Untitled Document
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
11/19/24
Kaylee Dore
Standardized Testing
Oftentimes parents and students just get notified when testing is starting in their
classroom but don’t take some time to dive into standardized testing. “Standardized testing is a
method of assessment built on the principle of consistency: all test takers are required to answer
the same questions and all answers are graded in the same, predetermined way” (Top Hat). The
problem I have as well as many other people have with standardized testing is how effective
these tests truly are. Why do we force our kids and students to sit down for hours and take these
tests? Are these tests beneficial to students or just beneficial for funding purposes only? In this
essay I will explore the background of standardized testing, the positive and negative effects
“Tests have been a fixture in America’s education since the decades of the 20th century,
when they were used to make decisions about matters such as promotion to the next grade level,
graduation in college mission (Ravitch). In the early 20th century, IQ tests were introduced. By
the mid 20th century, standardized tests were made to assess students' performances in the
United States. Standardized tests were introduced during the same time of the SAT and ACT for
college admissions (Madaus). During this time many people thought that standardized tests
would help prepare students for the SAT and ACT tests in order to get into college.
Advocates for standardized testing argue that these tests provide an objective measure of
students' performances. One of the major advantages of standardized tests is that these tests
allow for comparisons across different schools and districts. Although this may not seem like a
major deal, in reality being able to compare test scores across different schools and districts helps
identify areas in need of improvement within each school. Advocators like these tests because
they are given under nearly identical testing conditions, and are graded by a machine or blind
reviewer (Aaron). This doesn’t allow any room for any error like favoritism or leniency. These
tests are intended to provide an accurate, unfiltered measure of what a student knows.
Standardized tests also hold schools accountable for student outcomes, motivating educators to
enhance their teaching methods (Linn). Additionally, standardized testing can serve as a tool for
Despite its advantages, standardized testing has several major disadvantages. Critics
argue that these tests fail to capture a student's full academic abilities as they tend to emphasize
memorization and specific content knowledge leaving behind critical thinking and problem
solving skills. On top of all of these disadvantages, such high stakes associated with these tests
lead to unnecessary stress for students, educators, administrators and parents. There is also
concern that standardized testing unfairly affects students from marginalized backgrounds. “As a
result of the pressure to raise test scores, cheating has taken place in many different forms and on
all levels, but mostly in schools serving low income, minority students” (Tienken). Students feel
so much pressure to do well on these tests they are doing everything possible even if it means
cheating especially students who struggle more and need extra help but don’t get it. Not to
mention that emphasizing these standardized tests puts more pressure on the teachers to teach
based on these tests and narrows the curriculum due to the high stakes of these tests. Lastly,
many people feel that standardized testing is so emphasized so their school gets more funding
and doesn’t lose any funding. This puts a lot of pressure on teachers and administrators as they
proposed. One approach is doing performance-based assessments, this would have students
doing projects, portfolios and presentations. This allows for a more comprehensive
(Wiggins). This also gives the students some creativity while still showing their knowledge.
Another alternative proposed is formative assessments. This involves constant feedback and
evaluation throughout the learning process. This promotes continuous learning and growth while
allowing teachers to Adjust based on their students' needs. Some people even advocate for
standardized testing but with a combination of other evaluation methods to give a more overall
In conclusion, while standardized testing has been Very important for educational
assessments, its effectiveness remains in question. The objective nature of standardized tests can
allow comparisons, accountability and unfiltered measurements of what a student knows, the
disadvantages such as stress, inequality, and lack of focus on content knowledge raises major
concern. So, the big question that will never be able to be answered but provokes many different
thoughts is: Do standardized tests accurately represent students and are they truly beneficial? As
the educational system continues to evolve, it is important and critical that educators continue to
explore and use alternative assessment methods that better capture students' learning.
Work Cited
Standardized test definition and meaning (2019) Top Hat. Available at:
https://tophat.com/glossary/s/standardized-test/ (Accessed: 30 November 2024).
Tienken, C.H., & Zhao, Y. (2013). How common standards and standardized testing widen
the opportunity gap. In P.L. Carter & K.G. Welner (eds.) Closing the opportunity gap:
What America must do to give every child an even chance (pp. 11-22). Oxford.
Ravitch, D. (2010). The trouble with accountability. In The death and life of the great
American school system (pp. 149-168). Basic Books.
Churchill, A. and Murray, J. (no date) Bless the tests: Three reasons for standardized
testing, The Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Available at:
https://fordhaminstitute.org/national/commentary/bless-tests-three-reasons-standardized-te
sting (Accessed: 30 November 2024).