Contempt petition-1945-2017-SCI-Order-07092018

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

ITEM NOS.1 & 56 COURT NO.

4 SECTION XIV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1921/2017 in C.A. No. 6950/2009

RANBIR SINGH Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

S.K. ROY, CHAIRMAN, LIFE INSURANCE CORP.


OF INDIA AND ANR. Respondent(s)

(IA 48898/2018-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT,
89724/2018-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT)

WITH
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1922-1923/2017 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)
(FOR impleading party ON IA 37941/2018
FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 37941/2018
FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 37942/2018
FOR impleading party ON IA 70459/2018
FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 70459/2018)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1924-1925/2017 in C.A. No. 6952/2009 (XIV)


(IN R.P.(C) NO.2993/2015, IN CURATIVE PET(C) NO.25/2017)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1944/2017 in C.A. No. 6956/2009 (XIV)


(FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 37932/2018)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1945/2017 in C.A. No. 6956/2009 (XIV)


(FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 16380/2018
FOR [I/A TO PLACE ON RECORD LIST OF EMPLOYEE/WORKMEN] ON IA
38148/2018)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1965-1967/2017 in C.A. No. 6953/2009 (XIV)


(IN C.A. 6953/2009, IN C.P.(C) NO.637/2015)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1968-1969/2017 in C.A. No. 6953/2009 (XIV)


(IN C.A. 6953/2009, IN C.P.(C) NO.637/2015)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 31-32/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)


(IN C.A. NO.6950/2009, IN C.P. NO.459/2015)
(IA No.7430/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

Diary No(s). 1520/2018 (XIV)

SLP(C) No. 5494-5499/2018 (IX)


Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
NARENDRA PRASAD
Date: 2018.09.08

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 812/2018 in C.A. No. 6953/2009 (XIV)


12:27:51 IST
Reason:

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 813/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

1
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 814/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 825/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 824/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)


(FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 32041/2018)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 826/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 952/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1043/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

Diary No(s). 13484/2018 IN C.A. NO.6950/2009 (XIV)


(FOR [SEEKING PERMISSION TO FILE CONTEMPT PETITION] ON IA
52665/2018)

Diary No(s). 13488/2018 IN C.A. NO.6950/2009 (XIV)


( FOR [SEEKING PERMISSION TO FILE CONTEMPT PETITION] ON IA
52680/2018)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 986/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 988/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 987/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1035/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

Diary No(s). 17640/2018 IN C.A. NO.6950/2009 ()


(FOR[ SEEKING PERMISSION TO FILE CONTEMPT PETITION ] ON IA
68672/2018)

Diary No(s). 17645/2018 IN C.A. NO.6950/2009 ()


(FOR[ SEEKING PERMISSION TO FILE CONTEMPT PETITION ] ON IA
68694/2018)

Diary No(s). 17650/2018 IN C.A. NO.6950/2009 ()


(FOR[ SEEKING PERMISSION TO FILE CONTEMPT PETITION ] ON IA
68719/2018)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1069/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1288/2018 in C.A. No. 6954/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1211/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1210/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1298/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1328/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

2
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1330/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1331/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1657/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1659/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1658/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1660/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1661/2018 in C.A. No. 6950/2009 (XIV)

Date : 07-09-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Basant,Sr.Adv.


Mr. M.A. Chinnasamy, AOR
Ms. C. Rubavathi,Adv.
Mr. S. Peer Mohamad,Adv.
Mr. V. Senthil Kumar,Adv.
Mr. P. Rajaram,Adv.
Mr. P. Mahadavan,Adv.

Mr. R.S. Suri,Sr.Adv.


Mr. B.K. Pal, AOR
Mr. Varun Khana,Adv.
Mr. P.V. Singh,Adv.

Mr. S. Nandakumar,Adv.
Mr. P. Vasu,Adv.
Mr. M.P. Srinivasa Rao,Adv.
Mr. M.S. Saran Kumar,Adv.
Ms. Deepika Nandakumar,Adv.
Mr. Sugam Kumar Jha,Adv.
Mr. Ram Dhan Singh Narwal,Adv.
Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR

Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR


Mr. Ashutosh Yadav,Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Singh,Adv.

Mrs. Anjani Aiyagari, AOR

Mr. Bankey Bihari Sharma, AOR


Mr. Ravi Prakash Jadhav,Adv.

Mr. M.M. Singh,Adv.

3
Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR
Mr. Anurag Bhardwaj,Adv.
Mr. Pramod Kumar,Adv.
Mr. Jitendra Kr.Adv.
Mr. Prashant Kr. Singh,Adv.

Mr. Mahesh Srivastava,Adv.


Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, AOR

Mr. Rajendra Sahu,Adv.


Mr. Rishabh Sahu,Adv.
Ms. Hema Sahu,Adv.
Mr. C.L. Sahu, AOR

Mr. Balraj Dewan, AOR

Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran, AOR


Mr. K. Ethiraj,Adv.
Mr. P. Rajaram,Adv.

Ms. Divya Roy, AOR

Mrs. Kawaljit Kochar,Adv.


Mr. Kusum Chaudhary, AOR

Mr. G. Ananda Selvam,Adv.


Mr. K. M. Samy,Adv.
Mr. Jay Kishor Singh,Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. K.K. Venugopal,AG


Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, AOR
Mr. Anmol Tayal,Adv.
Mr. Ankur,Adv.
Mr. Vinay Ratnakar,Adv.

Mr. Pardeep Gupta,Adv.


Mr. Parinav Gupta,Adv.
Mrs. Mansi Gupta,Adv.
Mr. Wazir Singh Malik,Adv.
Mr. Moazzam Ali,Adv.
Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv.

Mr. V.N. Raghupathy,Adv.


Mr. Md. Apzal Ansari,Adv.
Mr. Parikshit P. Angagi,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following


O R D E R

The crucial dispute in these proceedings is regarding the


beneficiaries of the Award dated 18.06.2001 in I.D. No.27 of 1991
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT), New Delhi.

4
The Award has been finally upheld by this Court in the judgment
rendered in Tamil Nadu Terminated Full Time Temporary LIC Employees
Association v. Life Insurance Corporation of India and Others,
reported in (2015) 9 SCC 62.
Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General for India
appearing for the respondents/LIC, submits that for want of
documents/materials, the LIC is not in a position to verify as to
who are the actual beneficiaries of the Award. Learned counsel
appearing for the Union(s) and the individual workers, however,
would submit that despite producing the records and despite
availability of the original records with the LIC, no positive
decision is taken by it.
Faced with such a situation, we are of the view that the CGIT,
New Delhi should look into the matter with regard to the claims
made by the Union(s)/individual workmen, regarding entitlement to
the benefits under the Award and submit a report to this Court.
Accordingly, we direct the CGIT, New Delhi to look into the claims
made by the Union(s)/individual Workmen and submit a report to this
Court within three months.
There is also a dispute raised by some of the respondents that
the benefit of Award should be made available to those who have
been engaged as Badli workers after 4.3.1991. That is a matter for
interpretation by this Court. For the time being, CGIT, New Delhi
would limit its enquiry only to the claims of the Badli workers
between 20.05.1989 and 04.03.1991, as already indicated by this
Court in the order dated 11.05.2018.
We do not find that it is a case of contempt. Therefore, the
contempt notices are discharged. However, the
applications/petitions be kept pending for the purpose of necessary
assistance to the Court.
List on 12.12.2018.

(NARENDRA PRASAD) (RENU DIWAN)


COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

You might also like