Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Pareto

    Uploaded by

    Anya Forger
    a note for pareto a quality control tool

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Pareto

    Uploaded by

    Anya Forger
    1 views2 pages
    a note for pareto a quality control tool

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    a note for pareto a quality control tool

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    1 views2 pages

    Pareto

    Uploaded by

    Anya Forger
    a note for pareto a quality control tool

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Students: Milbert Maravilleza & Khian Rey Jimenez Date: 11/26/24

    Year & Sec: BSIT-3B Instructor: Mrs. Christel Nuñez-Ygot

    Pareto Analysis Activity

    Defect Type Frequency Percentage Cumulative Percentage


    Machine Malfunction 20 34% 34%
    Incorrect Assembly 12 20% 54%
    Material Shortage 7 12% 66%
    Missing Tools 10 17% 83%
    Faulty Components 7 12% 95%
    Human Error 3 5% 100%
    Total 59 100%
    A team at a manufacturing plant wanted to identify the most common production issues
    causing delays. They asked the staff to record the type of issues encountered during the
    assembly process over a two-week period. Afterward, they collected the data and tallied the
    results by specific issue.

    Pareto Chart of Defect Types


    25 120%
    20 100%100%
    95% 80%
    15 83%
    66% 60%
    10 54%
    34% 40%
    Frequency

    5 20%
    0 0%
    on y e s ts r
    bl g ol en ro
    cti m rta To n Er
    lf u
    n se o g po an
    A s Sh in m
    M
    a
    ct ia
    l iss Co
    m
    Hu
    ne rre er M tl y
    hi co at
    a c In M F au
    M

    Defect types

    Conclusion:
    Priority should be given to addressing Machine Malfunction (34%), Incorrect Assembly (20%),
    and Missing Tools (17%) first, as resolving these defects will eliminate 71% of the issues.
    Following this, addressing Material Shortage (12%) will increase the resolution rate to 83%,
    aligning with the 80/20 rule. The remaining issues, Faulty Components (12%) and Human Error
    (5%), are less critical and can be addressed later.

    You might also like