Atlantis 2013
Atlantis 2013
Atlantis 2013
COPD
Background: The longitudinal associations between depression or anxiety and COPD, and their
comorbid effect on prognosis, have not been adequately addressed by previous reviews. We aimed
to systematically assess these associations to inform guidelines and practice.
Methods: We searched electronic databases for articles published before May 2012. Longitudinal
studies in adult populations that reported an association between clinically relevant depression
or anxiety and COPD, or that reported their comorbid effect on exacerbation and/or mortality,
were eligible. Risk ratios (RRs) were pooled across studies using random-effects models and were
verified using fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity was explored with subgroup and metaregression
analyses.
Results: Twenty-two citations yielded 16 studies on depression or anxiety as predictors of COPD
outcomes (incident COPD/chronic lung disease or exacerbation) and/or mortality, in 28,759 par-
ticipants followed for 1 to 8 years, and six studies on COPD as a predictor of depression in
7,439,159 participants followed for 1 to 35 years. Depression or anxiety consistently increased the
risk of COPD outcomes (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.22-1.68), particularly in higher-quality studies and
in people aged ⱕ 66 years. Comorbid depression increased the risk of mortality (RR, 1.83; 95%
CI, 1.00-3.36), particularly in men. Anxiety (or psychologic distress) increased the risk of COPD
outcomes/mortality in most studies (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02-1.58). Finally, COPD consistently
increased the risk of depression (RR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.45-1.96).
Conclusions: Depression and anxiety adversely affect prognosis in COPD, conferring an increased
risk of exacerbation and possibly death. Conversely, COPD increases the risk of developing depres-
sion. These bidirectional associations suggest potential usefulness of screening for these disease
combinations to direct timely therapeutic intervention. CHEST 2013; 144(3):766–777
Abbreviations: GOLD 5 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; RR 5 risk ratio
Mean Predictor
Study/Year Age, y Predictor, Assessment Prevalence, % Outcome, Assessment
Depression or anxiety
exposure → COPD
or mortality outcome
Almagro et al34/2002 72 Depressive symptoms, NR Mortality
Yesavage score ⱖ 11 (PDA)
Coventry et al32/2011 65 Depressive symptoms, 43 COPD exacerbation, hospital
HADS score ⱖ 15 (PDA) readmission
Dalal et al10/2011 64 Depression or anxiety, prescriptions & 50 COPD exacerbation, hospital ED
ICD-9 criteria (PDA) presentation or readmission
de Voogd et al35/2009 61 Depressive symptoms, HADS score ⱖ 8 33 Mortality
Eisner et al23/2010 57 Anxious symptoms, HADS score ⱖ 8 15 COPD exacerbation, hospital readmission
Fan et al13/2007 67 Depressive symptoms, NR COPD exacerbation, hospital presentation
BDI score ⱖ 15 (PDA) (respiratory related)/mortality
Gudmundsson et al28/2005 69 Depressive/anxious symptoms, 29/41 COPD exacerbation, hospital readmission
HADS score ⱖ 8
Ito et al26/2012 70 Depressive symptoms, 18 COPD exacerbation, hospital
CES-D score ⱖ 16 readmission/mortality-hospitalization
Jennings et al24/2009 67 Depressive symptoms, MH score ⱕ 20 17 COPD exacerbation, patient records
Laurin et al30/2009 66 Depression or anxiety, DSM-IV 49 COPD exacerbation (consistent with
criteria (PDA) GOLD), hospital readmission or
additional treatment
Ng et al14/2007 72 Depressive symptoms, HADS score ⱖ 8 44 COPD exacerbation, hospital
readmission/mortality
Patten et al31/2008 44 Probable depression, CIDI-SF (PDA) 6 Chronic bronchitis/emphysema,
questionnaire
Pembroke et al33/2006 54 Psychologic distress symptoms, 14/20 Chronic bronchitis, questionnaire
GHQ score ⱖ 4
Stage et al29/2005 71 Depression, ICD-10 criteria (PDA) 47 Mortality
Walke et al25/2007 72 Depressive/anxious symptoms, 30 (49) Mortality
ESAS moderate or severe
Xu et al27/2008 66 Depressive/anxious symptoms, 10/5 COPD exacerbation (consistent with
HADS score ⱖ 11 vs ⱕ 7 (PDA) GOLD), hospital readmission
COPD exposure → depression
or anxiety outcome
Atlantis et al40/2011 73 Chronic bronchitis, emphysema or 3 Depressive symptoms, PAS score ⱖ 5
asthma, questionnaire
Giltay et al38/2010 57 Chronic lung diseases (bronchial 26 Depressive symptoms, Zung SDS
asthma, pulmonary emphysema, score ⱖ 50
chronic bronchitis), spirometry
Schneider et al41/2010 66 COPD, GP diagnosis 46 Depression, GP
Sode et al39/2011 55 case/26 COPD, ICD-8/10 criteria 4 Depression, ICD-8/10 criteria
controls
van den Bemt et al37/2009 62 COPD, GP diagnosis 29 Depression, GP
Wagena et al36/2005 42 Chronic bronchitis, questionnaire 2 Depressive/anxious symptoms,
HADS score ⱖ 11
BDI 5 Beck Depression Inventory; CES-D 5 Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale; CIDI-SF 5 Composite International Diagnostic
Interview Short Form; DSM-IV 5 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition); ESAS 5 Edmonton Symptom
Assessment Scale; GHQ 5 General Health Questionnaire; GOLD 5 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; GP 5 general
practitioner; ICD 5 International Classification of Diseases; MH 5 Mental Health item from the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey; NR 5 not
reported; PDA 5 probable depression or anxiety (good evidence based on clinical interview or valid instrument using a high cutoff point for
clinically relevant symptoms). See Table 1 for expansion of other abbreviations.
The sample sizes ranged from 49 to 14,682, resulting and by psychometrics using various cutoff points in
in a total of 28,759 participants across studies. The the remaining 13 studies. There was good evidence
mean age of the samples ranged from 44 to 72 years. of probable depression or anxiety (clinical interview or
All except one study sampled both sexes (overall, valid instrument using a high cutoff point for clinically
54% men), and reported effect estimates in men and relevant symptoms) in only eight of 16 studies.10,13,27,29-32,34
women separately.33 Depression or anxiety predictors The prevalence of depression or anxiety predictors
were defined by physician diagnosis or the use of anti- (exposure category) reported in 14 studies ranged from
depressant/antianxiety medications in three studies,10,29,30 5% to 50%. The primary outcomes consisted of COPD
Follow-up,
Total or Risk Quality
Study/Year Median, y Expression Covariate Adjustments/Considerations Score
Depression or anxiety
exposure → COPD
or mortality outcome
Almagro et al34/2002 2.3, median OR Age, sex, FEV1, functional status, medications, dyspnea, SGRQ, medical 5.2
conditions, past-year readmission, marital status, discharge Paco2
Coventry et al32/2011 1 OR Age, sex, FEV1, smoking, comorbidity, previous COPD admission 5.7
Dalal et al10/2011 1 OR Age, sex, comorbidity, medications, medical costs 6.4
de Voogd et al35/2009 7, median HR Age, sex, partner status, smoking, FEV1, BMI, depressive symptoms, 5.2
Type D personality, exercise capacity
Eisner et al23/2010 2.1, median HR Age, sex, race, education, income, smoking, BODE index, COPD severity 5.7
Fan et al13/2007 1/3 OR Age, sex, lung function/capacity, BODE index, comorbidity, antidepressants 5.1
Gudmundsson et al28/2005 1 HR Age, smoking, FEV1, SGRQ 4.8
Ito et al26/2012 1 RR BMI, GOLD stage, Pao2, Paco2, treatments (long-term oxygen therapy; 5.3
noninvasive positive pressure ventilation; corticosteroids)
Jennings et al24/2009 1 OR Age, sex, FEV1, exercise capacity, BMI, treatments (corticosteroids; use 6.6
of home oxygen), comorbidities
Laurin et al30/2009 2 RR Age, sex, length of COPD diagnosis, disease severity, smoking, setting, 5.7
comorbidity, follow-ups, past hospitalizations
Ng et al14/2007 1, median HR Age, sex, marital status, hospital length of stay, BMI, FEV1, FVC, Pao2, 5.8
Paco2, COPD duration, dyspnea, smoking, past readmissions, SGRQ
Patten et al31/2008 8 HR Age, sex, health service use, smoking 6.4
Pembroke et al33/2006 3, median OR Age, sex stratification, socioeconomic status, BMI, FEV1 6.2
Stage et al29/2005 2.2 HR Age, sex, smoking, antidepressants, FEV1, corticosteroids 5.9
Walke et al25/2007 2 OR None 5.0
Xu et al27/2008 1 IRR Age, sex, smoking, marital status, education/employment, FEV1, 5.3
dyspnea, walking capacity, social support, COPD-related self-efficacy,
comorbidities, hospital type, respiratory medications, oxygen
therapy, past readmissions
COPD exposure → depression
or anxiety outcome
Atlantis et al40/2011 2 RR None 5.5
Giltay et al38/2010 5 OR Age, country, socioeconomic status, marital status, smoking, BMI 6.7
Schneider et al41/2010 10 OR Smoking, BMI, infections, sleep disorders, medical conditions 6.9
Sode et al39/2011 26 OR Age, sex, descent, geographical residency, education 8.4
van den Bemt et al37/2009 35 HR Age, sex, socioeconomic status, GP setting, comorbidity 7.1
Wagena et al36/2005 1.5 OR Age, sex, education, smoking 6.6
BODE index 5 based on BMI, degree of airflow obstruction measured by FEV1, grade of dyspnea assessed by the modified Medical Research
Council dyspnea scale, and exercise capacity measured by the 6-min walk test; HR 5 hazard ratio; IRR 5 incident rate ratio; RR 5 relative risk;
SGRQ 5 St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.
Figure 2. Risk ratios for all 13 studies assessing the association between depression or anxiety and risk
of COPD outcomes.
Sensitivity Analysis No. Studies Total Sample Size Risk Ratio (95% CI) P Value
Fixed-effects model 13 30,137 1.41 (1.29-1.55) .012
Exclusion of anxiety or psychologic distress studies 10 25,050 1.43 (1.20-1.71) .015
Exclusion of lower-quality studies (score , 6.0) 5 26,737 1.69 (1.48-1.94) .617
Exclusion of 3 studies in non-COPD populations 10 10,998 1.31 (1.12-1.54) .041
Exclusion of 7 studies using possible rather than probable 6 23,998 1.58 (1.35-1.86) .148
depression criteria
Exclusion of 1 study with extreme CIs 12 30,061 1.43 (1.21-1.68) .004
Pembroke et al men and women in Figure 2 have been counted as two studies. P value is for heterogeneity within each sensitivity analysis (not
33
after exclusion of studies using possible rather than produced and showed only slight evidence of publi-
probable depression criteria (decreased to 1.47 [95% CI, cation bias, because there was only one small study26
0.37-5.78]) and one study with extreme CIs (decreased whose RR estimate was larger and aligned with the
to 1.65 [95% CI, 0.93-2.91]). pooled RR (e-Fig 2).
In subgroup analyses (Fig 5), there was a trend for
effect estimates that was larger in the group of studies Ancillary Meta-analysis: Anxiety or Psychologic
containing a predominance of men (2.82 vs 0.90, Distress Exposure and Risk of COPD Outcomes or
P 5 .08). Similarly, there was a trend for male sex pre- Mortality: Figure 6 presents RRs (with 95% CIs) for
dicting the log RR in metaregression (1.03; 95% CI, all six studies assessing the association between anxiety
1.00-1.07; P 5 .07 per 1 percentage point increment or psychologic distress exposure (rather than depres-
in percentage of men). In addition, a funnel plot was sion) and risk of COPD outcome or mortality (one
Figure 3. Results of subgroup analyses of 13 studies assessing the association between depression or
anxiety and risk of COPD outcomes. df 5 degrees of freedom.
study25), in an ancillary meta-analysis. The pooled RR (I2 5 27.7%, P 5 .246). The sensitivity analysis pre-
of 1.27 (95% CI, 1.02-1.58) shows that anxiety or psy- sented in Table 6 shows that the pooled RR was sim-
chologic distress, like depression, was associated with ilar after exclusion of three studies in populations with
an increased risk of COPD outcomes or mortality. self-reported chronic lung disease38,40 (1.55 [95% CI,
There was a low degree of heterogeneity among studies 1.45-1.65]), and the single lower-quality study40 (1.65
(I2 5 21.8%, P 5 .270), which was mostly attributed to [95% CI, 1.43-1.91]). Limited data from one study
two large studies23,28 that had smaller RR estimates suggested that chronic bronchitis may also increase
aligned with the pooled RR. the risk of anxiety (RR, 5.09; 95% CI, 2.91-8.89).36
Effect estimates were not associated with explana-
COPD Exposure and Risk of Depression or Anxiety: tory variables in subgroup analyses (e-Fig 3) or metare-
Figure 7 presents RRs (with 95% CIs) for all six studies gressions. In addition, a funnel plot was produced
assessing the association between COPD and risk of and showed only slight evidence of publication bias,
depression. The pooled RR of 1.69 (95% CI, 1.45-1.96) because all studies had relatively large sample sizes
shows that COPD was associated with increased risk (e-Fig 4).
of depression. There was a high degree of heteroge-
neity among studies (I2 5 70.8%, P 5 .004), which was
mostly a result of variation in degree of deference, Discussion
because all six studies had RR estimates with 95% CIs
Summary of Evidence
farther from the null. After exclusion of two outlier
studies,36,40 the pooled RR decreased to 1.55 (95% CI, We have confirmed that depression or anxiety con-
1.46-1.66) and the degree of heterogeneity lessened fers an increased risk of COPD outcomes and possibly
Sensitivity Analysis No. Studies Total Sample Size Risk Ratio (95% CI) P Value
Fixed-effects model 7 1,442 1.92 (1.42-2.61) .003
Exclusion of 4 studies using possible rather than probable 3 794 1.47 (0.37-5.78) .001
depression criteria
Exclusion of 1 study with extreme CIs 1 1,366 1.65 (0.93-2.91) .007
P value is for heterogeneity within each sensitivity analysis (not for tests that risk ratio 5 1).
death. Moreover, COPD increases the risk of devel- one.29 The conflicting result could have been due to
oping depression. People with depression or anxiety chance, because that outlier study was conducted in
had a 43% increased risk of COPD outcomes (Fig 2), only 49 patients.29 The subgroup analyses suggested
and patients with COPD and depression or anxiety that effect estimates were larger in studies with a male
had a 31% increased risk of exacerbation (Table 4). predominance. This could have been due to several
Compared with the effect estimates in a recently factors other than comorbid depression, such as the
reported systematic review,12 our results for COPD higher prevalence of COPD,2 ever smoking,2 and mor-
exacerbation risk are two- to threefold greater and more tality rates1 observed in men. However, the signifi-
conclusive. The effect estimate for COPD outcomes cant effect estimate for mortality was partially driven
increased in size for higher-quality studies, in studies by one study that had a very large and imprecise effect
with good evidence of clinically relevant depression estimate26 (Table 5). In addition, the results of our ancil-
or anxiety (probable depression/anxiety), and in those lary analysis suggested that people with anxiety or
containing people aged ⱕ 66 years (Fig 3); remained psychologic distress had an increased risk of COPD
robust after exclusion of anxiety or psychologic dis- outcome or mortality (Fig 6), but the size of the effect
tress studies; and decreased in size after exclusion of estimate (27%) was smaller when compared with our
three studies in non-COPD populations (Table 4). results for depression.
Thus, limited evidence based on subgroup analyses People with COPD had a 55% to 69% increased
suggests that depression or anxiety is a strong predictor risk of developing depression (Fig 7), and effect esti-
of incident chronic lung disease and a most useful mates were robust across all six reviewed studies.
prognostic indicator when there is good evidence of Furthermore, the limited data suggest that chronic
psychopathology, especially in younger patients with bronchitis alone may increase the risk of anxiety. Once
COPD. comorbidity is present, depression or anxiety worsens
Patients with COPD and comorbid depression had COPD prognosis and may interfere with effective
an 83% increased risk of mortality (Fig 4), and effect COPD management, as described in the introduc-
estimates were consistent across all studies except tion. The increased burden of comorbid depression or
anxiety in COPD likely rises with the degree of dis- oping depression, which should inform guidelines and
ease severity. Accordingly, airflow limitation, a conven- practice. Furthermore, we found evidence to suggest
tional measure of COPD severity, tended to be greater that future higher-quality studies will likely strengthen
among patients with, than without, depression or anx- rather than weaken this evidence base.
iety in several of the studies we reviewed.13,14,23,27
Collectively, the existing literature is sufficient to
Limitations
draw the conclusions that depression or anxiety confers
an increased risk of COPD outcomes and possibly Several limitations require consideration. First,
mortality too, and COPD increases the risk of devel- because only a small number of studies conducted in
Figure 7. Risk ratios for all six studies assessing the association between COPD and risk of depression.
Sensitivity Analysis No. Studies Total Sample Size Risk Ratio (95% CI) P Value
Fixed-effects model 6 7,439,159 1.58 (1.54-1.61) .004
Exclusion of a lower-quality study (score , 6.0) 5 7,438,438 1.65 (1.43-1.91) .006
Exclusion of 3 studies in non-COPD populations 3 7,433,419 1.55 (1.45-1.65) .215
P value is for heterogeneity within each sensitivity analysis (not for tests that risk ratio 5 1).
specific populations were included, the findings of this bidities, because timely diagnosis and treatment may
review may not be relevant to other countries and key favorably affect COPD prognosis.
groups; thus, further research is required. Second, only
five10,24,31,33 out of 13 studies of depression or anxiety
exposure and risk of COPD outcomes, and none of Acknowledgments
seven studies of comorbid depression exposure in Author contributions: Dr Atlantis is the guarantor of the paper
and takes responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole,
patients with COPD and risk of mortality, received a from inception to published article.
score of ⱖ 6.0. This suggests there were several poten- Dr Atlantis: contributed to the conception and design of the review,
tial sources of bias that could have weakened our results, identification of studies for inclusion, extraction and interpretation
of data, drafting of the article, and approval of the final completed
because we found that effect estimates increased with article.
quality score. For instance, two lower-quality studies Dr Fahey: contributed to the extraction, analysis, and interpretation
had conflicting findings29 or very imprecise effect esti- of data; revision of the article; and approval of the final completed
article.
mates (extremely wide CIs) that biased the effect Dr Cochrane: contributed to the extraction and interpretation of data,
estimate for mortality,26 and there was substantial het- revision of the article, and approval of the final completed article.
erogeneity in assessments and definitions of COPD Dr Smith: contributed to the interpretation of data, revision of the
article, and approval of the final completed article.
exacerbation and depression or anxiety among stud- Financial/nonfinancial disclosures: The authors have reported
ies. Third, we acknowledge that our use of checklist- to CHEST the following conflicts of interest: Dr Cochrane has
derived summary scores to distinguish higher- and received pharmaceutical company sponsorship to attend national
and international symposia from GlaxoSmithKline plc, Novartis AG,
lower-quality studies is questionable and should be and Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH and has received honoraria as
interpreted with caution. However, we were unable a speaker from GlaxoSmithKline plc. Drs Atlantis, Fahey, and Smith
to assess each quality item individually using subgroup have reported that no potential conflicts of interest exist with any
companies/organizations whose products or services may be dis-
and metaregression analyses because of the high num- cussed in this article.
ber of quality items on our checklist (n 5 9) and low Other contributions: This research was performed at the Univer-
statistical power. Fourth, failure to explore and/or detect sity of Western Sydney. We are grateful to Geoffrey Lattimore, BA,
Dip Teaching, for his work in developing and conducting the elec-
significant sources of heterogeneity among studies using tronic database searches.
subgroup and metaregression analyses could have been Additional information: The e-Appendix and e-Figures can be
due to the small number of studies included, result- found in the “Supplemental Materials” area of the online article.
ing in low statistical power. Fifth, reviewer-level lim-
itations include incomplete retrieval of information
for several of the 28 citations excluded and the exis- References
tence of other relevant studies not identified with our 1. World Health Organization. The Global Burden of Disease: 2004
Update. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;
search strategy despite having consulted several experts 2008.
in the field, resulting in selection bias. However, this 2. Buist AS, McBurnie MA, Vollmer WM, et al; BOLD Col-
was an unlikely source of bias, because the results and laborative Research Group. International variation in the
conclusions reported in most of the excluded studies prevalence of COPD (the BOLD Study): a population-based
were in line with those reported herein. prevalence study. Lancet. 2007;370(9589):741-750.
3. Yohannes AM, Willgoss TG, Baldwin RC, Connolly MJ.
Depression and anxiety in chronic heart failure and chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease: prevalence, relevance, clin-
Conclusions ical implications and management principles. Int J Geriatr
Psychiatry. 2010;25(12):1209-1221.
We have confirmed that depression or anxiety con- 4. Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada-Villa J, et al; WHO
fers an increased risk of COPD outcomes and possibly World Mental Health Survey Consortium. Prevalence, severity,
death, and that COPD increases the risk of developing and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the
depression. Consideration of these bidirectional associ- World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys.
ations and the adverse prognostic impact of comorbid JAMA. 2004;291(21):2581-2590.
5. Fan VS, Giardino ND, Blough DK, Kaplan RM, Ramsey SD;
COPD and depression or anxiety is an important step Nett Research Group. Costs of pulmonary rehabilitation and
in informing physician practice. Our results are suffi- predictors of adherence in the National Emphysema Treat-
cient to justify screening for this combination of comor- ment Trial. COPD. 2008;5(2):105-116.