Learning Experience 16
Learning Experience 16
Learning Experience 16
16.1 EXPOSURE
Familiarizing Oneself with Examples of Completed Classroom-Based Action Research
Go to the library or search the internet for three examples of classroom-based action research. Read
through each of these and be able to determine the important things that are contained in each action
research.
Try your best to come up with the parts of a completed action research based on the written report.
Together with your c-student teachers, describe in your own words, the classroom-based action
research which you have chosen (from among the three samples) for presentation. Focus on the steps
and processes that the author has done while doing the research. Describe in greater detail the steps
or processes the researcher or author has done in each part. Then discuss and get reactions from your
co-student teachers. Remember this is a completed action research
Following are parts/ steps and processes of a completed classroom-based action research as shown in
a written report. Arrange them in the order that they come by putting a number representing the first
step (1), second step (2) etc.
on the left column.
No.
Part of the Action-
Sequenc Corresponding Step or Process
Research
e
Results / Findings Analyzed the data, usually the charge caused by the action
or the effect of the action.
Statement of the Problem Defined or stated what the problem is all about.
Introduction Presented the context or background of the problem and
the need to conduct the action research.
Conceptual Framework Developed a holistic view of the problem supported by
principles of education and pedagogy, or if possible,
theories of learning.
Methodology Presented the tools or tests for gathering data; how the
data was gathered, and identified the participants of the
action research.
Conclusions Presented how the results of the action research will help
local practice, or education in general.
16.3 IDENTIFICATION
Identifying what Important Content Material Comprises an Action Research Proposal
Writing an action research proposal goes only as far as what will still be done; hence, in writing the
action research proposal, the future tense is used. There is no presentation of results or findings.
However, if one has written a well though-out proposal, a big part of the action research work would
have already been done which is the conceptualization of the research. Once the action research is
conceptualized well, the direction for implementation becomes clear.
Following are the parts of an action research proposal following the flow of conceptual framework of
action research presented in LE 14.
Action hypothesis means your expectations of what the results of your action will be. You do not
have to wait until your action research is completed, to know the results. Putting together what
you have learned in your study of the principles of education and pedagogy, as well as theories
of learning will enable you to make educated “predictions” or “guesses” about the impact or
effects of the action you are going to implement. Do you expect that our action will effect a
positive change? Will the action help solve the problem you identified? Will the action, if
applied in the teaching-learning process contribute to improvement of learning and subsequently
to the improvement of learning outcomes?
2.2 Hypothesis
Advance your expectations regarding the effects of your action. If at the outset, what do you
expect the action or the strategy to affect or impact on the classroom problem being
addressed?
1 Writing a Classroom-Based
Action Research Proposal
3. Taking Action (Selecting a course of action)
3.1 Implementing the action or the strategy selected to solve the problem.
Describe the action/ strategy and how long you are going to implement it and to whom.
3.2 Data Collection Method
Describe the processes you will use to collect your data
What data will you collect for your variables? How are you going to collet your data? Are
your data quantitative or qualitative? What tool will you use for gathering the data you will
need to analyze? Are you going to use a data-gathering tool which is already existing? Or are
you going to develop the tool yourself?
Taking off from the same example on poor mathematics performance, are you going to
collect your data by administering a mathematics test that you have developed? Or are you
going to use or adapt an existing test of mathematics?
Writing the research proposal stops at the plan for analysis of data. In the absence of data at
this point, one cannot plan for how the conclusions will be written. Nor one cannot plan for
any further actions to be take, just in case, the results do not come about as expected.
Expected Output:
a. Gathered data collated, organized and analyzed.
b. Write up of the analysis and meanings taken from
the data; as well as effect of the action/ strategy.
c. After analysis, determine if the expectation has
been confirmed or not.
1 Writing a Classroom-Based
Action Research Proposal
5. Specifying learning: Identifying general findings
Mrs. Peralta is a Grade 3 teacher in reading. She noticed that about 50% of her pupils have
low levels of comprehension. In many of her quizzes and questions, only a number are able to
respond correctly. Mrs. Peralta knows the expected learning outcomes in reading for this grade.
She felt apprehensive, her pupils may not be able to develop reading comprehension skills
required at that grade. She thought she had to do something to increase or improve the current
levels of reading comprehension among her pupils. She thought she had to have a plan of the
action she wanted to implement.
First, she read books in the library about reading comprehension. She also read theories in
reading, and even theories of intellect. She felt the need to do that so that she will have a sound
basis for deciding which of the possible actions would be the most appropriate or the best to
implement. She would also have a good basis for advancing an “educated” guess or “prediction”
as to what will happen, particularly, if the action will improve reading comprehension of the
pupils.
This action research aims to determine how Grade 3 pupils could improve their
levels of reading comprehension.
1. The implementation of the special computer program will improve the reading
comprehension levels of the Grade 3 pupils.
2. After going through the special computer program, the pupils will have higher
reading comprehension skills than before going through it.
V. General Methodology
a. Participation
The participants will be Grade 3 pupils with lowest grades in Reading.
b. Data-Gathering Tools
A 30-item test to measure reading comprehension will be administered
before and after going through the special computer program in reading. The test
is existing. An observation tool will also be developed. This will be used to
observe the behavior of the pupils while they are dealing with the special
computer reading program.
d. Analysis
1 Writing a Classroom-Based
Action Research Proposal
1. The scores of the pupils on the test administered before and after going
through the computer program will be compared.
2. The results on the observation tools will also be analyzed to determine
whether the pupils enjoyed the material or not; or of they found the material
easy or difficult to deal with.
e. Post Analysis
Determine if the hypothesis (expectation) has been confirmed or not, on the
basis of the analysis of data. The implications of the findings to education and
the improvement of education practice will also be advanced.
16.5 DISSEMINATION
Sharing and Presenting an Action Research Proposal
Together with your CT and co-student teachers, present your sample action pf research proposal.
Compare your action research proposal with your co-student teachers and share your insights on your
finished output.
ASSESSMENT
For Use of the FS Program Coordinator
Criterion: Developing the skill of applying the principles and requirements of writing an action
research proposal.
Rubric
Score Description
1 Writing a Classroom-Based
Action Research Proposal
The student teacher demonstrates a high level of skill in applying the principles and
91 – 100
requirements of writing an action research proposal.
The student teacher demonstrates more than average level of skill in applying the
81 – 90
principles and requirements of writing an action research proposal.
The student teacher demonstrates an average level of skill in applying the principles and
71 – 80
requirements of writing an action research proposal.
The student teacher demonstrates less than average level of skill in applying the
61 – 70
principles and requirements of writing an action research proposal.
The student teacher demonstrates less than average level of skill in applying the
51 - 60
principles and requirements of writing an action research proposal
__________________________________
Signature of FS Program Coordinator