Toxins 12 00653

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

toxins

Editorial
Freshwater Algal Toxins: Monitoring and
Toxicity Profile
Angeles Jos * and Ana M. Cameán
Area of Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sevilla, C/Profesor García González 2,
41012 Sevilla, Spain; [email protected]
* Correspondence: [email protected]

Received: 18 September 2020; Accepted: 23 September 2020; Published: 13 October 2020 

Climate change and human activities are more and more affecting the dynamics of phytoplankton
communities. Among them, cyanobacterial abundance has increased disproportionately relative to
other phytoplankton, and this trend is likely to continue in the coming decades. This fact has deleterious
effects on ecosystem biodiversity but also adversely affects drinking water supplies, livestock watering,
crop yields, aquaculture, etc. Thus, the proliferation of cyanobacterial blooms represents an economic
issue and, more importantly, human and animal health risks due to the common production of potent
toxins, cyanotoxins. Moreover, these risks are increased due to their accumulation potential and their
transference to the food chain.
In spite of the worldwide increasing occurrence of cyanotoxins, they are still underestimated in
regulations, with Microcystin-LR (MC-LR) as the main one (and in many cases the only one) considered.
However, risk management of cyanotoxins is only possible after a thorough risk evaluation, and for
that purpose, toxicity and exposure data are required. Thus, occurrence and monitoring information is
of key importance, and new data in relation to the conditions that favor cyanobacterial growth and
cyanotoxins production are welcome in order to prevent their appearance.
On the other hand, in regard to toxicity, the scientific literature shows already a wide array of
adverse effects cyanobacterial toxins can induce. However, there are still health consequences not
investigated deeply enough as well as many data gaps in different aspects regarding different targets
of cyanobacteria toxicity, from plants to animals and humans. Thus, the aim of this special issue was to
gather new studies that could contribute in the risk evaluation process of cyanotoxins. This goal was
achieved with a compilation of 11 articles (10 research papers and a review).
Among the articles focused on monitoring issues, Hartnell et al. [1] investigated the cyanobacterial
abundance and the MC profiles in two southern British lakes. They could not correlate the elevated
MC concentrations found with the number of cyanobacterial cells, but the linear regression analysis
performed suggested that temperature and dissolved oxygen could explain the variability of MC
across both reservoirs. They concluded that there is a need to develop inclusive, multifactor holistic
water management strategies to control cyanobacterial risks in freshwater bodies.
Taranu et al. [2] applied multivariate canonical analyses and regression tree analyses to identify
how different congeners (MC-LA, -LR, -RR, and -YR) varied with changes in meteorological and
nutrient conditions over time and space. They found that MC-LR was associated with strong winds,
warm temperatures, and nutrient-rich conditions, whereas MC-LA, for example, tended to dominate
under intermediate winds and nutrient-poor conditions. Thus, the knowledge of the environmental
factors leading to the formation of different MC congeners in freshwaters is necessary to assess the
duration and the degree of toxin exposure under future global change.
Tamele and Vasconcelos [3] performed a review about the MCs incidence in the drinking water of
Mozambique. This report showed that the few studies done in Maputo and Gaza provinces indicated
the occurrence of MC-LR, -YR, and -RR at concentrations above the maximum limit recommended by

Toxins 2020, 12, 653; doi:10.3390/toxins12100653 www.mdpi.com/journal/toxins


Toxins 2020, 12, 653 2 of 3

the World Health Organization. Authors evidenced the need to implement an operational monitoring
program of MCs in order to reduce or avoid the possible cases of intoxications since the drinking water
quality control tests in the country do not include a MCs test.
Other aspects were covered by Perez and Chu [4], LeBlanc et al. [5], and Galetović et al. [6].
Perez and Chu [4] focused their study on zinc metal resistance and stress response in a toxigenic
cyanobacterium, Microcystis aeruginosa UTEX LB 2385, by monitoring cells with ZnCl2 treatment.
Among their results, they found that M. aeruginosa UTEX LB 2385 was able to survive ZnCl2
concentrations of up to 0.25 mg/L, with increasing biomass through 15 days. A persistent yield
of the cyanotoxin MC-LR (µg/cell) was observed in all ZnCl2 treated cells by 15 days, indicating that
this cyanotoxin remains present in the environment even with low cell concentrations.
Leblanc et al. [5] isolated a new MC, [D-Leu1 ]MC-LY, and other related ones,
from Microcystis aeruginosa strain CPCC-464. The compound was characterized by 1 H and 13 C NMR
spectroscopy, liquid chromatography–high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS/MS),
and UV spectroscopy. Moreover, [D-Leu1 ]MC-LY showed a potency similar to MC-LR in the protein
phosphatase 2A inhibition assay. The authors concluded that [D-Leu1 ]-containing MCs may be more
common in cyanobacterial blooms than is generally appreciated but are easily overlooked with standard
targeted LC–MS/MS screening methods.
Finally, regarding monitoring-related aspects, Galetović et al. [6] reported the absence of
cyanotoxins in Llayta, edible Nostocaceae colonies from the Andes Highlands, by using molecular
and chemical methods. Thus, they concluded that Llayta could be considered a safe ingredient for
human consumption.
Cyanotoxins toxicity has been an important topic in this special issue. The study of
Llana-Ruiz-Cabello et al. [7] explored the susceptibility of two green vegetables, spinach and lettuce,
to the cyanotoxins MC and cylindrospermopsin (CYN), individually and in mixture. The study
revealed growth inhibition of the aerial part in both species when treated with 50 µg/L of MC, CYN,
and CYN/MC mixture. MC showed to be more harmful to plant growth than CYN. Additionally, CYN,
but not MC, was translocated from the roots to the leaves. CYN and MC affected the levels of minerals,
particularly in plant roots.
Foss et al. [8] described a case report in which MC intoxications of canines were diagnosed through
interpretation of clinicopathological abnormalities, pathological examination of tissues, microscopy,
and analytical MC testing of antemortem/postmortem samples. The described cases represent the first
use of urine as an antemortem, non-invasive specimen to diagnose MC toxicosis. Authors concluded
that antemortem diagnostic testing to confirm MC intoxication cases is crucial for providing optimal
supportive care and mitigating MC exposure.
Leticia Díez-Quijada et al. [9] explored the genotoxic effects of MC-LR and CYN combinations in rats.
Their results revealed an increase in micronucleous formation in bone marrow. However, no DNA strand
breaks nor oxidative DNA damage were induced, as shown in the comet assays. The histopathological
study indicated alterations only in the highest dose group. Therefore, the combined exposure to
cyanotoxins may induce genotoxic and histopathological damage in vivo.
Finally, two articles pointed out that MC-LR exacerbated the severity of illnesses such as
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [10] and dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis [11] in
animal models. This is an important aspect, as the exposure to MC-LR, even at levels that are
below the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) established in healthy animals, can worsen
pre-existing pathologies.
All these studies have contributed to extend the knowledge on cyanotoxins and complete those
published in our previous special issue, “Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins: New Advances and Future
Challenges” [12]. Moreover, the 20 special issues dealing with this topic published thus far in the
journal Toxins demonstrate the interest cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins have in the scientific community.
Toxins 2020, 12, 653 3 of 3

Funding: This research received no external funding.


Acknowledgments: The co-editors are very grateful to all the authors who contributed to this Special Issue
Freshwater Algal Toxins: Monitoring and Toxicity Profile. We greatly appreciate the efforts carried out by external
expert peer reviewers, whose rigorous evaluations of all the submitted manuscripts contributed to improve the
quality of this Special Issue. The co-editors also wish to thank the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of Spain
(PID2019-104890RB-I00, MICINN/FEDER, UE) and the Faculty of Pharmacy of the Universidad de Sevilla. Finally,
the co-editors very much appreciate the good organization and the constant support of the MDPI editorial team
and staff.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
1. Hartnell, D.M.; Chapman, I.J.; Taylor, N.G.H.; Esteban, G.F.; Turner, A.D.; Franklin, D.J. Cyanobacterial
Abundance and Microcystin Profiles in Two Southern British Lakes: The Importance of Abiotic and Biotic
Interactions. Toxins 2020, 12, 503. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Taranu, Z.E.; Pick, F.R.; Creed, I.F.; Zastepa, A.; Watson, S.B. Meteorological and Nutrient Conditions
Influence Microcystin Congeners in Freshwaters. Toxins 2019, 11, 620. [CrossRef]
3. Tamele, I.J.; Vasconcelos, V. Microcystin Incidence in the Drinking Water of Mozambique: Challenges for
Public Health Protection. Toxins 2020, 12, 368. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Perez, J.L.; Chu, T.-C. Effect of Zinc on Microcystis aeruginosa UTEX LB 2385 and Its Toxin Production.
Toxins 2020, 12, 92. [CrossRef]
5. Leblanc, P.; Merkley, N.; Thomas, K.; Lewis, N.I.; Békri, K.; Renaud, S.L.; Pick, F.R.; McCarron, P.;
Miles, C.O.; Quilliam, M. Isolation and Characterization of [D-Leu1]microcystin-LY from Microcystis
aeruginosa CPCC-464. Toxins 2020, 12, 77. [CrossRef]
6. Galetović, A.; Azevedo, J.; Castelo-Branco, R.; Oliveira, F.; Gómez-Silva, B.; Vasconcelos, V. Absence of
Cyanotoxins in Llayta, Edible Nostocaceae Colonies from the Andes Highlands. Toxins 2020, 12, 382.
[CrossRef]
7. Llana-Ruiz-Cabello, M.; Jos, A.; Cameán, A.; Oliveira, F.; Felpeto, A.B.; Machado, J.; Azevedo, J.; Pinto, E.;
Almeida, A.; Campos, A.; et al. Analysis of the Use of Cylindrospermopsin and/or Microcystin-Contaminated
Water in the Growth, Mineral Content, and Contamination of Spinacia oleracea and Lactuca sativa. Toxins
2019, 11, 624. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Foss, A.J.; Aubel, M.T.; Gallagher, B.; Mettee, N.; Miller, A.; Fogelson, S.B. Diagnosing Microcystin Intoxication
of Canines: Clinicopathological Indications, Pathological Characteristics, and Analytical Detection in
Postmortem and Antemortem Samples. Toxins 2019, 11, 456. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Díez-Quijada, L.; Medrano-Padial, C.; Llana-Ruiz-Cabello, M.; Cătunescu, G.M.; Moyano, R.; Risalde, M.A.;
Cameán, A.; Jos, A. Cylindrospermopsin-Microcystin-LR Combinations May Induce Genotoxic and
Histopathological Damage in Rats. Toxins 2020, 12, 348. [CrossRef]
10. Lad, A.; Su, R.C.; Breidenbach, J.D.; Stemmer, P.; Carruthers, N.J.; Sanchez, N.K.; Khalaf, F.K.; Zhang, S.;
Kleinhenz, A.L.; Dube, P.; et al. Chronic Low Dose Oral Exposure to Microcystin-LR Exacerbates Hepatic
Injury in a Murine Model of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Toxins 2019, 11, 486. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Su, R.C.; Blomquist, T.M.; Kleinhenz, A.L.; Khalaf, F.K.; Dube, P.; Lad, A.; Breidenbach, J.D.; Mohammed, C.J.;
Zhang, S.; Baum, C.E.; et al. Exposure to the Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB) Toxin Microcystin-LR (MC-LR)
Prolongs and Increases Severity of Dextran Sulfate Sodium (DSS)-Induced Colitis. Toxins 2019, 11, 371.
[CrossRef]
12. Cameán, A.M.; Jos, A. Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins: New Advances and Future Challenges, 1st ed.;
MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–248.

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

You might also like