Ge3 Week 10

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

SANTO TOMAS COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE,

SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY


Feeder Road 4, Brgy. Tibal-og, Santo Tomas, Davao del Norte, Philippines

GE 3
THE CONTEMPORARY
WORLD
CHAPTER 7
• Global media culture
• Various forms of global integration
• Dynamics between local and global cultural production
• Globalization of religion

In this lesson, challenge


yourself to:

• Analyze how various media drive


various forms of global integration
ABSTRACTION

Global Media Cultures

The media have a very important impact on cultural globalization in two


mutually interdependent ways: Firstly, the media provide an extensive transnational
transmission of cultural products and, secondly, they contribute to the formation of
communicative networks and social structures. The rapidly growing supply of media
products from an international media culture presents a challenge to existing local and
national cultures. The sheer volume of the supply, as well as the vast technological
infrastructure and financial capital that pushes this supply forward, have a considerable
impact on local patterns of cultural consumption and possibilities for sustaining an
independent cultural production. Global media cultures create a continuous cultural
exchange, in which crucial aspects such as identity, nationality, religion, behavioral
norms and way of life are continuously questioned and challenged. These cultural
encounters often involve the meeting of cultures with a different socio-economic base,
typically a transnational and commercial cultural industry on one side and a national,
publicly regulated cultural industry on the other side.

Due to their very structure, global media promote a restructuring of


cultural and social communities. The media such as the press, and later radio and tv
have been very important institutions for the formation of national communities. Global
media support the creation of new communities. The Internet, for example, not only
facilitates communication across the globe, but also supports the formation of new
social communities in which members can interact with each other. And satellite tv and
radio allow immigrants to be in close contact with their homeland's language and
culture while they gradually accommodate to a new cultural environment. The common
point of departure is the assumption that a series of international media constitutes a
global cultural supply in itself and serves as an independent agency for cultural and
social globalization, in which cultural communities are continuously restructured and
redefined. (Source: Website)

In other words, media cultures take part in the process of globalization,


including how they challenge existing cultures and create new and alternative symbolic
and cultural communities.
Various Forms of Global Integration

Global integration is not a new phenomenon in today's contemporary


world. Trade took place between distant civilizations even in ancient times. This
globalization process in the economic domain has not always proceeded smoothly
has it benefited all whom it was offered, But, despite occasional interruptions, such
as the collapse of the Roman Empire or during the interwar period in this century,
the degree of economics integration among different societies around the world
has generally been rising in the past half century, and ever greater than it has
been and is likely to improve.

There are three (3) factors that have affected the process of
economic globalization. These are:

1. Improvements in transportation and communication technology have reduced


the cost of transporting goods, services and factors of production and
communicating economically useful knowledge and technology

2. Tastes of individuals and, societies have generally but not universally, favored
taking advantage of the opportunities provided by declining costs of transportation
and communication through increasing economic integration.

3. The character and pace of economic integration have been significantly


influenced by public policies, although it is not always in the direction of increasing
economic integration.

Thus, technology, tastes, and public policy each have important


influence on the pattern and pace of economies in its various dimensions.

Dynamics Between Local and Global Cultural Production

Paulo Emanuel Novais Guimarães pointed out that the advent of the
category 'world music' led to both an unprecedented level of (re)discovery of local
music scenes and to an assemblance of an intricate global musical platform in the
contemporary age of globalization. The processes in which local cultures express
and engage themselves with broader global networks and the other way around
can be claimed to be indispensable sources of knowledge in the analytical
approach of socio-political concerns, these being of small or large-scale societies.
Extremely frequent in debates on globalization is after all the dichotomic struggle
between the concrete and human 'local' against the abstract and dehumanizing
'global' (Wilson & Dissanayake, 1996: 22). In order to apprehend how this
relationship has indeed been marked at times by oppression and domination, the
critical theories of authors such as Edward Said, Homi K. Bhabha and Immanuel
Wallerstein will be applied to cases of local and global music industry operations.
This lesson aims nonetheless, above all, to provide a concise yet consistent
introduction to how this relation goes beyond the criticisms of cultural imperialism
and Americanization, to how multifarious this relation can be. Key issues
represented by the binary concepts of authenticity and homogeneity and of
production, distribution and marketing of cultural products, will be referred to.
Without trying to uphold a modernocentric view that admits the rise of globalization
as a recent phenomenon, the commercial dynamics between the global and the
local in world music approached, will be mostly from the 1950's onwards.

Globalization of Religion

One may ask: what is the relation of religion to globalization? First,


there is the way in which globalization flattens out cultural differences, erodes local
customs and beliefs, and spreads a secular, capitalist way of life that us at odds
with religions of all sorts. At the same time, there is the way in which religion
serves as the source of globalization's greatest resistance and as a haven for
those standing in opposition to its ubiquitous yet often subtle power.

In both of these views, the relationship between religion and


globalization is antagonistic-one of struggle and conflict.

While opposition is an important aspect of the relationship between


religion and globalization, to see them only as foes misses some of the
complexities of their interaction, not only in the past but in the postmodern world
as well.

Religion and globalization can also be seen as partners in historical


change. In times past, religion, in various manifestations, has been a carrier of
globalizing tendencies in the world. The history of Christianity, of course, can be
understood in part as an early effort to create a global network of believers. Its
extraordinary growth and influence as a world religion was a result of a link
between its own global ambitions and the expansion of various political and
economic regimes. It succeeded as a globalizing force long before there was a
phenomenon called "globalization." Elements of this historical pattern can be
found in Buddhism, Islam, and other faiths as well.

Religion is hardly epi-phenomenal to the processes of globalization


in our own day. It continues to be a player in intricate and even contradictory ways.
To be sure, it was once thought that secularization was the inevitable outcome of
the processes we call "modernity." Clearly this has not been the case. Religious
faith persists in a complex interaction with the structures and processes of the
modern world and that complexity has only intensified under the conditions of
contemporary globalization.
Sassen (1991) used the concept of global cities to describe the three
urban centers of New York, London, and Tokyo as economic centers that exert
control over the world’s political economy. World cities are categorized. As such
based on the global reach of organizations found in them. Not only are there
inequalities between these cities, there also exists inequalities within each city
(Beaverstock et al.,2002). Alternatively, following Castells (2000), these cities can
be seen as important nodes in a variety of global networks.

Although cities are major beneficiaries of globalization, Bauman


(2003) claimed that they are also the most severely affected by global problems.
Therefore, the city faces peculiar political problems, wherein it is often fruitlessly
seeking to deal locally with global problems and “local politics has become
hopelessly overloaded” (p.102).

Theories of Global Stratification

For much of human history, all of the societies on earth were poor.
Poverty was the norm for everyone but obviously, that is not the case anymore.
Just as you find stratification among socioeconomic classes within a society like
the Philippines, you would also see across the world a pattern of global
stratification with inequalities in wealth and power between societies. So what
made some parts of the world develop faster, economically speaking, than others?
We may draw answers by looking at the different theories of global stratification.

You might also like