Dubner D 2013 Psychology Science Happiness
Dubner D 2013 Psychology Science Happiness
Dubner D 2013 Psychology Science Happiness
Research Say?
David Dubner
Abstract
This paper surveys the scientific evidence regarding the nature of human happiness by drawing upon
numerous studies in social science domains: namely psychology, but also related fields of business
leadership and consulting, economics, and behavioral economics. Beginning with a definition and
narrowing of the terminology, the review moves toward a brief sketch of measurement methods in the
topic. Subjective well-being and happiness are then explored within the framework of psychological
theories of happiness, including tension-reduction and goal attainment theories, activity and process
theories, and genetic and biologic dispositional theory. Evolving views regarding hedonic adaptation as a
key process underlying happiness is examined, as well as Lyubomirsky and Layous’ (2013)
comprehensive model of happiness as a framework that encompasses the entire scope of psychological
theories regarding happiness. Finally, the correlational evidence related to the various components of
happiness is reviewed, concluding with the observation that although strong correlational evidence is
linked to well-being, happiness is a concept that defies unequivocal causal attributions because it
contains a complex amalgam of interrelated and bi-reciprocal variables.
Defining Happiness
Any serious discussion about happiness must first begin by attempting to define what
we mean by the term happiness. In general, happiness can be thought of as an
emotional state that reflects a high level of mental and/or emotional well-being. Current
scientific perspectives typically frame happiness as a complex binary construct that
encompasses subjective elements of both affect and cognition that contribute to well-
being. Subjective well-being (SWB), according to Lyubomirsky and Dickerhoof (2006) “
represents people’s beliefs and feelings about whether they are leading a rewarding
and desirable life (p. 167).” Diener, Oishi, and Lucas (2009), define SWB as “
a person’s cognitive and affective evaluations of his or her life as a whole (p.187),”
including evaluations of emotional reactions to life events, and also cognitive judgments