rate.
Equilibrium Output and the Consumption Function
Equilibrium output is
determined where the C + I line
intersects the 45E line. At that
level of output, y*, desired
spending equals output.
The Determination of Equilibrium Output (Income)
AE ≡ C + I.
C+I>Y
planned aggregate expenditure > aggregate output
Deriving the Planned Aggregate Expenditure Schedule and Finding Equilibrium. The
Figures in Column 2 Are Based on the Equation C = 100 + .75Y.
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Planned Unplanned
Aggregate Aggregate Inventory
Output Aggregate Planned Expenditure (AE) Change Equilibrium?
(Income) (Y) Consumption (C) Investment (I) C+I Y − (C + I) (Y = AE?)
S = y −C