PR-2-Activity_Sample
PR-2-Activity_Sample
PR-2-Activity_Sample
Statistic n Rule
Descriptive N/A Motivation Descriptive N/A N/A N/A N/A
1. What is the Score Statistics
mean, median,
mode, standard
deviation and
variance of the
respondents in
terms of:
a. Motivation
level and;
b. Score
Interpretation
A. Descriptive Statistics
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics between the Respondents’ Motivation Level and Score
Variables Mean Median Mode Standard Deviation Variance
Motivation 4.33 4.33 5 .552 .304
Score 59.02 56.00 52 18.874 356.223
This table presents the Mean, Median, and Mode of the Scores and Motivation Level of the Respondents. In the first
column, their motivation level has a mean of 4.33, median of 4.33, mode of 5, standard deviation of _____ and variance of
____. Meanwhile, their scores have a mean of 59.02, median of 56.00, mode of 52, standard deviation of ____ and variance
of ______.
B. Independent T-test
Table 2. Comparison between the Motivation level of Male and Female Respondents
Variables Mean SD df p
Motivation 178 .473
Male 4.36 .514
Female 4.30 .588
Table 1 shows that males were significantly different from females on motivational level, (p = .473). Inspection of the
two groups indicates that the motivational level for male students (4.36) is significantly higher than the motivational level
(4.30) for female students.
Table 2 shows that males were significantly different from females in terms of their scores, (p = .018). Inspection of
the two groups indicates that the score of female students (60.89) is significantly higher than the score (57.16) of male
students.
C. Analysis of Variance
Table 4. Comparison between the Motivation Level of Respondents’ Low, Average and High SES
A statistically significant difference was found among three levels of SES namely Low, Average and High in terms of
their motivation level, F(2, 102) = 5.097, p < .05. Table 3 shows that the mean in the motivation level is 4.02 for low SES,
4.14 for average SES, and 4.34 for high SES. Post hoc Tukey HSD Test indicate that (discuss levels of IV that return
statistically significant different means).
D. Bivariate Correlation
Table 5. Bivariate correlation between the Motivation Level of Respondents’ Low, Average and High SES
Variables p-value Pearson Correlation Coefficient, r
SES .002 0.750
Score
To investigate if there was a statistically significant association between SES and Score, a correlation was
computed. The Pearson’s r was calculated, r(180) = .750, p < .05. The direction of the correlation was positive, which
means that ________________ tend to have a higher ________ and vice versa.
Bivariate Linear Regression was conducted to investigate whether the students’ scores in diagnostic test significantly
predict their scores in the summative test. Results revealed that this predictor accounts about 20% of the variance of the
predicted variable. Further, ANOVA results showed that this prediction is significant, F=25.716, p<.05.
The beta coefficient presented in Table 3 shows that a unit increment in the diagnostic test translates to 0.447 units
increase in the summative test.