3. Potentially Malignant Disorders (1)
3. Potentially Malignant Disorders (1)
3. Potentially Malignant Disorders (1)
CONTENTS
• INTRODUCTION
• TERMINOLOGIES
• CLASSIFICATION
• INDIVIDUAL DISORDERS
- DEFINITION
- ETIOPATHOGENESIS
- CLINICAL FEATURES
- DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
- INVESTIGATIONS
- MANAGEMENT
REFERENCES
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
INTRODUCTION
• It conveys that not all lesions and conditions described under this
term may transform to cancer, rather that there is a family of
morphological alterations amongst which some may have an
increased potential for malignant transformation.
• Potentially malignant disorders of the oral mucosa are also
indicators of risk of likely future malignancies elsewhere in
(clinically normal appearing) oral mucosa and not only site-
specific predictors.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
1. High Risk
1.1. Erythroplakia.
1.2. Leukoplakia.
1.3. Oral Submucous Fibrosis (OSF).
1.4. Erosive Lichen Planus.
2. Life-style Related
2.1. Smokeless Tobacco Keratosis.
2.2. Reverse Smoker‘s Palate.
2.3. Actinic Cheilitis
3. Infections
3.1. Hyperplastic Candidiasis.
3.2. Viral (HPV, HIV, EBV, HBV, HSV).
3.3. Tertiary Syphilis.
4. Immunodeficiency
4.1. Solid Organ Transplantation.
4.2. Graft Versus Host Disease.
4.3. Chronic Cutaneous Lupus Erythematous.
5. Inherited Disorders
5.1. Xeroderma Pigmentosum.
5.2. Dyskeratosis Congenita.
5.3. Epidermolysis Bullosa.
5.4. Bloom Syndrome.
5.5. Fanconi‘s Anemia.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
▼ PREMALIGNANT LESIONS
Oral Leukoplakia and Erythroplakia
Oral Submucous Fibrosis
▼ IMMUNOPATHOLOGIC DISEASES
Oral Lichen Planus
Drug-Induced Lichenoid Reactions
Lichenoid Reactions of Graft-versus-Host Disease
Lupus Erythematosus
▼ ALLERGIC REACTIONS
Lichenoid Contact Reactions
Reactions to Dentifrice and Chlorhexidine
▼ TOXIC REACTIONS
Reactions to Smokeless Tobacco
Smoker‘s Palate
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Oral Leukoplakia
Tobacco-associated leukoplakia.
The etiological role of tobacco in patients who smoke cigarettes,
cigars or pipes is less obvious.
• Therefore, preference has been given to the term ‗tobacco-
associated leukoplakia‘ (leukoplakia in smokers) over the term
‗tobacco-induced white lesions‘.
Idiopathic leukoplakia.
One also recognizes nontobacco-associated leukoplakia
(leukoplakia in nonsmokers), often referred to as idiopathic
leukoplakia.
Epidemiology
Clinical Aspects
Clinical features
• These sites have also been found to have a higher frequency of loss
of heterozygosity compared with low-risk sites.
• However, the separation into high- and low-risk sites has recently
been questioned.
Histopathological Aspects
• P — Pathology
• P0 — No epithelial dysplasia
• P1 — Distinct epithelial dysplasia
• Px — Dysplasia not specified in the pathology report.
• Stage I — L1 P0
• State II — L2 P0
• Stage III — L3 P0 or L1 L2 P1
• Stage IV — L3 P1
• The proposed system should facilitate uniform reporting of
treatment or management results of OLEPs in which a biopsy has
become available.
• The system can easily be adjusted by replacing the
histopathological criteria of epithelial dysplasia by a clinical
subdivision in homogeneous and nonhomogeneous leukoplakia for
cases in which no biopsy is available.
• It also could serve as a means for epidemiological studies.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Biopsy
Diagnosis
Management
• The reported cure rates after laser surgery vary between 33.9% and
82%, and recurrence between 7.7% and 66%.
• Another large retrospective study reported cure rates of 82%, local
recurrence of 9.9%, and 1.1% malignant transformation. On the
contrary, surgery has been strongly questioned as squamous cell
carcinomas are almost equally prevalent in non–surgically treated
patients as in patients subjected to surgery.
• This may be explained by genetic defects in clinically normal
mucosa and is supported by a concept referred to as field
cancerization.
• Field cancerization is caused by simultaneous genetic instabilities
in the epithelium of several extralesional sites that may lead to
squamous cell carcinomas.
• However, in the absence of evidenced-based treatment strategies
for oral leukoplakias, surgery will remain the treatment for oral
leukoplakias.
• The use of antioxidant nutrients and vitamins have not been
reproducibly effective in management.
• Programs have included single and combination dosages of
vitamins A, C, and E; beta carotene; analogues of vitamin A; and
diets that are high in antioxidants and cell growth suppressor
proteins (fruits and vegetables)
• Carotenoids (Beta-Carotene 360mg Once weekly for 1 year) and
lycopene 4mg –BD for 3months ) : Beta-carotene is a vitamin A
precursor and Lycopene is a carotenoid without provitamin A
action , have antioxidant action.
• Systemic Vit A – 2-300,000 IU /week for 1 year
• Topical Vit A – 0.05 % 3/day for 2 weeks
• Topical Isotretinoin 0.1 % 3/day for 2 weeks
Anti-neoplastic agents:
• Bleomycin: Topical bleomycin is used in dosages of 0.5%-1%
/day for 12 to 15 days or 1%/day for 14 days for treatment of
leukoplakia.
• 5-Fluorouracil: affect the cell cycle and induce apoptotic death of
cancer cells
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Prognosis
ERYTHROPLAKIA
Etiology
Clinical Features
Histopathologic Features
Differential Diagnosis
Lesion Description
DEFINITIONS
Epidemiology
ETIOLOGY
and use of more spices and chillies to make the food tasty, coupled
with lack of health consciousness.
• Autoimmunity: is considered as one of the etiologic factor and
hence various authors studied OSF from the immunological points
of view.
• Phatak AG etal (1978) observed that these patients had
significantly elevated levels of serum globulin and
immunoglobulin IgG and Binnie and Cowson (1972) reported that
OSF and progressive systemic sclerosis (scleroderma), share a
defect of collagen maturation which gives rise to a clinically and
histologically similar presentation of both.
• A significantly higher positive ANA (23.9%), SMA (23.9%), and
GPCA (14.7%) in OSF patients has been seen (Chiang et al 2002)
Genetic susceptibiiity :
• Only an estimated 1-2% of the population who have an areca nut
chewing habit may develop the disease.
• This suggests a possible genetic predisposition in the affected
people A genetic predisposition is also supported by association-
specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules, such as HLA-
A10, -B7, and -DR3.
• Further HLA-typing done by the use of the polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) also demonstrates significantly increased
frequencies of HLA-A24, DRB1-11 and DRB3-0202/3 antigens in
21 OSF patients when compared with the English controls (Saeed
B et al, 1997).
Role of infections : HPV, HSV, EBV (Abnormal CD4/CD8 ratio)
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Pathogenesis
• OSF reactions may be the result of either direct stimulation from
exogenous antigens like Areca alkaloids or changes in tissue
antigenicity that may lead to an autoimmune response.
• The inflammatory response releases cytokines and growth factors
that promote fibrosis by inducing the proliferation of fibroblasts,
up-regulating collagen synthesis and down-regulating collagenase
production.
• Arecoline has the capacity to modulate matrix metalloproteinases,
lysyl oxidases, and collagenases, all affecting the metabolism of
collagen, which leads to an increased fibrosis.
• During the development of fibrosis, a decrease in the water-
retaining proteoglycans will occur in favor of an increased collagen
type I production.
• There is also evidence of a genetic predisposition of importance for
the etiology behind submucous fibrosis.
• Polymorphism of the gene, which is coding for tumor necrosis
factor a (TNF-a), has been reported to promote the development of
the disorder.
• Fibroblasts are stimulated by TNF-a, thereby participating in the
development of fibrosis.
• Aberrations of other cytokines of importance are transforming
growth factor b and interferon-c, which may lead to increased
production and decreased degradation of collagen.
• Previous studies on the pathogenesis of OSF have suggested that
the occurrence may be due to:
• Clonal selection of fibroblasts with a high amount of collagen
production during the long-term exposure to areca quid ingredients
(Meghji S et al, 1987).
• Stimulation of fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis by
arecanut alkaloids (Harvey W et al, 1986).
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
• Further, it is evident that both ROS and HIF-α were necessary for
hypoxia-induced TGF-β1 upregulation.
• In OSF a possible relationship between Hif-1 α, ROS and EMT has
been revealed as an upregulation of Hif-1 α in OSF and also
production of ROS by arecoline treatment have been shown.
• In summary the above events show possible EMT in OSF leading
to fibrosis.
CLINICAL FEATURES
Early OSF
Advanced OSF
Histological features
Classifications of OSF
4. Gupta D.S. and Golhar B.L. classified into four stages based on
the increasing intensity of trismus as:
• Very early stage: The patients complain of burning sensation in
the mouth or ulceration without difficulty in MO.
• Early stage: Along with burning sensation, the patients complain
of slight difficulty in opening the mouth.
• Moderately advanced stage: The trismus is marked to such an
extent that the patient cannot open his/her mouth more than two
fingers width therefore experiencing difficulty in mastication.
• Advanced stage: Patient is undernourished, anemic and has a
marked degree of trismus.
• Stage 4 (S4): A: Any one of the above stage along with other
PMD e.g. oral leukoplakia, oral erythroplakia, etc.
• B: Any one of the above stage along with oral carcinoma.
17. Kerr A.R. et al gave the following grading system for OSF as:
• Grade 1: Mild: Any features of the disease triad for OSF
(burning, depapillation, blanching or leathery mucosa) may be
reported and inter-incisal opening >35 mm.
• Grade 2: Moderate: Above features of OSF and inter-incisal
limitation of opening between 20 to 35 mm.
• Grade 3: Severe: Above features of OSF and inter-incisal
opening < 20 mm.
• Grade 4A: Above features of OSF with other PMD on clinical
examination.
• Grade 4B: Above features of OSF with any grade of oral
epithelial dysplasia on biopsy.
• Grade 5: Above features of OSF with oral SCC.
Diagnosis
Immunological studies
• Because of a possible immunological connection, the fact that the
disease has been reported in subjects who do not practice the betel
habit and the inability to prove a dose and effect relationship in all
cases, the question arose whether there is a predisposition for the
disease.
• In this respect, the finding by Canniff et al (1981) that the human
leukocyte antigens (HLA) A10, B7 and DR3 occurred significantly
more frequently in OSF, is important.
• In addition, studies on the relationship between systemic disease
and OSF proved negative.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
Antioxidants :
Lycopene (16 mg of lycopene daily in 2 divided doses for 2
months ) ,
Beta carotene : 6 weeks of treatment with tablets containing
mostly beta-carotene and vitamin E thrice daily, showed an
effective increase in MO and tongue protrusion in OSF patients ,
Enzymes
• Chymotrypsin an endopeptidase, acts as a proteolytic and anti-
inflammatory agent.
• Local injection of chymotrypsin has proved to be successful in
treating OSF.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Malignant transformation
Clinical features
Palatal keratosis :
• Palatal keratosis denotes the diffuse whitening of the palatalal
mucosa .
• It may be mild, moderate or severe in intensity.
• Palatal keratosis may occur independently or coexist with other
components.
• Overall ,it forms upto 55% of the palatal components.
Excrescences:
• It comprise 1-3mm elevated areas ,often with central red dots
marking the orifices of the palatal mucous glands.
• Some 46% of the palatal changes consists of it
• It represents the initial palatal reaction and they are generally
transient.
• The milder form of excrescences resemblethe smoker‘s palate seen
in conventional smokers.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Patches :
• Are welldefined ,elevated plaques which could qualify for the
clinical term Leukoplakia.
• Palatal patches show characteristic histological features that differ
from the features of leukoplakia.
• Patches can be small or large.
• These account upto 12% of the palatal components.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Red areas:
• Red areas are well difined reddening of the palatal mucosa .
• Clinically ,they are indistinguishable from erythroplakias.
• Red areas form only 2% of the palatal components.
• Nevertheless, they are the most serious ,showing epithelial
dysplasia in 52% of the cases.
• Long term studies demonstrate a high rate of malignant
transformation.
Ulcerated areas:
• Ulcerated areas are charcterized by crater-like ulcerations with
deposits of fibrin often surrounded by keratinization
• Ulcerations form only 2% of the palatal components.
• They represent a ‗burn‘ type reaction of the palatal mucosa from
the intense heat of the lighted end of chutta.
• A similar lesion was observed in an individual from Ernakulam
district who ate ‗ piping –hot‖ rice ,but never smoked in reverse
fashion.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Hyperpigmentation:
• Pigmentation changes that include hyperpigmentation and loss of
pigmentation ,occur almost in all cases of chutta smokers
• Hyperpigmentation manifests in various forms,such as the spotted
,linear,patchy,diffuse and reticular types.
• Palatal pigmentation is perhaps a protective reaction to the heat and
smoke ; it is not known to redispose to a melanoma or any other
pathology.
• Microscopically ,hyperpigmentation areas show increased melanin
deposits in the basal cell layer and the lamina propria.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Nonpigmented areas
• Nonpigmented areas indicate areas of platal mucosa which are
clinically devoid of melanin pigmentation.
• Nonpigmentated areas result following the regression of red areas.
• Loss of pigmentation may render the palatal mucosa more
vulnerable to the action of carcinogens in tobacco.
• Microscopically ,nonpigmented areas are marked by minimal or no
melanin deposits in the basal cell layer.
• Epithelial dysplasia was observed in 19% of nonpigmented areas.
Multimorphic lesion:
• Various palatal components may coexist and they also occur in
association with non palatal lesions.
• Keratosis and excrescences coexist more frequently followed by a
combination of excrescences and patches; and red areas and
patches.
• Furthermore , palatal changes may occur with non-palatal lesions
as well.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Natural history
Malignant transformation
Management
Etiopathogenesis
TYPICAL FEATURES
Diagnosis
Prevalence/Incidence
Systemic associations
Psychological factors
Precipitating factors
Clinical Features
Multiforms:
• Ocassionally several forms of OLP may coexist and one form may
change to another over time.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Extraoral manifestations
Malignant potential
Diagnosis:
• Civatte bodies
• Separation of epithelium from lamina propria
Differential diagnosis
Treatment
Drug therapy
Corticosteroids
• The most commonly employed and useful agents for the treatment
of LP are topical corticosteroids.
• A response to treatment with midpotency corticosteroids such as
triamcinolone, potent fluorinated corticosteroids such as
fluocinolone acetonide and fluocinonide and superpotent
halogenated corticosteroids such as clobetasol has been reported in
30–100% of treated patients (Lozada- Nur et al, 1994; Aleinikov et
al, 1996; Carbone et al,1999; Buajeeb et al, 2000; Thongprasom et
al, 2003).
• The greatest obstacle in using topical corticosteroids in the mouth
is the lack of adherence to the mucosa for a sufficient length of
time.
• For this reason, some investigators prefer using topical
corticosteroids in adhesive pastes although there is no data that
topical steroids in adhesive bases are more effective than as base
preparations (Buajeeb et al, 2000; Lo Muzio et al, 2001).
• Elixir forms of corticosteroids, such as dexamethasone,
triamcinolone and clobetasol have been used as an oral rinse for
patients with diffuse oral involvement or for elderly patients who
may find it technically difficult to apply medication to various
active locations of the oral cavity.
• Careful consideration should be given to the vehicle as unlike skin
compounds, which have been well-studied,clinical trials that have
compared the strength of corticosteroids in various bases in the oral
cavity are generally lacking.
• Few serious side-effects arise with topical corticosteroids.
• Unlike the skin, atrophy in the oral mucosa is rarely observed.
• As many as one third of OLP patients treated with topical
corticosteroids develop secondary candidiasis which necessitates
treatment (Vincent et al, 1990) or instituting antifungal therapy
before the patient begins using topical steroids (Lozada-Nur et al,
1994; Carbone et al, 1999).
• Prolonged use of these drugs may occasionally result in diminished
biological effectiveness (tachyphylaxis), which can be avoided by
using alternate day therapy or by using a very potent steroid (e.g.
clobetasol) initially and then a moderately potent corticosteroid
(e.g. triamcinolone) for maintenance therapy.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
resolution of ulcers and erosions when the drug was applied over a
19 month period (Hodgson et al, 2003).
• Burning is the commonest side-effect with tacrolimus and is
observed in <20% of patients (Hodgson et al, 2003).
• Therapeutic levels of tacrolimus can be demonstrated in OLP
patients using the drug but are unrelated to the extent of oral
mucosal involvement (Kaliakatsou et al, 2002).
• Relapses of OLP after cessation of tacrolimus therapy are common
(Olivier et al, 2002).
• Notably, in a mouse model, topically applied tacrolimus has been
shown to accelerate skin carcinogenesis (Niwa et al, 2003).
• The US Food and Drug Administration recently issued a health
advisory to inform healthcare providers and patients about a
potential cancer risk from use of tacrolimus.
• They recommended the drug be used in minimum amounts, only
for short periods of time, not continuously, and only as labelled –
for atopic dermatitis.
• Topical retinoids such as tretinoin have been reported to be
effective for oral LP (Sloberg et al, 1979).
• However, topical corticosteroids (0.1% fluocinolone acetonide) are
more effective than topical 0.05% tretinoin in the treatment of
atrophic-erosive OLP (Buajeeb et al, 1997).
• Therefore, as a monotherapy, tretinoin has limited value in OLP
but in combination with topical corticosteroids, especially for
reticular lesions, modest benefits may be achieved with high doses
and frequent applications (Eisen, 2002b).
• Retinoids applied to the skin often cause considerable irritation
and inflammation, and the same is to be expected when applied to
oral mucous membranes.
Systemic therapy
Griseofulvin (Bagan et 1 g day Mixed results; very safe but several studies
al, 1985; Naylor, 1990) show no improvement
Treatment Comments
Psoralens and long wave ultraviolet A Excellent results in several studies; PUVA
(PUVA) (Jansen et al, 1987; Lundquist has oncogenic potential limiting its use
et al, 1995)
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Clinical features
• Discoid oral lesions are similar to those occurring on the skin and
appear as whitish striae frequently radiating from the central
erythematous area, giving a so-called ―brush border.‖
• Atrophy and telangiectases are also frequently present.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Histopathologic Features
Management
Epidemiology
• XP has been found in all continents and across all racial groups.
• Consistent with autosomal recessive inheritance, males and
females are similarly affected.
• Estimates made in the 1970‘s suggested an incidence in the USA
of 1 in 250, 000 and in Japan of 1 in 20, 000 .
• A more recent survey in Western Europe suggests approximately
2.3 per million live births .
• Anecdotally, the incidence in North Africa and the Middle East,
where there is a high level of consanguinity, is substantially higher.
• The incidence in India is not known.
• A literature search identified several case reports from India but
mutation analysis had not been performed in any of the cases.
[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10]
• Till 2015 , 37 unrelated families with patients having XP have been
reported from India.
• Many families have been reported from South India especially
Karnataka, where significant consanguinity is observed.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Etiopathogenesis
• Exposure to UV radiation
• Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation is composed of UVA spectrum and
UVB spectrum, where UVB plays an important role in the etiology
of XP.
• UV irradiation causes photoproducts in DNA, chiefly cyclobutane
pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and 6-pyrimidine-4-pyrimidone,
which further brings about cell death, mutagenesis, carcinogenesis
and cellular ageing .
• XP is an autosomal recessive disorder which results from
mutations in any of the eight genes.
• These genes restore the DNA damage induced by UV radiation by
a process known as nucleotide excision repair (NER) .
• XP patients have mutations in one or more NER genes, and cause
molecular defects in cellular DNA repair mechanisms and
hypersensitivity to UV radiation.
• As a result, the accumulation of unrepaired UV induced DNA
damage occurs which either facilitate cell death, contributing to
accelerated skin ageing, or cellular transformation resulting in the
development of malignancies.
• Many XP patients with tumors show mutations in the p53 gene,
indicating that p53 mutations are characteristic of UV exposure.
• Consanguinity
• Consanguinity has been implicated as an etiological factor.
• This has been reported to varying degrees of up to 92.8% in XP
patients in Libya.
• Other studies reported from Egypt, Pakistan, and Nigeria etc. have
a high incidence of XP .
• Drugs and Chemicals
• A number of DNA-damaging agents apart from UV radiation have
been implicated to cause a hypersensitive response to XP cell.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Aetiology
Clinical features
Oral manifestations
Diagnosis
Differential diagnosis
Management
Genetic counselling
• As with all genetic disorders, genetic counselling and
psychological support is appropriate for the families, to discuss
aetiology, probability of occurrence in future pregnancies,
increased likelihood of occurrence in communities in which
consanguineous marriages are common.
Antenatal diagnosis
• The DNA repair tests described above can be carried out on
chorionic villus-derived cells or on amniocytes in affected families,
as can molecular analysis if the mutation in the proband has been
identified.
• Although no cure is available for XP, the skin problems can be
dramatically ameliorated by appropriate protection.
• However, some effects of sun exposure before diagnosis may
appear years later despite adequate sun protection after diagnosis.
• As the skin changes are all caused by UV light, complete
protection from exposure to UV can prevent further skin changes
completely.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
SIDEROPENIC DYSPHAGIA
Etiopathogenesis
Clinical features
Laboratory Findings
Management
DYSKERATOSIS CONGENITA
Etiology
Clinical Features
Oral Manifestations
Histologic Findings
Laboratory Findings
Treatment
EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA
Etiology
• More than one half of JEB cases are caused by one of two
recurrent nonsense mutations in the LAMB3 gene, which is helpful
for mutation analysis and prenatal testing.
• Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) thus far has been
associated in all cases with mutations of the gene coding for type
VII collagen (COL7A1).
• Anchoring fibrils are affected in patients with DEB, and the degree
of involvement ranges from subtle changes to complete absence.
Oral Manifestations
Histologic Features
Oral Manifestations
Histologic Features
• This form of the disease may have its onset in infancy or it may be
delayed until puberty.
• The blisters commonly develop scarring which is sometimes
keloidal in type.
• In the majority of cases, the nails are thick and dystrophic, and
milia are commonly present.
• However, the eye is never involved.
• Palmar-plantar keratoderma with hyperhidrosis also may occur as
well as ichthyosis and sometimes hypertrichosis.
Oral Manifestations
• Bullae of the oral cavity have been described as occurring in about
20% of cases of this type, and Andreasen has described oral milia.
• The teeth are unaffected.
Histologic Features
Oral Manifestations
Histologic Features
Treatment
Clinical features
Lab investigation
Management
• The treatment is similar as described for MMP and LAD, with the
therapy depending upon the extent and severity of the clinical
lesions.
• The classic form of the disease tends to be resistant to treatment,
whereas the inflammatory form often responds well to dapsone.
• Some patients with an inadequate response to dapsone (50 to
150mg /day) have obtained remission with colchicine (0.5-
2mg/day).
• Systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs are often
required to control the lesions in severe widespread EBA.
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
REFERENCES:
20.Zain RB, Ikeda N, Gupta PC, et al. Oral mucosal lesions associated
with betel quid, areca nut and tobacco chewing habits: consensus
from a workshop held in Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia, November 25–
27, 1996. J Oral Pathol Med 1999;28:1–4.
21.Rajendran R. Oral submucous fibrosis: etiology, pathogenesis,and
future research. Bull World Health Organ 1994;72(6):985–96.
22.Pindborg JJ, Sirsat SM. Oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Surgery,
Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1966 Dec 1;22(6):764-79.
23.Sirsat SM, Khanolkar VR. Submucous fibrosis of the palate and
pillars of the fauces. Indian journal of medical sciences. 1962
Mar;16:189-97.
24.Phatak AG. Serum proteins and immunoglobulins in oral
submucous fibrosis. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head &
Neck Surgery. 1978 Mar 1;30(1):1-4.
25.Binnie WH, Cawson RA. A new ultrastructural finding in oral
submucous fibrosis. British Journal of Dermatology. 1972 Mar
1;86(3):286-90.
26.Ratheesh AV, Kumar B, Mehta H, Sujatha GP, Shankarmurthy SP.
Etiopathogenesis of oral submucous fibrosis. Journal of Medicine,
Radiology, Pathology and Surgery. 2015;1:16-21
27.Tilakaratne WM, Ekanayaka RP, Warnakulasuriya S. Oral
submucous fibrosis: a historical perspective and a review on
etiology and pathogenesis. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral
pathology and oral radiology. 2016 Aug 31;122(2):178-91.
28.Rao AB. Idiopathic palatal fibrosis. British journal of surgery.
1962 Jul;50(219):23-5.
29.Kamat MS, Vanaki SS, Puranik RS, Puranik SR, Kaur R. Oral
Candida carriage, quantification, and species characterization in
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders