Global, Regional, and National Burden of Migraine
Global, Regional, and National Burden of Migraine
Global, Regional, and National Burden of Migraine
Summary
Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 954–76 Background Through the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors (GBD) studies, headache has emerged
This online publication has as a major global public health concern. We aimed to use data from the GBD 2016 study to provide new estimates for
been corrected. The corrected prevalence and years of life lived with disability (YLDs) for migraine and tension-type headache and to present the
version first appeared at
methods and results in an accessible way for clinicians and researchers of headache disorders.
thelancet.com/neurology on
November 17, 2021
See Comment page 929 Methods Data were derived from population-based cross-sectional surveys on migraine and tension-type headache.
*Collaborators listed at the end
Prevalence for each sex and 5-year age group interval (ie, age 5 years to ≥95 years) at different time points from
of the Article 1990 and 2016 in all countries and GBD regions were estimated using a Bayesian meta-regression model. Disease
Correspondence to: burden measured in YLDs was calculated from prevalence and average time spent with headache multiplied by
Prof Lars Jacob Stovner, disability weights (a measure of the relative severity of the disabling consequence of a disease). The burden
Department of Neuromedicine stemming from medication overuse headache, which was included in earlier iterations of GBD as a separate
and Movement Science,
Norwegian University of Science
cause, was subsumed as a sequela of either migraine or tension-type headache. Because no deaths were assigned
and Technology, Trondheim to headaches as the underlying cause, YLDs equate to disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). We also analysed
N-7491, Norway results on the basis of the Socio-demographic Index (SDI), a compound measure of income per capita, education,
[email protected] and fertility.
Findings Almost three billion individuals were estimated to have a migraine or tension-type headache in 2016:
1·89 billion (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 1·71–2·10) with tension-type headache and 1·04 billion (95% UI 1·00–1·09)
with migraine. However, because migraine had a much higher disability weight than tension-type headache, migraine
caused 45·1 million (95% UI 29·0–62·8) and tension-type headache only 7·2 million (95% UI 4·6–10·5) YLDs
globally in 2016. The headaches were most burdensome in women between ages 15 and 49 years, with migraine
causing 20·3 million (95% UI 12·9–28·5) and tension-type headache 2·9 million (95% UI 1·8–4·2) YLDs in 2016,
which was 11·2% of all YLDs in this age group and sex. Age-standardised DALYs for each headache type showed a
small increase as SDI increased.
Interpretation Although current estimates are based on limited data, our study shows that headache disorders, and
migraine in particular, are important causes of disability worldwide, and deserve greater attention in health policy
debates and research resource allocation. Future iterations of this study, based on sources from additional countries
and with less methodological heterogeneity, should help to provide stronger evidence of the need for action.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0
license.
Research in context
Evidence before this study globally, and was among the ten most disabling disorders in
Since 2000, the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk each of the 21 GBD regions. It was particularly burdensome
Factors (GBD) studies have produced estimates of prevalence among young and middle-aged women. Unlike many other
and burden of migraine. Since GBD 2010, tension-type diseases and injuries quantified in GBD studies, headache
headache and medication overuse headache have been added showed no clear relation to sociodemographic development, as
and estimates have been made by country spanning the measured by the Socio-demographic Index. No risk factors have
period from 1990 to the most recent year for which data are yet been established in the GBD studies for headache disorders,
available. Headache disorders, and in particular, migraine, and headache epidemiological studies are absent in many
have been found to be highly prevalent and a cause of large countries and regions.
burden. To date, no research article has focused on the
Implications of all the available evidence
detailed methods and results of headache estimates from
Through the GBD studies, headache disorders, and in particular,
GBD. With the present study, we updated a previous
migraine, have been shown to be among the most disabling
systematic review covering 1980–2001 by doing a review that
disorders worldwide. Many fatal and disabling disorders
searched PubMed for articles using the terms “migraine”,
decrease with socioeconomic development, but this does not
“tension”, “headache”, “medication”, and “epidemiology”
seem to be true for migraine and tension-type headache.
from Jan 1, 2001, until Dec 31, 2015. There were no language
Hence, their relative importance is likely to increase in the
restrictions.
future. More high-quality headache epidemiological studies
Added value of this study and studies aiming to identify modifiable risk factors should be
In 2016, of all GBD causes of disease, tension-type headache done. Effective strategies to modify the course of headaches
was the third most prevalent, and migraine the sixth. In terms and alleviate pain exist, but many people affected by headache
of years of life lived with disability, migraine ranked second are not benefiting from this knowledge.
data were absent for more than half of the world’s In the GBD cause hierarchy, migraine and tension-
population. When new data came from big countries like type headache are individual disorders on Level 3,
Russia, China, India, and some parts of Africa, and with under neurological disorders (Level 2) and non-
tension-type headache and medication overuse headache communicable diseases (Level 1). No further
also taken into account, headache disorders were subdivision exists for headaches, so each reappears at
collectively the third cause of disability in people under Level 4. In GBD 2013 and GBD 2015, medication
50 years of age in GBD 2015.3 Since GBD 2010, prevalence overuse headache was treated as a separate disorder,
and burden of disability have been re-estimated for the but in GBD 2016 it was considered a sequela of either
full time period from 1990 until the most recent year for migraine or tension-type headache. The burden of
which data are available, each time incorporating new medication overuse headache was therefore added to
data sources and any updates to methods. the burdens estimated for these headache types
Given the importance of headache disorders for according to a meta-analysis of three studies reporting
global public health, which has become evident through the proportions of medication overuse headache
GBD, we wanted to inform an audience of headache resulting from migraine (73·4%, 95% uncertainty
specialists about these studies. The aims of the present interval [UI] 63·9–82·0) or tension-type headache
Article are to provide an overview of the GBD methods (26·6%, 18·0–36·1).4–6
as applied to headache, to present detailed results of the In GBD, disease burden is estimated in disability-
update for 1990–2016 on headache burden in different adjusted life-years (DALYs), which are the sum of years
world regions and with time trends, and to discuss the of life lost (YLLs) to premature mortality and years of
implications of these results both for future iterations life lived with disability (YLDs). Because GBD does not
of GBD and for health policies around the world. estimate any deaths from headache disorders as the
underlying cause, DALYs for headaches are equivalent
Methods to YLDs. YLDs for each headache disorder are calculated
Overview from its prevalence and the mean time patients spend
The main elements of the GBD methods, both general with that type of headache multiplied by the associated
and pertaining to migraine and tension-type headache, disability weight. The determination of headache
are described in the appendix. In the main text of this disability weights through population and internet See Online for appendix
Article, we concentrate on methods pertaining to surveys was on the basis of lay descriptions (appendix).7,8
estimation of the burden of migraine and tension-type The disability weight for migraine was 0·434, meaning
headache. A flowchart of the different steps in these that during an attack the affected person experiences
methods is shown in the appendix. health loss of 43·4% compared with a person in full
health. The disability weight for medication overuse adjustment led to a downward correction for YLDs for
headache was 0·223 and for tension-type headache was migraine in women and children by factors ranging
0·037. After all diseases were estimated separately, an from 2·1% (at ages 5–9 years) to 20·6% (at ages
adjustment was made to YLDs to account for ≥95 years), reflecting a strong correlation between
comorbidity by use of simulation methods assuming a comorbidity and age. The corresponding figures in
multiplicative, rather than additive, model. This males were 2·1% and 20·7%, respectively.
Table: Prevalent cases and YLDs for migraine and tension-type headache in 2016 and percentage change of age-standardised rates by location
The Caribbean LCA TTO TLS Seychelles Persian Gulf Singapore Balkan Peninsula Fiji Tonga
Figure 1: Age-standardised prevalence of migraine per 100 000 population by location for both sexes, 2016
ATG=Antigua and Barbuda. FSM=Federated States of Micronesia. LCA=Saint Lucia. TLS=Timor-Leste. TTO=Trinidad and Tobago. VCT=Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
The Caribbean LCA TTO TLS Seychelles Persian Gulf Singapore Balkan Peninsula Fiji Tonga
Figure 2: Age-standardised prevalence of tension-type headache per 100 000 population by location for both sexes, 2016
ATG=Antigua and Barbuda. FSM=Federated States of Micronesia. LCA=Saint Lucia. TLS=Timor-Leste. TTO=Trinidad and Tobago. VCT=Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
(western Europe, high-income North America, and with headache. For both migraine and tension-type
high-income Asia Pacific), and no data on any of the headache, frequency and duration were reported most
headaches were available from the Caribbean, central commonly in categories, and the midpoint was
sub-Saharan Africa, southern sub-Saharan Africa, or assumed to represent each category. For medication
Oceania (see appendix) regions. In all regions and overuse headache, only one study included in GBD
countries, prevalence was estimated with a Bayesian 2016 (from Russia) gave data on time in symptomatic
meta-regression model (DisMod-MR 2.1), and estimates state, reporting a mean headache frequency of 23·1
were obtained in this way also for countries and regions (SD 6·7) days per month.15 According to the ICHD-3
where no relevant headache studies had been done. definition, medication overuse headache is present on
more than 15 days per month for more than 3 months.10
Calculation of proportion of time in the symptomatic
state Modelling of prevalence
Headache disorders are modelled as chronic episodic In the mathematical modelling, the mortality due to
conditions. The prevalence reflects the individuals in headache was set at zero,16 as was occurrence below age
the population who have had at least one episode in the 5 years.17 In the sources used for this study, prevalence
past 12 months fulfilling ICHD criteria. To calculate the rates vary, but the degree to which this reflects real
average proportion of time with headache (ie, in the variation across borders and time, or methodological
symptomatic state) necessary for YLD calculation, differences, is mostly not known. Method most
13 population-based studies were identified that had probably plays a large role because results can be
data on frequency and duration of migraine attacks substantially influenced by relatively minor differences,
(appendix). From these studies, we estimated the such as variations in the screening question.18 To adjust
average number of hours migraineurs spend in attacks, for differences in methodological quality, all prevalence
and expressed this as a proportion of a year, which was studies included in GBD are scored according to a
8·5% (95% UI 5·8–11·2). modified version (dichotomised variables) of published
For tension-type headache, seven studies on duration methodological quality criteria for headache epidemio
and frequency of attacks showed that affected people logical studies,11 taking into account the repre sen
spend, on average, 4·7% (95% UI 1·3–8·0) of their time tativeness of the population of interest (representative
of country or community vs selected population), measure of income per capita, education, and fertility.19
quality of sampling (random sample of the population We also present results by groupings of countries into
of interest vs not random sample), recall period (1-year quintiles (high SDI, middle-high SDI, middle SDI,
prevalence vs other recall period), participation rate middle-low SDI, and low SDI) based on their 2016 SDI
(≥70% vs <70%), survey method (face to face with value. Additional details on the SDI methods can be
For the online results tool used headache expert or trained interviewer vs other), found online.
for estimation see validation of diagnostic instrument (sensitivity or
http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-
results-tool
specificity ≥70% vs <70% or no validation), and Role of the funding source
application of ICHD criteria (strict criteria or reasonable The funder of the study had no role in study design,
modification of criteria vs other modification of data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or the
criteria). In DisMod-MR 2.1, these methodological writing of the report. All authors had full access to the
variables were evaluated for a systematic difference and data in the study and had final responsibility for the
corrected accordingly (appendix). decision to submit for publication.
For the data visualisations of
GBD 2016 results see
Socio-demographic Index (SDI) Results
https://vizhub.healthdata.org/ We examined the relationships between migraine and In 2016, almost three billion individuals were estimated
gbd-compare/ tension-type headache DALYs and SDI, a composite to have a headache disorder: 1·89 billion (95% UI
1·71–2·10) with tension-type headache and 1·04 billion
A (95% UI 1·00–1·09) with migraine (table). All data on
60 Female age-standardised prevalence and YLDs for all countries
Male
and regions, for both 1990 and 2016, are publicly
available in online visualisations and results download
tools. For tension-type headache, the global age-
standardised prevalence was 26·1% (23·6–29·0)
40 overall: 30·8% (28·0–34·0) for women and 21·4%
(19·2–23·9) for men. All results for both sexes are
Prevalence (%)
resembled migraine closely, and was associated with done in the past 10 years that are of higher quality than
considerable disability. Until 2000, the majority of earlier studies.
studies reported only definite migraine, and not both Despite these methodological challenges, headache
definite and probable diagnoses. After 2000, more disorders are ubiquitous and contribute to a large
studies reported both types, and these studies indicate burden of lost health. Sizeable resources would be
that the prevalence of probable migraine is almost as needed to prevent or alleviate this burden in the
high as that of definite migraine.26,28 Future iterations of hundreds of millions of people with headache world
GBD should therefore find a reasonable and consistent wide. Until now, most interventions have aimed at the
way to deal with probable migraine because it is a management of symptoms, but preferable for such an
common cause of disability that otherwise will be immense public health problem might be modification
unaccounted for. Similar arguments can be made for at a population level of risk factors, if such can be
probable tension-type headache, although knowledge of identified. This intervention would require greater
this headache type is far less, and the YLDs missed by knowledge of the modifiable factors that drive headache:
omitting this are fewer because of the much lower several have been suggested with varying degrees of
disability weight of tension-type headache compared scientific support, such as obesity, smoking, indoor and
with migraine. outdoor air pollution, level of physical activity, altitude,
Another problem is the handling of chronic headache blood pressure, and level of stress.29–32 Of these factors,
disorders (ie, present on 15 or more days per month altitude and stress are not included as risks in GBD.
for more than 3 months). Many of these headaches will For the other postulated risks, the evidence for an effect
fall into the categories of chronic migraine, chronic on headaches is, in our opinion, insufficient. Potential
tension-type headache, or medication overuse head headache risk factors should be tested against GBD
ache, but the high frequency of headaches tends to blur causal criteria for inclusion of risks and associated
the features necessary for diagnosis. These headaches outcomes.33 If none of these risk factors pass the
become even more difficult to diagnose with certainty criteria, more and better epidemiological and patho
in cross-sectional epidemiological studies based on physiological studies should be done to prove or refute
questionnaires, especially when these are self-admin hypotheses about causation.
istered or applied by lay interviewers. With the Headache disorders do not appear to be strongly
exception of medication overuse headache, which is linked to socioeconomic development, as measured by
diagnosed by enquiry into medication use, these head SDI (table). The previous notion that headache was
aches are usually lumped into a descriptive category of mainly a disorder of high-income countries and
headache on 15 or more days per month, and not particularly prevalent among the wealthy, is refuted by
counted in GBD. Hence, there might be additional, and the present study, but neither is the opposite true.
perhaps considerable, headache-related morbidity that Hence, no significant reduction in the global burden of
is not captured by the diagnoses used in GBD. headache can be expected from the demographic and
Despite efforts to adjust for methodological diff epidemiological transitions22 that large parts of the
erences between studies, part of the variation between world are presently undergoing, because no clear
countries might be due to residual measurement error, pattern of decreasing YLD rate with increasing SDI
rather than true variation. Efforts have been made to exists. It can, however, be predicted that the relative
standardise the methods for studies on prevalence and importance of headaches will further increase as the
burden of headache,11 and in the future adherence to importance of other disorders, such as malnutrition,
these will hopefully make it easier to compare the infections, maternal and child diseases, and cardio
burden over geographical borders and time periods. vascular and other fatal non-communicable disorders
One of the greater challenges in modelling headache is decreases. Although a socioeconomic index like the
the poor knowledge of predictors. Such predictors help SDI does not reflect differences in headache prevalence
to stabilise disease models in the sense that they adjust when applied across countries and cultures, the
data points that are affected by measurement error. possibility that such factors are important within a
Another problem concerns how to estimate the country or region cannot be eliminated. A socioecon
proportion of time during which people with a headache omic gradient, to the effect that low socioeconomic
disorder actually have headache (time in symptomatic status is linked to higher headache prevalence, has
state). This difficulty exists partly because average been shown in countries of high, middle, and low
duration and frequency of headaches are usually income.15,34–36
reported in categories, and estimates thus depend on Even if it proves difficult to establish, with reasonable
choice of mean value in each category, and partly certainty, that modifiable risk factors exist for headache,
because the present figures rely on older studies that the results of GBD definitely give a strong call for
are of rather poor general quality. Better estimates can improving health care for headache. This call involves
probably be obtained with a more systematic analysis of the inclusion of headache care in existing health-care
individual record data in some of the major surveys systems, and not only in the high-income part of the
world. Implementation of a headache service in Alessandra C Goulart, Rahul Gupta, Graeme J Hankey, Simon I Hay,
Georgia, a country where none existed previously, has Mohamed I Hegazy, Esayas Haregot Hilawe, Amir Kasaeian,
Dessalegn H Kassa, Ibrahim Khalil, Young-Ho Khang,
been economically sustainable.37 An educational Jagdish Khubchandani, Yun Jin Kim, Yoshihiro Kokubo,
programme among general practitioners in Estonia has Mohammed A Mohammed, Mohammed A Mohammed,
been shown to reduce unnecessary referrals to Ali H Mokdad, Maziar Moradi-Lakeh, Huong Lan Thi Nguyen,
specialists and special examinations.38 A programme to Yirga Legesse Nirayo, Mostafa Qorbani, Anna Ranta, Kedir T Roba,
Saeid Safiri, Itamar S Santos, Maheswar Satpathy, Monika Sawhney,
increase competence in headache care in China is now Mekonnen Sisay Shiferaw, Ivy Shiue, Mari Smith,
being implemented.39 Some simple remedies and Cassandra E I Szoeke, Nu Thi Truong,
methods, like aspirin for attack treatment and ami Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian, Kidu Gidey Weldegwergs,
triptyline for prevention of migraine, together with Ronny Westerman, Tissa Wijeratne, Bach Xuan Tran,
Naohiro Yonemoto, Valery L Feigin, Theo Vos, Christopher J L Murray.
provision of information for patients and education for
health-care providers, should be highly cost-effective in Affiliations
Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of
low-income and middle-income countries.40 A study Science and Technology, and Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headaches,
from European and Latin American countries has St Olav’s Hospital, Trondheim, Norway (Prof L J Stovner PhD,
shown that discontinuation of medication overuse can Prof T J Steiner PhD); Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation,
reduce the proportion of severely disabled patients with University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA (E Nichols BA,
K J Foreman PhD, Prof S I Hay DSc, Prof Ali H Mokdad PhD,
medication overuse headache by almost 60%.41 This M Smith MPA, M Smith BPA, Prof T Vos PhD,
study also indicates that increased awareness of the Prof C J L Murray DPhil, Prof V L Feigin PhD); Division of Brain
danger of non-critical use of acute medication might Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK (Prof T J Steiner);
prevent millions of people from developing this Department of Neurology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
(Prof F Abd-Allah MD, Prof A Abdelalim MD, Prof M I Hegazy PhD);
prevalent and disabling disorder. Family and Community Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah,
In high-income parts of the world, the results Saudi Arabia (Prof R M Al-Raddadi PhD); Public Health Debre Berhan
presented here also highlight a strong moral obligation University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia (M G Ansha MPH); Clinic for
Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade,
to allocate more resources to research aimed at
Serbia (A Barac PhD); Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade,
understanding the mechanisms of headache to enable Belgrade, Serbia (A Barac); Department of Internal Medicine
development of more effective prevention and (I M Bensenor PhD, Prof I S Santos PhD) and Center for Clinical and
treatments. At the same time, current treatments need Epidemiological Research (A C Goulart PhD), University of São Paulo,
São Paulo, Brazil; Institute for Global Health Innovations, Duy Tan
to be recognised as ineffective more because of poor
University, Hanoi, Vietnam (L P Doan BMedSc, H L T Nguyen MPH,
availability than inefficacy, and health services must do N T Truong BHlthSci); School of Pharmacy (D Edessa MPharm,
a better job of reaching people if new treatments are to Prof M S Shiferaw MSc) and School of Nursing and Midwifery
have an effect.42 For the pharmaceutical industry, the (K T Roba PhD), Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia; Neurology,
Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
market for proven cost-effective remedies is huge, as is
(Prof M Endres MD); Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medicine
the potential for a large decrease in pain and disability, and Pharmacy of Fez, Fez, Morocco (F G Gankpe MD);
and an increase in productivity, for the global Non-communicable Disease Department, Laboratoire d’Etudes et de
community. Recherche-action en Santé (leras Afrique), Porto Novo, Benin
(F G Gankpe); National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences,
In conclusion, major limitations still exist in the GBD Bangalore, India (G Gopalkrishna MD); West Virginia Bureau for
headache burden estimations, the most notable being Public Health, Charleston, WV, USA (Prof R Gupta MD); Health
the short supply of epidemiological data from large Policy, Management and Leadership West Virginia University School
parts of the world, the paucity of studies giving data on of Public Health, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA (Prof R Gupta);
Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
average time with headache, and great methodological (Prof G J Hankey MD); Oxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre
heterogeneity. Nevertheless, GBD 2016 confirms that for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford,
headache, and in particular, migraine, is a large public UK (Prof S I Hay); Tigray Health Research Institute, Mekelle, Ethiopia
health problem in both sexes and all age groups (E H Hilawe PhD); Hematology-oncology and Stem Cell
Transplantation Research Center, and Hematologic Malignancies
worldwide, but most so in young and middle-aged Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
women. Headache is not limited to the high-income (A Kasaeian PhD); Department of Nursing, Debre Markos University,
part of the world and, unless action is taken, it is here to Debre Markos, Ethiopia (D H Kassa MS); Department of Health Policy
stay: there is no indication that the demographic and and Management, College of Medicine, and Institute of Health Policy
and Management, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University,
epidemiological transitions alone will improve the Seoul, South Korea (Prof Y H Khang MD); Department of Nutrition
situation. Rather, these profound changes which reduce and Health Science, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA
mortality will increase the relative importance of (Prof J Khubchandani PhD); School of Medicine, Xiamen University
headache for public health. Malaysia, Sepang, Malaysia (Prof Y Kim PhD); Department of
Preventive Cardiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center,
GBD 2016 Headache Collaborators Suita, Japan (Prof Y Kokubo PhD); Department of Public Health,
Lars Jacob Stovner, Emma Nichols, Timothy J Steiner, Foad Abd-Allah, Jigjiga Unviersity, Jigjiga, Ethiopia (M A Mohammed PhD); University
Ahmed Abdelalim, Rajaa M Al-Raddadi, Mustafa Geleto Ansha, of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia (M A Mohammed); Preventive
Aleksandra Barac, Isabela M Bensenor, Linh Phuong Doan, Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Iran University of
Dumessa Edessa, Matthias Endres, Kyle J Foreman, Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (M Moradi-Lakeh MD); Department of
Fortune Gbetoho Gankpe, Gururaj Gopalkrishna, Clinical Pharmacy, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia
(Y L Nirayo MS, K G Weldegwergs MS); Non-communicable Diseases 9 Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache
Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran Society. The international classification of headache disorders,
(M Qorbani PhD); Department of Medicine, University of Otago, 2nd edn. Cephalalgia 2004; 24 (suppl 1): 1–160.
Wellington, New Zealand (Prof A Ranta PhD); Department of 10 Headache Classification Committee of the International
Neurology, Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache
Zealand (Prof A Ranta); Managerial Epidemiology Research Center, Disorders, 3rd edn. Cephalalgia 2018; 38: 1–211.
Department of Public Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, 11 Stovner LJ, Al Jumah M, Birbeck GL, et al. The methodology of
Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran population surveys of headache prevalence, burden and cost:
principles and recommendations from the Global Campaign
(S Safiri PhD); Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at
against Headache. J Headache Pain 2014; 15: 5.
Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA (M Sawhney PhD); University Grants
12 United States MarketScan Claims and Medicare Data. Ann Arbor:
Commission Centre of Advanced Study in Psychology, Utkal
Truven Health Analytics, 2000.
University, Bhubaneswar, India (M Satpathy PhD); Institute for
13 United States MarketScan Claims and Medicare Data. Ann Arbor:
Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Martin Luther
Truven Health Analytics, 2010.
University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany (I Shiue PhD); Medicine
14 United States MarketScan Claims and Medicare Data. Ann Arbor:
Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne,
Truven Health Analytics, 2012.
VIC, Australia (Prof C E I Szoeke PhD); Department of Medicine,
15 Ayzenberg I, Katsarava Z, Sborowski A, et al. The prevalence of
University of Melbourne, St Albans, VIC, Australia
primary headache disorders in Russia: a countrywide survey.
(Prof T Wijeratne MD); Raffles Neuroscience Centre, Raffles Hospital, Cephalalgia 2012; 32: 373–81.
Singapore, Singapore (Prof N Venketasubramanian FRCP); Yong Loo
16 Asberg AN, Stovner LJ, Zwart JA, Winsvold BS, Heuch I,
Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Hagen K. Migraine as a predictor of mortality: The HUNT study.
Singapore (Prof N Venketasubramanian); Competence Center of Cephalalgia 2016; 36: 351–57.
Mortality-follow-up, German National Cohort, Federal Institute for 17 Wober-Bingol C. Epidemiology of migraine and headache in
Population Research, Wiesbaden, Germany (R Westerman DSc); children and adolescents. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2013; 17: 341.
Department of Psychology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia 18 Hagen K, Zwart JA, Aamodt AH, et al. A face-to-face interview of
(Prof T Wijeratne); Department of Health Economics, Hanoi Medical participants in HUNT 3: the impact of the screening question on
University, Hanoi, Vietnam (Prof B X Tran PhD); Department of headache prevalence. J Headache Pain 2008; 9: 289–94.
Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan 19 GBD 2016 Mortality Collaborators. Global, regional, and national
(Prof N Yonemoto MPH); National Institute for Stroke and Applied under-5 mortality, adult mortality, age-specific mortality, and life
Neurosciences Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, expectancy, 1970–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global
New Zealand (Prof V L Feigin PhD). Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017; 390: 1084–150.
20 GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence
Contributors
Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence,
LJS prepared the first draft. TJS, EN, and TV analysed the data and
prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and
edited the first draft and final versions of the Article. LJS finalised all injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the
drafts, and approved the final version of the Article. All other authors Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017; 390: 1211–59.
provided data, developed models, reviewed results, provided guidance on 21 WHO and Lifting The Burden. ATLAS of headache disorders and
methodology, or reviewed the Article, and approved the final version. resources in the world 2011. In: Saxena S, Dua T, Saraceno B,
Declaration of interests et al, eds. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011.
CEIS reports grants from the National Health and Medical Research 22 GBD 2016 DALYs and Hale Collaborators. Global, regional,
Council, during the study; and grants from Lundbeck and the and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases
and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries
Alzheimer’s Association, outside the submitted work. CEIS also
and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global
reports the patent PCT/AU2008/001556. All other authors declare no Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017; 390: 1260–344.
competing interests.
23 GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence
Acknowledgments Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence,
This research was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and
injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of
References Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016; 388: 1545–602.
1 Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R, et al. The global burden of 24 Diener HC, Holle D, Solbach K, Gaul C. Medication-overuse
headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability headache: risk factors, pathophysiology and management.
worldwide. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 193–210. Nat Rev Neurol 2016; 12: 575–83.
2 WHO. The World Health Report 2001. http://www.who.int/ 25 Kim BK, Chung YK, Kim JM, Lee KS, Chu MK. Prevalence,
whr/2001/en/index.html. Geneva: World Health Organization, clinical characteristics and disability of migraine and probable
2001. migraine: a nationwide population-based survey in Korea.
3 Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, Vos T. GBD 2015: migraine is the third Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 1106–16.
cause of disability in under 50s. J Headache Pain 2016; 17: 104. 26 Lanteri-Minet M, Valade D, Geraud G, Chautard MH, Lucas C.
4 Katsarava Z, Muessig M, Dzagnidze A, Fritsche G, Diener HC, Migraine and probable migraine—results of FRAMIG 3, a French
Limmroth V. Medication overuse headache: rates and predictors nationwide survey carried out according to the 2004 IHS
for relapse in a 4-year prospective study. Cephalalgia 2005; classification. Cephalalgia 2005; 25: 1146–58.
25: 12–15. 27 Arruda MA, Guidetti V, Galli F, Albuquerque RC, Bigal ME.
5 Jonsson P, Hedenrud T, Linde M. Epidemiology of medication Primary headaches in childhood—a population-based study.
overuse headache in the general Swedish population. Cephalalgia Cephalalgia 2010; 30: 1056–64.
2011; 31: 1015–22. 28 Patel NV, Bigal ME, Kolodner KB, Leotta C, Lafata JE, Lipton RB.
6 Colas R, Munoz P, Temprano R, Gomez C, Pascual J. Chronic Prevalence and impact of migraine and probable migraine in a
daily headache with analgesic overuse: epidemiology and impact health plan. Neurology 2004; 63: 1432–38.
on quality of life. Neurology 2004; 62: 1338–42. 29 Robberstad L, Dyb G, Hagen K, Stovner LJ, Holmen TL, Zwart JA.
7 Salomon JA, Vos T, Hogan DR, et al. Common values in assessing An unfavorable lifestyle and recurrent headaches among
health outcomes from disease and injury: disability weights adolescents: the HUNT study. Neurology 2010; 75: 712–17.
measurement study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. 30 Westergaard ML, Glumer C, Hansen EH, Jensen RH.
Lancet 2012; 380: 2129–43. Medication overuse, healthy lifestyle behaviour and stress in
8 Salomon JA, Haagsma JA, Davis A, et al. Disability weights for chronic headache: results from a population-based representative
the Global Burden of Disease 2013 study. Lancet Glob Health 2015; survey. Cephalalgia 2016; 36: 15–28.
3: e712–23.
31 Winsvold BS, Hagen K, Aamodt AH, Stovner LJ, Holmen J, 38 Braschinsky M, Haldre S, Kals M, et al. Structured education can
Zwart JA. Headache, migraine and cardiovascular risk factors: improve primary-care management of headache: the first
the HUNT study. Eur J Neurol 2011; 18: 504–11. empirical evidence, from a controlled interventional study.
32 Linde M, Edvinsson L, Manandhar K, Risal A, Steiner TJ. J Headache Pain 2016; 17: 24.
Migraine associated with altitude: results from a population-based 39 Yu S, Steiner TJ. Lifting the burden of headache in China:
study in Nepal. Eur J Neurol 2017; 24: 1055–61. managing migraine in a SMART way. J Headache Pain 2017;
33 GBD 2016 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and 18: 79.
national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, 40 Linde M, Steiner TJ, Chisholm D. Cost-effectiveness analysis of
environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters interventions for migraine in four low- and middle-income
of risks, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of countries. J Headache Pain 2015; 16: 496.
Disease Study 2016. Lancet 390: 1345–422 41 Bendtsen L, Munksgaard S, Tassorelli C, et al. Disability, anxiety
34 Hagen K, Vatten L, Stovner LJ, Zwart JA, Krokstad S, Bovim G. and depression associated with medication-overuse headache can
Low socio-economic status is associated with increased risk of be considerably reduced by detoxification and prophylactic
frequent headache: a prospective study of 22718 adults in Norway. treatment. Results from a multicentre, multinational study
Cephalalgia 2002; 22: 672–79. (COMOESTAS project). Cephalalgia 2014; 34: 426–33.
35 Lipton RB, Bigal ME. The epidemiology of migraine. Am J Med 42 Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, Vos T, Jensen R, Katsarava Z. Migraine is
2005; 118 (suppl 1): 3S–10S. first cause of disability in under 50s: will health politicians now
36 Gururaj G, Kulkarni GB, Rao GN, Subbakrishna DK, Stovner LJ, take notice? J Headache Pain 2018; 19: 17.
Steiner TJ. Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of
primary headache disorders: results of a population-based survey
from Bangalore, India. Indian J Public Health 2014; 58: 241–48.
37 Giorgadze G, Mania M, Kukava M, et al. Implementation of
effective, self-sustaining headache services in the Republic of
Georgia: evaluation of their impact on headache-related disability
and quality of life of people with headache. Cephalalgia 2018;
38: 639–45.