BTVN
BTVN
BTVN
Bài 2:
The graph illustrates the information about the icelandic’s
population’s age over the course of 30 years, commencing from
1990.
At first glance, the data reveals an upward trend of individuals
within the 25-54 age group, whilst the percentages of the
younger, particularly 0-14 and 15-24, categories experienced a
slump. In stark, the percentages of the two older age groups
remained stable.
Upon closer inspection, it is apparent that the majority of the
population fell within the 25-54 age range. This percentage
exhibited significant fluctuations, rising steadily from
approximately 32% in 1990 to nearly 38% in 2010, before
experiencing a substantial surge to just under 50% by 2020.
Conversely, the proportion of individuals aged 0-
14 declined consistently from around 25% in 1990 to 18% in
2020. Similarly, the percentage of the 15-24 age group
decreased from over 20% in 1990 to approximately 8% in 2020.
In contradistinction, the percentages of the elderly age groups,
55-64 and 65 and over, remained relatively stable, with minor
fluctuations, maintaining a range from around 10% to 12% over
the entire period.
Bài 3:
Task 2:
The practice of broadcasting criminal trials on television is
becoming a contentious topic. Although some air their view
that this action possess some benefits, from my perspective,
the drawbacks of televising criminal trials surpass the benefits.
On the one hand, televising criminal trials can boost public trust
in the legal system by giving citizens the chance to see how
justice is administered. By way of illustration, in 1991, the trial
of the police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King was
broadcast on national television, allowing the public to witness
the presentation of evidence and the final verdict. By airing
trials, the general public gains an opportunity to better
understand the legal process and how it functions. Additionally,
this transparency can help ensure that judges, lawyers, and
other legal professionals are held accountable for their actions,
as they know their behavior is being observed by a broader
audience.
On the other hand, broadcasting criminal trials on television can
affect the integrity of the trial process and violate the rights of
the accused. The presence of cameras in the courtroom can be
distracting and intimidating for witnesses and defendants,
potentially influencing their behavior and testimony. One
primary example is the trial of Michael Jackson in 2005. During
the trial, which was widely covered by the media and broadcast
live on television, the courtroom was filled with cameras
and reporters. The intense media coverage created a circus-like
atmosphere in the courtroom, which many people found
intimidating and distracting.
In conclusion, while there are arguments on both sides of the
issue, I hold an unwavering view that the disadvantages of
broadcasting criminal trials on television outweigh the
advantages.