A STUDY ON THE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES

OF INCOME INEQUALITY
 A STUDY ON THE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF INCOME INEQUALITY

Introduction:

Income inequality, the unequal distribution of income among a population, is a complex

and multifaceted issue affecting countries worldwide. It arises from a confluence of
factors that include economic trends, educational access, and labour market dynamics.
Globalisation and technological advancements, while driving overall economic growth,
often disproportionately benefit high-skilled workers, leading to significant gains for
those at the top while leaving low-skilled workers behind. This phenomenon is further
worsened by wage disparities across different industries and occupations, which
contribute to the widening income gap. Additionally, unequal access to quality education
remains a critical driver of income inequality, as individuals from disadvantaged
backgrounds struggle to compete in an increasingly skill-oriented job market. This lack
of access prevents many from obtaining the qualifications needed for higher-paying
jobs, thus perpetuating economic disparities.

Economic policies and labor market regulations also play pivotal roles in shaping
income distribution. Insufficient minimum wage laws and declining unionization rates
weaken workers' bargaining power, resulting in lower wages and benefits for a
significant portion of the workforce. Furthermore, regressive tax systems that place a
heavier burden on lower-income individuals and inadequate social safety nets fail to
mitigate the effects of income disparity, allowing the rich to get richer while the poor
become poorer. Family structure and demographic changes, such as the prevalence of
single-parent households, also influence income distribution, with single-income families
often facing greater financial challenges. Discrimination based on gender, race, and
ethnicity further limits opportunities for many individuals, exacerbating income
inequality.

The consequences of income inequality are profound and far-reaching, impacting both
economic stability and social cohesion. Economically, high levels of inequality can stifle
growth by limiting the purchasing power of a significant portion of the population,
leading to reduced demand for goods and services. This reduction in demand can
hinder business expansion and innovation, creating a less dynamic economy.
Additionally, income inequality can lead to economic instability by increasing the
vulnerability of lower-income groups to financial crises and economic shocks. Socially,
income inequality manifests in increased poverty rates, health disparities, and
educational gaps, perpetuating a cycle of disadvantage across generations. Health
disparities are particularly concerning, as individuals in lower-income brackets often lack
access to adequate healthcare, leading to poorer health outcomes and higher mortality
rates.
Review of literature:

1. ‘Income inequality in the developing world’ by Martin Ravallion discusses how

Income inequality in developing countries remains a concern. While global
inequality has decreased over 30 years, within-country inequality has slowly
risen, staying stable since 2000. Growth has reduced absolute poverty but less
so in unequal countries. High inequality threatens future growth and poverty
reduction, with rising perceptions of gaps in living standards between the rich and
poor.

2. ‘Income Inequality and Social Dysfunction’ by Richard G. Wilkinson, and Kate E.

Pickett addresses that population health is better in more equal societies. Higher
rates of mental illness, violence, imprisonment, and other social problems are
linked to inequality. These issues affect the majority in unequal societies. This
paper concludes that health and social issues are driven by social stratification
and material inequality.

3. ‘Standardising the World Income Inequality Database’ by Frederick Solt

discusses how Cross-national research on income inequality has been limited by
inconsistent data across countries and over time. The Standardized World
Income Inequality Database (SWIID) aims to overcome these limitations.

4. ‘Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality – An Overview’ by Matthew

Polacko addresses rising income inequality in advanced economies, which is
driven by political choices, not just globalisation or technology. Neoliberal policies
since the 1980s, affecting unions, executive pay, welfare, and taxes, have fueled
inequality. This has harmed economic growth, health, and social mobility, and
increased violent crime.

5. ‘Economic Consequences of Income Inequality’ by Jason Furman, and Joseph E.

Stiglitz discusses the impact of income inequality on economic growth, business
cycles, and credit rationing. They also highlight the influence of incomplete
information and capital market imperfections on firm behaviour and the potential
implications for economic volatility.

6. ‘Exploring the Causes and Consequences of Regional Income Inequality in

Canada’ by Yannick Marchand, Jean Dubé &Sébastien Breau discussed the
surge in populist movements has highlighted regional inequality in Canada,
driven by economic development, labour market conditions, and socioeconomic
factors. Regions with manufacturing have lower inequality, while those with
services and knowledge-intensive businesses have higher inequality; short-term
growth benefits from inequality, but long-term growth suffers.

7. ‘Inequality: Causes and Consequences’ by Kathryn M. Neckerman, and

Florencia Torche talks about how over the past 30 years, research on economic
disparities has expanded globally, examining inequality in earnings, wealth, and
 opportunity. This review updates U.S. inequality research, explores its social and
political impacts, and highlights global trends, suggesting sociologists focus on
firms, labour markets, and the effects of social, political, and cultural factors.

8. ‘Employment relations and growing income inequality: Causes and potential

options for its reversal’ by Thomas A Kochan and Christine A Riordan discusses
that income inequality is a major development in employment relations,
particularly pronounced in the United States. We review its causes, emphasising
labour market institutions, wage regulations, and safety net policies, and suggest
actions to reverse the trend, while also considering the roles of technology,
education, globalisation, and organisational restructuring.

9. ‘The psychological consequences of income inequality’ by Nicholas R. Buttrick.

This paper reviews the societal effects of income inequality, drawing from
multiple disciplines including psychology, sociology, political science, economics,
and public health. Living in highly unequal societies is linked to increased
mistrust and social status anxiety, which contribute to negative outcomes like
lower happiness, weaker social cohesion, higher mortality, worse health, and
weaker governance.

10. ‘Income Inequality: The Implications Of Economic Structure And Social

Conditions’ by Don E. Albrecht &Carol Mulford Albrecht discusses how income
inequality has risen in the U.S. and other developed nations in recent decades,
leading to significant social consequences. This study of U.S. county-level data
found that social conditions, particularly female employment and female-headed
households, were more strongly related to inequality than economic structure,
with high female employment linked to lower inequality and high proportions of
female-headed households linked to higher inequality.

Significance of Study:

Studying income inequality is crucial for understanding economic disparities and their
broader social impacts. It sheds light on the distribution of wealth, revealing gaps
between the rich and poor, and helps explain how resources are concentrated in
society. High income inequality can limit access to education, healthcare, and
opportunities for upward mobility, leading to poorer health outcomes and perpetuating
cycles of poverty. It also informs policies aimed at reducing poverty, fostering inclusive
economic growth, and promoting social cohesion.

Moreover, income inequality is linked to political stability and economic development.

Extreme disparities can lead to social unrest and instability, while more equitable
societies tend to experience sustainable growth and stronger social bonds. By
examining income inequality, policymakers can design effective taxation, social welfare,
and labor market strategies to address these issues. Additionally, understanding
inequality helps balance innovation with fairness, ensuring that economic gains benefit
a broader section of the population.
Profile of the study area:

The study investigates the causes and consequences of income inequality within a
specific country, addressing economic, educational, labour market, demographic, and
social factors. Economic factors such as globalisation, technological change, and
inequities in education and labour market policies contribute to income disparities.
These disparities, in turn, have profound social consequences, including increased
poverty, social unrest, and health disparities. Additionally, the study considers the
demographic profile and policy environment of the country, essential components for
understanding the complexities of income inequality and informing effective policy
interventions.

Furthermore, the study examines the geographical context and demographic

characteristics of the study area to provide a comprehensive analysis of income
inequality. It considers both urban and rural regions, recognizing the diversity of
economic conditions and social dynamics across different areas. By analyzing
population size, age distribution, and cultural diversity, the study captures the nuanced
factors influencing income distribution and social cohesion within the country.
Additionally, the economic overview, including primary industries and employment rates,
offers insights into the structural foundations of income inequality. Understanding the
interplay between economic, social, and demographic factors is crucial for devising
targeted interventions to address income disparities and promote equitable economic
growth and social development.

Research Methodology:

The research methodology of this study was conducted through a comprehensive

research and review process. Secondary data was gathered from highly credible
sources such as scholarly research papers and articles by renowned economists. This
ensured the reliability and validity of the information used in the analysis.

The data analysis was carried out using descriptive statistical methods in an organised
and systematic manner. This approach allowed for a thorough examination of trends
and patterns in income inequality, providing a solid foundation for drawing meaningful
conclusions and making informed policy recommendations.

Objectives:

● To investigate the key factors driving income inequality, including economic

policies, education, labour market dynamics, and demographic changes.
● To examine the consequences of income inequality on economic growth, social
cohesion, health, and political stability.
 ● To assess the effectiveness of current policies aimed at reducing inequality,
identifying best practices for improvement.
● To explore the impact of globalization, technological change, and labor market
policies on income inequality within the country.

Limitations of study:

Studying income inequality using secondary data has limitations such as data
inaccuracy, lack of granularity, and incomplete coverage of informal sectors or
unreported income. Additionally, data comparability across regions or time can be
difficult, and secondary data often shows correlations rather than establishing causality,
limiting actionable insights for policy-making.

What are the key factors driving income inequality?

The causes of income inequality are multifaceted and can be attributed to a combination
of global and country-specific factors. These factors may reinforce each other and are
crucial in shaping income inequality trends. Here are some of the key forces that have
been proposed in both theoretical and empirical literature to account for income
inequality:

Global Factors:

Technological Progress: Technological advancement has contributed to the skill

premium, where individuals with higher education have a comparative advantage in
using new technologies. This has led to a widening gap in income between individuals
with different skill levels.

Globalisation: The increased interconnectedness of economies has influenced income

inequality by affecting the distribution of wages and employment opportunities across
different regions and industries.

Commodity Price Cycles: Fluctuations in commodity prices can impact the income
levels of individuals working in sectors closely tied to commodity production and trade.

Geographical Disparities: Regional disparities, especially between urban and rural

areas, can intensify income inequality. Living in or near urban centers often provides
greater job opportunities, further exacerbating wealth inequality.

Global Economic Crises: Events such as the COVID-19 pandemic have widened
income gaps, with the poor being disproportionately impacted. The pandemic has
exacerbated global income inequality, erasing progress and disproportionately affecting
already disenfranchised communities.
Country-Specific Factors:

Economic Developments and Stability: Domestic economic conditions, such as

economic growth, stability, and access to quality employment, play a significant role in
shaping income distribution within countries.

Domestic Policies: Redistributive fiscal policies, financial integration, labour and product
market policies, and liberalisation and deregulation of markets also contribute to income
inequality trends within countries.

Historical Factors: Historical events such as apartheid in South Africa and slavery in the
United States have contributed significantly to income inequality. For example,
apartheid led to formalized racial segregation in South Africa, restricting the economic
activities and movements of Black South Africans for almost 50 years, resulting in a
deeply entrenched wealth divide.

Unequal Distribution of Land: Unequal land distribution, often stemming from historical
injustices, has been a significant contributor to income inequality. In South Africa, the
long history of unequal land ownership, rooted in the apartheid era, has perpetuated
economic disparities and hindered progress toward addressing inequality.

Stagnant Wages: In many countries, stagnant wages have failed to keep pace with
inflation, leading to a widening gap between income levels. This is evident in the United
States, where wages have not kept up with rising living costs, exacerbating wealth
inequality.

Gender Disparities: Gender-based income disparities play a crucial role in income

inequality. In South Africa, for instance, women earn significantly less than men, even
with comparable education levels, thereby contributing to the overall income gap.

It's important to note that while some level of inequality is inevitable in a market-based
economic system due to differences in talent, effort, and luck, excessive inequality can
have severe repercussions. Excessive inequality has the potential to erode social
cohesion, lead to political polarisation, and ultimately hinder economic growth. The
impact of these forces on income inequality can vary across different regions and
countries, and policymakers need to consider these factors when designing specific
policies aimed at addressing inequality.

Causes of Income Inequality: Two Case Studies:

In South Africa, income inequality is deeply rooted in the historical legacy of apartheid
and unequal land distribution. The formalised racial segregation under apartheid
restricted the economic activities and movements of Black South Africans for nearly half
a century, creating a society structured to uplift white individuals while marginalising
Black South Africans. Even following the end of apartheid in the 1990s, the country has
struggled to address the deeply ingrained wealth disparities, with the top 10% of the
population holding a staggering 71% of all income. Furthermore, gender, race, and land
ownership are also significant factors contributing to income inequality in South Africa,
with women earning substantially less than men and unequal land distribution
perpetuating disparities among rural communities. The COVID-19 crisis has further
exacerbated these issues, amplifying unemployment and widening the income gap.

In the United States, income inequality is influenced by a complex historical legacy of

slavery and ongoing challenges related to stagnant wages. The deep imprint of slavery
and subsequent racial segregation severely limited economic opportunities for Black
individuals, resulting in persistent wealth disparities. Additionally, the failure of wages to
keep pace with inflation has further contributed to income inequality in the United
States, with consumer prices rising significantly higher than wages. The unequal
distribution of wealth is evident with the top 10% of earners holding 68% of the country's
total wealth, while the lowest 50% hold just 3.3%. This disparity has persisted despite
efforts to address income and wealth inequalities, symbolising the enduring impact of
historical and economic factors on the country's income inequality landscape.

How is Income Inequality measured?

Income inequality is measured using the Gini coefficient, which is a statistical measure
of the distribution of income or wealth within a population. The Gini coefficient ranges
from 0 to 1, where 0 represents perfect equality (everyone has the same income) and 1
represents perfect inequality (one person has all the income, while others have none).

The Gini coefficient is widely used to quantify income inequality, providing a snapshot of
the income distribution within a specific population or country. It takes into account the
entire income distribution, reflecting how incomes are spread across different segments
of the population. The coefficient is calculated based on income data, and a higher Gini
coefficient indicates greater inequality.

It's important to note that the Gini coefficient can be used for different forms of income,
such as disposable income or consumption, and it already includes any redistribution
through taxes and transfers unless specified otherwise. This means that it reflects the
impact of government policies on income distribution. The Gini coefficient is a
commonly utilised measure to assess and compare income inequality within populations
and across regions or countries.
What are the consequences of Income Inequality?

Income inequality can have profound consequences on societies and economies. While
some level of inequality is typically present in market-based systems due to variations in
talent, effort, and luck, excessive inequality can lead to various negative outcomes.
Here are some consequences of income inequality:

Social Cohesion: Excessive income inequality can erode social cohesion by creating
divisions within society. It can result in increased tensions, conflict, and reduced trust
among individuals and groups.

Political Polarisation: High levels of income inequality can lead to political polarization
as different socioeconomic groups may have conflicting interests and priorities. This can
hinder effective governance and decision-making processes.

Economic Growth: Excessive income inequality has the potential to lower economic
growth. When wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few, it can lead to reduced
consumer spending, investment, and overall economic activity.

Health Disparities: Income inequality is often associated with disparities in access to

healthcare and health outcomes. Lower-income individuals may face barriers to quality
healthcare, leading to poorer health outcomes and reduced life expectancy.

Education Disparities: Inequality can impact access to education and opportunities for
social mobility. Lower-income individuals may have limited access to quality education
and training, which can perpetuate intergenerational cycles of poverty.

Crime and Social Unrest: Studies have shown a correlation between income inequality
and higher levels of crime and social unrest. Economic disparities can create feelings of
disenchantment and lead to higher crime rates and social instability.

Reduced Social Mobility: High levels of income inequality can restrict social mobility,
making it harder for individuals from lower-income backgrounds to improve their
economic status. This can perpetuate inequality across generations.
Resource Allocation: Unequal distribution of resources can result in inefficiencies in
resource allocation. When a significant portion of wealth is concentrated in a few hands,
resources may not be allocated optimally for the benefit of society as a whole.

Understanding the consequences of income inequality is crucial for policymakers to

design effective interventions and policies aimed at addressing inequality and promoting
more inclusive and sustainable economic development.

Basic Facts about Income Inequality:

Global inequality has been declining fast since the 1990s. After a period of widening
disparities between countries’ per capita income, global inequality began to stabilise
and has subsequently rapidly declined over the last three decades. However, it's
important to note that not all regions of the world have experienced income
convergence with more developed countries. Sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, has
experienced more modest income growth compared to Asia. The COVID-19 crisis is
likely to reverse some of the gains made in reducing global inequality.

Sources: Historical series are from Van Zaden and others (2014), who build on Bourgui-gnon and
Morrisson (2002). Recent data is from Lakner and Milanovich (2013).
Within-country inequality has risen in most countries. Over the past three decades,
more than half of the countries and close to 90 per cent of advanced economies have
seen an increase in income inequality. Some key factors contributing to this increase
include technological progress, globalisation, commodity price cycles, and domestic
economic policies such as redistributive fiscal policies, labour, and product market
policies.

Source: IMF, Fiscal Monitor, October 2017

Rising social spending has been used to combat inequality. Fiscal policy, including
taxes and transfers, has been instrumental in decreasing income inequality in advanced
economies. In fact, taxes and transfers decrease income inequality by one-third in
advanced economies, with most of the impact coming from public social spending, such
as pensions and family benefits. In developing economies, the redistributive impact of
fiscal policy is lower, contributing to higher levels of inequality.
Source: IMF Fiscal Monitor, October 2017.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Income Inequality:

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has increasingly recognised the significance of
income inequality in recent years, particularly in the context of macroeconomic stability
and sustainable growth. The IMF has been engaged in research and policy discussions
related to income inequality, and its stance on this issue has evolved. Here are some
key points regarding the IMF's approach to income inequality:

1. Research and Analysis: The IMF has conducted extensive research on the
relationship between income inequality, macroeconomic performance, and financial
stability. This has included analysing the impact of inequality on economic growth,
identifying policy measures to address inequality, and examining the social and political
implications of rising income disparities.

2. Fiscal Policy: The IMF has emphasised the role of fiscal policy, including taxes and
public spending, as a tool to address income inequality. The institution has recognised
the importance of progressive taxation, well-targeted social transfers, and public
spending on education, healthcare, and social protection to mitigate inequality and
promote inclusive growth.

3. Safety Nets and Social Protection: The IMF has increasingly recognised the
importance of strong social safety nets and social protection programs in addressing
income inequality and promoting social cohesion. This includes advocating for well-
designed social safety nets that can provide a buffer against economic shocks and
support vulnerable populations.

4. Inclusive Growth Agenda: The IMF has integrated the concept of inclusive growth into
its policy advice and surveillance activities. This approach emphasizes the need for
economic policies that not only promote growth but also ensure that the benefits of
growth are equitably distributed across various segments of society.

5. Policy Advice: The IMF has included recommendations to address income inequality
in its policy advice to member countries. This may involve advising on reforms to tax
systems, social spending, labour market policies, and financial sector regulation to
promote more equitable outcomes.

Overall, the IMF's engagement with income inequality reflects a growing recognition of
its importance in achieving macroeconomic stability, sustainable growth, and social
cohesion. The institution has incorporated considerations of income distribution into its
policy dialogues and analytical work, highlighting the multifaceted links between
inequality, economic outcomes, and social development.

Impact of globalisation and technology on income inequality

1. Globalisation:
Globalisation has been a prominent factor in the rise of income inequality by shifting
production overseas, hence reducing wages for lower-skilled workers in developed
countries. This phenomenon, known as the 'market forces hypothesis,’ suggests that
the demand for high-skilled labour worldwide has increased, leading to upward pressure
on top earners, while lower-skilled workers have faced challenges due to global
competition. However, attributing income inequality solely to globalisation has
limitations, as the extent of inequality increases varies among countries despite similar
exposure to global forces. While globalisation has impacted domestic policy choices,
individual policy decisions play a crucial role in mediating its effects on income
distribution. Despite its role in shaping economic structures, globalisation's inequality-
increasing effect has been deemed "small-to-moderate," with financial globalisation
showing a significant impact.

2. Technology:

Technological advancements have significantly contributed to income inequality through

skills-biased technological change (SBTC), which favours non-routine work that requires
specialised skills over routine tasks that can be automated. The digital age has led to
the creation of part-time, flexible jobs without benefits, worsening income disparities as
routine jobs diminish. The prevailing 'marginal productivity theory' argues that higher
productivity merits higher incomes, justifying the skill-based wage gaps perpetuated by
technological progress. Despite this, critics point out that SBTC alone cannot explain
historical declines in inequality or factors like gender and racial wage gaps, challenging
the notion that technological advancements are the primary determinant of income
inequality. While globalisation and technology play crucial roles, they predominantly
underlie institutional factors such as reduced tax progressivity, escalating executive pay,
and union decline, which have a more significant impact on income distribution.

3.Tax Policy:

Tax policy plays a crucial role in shaping income inequality, as taxes provide the main
source of government revenue for redistribution. Historically, progressive taxation,
based on the principle of marginal utility, supported redistribution by benefiting the poor
more from incremental income. However, the shift towards trickle-down economics in
the late 1970s, with tax cuts for the wealthy, reduced personal and corporate income tax
progressivity. For example, the average top income tax rate in OECD countries dropped
from 62% in 1981 to 35% in 2015, with significant declines in the UK and US. Recent
research shows that these tax reforms have increased pre-tax income inequality without
boosting economic growth. Additionally, tax avoidance via offshore havens has
exacerbated income inequality since 1980.

4. Union Decline:

The decline in union density has had a significant impact on income inequality,
contributing to its rise in many developed economies. Historically, trade unions have
played a crucial role in moderating income disparities by restricting wage decline among
low-wage earners and controlling wage surges among high-wage earners. Additionally,
the presence of unions has influenced the wage structure by driving up the wages of
non-union employees in similar industries.

However, the weakening of trade unions and the subsequent decline in their influence
has led to substantial policy defeats and reduced political power for labour. This de-
politicisation of labour has been reinforced by corporate influence on policymakers,
resulting in a decline in union regulations and the separation of policymakers from
labour concerns. Consequently, the decline in union density has led to a loss of
bargaining power for workers, thereby exacerbating income inequality. Statistical
studies have demonstrated a strong negative correlation between union density and
income inequality, suggesting that countries with higher union density exhibit lower
levels of income inequality.

Overall, the decline in union density has been linked to a significant portion of the total
increase in income inequality, particularly in countries like the UK and the US, where the
most pronounced increases in income inequality have occurred concurrently with the
substantial falls in union density.

Gini coefficient by union density, OECD 1980–2018. Data on Gini coefficients from SWIID (Solt 2020);
data on union density from ICTWSS Database (Visser 2019).
Findings:

Economic Policies: Economic policies, particularly regressive tax structures and

reduced social spending, disproportionately affect lower-income populations,
exacerbating income inequality and limiting opportunities for disadvantaged groups.

Education: Disparities in educational access significantly influence income inequality, as

individuals with higher education levels generally earn more, leaving those without
access to quality education at a disadvantage.

Labour Market Dynamics: Labor market dynamics, including wage stagnation and the
decline of unionised jobs, restrict upward mobility for lower-income workers, contributing
to persistent income inequality and limiting economic advancement for disadvantaged
communities.

Consequences of Income Inequality: Income inequality adversely affects economic

growth by reducing aggregate demand and exacerbating social fragmentation. It also
leads to health disparities, as marginalised populations have limited access to
healthcare, and fosters political instability due to increasing discontent.

Effectiveness of Current Policies: Current policies to reduce income inequality have

yielded mixed results, with some initiatives successfully promoting equity through
progressive taxation and social programs. However, there remains a need to identify
and implement best practices for more effective outcomes.

Impact of Globalization and Technology: Globalization and technological change

significantly influence income inequality by creating disparities in labour market
opportunities. While these factors can enhance productivity and growth, they often
disproportionately benefit skilled workers, leaving lower-skilled individuals at a
disadvantage.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, income inequality is a multifaceted issue driven by various factors,

including economic policies, educational disparities, labor market dynamics, and
demographic changes. The consequences are far-reaching, impacting economic
growth, social cohesion, health outcomes, and political stability. The International
Monetary Fund emphasizes that reducing inequality is essential for sustainable
development and economic stability, advocating for policies that promote equitable
growth. Additionally, globalization and technological advancements have further
complicated the landscape of income inequality, creating opportunities for some while
marginalizing others. As nations navigate these challenges, it is crucial to implement
targeted strategies that address the root causes of inequality, ensuring that economic
benefits are distributed more equitably across all segments of society. By fostering
inclusive growth, countries can enhance social cohesion and create a more stable,
prosperous future for everyone.

Bibliography:
1.https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/Inequality/introduction-to-inequality

2.https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/spp-2021-0017/html?
lang=en

3.https://www.humanrightscareers.com/issues/income-inequality-causes-facts-
examples/#:~:text=Income%20inequality%20is%20a%20global%20issue
%20with%20several%20causes%2C%20including,tax%20reforms%2C%20and
%20higher%20wages.

4.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
262608920_Income_Inequality_in_the_Developing_World

5.https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-
115926

6.https://fsolt.org/swiid/#:~:text=The%20goal%20of%20the
%20Standardized,across%20countries%20and%20over%20time.

7.https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/spp-2021-0017/html?
lang=en
8.https://www.kansascityfed.org/Jackson%20Hole/documents/3574/1998-
S98stiglitz.pd

9. https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recgxx/v96y2020i2p83-107.html

10.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
228234462_Inequality_Causes_and_Consequences

11.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
301539415_Employment_relations_and_growing_income_inequality_Causes_an
d_potential_options_for_its_reversal

12.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
314755950_The_psychological_consequences_of_income_inequality

13. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02732170601118153