Geochemical and Isotopic Evidence of Groundwater S
Geochemical and Isotopic Evidence of Groundwater S
Geochemical and Isotopic Evidence of Groundwater S
Abstract
The city of Essaouira is located along the north-west coast of Morocco, where groundwater is the main source of drinking,
domestic and agricultural water. In recent decades, the salinity of groundwater has increased, which is why geochemical
techniques and environmental isotopes have been used to determine the main sources of groundwater recharge and
salinization. The hydrochemical study shows that for the years 1995, 2007, 2016 and 2019, the chemical composition of
groundwater in the study area consists of HCO3–Ca–Mg, Cl–Ca–Mg, SO4–Ca and Cl–Na chemical facies. The results show
that from 1995 to 2019, electrical conductivity increased and that could be explained by a decrease in annual rainfall in
relation to climate change and water–rock interaction processes. Geochemical and environmental isotope data show
that the main geochemical mechanisms controlling the hydrochemical evolution of groundwater in the Cenomanian–
Turonian aquifer are the water–rock interaction and the cation exchange process. The diagram of δ2H = 8 * δ18O + 10
shows that the isotopic contents are close or above to the Global Meteoric Water Line, which suggests that the aquifer
is recharged by precipitation of Atlantic origin. In conclusion, groundwater withdrawal should be well controlled to
prevent groundwater salinization and further intrusion of seawater due to the lack of annual groundwater recharge in
the Essaouira region.
* Otman EL Mountassir, [email protected] | 1High Energy and Astrophysics Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia,
Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech, Morocco. 2International Water Research Institute (IWRI), Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P),
Benguerir, Morocco. 3Mohammadia School of Engineers, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco. 4Institut de Recherche Pour Le
Développement (IRD), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR), Centre D’études Spatiales de La Biosphère (CESBIO), Université de Toulouse,
Toulouse, France. 5Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, C2TN/IST, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Vol.:(0123456789)
have been employed in regional groundwater studies at aquifers (Plio-Quaternary and Cenomanian–Turonian).
different locations across the world. The works of [18–24] The goal of the current study system is to provide base-
have demonstrated effectiveness of this approach in line information on: (1) the hydrochemical characteristics
understanding recharge pattern, origin and residence of groundwater, (2) the key processes that deteriorate the
time of groundwater from specific sites to basin-scale quality of groundwater and (3) the sources of groundwater
hydrogeological investigations. Most of these studies recharge and their mixing pathways.
have contributed vital information and knowledge that
are useful in global groundwater resource management.
Dissolved major ions and stable environmental isotopes 2 Climate
(δ18O and δ2H) have been used to describe the sources
of salinization and hydrogeochemical processes affecting The Meskala–Ouazzi sub-basin is located in the north-
groundwater quality in this complex system [25–27]. In eastern part of Essaouira city (Fig. 1). It is bordered on
addition, the objective of this research is to determine the the north by Jbel Hadid, on the south by Igrounzar Wadi,
main source(s) of groundwater mineralization in different on the east by the Bouabout region and on the west by
Vol:.(1234567890)
the Atlantic Ocean (Fig. 1). This study is crossed by Wadi pH, electrical conductivity and TDS) were taken in the field
Ouazzi and Wadi Igrounzar whose natural outlet is the using the multi-parameter HI9828. The depth to water
Atlantic Ocean and has a total area of 1260 km2. The basin in each well was measured using a sound piezometric
is under semiarid climate with irregular rainfall of about probe. The water samples were taken after pumping for
300 mm year−1 and the temperature oscillates around 10–15 min to obtain representative values under ambient
20 °C [9, 22]. aquifer conditions. Samples were collected in clean poly-
ethylene bottle of 500 mL and then stored at a tempera-
ture below 5 °C before analysis in the laboratory.
3 Geological and hydrogeological settings Chemical analyses were carried out at the Laboratory
of Geosciences and Environment of the Ecole Normale
Geologically, the upstream part of the study area (Fig. 2) Superieure of Marrakech (Morocco). The contents of chlo-
is dominated by the middle and upper Cretaceous out- ride (Cl−) and sulphate ( SO42−) anions were determined to
crop (Albian, Vraconian, Cenomanian and Turonian). adopt the Mohr technique and the nephelometric tech-
These formations consist of banks of limestone and nique, respectively. Ca2+ and Mg2+ concentrations were
dolomitic intercalated with marls and sandstones. The determined using the EDTA titrimetric method. HCO3− and
Albian and Vraconian are represented by green marls CO3− contents were analysed by titration using 0.1 M HCl
(thickness 160 m) and dolomitic limestones (thickness acid. Na+ and K+ were measured by flame spectrometry at
140 m). The Cenomanian is characterized by an alterna- the University Center for Analysis, Technology Transfer &
tion of grey marls with anhydrite, lumachellic limestones Incubation Expertise (CUAE2TI) at the Faculty of Sciences
and sandstones in small proportions (thickness 200 m) (Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra, Morocco). The ionic balance
[28, 29]. The Turonian consists of limestones where silica for all samples was within ± 10%.
is very abundant. The downstream part of the study area Stable isotope levels were measured by laser spectros-
is characterized by the outcrop of the Plio-Quaternary copy. The measurements are expressed in per mille com-
formations. These are represented by conglomerates, pared to the international Standard Mean Ocean Water
alluviums, colluvium and sandstones (Fig. 2). (SMOW) with an analytical uncertainty of ± 0.1‰ for δ18O
Hydrogeologically, two major aquifer systems have and ± 1‰ for δ2H. The analyses of stable isotopes (δ2H and
been identified: the first is a multi-layered aquifer consist- δ18O) were carried out at Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias
ing primarily of Plio-Quaternary detrital deposits (sand- Nucleares laboratory (CTN/IST, Universidade de Lisboa).
stones, conglomerates and sands), responsible for much The methodology adopted thus makes it possible to
of the population’s water supply. This comes into close explore the potentials of a multidisciplinary approach,
contact with the formations of the Triassic and Cretaceous centred on the use of stable isotopes, to determine the
below. The second is the calco-dolomitic layers of the recharge areas of the main sources studied. The technique
Cenomanian–Turonian age [28, 29], reflecting the karstic of interpolation (IDW) via a geographical information sys-
aquifer; according to [28, 29], the Turonian horizon flour- tem (GIS) was used to compile spatiotemporal distribution
ishes between 400 and 700 m altitude (a.s.l.) on the Jbel maps of electrical conductivity.
Kchoula, while the Plio-Quaternary layers grow between
sea level and 300 m altitude (a.s.l.). Transmissivity levels
are approximately 4.5 × 10–5 to 6 × 10–2 m2/s from pump- 5 Results and discussion
ing experiments conducted inside the Plio-Quaternary
aquifer [28], while the hydraulic has a permeability of 5.1 Piezometry
3.2 × 10–2 m/s in the downstream part of the study area
[29]. Four piezometers (a-d) were used to track the
Meskala–Ouazzi sub-basin piezometric level. Furthermore,
Fig. 3 shows that heavy rains cause a continuous increase
in the piezometric level, indicating that groundwater levels
4 Methodology are highly dependent on precipitation. The four piezom-
eters studied display a general downward trend, despite
Four water sampling campaigns (112 boreholes, wells and a small increase in the piezometric level with intense pre-
springs) were performed in 1995 (18 samples), 2007 (25 cipitation [4]. Like other basins in coastal areas [30], the
samples), 2016 (19 samples) and 2019 (50 samples) in the Essaouira basin has not been spared the effect of climate
Meskala–Ouazzi region of Essaouira basin (Fig. 1). Meas- change, which is added to the effect of the overexploi-
urements of physico-chemical parameters (temperature, tation of groundwater. This effect is manifested by (a) an
Vol.:(0123456789)
increase in population of 9% leading to an increase in irri- of groundwater with an increase in salinity. This deple-
gated land (1300 ha), (b) upward trend in temperatures tion is due to marine intrusion and a decline in aquifer
with 1.5 °C warming and a general downward trend in recharge rates due to the drop in precipitation result of
precipitation of 12% and (c) a deterioration in the quality climate change [4, 17].
Vol:.(1234567890)
Fig. 3 Piezometric levels for the period 2006–2016 in the study area
Vol.:(0123456789)
Fig. 4 Hydrochemistry of the four campaigns 1995, 2007, 2016 and 2019 in the study area. a Piper diagram; b correlation between
Ca2+ + Mg2+ (meq/L) and HCO3− + SO42− (meq/L)
Fig. 5 Bivariate plots of electrical conductivity (EC) plotted against chemical constituents of groundwater
Mg2+, SO42− and Cl− were found to be the main contribu- calcite, dolomite and gypsum dissolution is prevailing in
tors to groundwater mineralization. For the groundwater the aquifer. If the samples fall below the 1:1 line, it reflects
from the study area, the main elements responsible for the dominance of ion exchange reactions, but if they plot
groundwater mineralization were M g2+, SO42−, Na+ and above the 1:1 line, then there is the presence of reverse ion
−
HCO3 [6, 21]. exchange reactions [32].
The diagram of Ca2+ vs Mg2+ (Fig. 6a) indicates that The Na+ vs Cl− diagram (Fig. 6b) indicates that most
most points are aligned on the straight line of slope 1. samples are aligned or before on the 1:1 axis, and
This reflects the contribution of dolomite dissolution to the concentration of C l − is correlated with N a + with a
the mineralization of groundwater, especially in waters strong correlation R2 = 0.9, indicating that halite disso-
sampled in 2016. If the samples plot close to the 1:1 line, lution may be the major reaction influencing the water
Vol:.(1234567890)
chemistry; high values of C l − and N a + can be resulted involvement of calcite dissolution in groundwater min-
from evaporation and the seawater intrusion in ground- eralization in the study area.
water in coastal areas. The water sample points with low On a plot of C a2+ and S O42− (Fig. 6d), majority of the
densities of N a + and C l − are basically distributed near samples for the four campaigns (1995, 2007, 2016 and
the 1:1 line under the action of atmospheric precipi- 2019) plot close to the 1:1 line and thus, with high corre-
tation and rock–water interactions. When entering the lation R2 = 0.8, indicate gypsum dissolution. However, the
discharge area (downstream area), the groundwater is samples that plot below and above the 1:1 line suggest
gradually affected by surface water recharging, human interplay of ion exchange and reverse ion exchange reac-
activities and evaporation. Both N a + and C l − begin to tions due to excess SO42− and Ca2+, respectively (Fig. 6d).
increase and the distribution of the groundwater sam-
ple points along y = x also begins to show a trend of 5.3 Spatiotemporal evolution of electrical
unevenness [34]. This is also confirmed by the plot conductivity
shown in Fig. 8. No relation had been mentioned
between Ca2+ and H CO3−. For the four campaigns (1995, Electrical conductivity (EC) values range from 615 to
2007, 2016 and 2019), the interaction between C a2+ and 5738 μS/cm with an average of 2449 μS/cm for 2019
−
H CO 3 (Fig. 6c) is poor. This illustrates the negligible samples, 803 to 4450 μS/cm with an average of 2345 μS/
Vol.:(0123456789)
Table 1 Chemical composition Sample pH T EC Ca2+ Mg2+ Na+ K+ HCO3− Cl− SO42− NO3− IB
of analysed samples of four
campaigns 1995, 2007, 2016 °C μS/cm meq/L %
and 2019
Campaign 1995
E1 19 1980 17.13 17.65 9 0.12 8.4 17.13 22.79 0.14 −5
E2 18 2600 16.21 17.73 19.01 0.12 7.56 30.54 16.35 1.09 −2
E3 17 3060 24.59 14.85 23.01 0.08 3.6 49.67 13.19 0 −3
E4 19 1800 11.44 1.24 12.01 0.13 7.84 21.13 3.8 0.93 − 15
E5 20 2230 13.33 23.15 10 0.15 6.92 27.43 13.13 0 −1
E6 18 1820 8.38 11.57 16.01 0.1 6.44 25.04 2.25 0.47 3
E7 20 804 5.35 5.48 5.5 0.03 5.28 9.92 0.88 1.52 −4
E8 19 2460 4.19 8 16.12 0.05 6.44 17.53 2.07 1.33 2
E9 19 1330 8.09 6.4 9.5 0.07 6.32 13.72 2.01 2.81 −2
E10 19 1080 7.35 5.8 6.5 0.05 5.32 13.22 0.81 1.3 −2
E11 16 382 2.63 3.18 2.5 0.09 2.76 6.41 0.49 0.36 −9
E12 20 1410 7.78 10.98 8.5 0.19 7.12 12.32 10.26 1.33 −6
E13 19.5 1460 7.27 7.92 10.5 0.42 7.48 14.32 3.15 5.24 −7
E14 18 640 4.35 6.8 3.02 0.08 6.52 5.21 2.91 0 −1
E15 18 1080 8.1 9.04 5 0.12 6.8 7.61 6.47 2.21 −2
E16 17.5 795 6.23 6.48 4 0.04 5.88 9.01 4.32 1.14 − 10
E17 18 700 6.07 5.73 3 0.03 6.24 7.11 3.75 0.78 −9
E18 19 1290 8.58 10.41 6.5 0.11 6.4 12.82 7.52 0 −2
Campaign 2007
E19 7.28 22 2600 7.49 8.52 7.27 0.14 6.2 17.9 1.79 1.38 −8
E20 7.24 20 1500 4.77 6.85 3.13 0.06 5.6 4.35 4.06 0.8 0
E21 7.5 17.4 998 3.92 2.9 2.96 0.08 5.25 2.82 0.49 0.75 3
E22 7.39 21.9 1065 3.14 4.56 2.17 0.05 5.5 3.07 1.57 0.64 −4
E23 7.69 21.3 994 3.64 4.22 1.89 0.06 5 1.93 1.42 0.69 4
E24 7.64 17.4 3880 34.03 27.81 2.44 0.32 4.4 4.98 49.81 0 4
E25 7.6 18.3 1600 3.59 6.21 2.84 0.11 5.65 4.67 4.59 0.36 −9
E26 7.11 21.5 2750 17.91 19.95 2.27 0.21 5.75 3.23 27.62 0 5
E27 6.9 26.6 2500 13.36 13.09 9.93 0.18 6 16.08 8 1.23 8
E28 6.9 22.8 2800 10.61 14.72 10.06 0.14 6.6 15.83 7.61 1.23 6
E29 6.75 22.2 3100 12.75 16.49 13.45 0.12 5.5 23.73 8.65 1.05 5
E30 6.65 24.8 2700 9.4 14.66 11.11 0.12 7.5 17.22 7.77 1.02 3
E31 7.35 24.4 2540 11.64 14.48 8.43 0.18 6 14.03 8.71 1.05 8
E32 7.35 22.2 2970 15.02 7.41 11.11 1.7 3 18.83 4.46 3.45 8
E33 7.8 23.2 900 3.88 4.37 5.18 0.36 5.83 4.05 3.68 0 1
E34 7.1 22.1 1900 10.97 10.44 8.4 0.12 3.28 31.03 0.16 0 −7
E35 7.65 26.4 3740 28.88 23.26 4.43 0.28 4.1 8.84 49.94 0.39 −5
E36 7.4 25 1220 2.46 4.33 5.38 0.36 5.5 3.61 4.47 0 −4
E37 7 26.2 2300 6.51 11.5 4.74 0.14 6.5 12.12 7.4 0.21 −7
E38 7.15 24.4 966 2.92 4.63 2.06 0.06 6.75 2.03 0.47 0.31 1
E39 6.85 29.5 1810 10.53 9.49 4.84 0.16 6.7 11.97 7.8 0.35 −3
E40 7.1 25.8 1400 8.18 6.39 4.49 0.11 6.4 10.21 1.87 0.73 0
E41 7.35 23.5 1500 4.87 4.25 6.98 0.09 3.61 13.88 1.86 0.15 −9
E42 7.1 22.8 1500 6.29 9.95 4.21 0.11 7.5 6.61 6.41 0.63 −1
E43 7.05 20 1867 6.84 8.15 5.29 0.35 6.26 8.52 6.55 0.58 −3
Campaign 2016
E44 7.49 19.5 2190 10.69 8.87 4.62 0.24 5.2 7.98 10.34 1.27 −1
E45 7.63 21 1188 5.78 5.24 1.61 0.1 4.2 2.17 5.74 0.52 0
E46 7.37 19.2 1300 5.62 5.97 2.48 0.09 5.6 3.35 5.03 0.47 −1
E47 7.23 22.1 1249 5.64 4.61 2.35 0.07 4.7 3.52 3.72 0.69 0
Vol:.(1234567890)
Table 1 (continued) Sample pH T EC Ca2+ Mg2+ Na+ K+ HCO3− Cl− SO42− NO3− IB
°C μS/cm meq/L %
E48 7.31 19.8 803 3.79 1.14 2.61 0.01 3.6 2.35 0.37 1.3 0
E49 7.11 18.5 2050 9.36 9 4.8 0.14 3.8 5.79 11.91 2.05 −1
E50 7.23 18 3250 10.14 9.23 14.16 0.05 6.1 22.56 2.61 1.55 1
E51 7.03 22.1 3050 27.03 10.59 3.08 0.13 3.6 3.52 32.77 0 1
E52 6.91 23.7 1800 8.78 7.99 4.21 0.09 6.2 8.02 5.91 0.32 2
E53 6.87 20.9 1883 5.12 3.53 8.57 0.02 4.1 10.25 1.55 1.58 −1
E54 6.99 23 4150 9.28 15.55 19.25 0.05 5.8 29.27 5.62 1.83 2
E55 7.15 23.3 1894 6.85 6.73 5.55 0.17 6.5 8.27 4.29 0 1
E56 7.07 21.2 1933 6.82 6.48 6.59 0.13 6 7.73 4.88 1.07 1
E57 6.99 23.4 2550 13.28 12.54 5.59 0.07 6.4 8.01 16.68 0.58 0
E58 7.04 22.1 2020 5.97 5.97 8.01 0.33 7.1 11.3 1.43 0 1
E59 7.33 24 2550 7.48 9.89 8.73 0.09 5 12.66 7.06 0.97 1
E60 6.99 23.2 3100 10.62 11.85 11.28 0.08 6 17.57 8.49 0.99 1
E61 7.32 19.6 3150 9.63 9.58 16.24 0 4.1 24.28 3.06 1.13 4
E62 7.11 20.5 4450 14.55 6.87 22.21 2.62 4.5 29.08 4.31 6.31 2
Campaign 2019
E63 7.44 21.48 4530 14.64 18.93 17.18 1.11 8.16 34.05 19.67 0.49 −9
E64 7.82 18.02 2249 7.60 7.94 8.59 0.26 6.12 16.01 5.59 0.97 −8
E65 7.13 21.71 2179 9.42 11.64 5.47 0.25 9.40 18.03 1.98 0.87 −6
E66 8.38 17.8 615 4.09 3.38 1.42 0.13 4.00 5.23 0.81 0.07 −6
E67 7.71 20.75 2381 9.04 8.40 5.69 0.22 9.80 13.20 4.77 0.19 −9
E68 7.45 20.18 3842 18.24 8.16 9.82 0.39 6.96 18.23 16.91 0.23 −7
E69 7.55 20.27 2199 13.12 7.39 6.93 0.20 5.88 15.22 5.90 0.13 1
E70 7.2 23.63 1075 5.92 7.89 1.19 0.06 8.00 9.21 0.39 0.29 −9
E71 7.21 24 972 5.12 5.12 6.66 0.05 8.00 6.01 0.57 1.74 2
E72 7.51 22 1888 6.72 8.07 5.25 0.12 6.96 12.82 2.34 0.48 −6
E73 7.45 21.06 4380 21.47 6.16 17.16 0.32 8.60 38.05 3.69 1.94 −7
E74 7.66 21.35 2500 7.50 7.71 12.74 0.37 7.80 24.03 0.26 0.11 −6
E75 7.6 20.9 3016 8.40 6.00 12.41 0.50 8.00 19.23 2.04 2.58 −8
E76 7.78 19.96 736 6.99 4.61 0.79 0.04 4.76 5.33 0.73 0.39 5
E77 7.55 18.91 882 9.03 7.31 0.65 0.09 9.00 6.81 1.24 0.29 −1
E78 7.76 20.95 796 5.16 6.64 0.54 0.04 8.20 5.21 0.32 0.21 −6
E79 7.45 21.44 1510 8.00 9.09 3.54 0.07 8.00 11.62 3.14 0.31 −5
E80 7.42 20.8 1559 6.60 7.88 3.61 0.08 6.96 13.22 1.68 0.19 − 10
E81 7.08 19.45 3690 12.88 13.57 13.01 0.13 9.40 32.45 3.69 1.35 −8
E82 7.16 20.3 5738 24.16 8.40 23.51 0.30 9.20 51.27 5.59 1.13 −9
E83 7.78 21.26 1020 5.60 6.67 1.92 0.10 7.96 6.41 1.55 0.35 −6
E84 7.76 19.3 1336 6.78 7.83 2.84 0.25 7.16 8.41 5.47 0.28 −9
E85 7.99 18 2750 13.44 13.78 4.30 0.32 6.20 12.82 17.05 1.03 −8
E86 7.47 21.4 1411 6.72 8.29 3.26 0.08 8.20 7.61 5.34 0.23 −8
E87 7.4 19.63 1584 7.84 9.10 4.37 0.14 7.80 8.81 8.71 0.08 −8
E88 7.98 14.85 1843 7.28 7.51 4.35 0.55 7.80 11.62 1.61 1.26 −6
E89 7.08 16.5 1574 5.12 7.48 3.53 0.13 6.72 8.49 2.68 0.48 −6
E90 7.57 20.3 1543 9.12 14.47 4.19 0.43 7.12 10.41 7.98 0.23 5
E91 7.09 17.25 3646 38.40 8.96 2.43 0.25 8.80 9.61 40.42 0.19 −8
E92 7.59 18.04 3389 20.96 21.43 6.60 0.29 11.20 18.83 26.95 0.65 −8
E93 7.53 17.5 1192 6.72 5.53 3.46 0.12 6.23 8.81 2.16 0.23 −5
E94 7.2 22.15 1261 6.24 8.01 2.43 0.07 6.56 8.41 4.49 0.39 −8
E95 7.8 21.03 862 4.40 2.61 2.45 0.02 4.96 3.19 0.58 0.48 1
E96 7.24 20.5 4965 15.60 24.47 15.21 0.16 10.40 26.44 24.38 2.82 −7
Vol.:(0123456789)
Table 1 (continued) Sample pH T EC Ca2+ Mg2+ Na+ K+ HCO3− Cl− SO42− NO3− IB
°C μS/cm meq/L %
E97 7.01 22.83 2939 27.52 10.72 2.16 0.15 10.40 8.81 29.40 0.03 −9
E98 7.65 22.05 2440 9.51 11.95 4.98 0.85 14.72 13.62 3.63 0.06 −8
E99 7.4 22.9 3220 13.04 13.81 13.27 0.17 9.80 26.84 6.81 0.60 −4
E100 7.56 20.96 2230 6.48 3.20 9.13 0.06 6.87 12.53 1.89 0.23 −7
E101 7.56 21.45 2266 6.16 6.68 8.32 0.05 6.92 13.60 3.86 0.40 −8
E102 7.22 20.68 4277 12.32 6.08 16.88 4.33 7.40 31.24 3.26 2.74 −6
E103 7.28 20.8 2657 8.32 11.08 8.06 0.13 7.00 19.23 6.02 0.73 −9
E104 7.3 19.15 4216 21.04 24.39 7.82 0.33 9.60 18.83 34.67 0.14 −8
E105 7.27 20.8 4349 9.77 15.11 19.72 0.19 8.16 36.67 8.16 1.05 −9
E106 7.43 20.8 3286 14.00 9.71 9.52 1.57 6.60 26.84 6.08 1.13 −8
E107 7.38 20.95 2140 5.38 7.38 8.37 0.11 8.56 13.20 2.22 0.46 −7
E108 7.18 22.2 2277 9.22 7.20 7.87 0.32 10.76 16.01 2.10 0.05 −8
E109 7.5 22.7 2148 7.72 10.14 6.31 0.09 8.40 15.22 3.88 0.35 −7
E110 7.32 21.5 2650 10.51 10.10 7.00 0.13 7.80 19.63 4.85 0.19 −8
E111 7.4 20.8 1873 5.76 3.84 8.07 0.08 5.32 12.40 2.34 0.48 −7
E112 7.4 19.2 4370 15.68 20.99 12.13 2.18 9.80 33.25 14.28 0.40 −6
cm for 2016 campaign waters, 900 to 3880 μS/cm with 5.5 Environmental isotopes (δ2H and δ18O)
an average of 2044 μS/cm for 2007 campaign waters
and 382 to 3060 μS/cm with an average of 1495 μS/ A total of 19 samples collected in 2016 were analysed for
cm for 1900 campaign waters (Table 1). However, an stable isotopes (δ18O and δ2H). Seven samples represent
increase in EC values has been observed from 1995 to the downstream of study area (Plio-Quaternary aquifer),
2019. The spatial distribution of EC values (Fig. 7a–d) for and 12 samples represent the upstream of study area
the four campaigns indicates that the salinity of ground- (Cenomanian–Turonian aquifer). For the upstream sam-
water in the study area where groundwater discharges ples, the oxygen-18 contents vary between a minimum of
into the Atlantic Ocean has risen over time, especially − 6.01‰ vs SMOW and a maximum of − 3.28‰ vs SMOW,
in 2019. with an average of − 5.04‰ vs SMOW. For deuterium, the
maximum value is − 21.2‰ vs SMOW and the minimum
5.4 Mechanisms controlling groundwater chemistry value equal to − 34.5.8‰ vs SMOW with an average of
− 29.8‰ vs SMOW (Table 2). As for the downstream sam-
The Gibbs diagram is an important tool for identifying ples, the contents of oxygen-18 vary between a minimum
these geochemical processes [35]. This consists of a of − 5.08‰ vs SMOW and a maximum of − 3.9‰ vs SMOW,
plot of the ratio of dominant cations Na/(Na + Ca) and with an average of − 4.63‰ vs SMOW. For deuterium, the
anions Cl/(Cl + HCO3) against the TDS to determine the maximum value is − 20.2‰ vs SMOW and the minimum
general mechanisms controlling the chemical composi- value equal to − 28.7‰ vs SMOW with an average of
tion of the studied groundwater. Essentially, groundwa- − 24.87‰ vs SMOW (Table 2). The results of isotopic analy-
ter chemistry is controlled by three dominant natural sis, the global meteoric water line [38] and the local mete-
mechanisms, including rock weathering dominance, oric line [39], were reported on the deuterium–oxygen 18
evaporation dominance and precipitation dominance diagram; this diagram (Fig. 9a) shows that two groups of
[36, 37]. As indicated in Fig. 8, the possible causes of cati- water can be distinguished.
ons and anions dominance in groundwater samples are For the isotopic characterization of study area, two
the water–rock interaction and evaporation processes. reference lines were used: the global meteoric water line
The dominance of calcium and bicarbonate ions in the (GMWL) following Eq. (1) [38],
groundwater samples is due to weathering process in
aquifer rocks. Evaporation greatly increases concentra- 𝛿 2 H = 8 ∗ 𝛿 18 O + 10. (1)
tions of ions formed by chemical weathering, leading to And the local meteoric water line of Essaouira basin
higher salinity. (LMWL) according to Eq. (2) [39]:
Vol:.(1234567890)
Fig. 7 Spatial distribution of EC in 1995 (a), 2007 (b), 2016 (c) and 2019 (d)
Vol.:(0123456789)
Fig. 8 Gibbs diagrams for the major ion composition of the groundwater in the study area
Vol:.(1234567890)
Table 2 Isotopic composition of analysed samples campaign 2016 salinity of the infiltration water that is ultimately attached
in Meskala–Ouazzi sub-basin to the water table. Infiltration water salinity is derived from
Sample pH T EC δ2H δ18O both the surface water and the soil along the paths [43,
°C µS/cm ‰ vs. SMOW 44]. Furthermore, independently of the isotopic exchange,
high concentrations of Cl− with low values of δ18O are
Upstream
associated with the processes of salt accumulation inside
EL1 7.2 19.5 2190 − 31.9 − 4.83
the aquifer (mineral dissolution and transpiration) as in
EL2 7.8 21 1188 − 34.4 − 5.16
samples El 16 and El 17.
EL3 7.4 19.2 1300 − 34.1 − 5.73
EL4 7.3 22.1 1249 − 34.5 − 5.52
EL5 7.5 19.8 803 − 28.8 − 4.63
6 Conclusion
EL6 7.7 18.5 2050 − 28.4 − 4.89
EL7 7.5 18 3250 − 21.2 − 3.28
The socio-economic development in the Essaouira
EL8 6.9 22.1 3050 − 32.9 − 6.01
basin depends heavily on groundwater resource; thus,
EL9 7.1 23.7 1800 − 28.8 − 5.5
the hydrochemical and isotopic studies made in this
EL10 7.5 20.9 1883 − 27.6 − 5.06
article aim to assess the process of salinization and
EL11 7.3 23 4150 − 24.3 − 4.61
recharge of the Plio-quaternary aquifer and Cenom-
EL12 7.1 23.4 2550 − 30.7 − 5.35
ano-Turonian aquifer given its strategic importance
Downstream
in the study area. Regarding hydrochemistry, with the
EL13 7.4 23.3 1894 − 24.2 − 4.34
observed increases in salinity, the chemical composi-
EL14 7.4 21.2 1933 − 26.8 − 4.88
tion of groundwater at a given sampling point did not
EL15 7.2 22.1 2020 − 22.7 − 4.58
improve. Furthermore, groundwater is mineralized,
EL16 7.2 24 2550 − 28.7 − 5.08
since EC values are between 1495 μS/cm for 1995 to
EL17 7.1 23.2 3100 − 27.8 −5
2449 μS/cm for 2019, explained by the decrease in the
EL18 7.3 20.8 3150 − 23.7 − 4.63
precipitation due to climate change and overexploita-
EL19 7.4 20.5 4450 − 20.2 − 3.9
tion. The main phenomenon controlling the salinity of
Min 6.9 18 803 − 34.5 − 6.01
the groundwater seems to be the dissolution of evapo-
Max 7.8 24 4450 − 20.2 − 3.28
rites (halite, gypsum and anhydrite) in the study area
Mean 7.33 21.38 2345.26 − 27.98 − 4.89
of Meskala–Ouazzi sub-basin. The results obtained in
Sd 0.22 1.82 983.68 4.42 0.64
the isotopic study showed that the groundwater of the
Cenemano-Turonian and Plio-Quaternary aquifer comes
from precipitation. According to the reports on deute-
recharge of groundwater (i.e. irrigation water, river water rium and oxygen-18, water quickly enters the aquifer
or precipitation) with a low Cl− the concentration contrib- without major change in the relative abundances of
utes to the enrichment of isotopic values as like in samples these two elements due to the phenomenon of evapo-
El 3 and El 4. ration, except for a few samples which are located in
The increase of the δ18O values along with C l− con- the recharge zone. The combination of chemical and
centrations enrichment could be a result of evaporation isotopic parameters, in particular C l− and δ18O, supports
(either during recharge, from shallow water levels, or the hydrochemical approach’s results by confirming that
seepage of sewage from the village of Meskala due to the the dissolution process is one of the key phenomena
absence of sanitation channels) as like in sample EL7, as leading to groundwater mineralization in the study
the evaporation process enriches both δ18O values and area. Knowledge of sources of groundwater recharge is
Cl− concentrations [42]. The δ18O values of groundwater essential for the protection and management of global
are enriched by surface water recharge (Wadi Igrounzar), aquifer systems, especially in regions where rainfall is
while the variation of Cl− concentrations depends on the likely to be significantly affected by climate change.
Vol.:(0123456789)
Fig. 9 Isotopic data in the study area. a δ18O versus δ2H for 2016 campaign; b δ18O versus Cl− diagram
Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to our colleagues for 2. Carreira PM, Marques JM, Nunes D (2014) Source of groundwater
their assistance in data collection and field investigation. Special salinity in coastline aquifers based on environmental isotopes
thanks go to the Editor-in-Chief and the reviewers for their critical (Portugal): natural vs. human interference. A Rev Reinterpret
reviews and valuable suggestions. We thank the people of Tensift Appl Geochem 41:163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeo
Hydraulic Basin Agency (ABHT) of the city of Marrakech for their chem.2013.12.012
help in the data piezometry, especially Mrs. Najar Insaf, Mr. Benaddi 3. Bouteraa O, Mebarki A, Bouaicha F, Nouaceur Z, Laignel B (2019)
Rabia and Mr. Qachar Mohammed. We do not forget to thank the Pr Groundwater quality assessment using multivariate analysis,
Ebn Touhami Mohamed, dean of the Faculty of Sciences of Kenitra, geostatistical modeling, and water quality index (WQI): a case
for his assistance during the chemical analyses of K+ and Na+ of the of study in the Boumerzoug-El Khroub valley of Northeast
groundwater collected in 2019. Algeria. Acta Geochim 38:796–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11631-019-00329-x
Declarations 4. Bahir M, Ouhamdouch S, Ouazar D, Chehbouni A (2020) Assess-
ment of groundwater quality from semi-arid area for drinking
purpose using statistical, water quality index (WQI) and GIS
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of
technique. Carbonates Evaporites 35:1–24. https://doi.org/10.
interest.
1007/s13146-020-00564-x
5. El Mountassir O, Bahir M, Ouazar D, Carreira PM (2021) Nitrate
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attri- pollution in groundwater of the Ouazi Basin: case of Essaouira
bution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adap- (Southwestern Morocco). In: Abrunhosa M, Chambel A, Pep-
tation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as poloni S, Chaminé HI (eds) Advances in geoethics and ground-
long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the water management: theory and practice for a sustainable devel-
source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate opment. Advances in science, technology and innovation (IEREK
if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this interdisciplinary series for sustainable development). Springer,
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59320-9_49
indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not 6. El Mountassir O, Bahir M, Ouazar D, Carreira PM (2021) For a
included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended better understanding of recharge and salinization mechanism
use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted of a Cenomanian–Turonian aquifer. In: Abrunhosa M, Chambel
use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright A, Peppoloni S, Chaminé HI (eds) Advances in geoethics and
holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons. groundwater management: theory and practice for a sustain-
org/licenses/by/4.0/. able development. Advances in science, technology and innova-
tion (IEREK interdisciplinary series for sustainable development).
Springer, Cham . https://d oi.o
rg/1
0.1
007/9
78-3-0
30-5
9320-9_4
2
7. Edmunds WM (2003) Renewable and non-renewable ground-
References water in semi-arid and arid regions. Dev Water Sci 50:265–280
8. Bennetts DA, Webb JA, Stone DJM, Hill DM (2006) Understand-
1. Hamed Y, Hadji R, Redhaounia B, Zighmi K, Bâali F, El Gayar A ing the salinization process for groundwater in an area of south-
(2018) Climate impact on surface and groundwater in North eastern Australia, using hydrochemical and isotopic evidence. J
Africa: a global synthesis of findings and recommendations. Hydrol 323:178–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.08.
Euro-Mediterr J Environ Integr 3:25. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 023
s41207-018-0067-8 9. El Mountassir O, Bahir M, Ouazar D, Ouhamdouch S, Chehbouni
A, Ouarani M (2020) The use of GIS and water quality index
Vol:.(1234567890)
to assess groundwater quality of krimat aquifer (Essaouira; 23. Bahir M, El Mountassir O, Ouazar D, Carreira PM (2021) Use of
Morocco). SN Appl Sci 2:1–16. https:// d oi. o rg/ 1 0. 1 007/ WQI and isotopes to assess groundwater quality of coastal
s42452-020-2653-z aquifers (Essaouira, Morocco). In: Abrunhosa M, Chambel A,
10. Ouarani M, Bahir M, Mulla DJ, Ouazar D, Chehbouni A, Dhiba D, Peppoloni S, Chaminé HI (eds) Advances in geoethics and
Ouhamdouch S, El Mountassir O (2020) Groundwater quality groundwater management: theory and practice for a sustain-
characterization in an overallocated semi-arid coastal area using able development. Advances in science, technology and innova-
an integrated approach: case of the Essaouira Basin, Morocco. tion (IEREK interdisciplinary series for sustainable development).
Water 12:3202. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113202 Springer, Cham. https://d oi.o
rg/1
0.1
007/9
78-3-0
30-5
9320-9_5
1
11. Kanduč T, Šlejkovec Z, Vreča P, Samardžija Z, Verbovšek T, Božič 24. Bahir M, El Mountassir O, Ouazar D, Carreira PM (2021) Hydro-
D, Jamnikar S, Solomon DK, Fernandez DP, Eastoe C, McIntosh J chemical analysis and evaluation of groundwater quality in
(2019) The effect of geochemical processes on groundwater in Ouazi Basin (Essaouira, Morocco). In: Abrunhosa M, Chambel
the Velenje coal basin, Slovenia: insights from mineralogy, trace A, Peppoloni S, Chaminé HI (eds) Advances in geoethics and
elements and isotopes signatures. SN Appl Sci 1:1518. https:// groundwater management : theory and practice for a sustain-
doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1561-6 able development. Advances in science, technology and innova-
12. Eissa MA, Mahmoud HH, Shouakar-Stash O, El-Shiekh A, Parker tion (IEREK interdisciplinary series for sustainable development).
B (2016) Geophysical and geochemical studies to delineate sea- Springer, Cham. https://d oi.o
rg/1
0.1
007/9
78-3-0
30-5
9320-9_5
0
water intrusion in Bagoush area, Northwestern coast. Egypt J Afr 25. Wang Y, Guo Q (2006) Strontium isotope characterization and
Earth Sci 121:365–381. https://d oi.o
rg/1
0.1
016/j.j afrea rsci.2
016. major iongeochemistry of karst water flow, Shentou, northern
05.031 China. J Hydrol 328:592–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.
13. Bahir M, Ouhamdouch S (2020) Groundwater quality in semi- 2006.01.006
arid environments (Essaouira Basin, Morocco). Carbonates Evap- 26. Casanova J, Negrel PH, Kloppmann W, Aranyossy JF (2001) Origin
orites 35:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-020-00576-7 of deep saline groundwaters in the Vienne granitoids (France).
14. Hassen I, Hamzaoui-Azaza F, Bouhlila R (2016) Application of Geofluids 1:91–101. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-8123.2001.
multivariate statistical analysis and hydrochemical and isotopic 00009.x
investigations for evaluation of groundwater quality and its suit- 27. Aquilina L, Ladouche B, Doerfliger N, Seidel JL, Bakalowicz M,
ability for drinking and agriculture purposes: case of Oum Ali- Dupuy C, LeStrat P (2002) Origin, evolution and residence time
Thelepte aquifer, central Tunisia. Environ Monit Assess 188:135. of saline thermal fluids (Balaruc springs, southern France): Impli-
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5124-7 cations for fluid transfer across the continental shelf. Chem Geol
15. Hamed Y, Dhahri F (2013) Hydro-geochemical and isotopic com- 192:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00160-2
position of groundwater, with emphasis on sources of salinity, 28. Bahir M, Carreira P, Da Silva MO, Fernandes P (2007) Caractérisa-
in the aquifer system in Northwestern Tunisia. J Afr Earth Sci tion hydrodynamique, hydrochimique et isotopique du système
83:10–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2013.02.004 aquifère de Kourimat (Bassin d’Essaouira, Maroc). Estud Geol
16. Hamed Y, Ahmadi R, Demdoum A, Bouri S, Gargouri I, Dhia HB, 64:61–73. https://doi.org/10.3989/egeol.08641433
Al-Gamal S, Laouar R, Choura A (2014) Use of geochemical, iso- 29. Bahir M, Mennani A, Jalal M, Youbi N (2000) Contribution à
topic, and age tracer data to develop models of groundwater l’étude des ressources hydriques du bassin synclinal d’Essaouira
flow: a case study of Gafsa mining basin-Southern Tunisia. J Afr (Maroc). Estud Geol 56:185–195. https://doi.org/10.3989/egeol.
Earth Sci 100:418–436. https://d oi.o
rg/1
0.1
016/j.j afrea rsci.2
014. 00563-4150
07.012 30. Rajmohan N, Elango L (2004) Identification and evolution of
17. Bahir M, Ouazar D, Goumih A, Ouhamdouch S (2019) Evolution hydrogeochemical processes in the groundwater environ-
of the chemical and isotopic composition of groundwater under ment in an area of the Palar and Cheyyar River Basins, South-
a semi-arid climate; the case of the Cenomano-Turonian aquifer ern India. Environ Geol 46:47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/
within the Essaouira basin (Morocco). Environ Earth Sci 78:353. s00254-004-1012-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8349-2 31. Piper AM (1944) A graphical interpretation of water analysis.
18. Jassas H, Merkel B (2015) Assessment of hydrochemical evolu- Trans Am Geophys Union 25:914–928
tion of groundwater and its suitability for drinking and irrigation 32. Fisher RS, Mullican WF (1997) Hydrochemical evolution of
purposes in Al-Khazir Gomal Basin, Northern Iraq. Enviro Earth sodium-sulphate and sodium-chloride groundwater beneath
Sci 74:6647–6663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4664-4 the Northern Chihuahuan desert, Trans-Pecos, Texas, USA.
19. Bouaroudj S, Menad A, Bounamous A, Ali-Khodja H, Gherib A, Hydrogeol J 5:4–16
Weigel DE, Chenchouni H (2019) Assessment of water quality at 33. Singh SP, Tripathi SK, Kumar V, Kumar A, Raha P (2015) Hydro-
the largest dam in Algeria (Beni Haroun Dam) and effects of irri- chemical investigation and groundwater quality evaluation
gation on soil characteristics of agricultural lands. Chemosphere for irrigation purpose in some blocks of Varanasi District, Uttar
219:76–88. https://d oi.o
rg/1
0.1
016/j.c hemos phere.2 018.1 1.1
93 Pradesh, India. Int J Trop Agric 33:1653–1660
20. Bouaicha F, Dib H, Bouteraa O, Manchar N, Boufaa K, Chabour 34. Zhu G, Wu X, Ge J, Liu F, Zhao W, Wu C (2020) Influence of min-
N, Demdoum A (2019) Geochemical assessment, mixing behav- ing activities on groundwater hydrochemistry and heavy metal
ior and environmental impact of thermal waters in the Guelma migration using a self-organizing map (SOM). J Clean Prod
geothermal system, Algeria. Acta Geochim 38:683–702. https:// 257:120–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120664
doi.org/10.1007/s11631-019-00324-2 35. Gibbs RJ (1970) Mechanisms controlling world water chemistry.
21. Bahir M, Ouazar D, Ouhamdouch S (2019) Hydrogeochemical Science 170:1088–1090. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.170.
investigation and groundwater quality in Essaouira region, 3962.1088
Morocco. Mar Freshwater Res 70:1317–1332. https://doi.org/ 36. Adimalla N, Wu J (2019) Groundwater quality and associated
10.1071/MF18319 health risks in a semiarid region of south India: implication to
22. Bahir M, Ouhamdouch S, Ouazar D, El Moçayd N (2020) Climate sustainable groundwater management. Hum Ecol Risk Assess
change effect on groundwater characteristics within semi-arid 25:191–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1546550
zones from western Morocco. Groundw Sustain Dev 10:1–15. 37. Adimalla N, Dhakate R, Kasarla A, Taloor AK (2020) Appraisal
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100380 of groundwater quality for drinking and irrigation purposes
Vol.:(0123456789)
in Central Telangana, India. Groundw Sustain Dev 10:100–334. Basin, north China. J Hydrol 385:216–229. https://doi.org/10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100334 1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.022
38. Craig H (1961) Standard for reporting concentrations of deute- 43. Foster S, Pulido-Bosch A, Vallejos Á, Molina L, Llop A, MacDon-
rium and oxygen-18 in natural waters. Science 133:1833–1834. ald AM (2018) Impact of irrigated agriculture on groundwater-
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.133.3467.1833 recharge salinity: a major sustainability concern in semi-arid
39. Mennani A (2001) Apport de l’hydrochimie et de l’isotopie à regions. Hydrogeol J 26:2781–2791. https://doi.org/10.1007/
la connaissance du fonctionnement des aquifères de la zone s10040-018-1830-2
côtière d’Essaouira (Maroc Occidental). PhD thesis, Cadi Ayyad 44. Kamal S, Sefiani S, Laftouhi NE, El Mandour A, Moustadraf J,
University, Marrakech, Morocco Elgettafi M, Himi M, Casas A (2021) Hydrochemical and iso-
40. El Mountassir O, Ouazar D, Bahir M, Chehbouni A, Carreira topic assessment for characterizing groundwater quality and
PM (2021) GIS-based assessment of aquifer vulnerability recharge processes under a semi-arid area: case of the Haouz
using DRASTIC model and stable isotope: a case study on plain aquifer (Central Morocco). J Afr Earth Sci 174:104077.
Essaouira basin. Arab J Geosci 14:321. https://doi.org/10.1007/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.104077
s12517-021-06540-6
41. Clark ID, Frjtz P (1997) Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
Lewis Publishers, New York jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
42. Currell MJ, Cartwright I, Bradley DC, Han DM (2010) Recharge
history and controls on groundwater quality in the Yuncheng
Vol:.(1234567890)
1. use such content for the purpose of providing other users with access on a regular or large scale basis or as a means to circumvent access
control;
2. use such content where to do so would be considered a criminal or statutory offence in any jurisdiction, or gives rise to civil liability, or is
otherwise unlawful;
3. falsely or misleadingly imply or suggest endorsement, approval , sponsorship, or association unless explicitly agreed to by Springer Nature in
writing;
4. use bots or other automated methods to access the content or redirect messages
5. override any security feature or exclusionary protocol; or
6. share the content in order to create substitute for Springer Nature products or services or a systematic database of Springer Nature journal
content.
In line with the restriction against commercial use, Springer Nature does not permit the creation of a product or service that creates revenue,
royalties, rent or income from our content or its inclusion as part of a paid for service or for other commercial gain. Springer Nature journal
content cannot be used for inter-library loans and librarians may not upload Springer Nature journal content on a large scale into their, or any
other, institutional repository.
These terms of use are reviewed regularly and may be amended at any time. Springer Nature is not obligated to publish any information or
content on this website and may remove it or features or functionality at our sole discretion, at any time with or without notice. Springer Nature
may revoke this licence to you at any time and remove access to any copies of the Springer Nature journal content which have been saved.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Springer Nature makes no warranties, representations or guarantees to Users, either express or implied
with respect to the Springer nature journal content and all parties disclaim and waive any implied warranties or warranties imposed by law,
including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.
Please note that these rights do not automatically extend to content, data or other material published by Springer Nature that may be licensed
from third parties.
If you would like to use or distribute our Springer Nature journal content to a wider audience or on a regular basis or in any other manner not
expressly permitted by these Terms, please contact Springer Nature at