A New Analytical Method For Solving Linear and Nonlinear Fractional Partial Differential Equations

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl. 2, No.

4, 247-256 (2016) 247

Progress in Fractional Differentiation and Applications


An International Journal

http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/pfda/020402

A New Analytical Method for Solving Linear and


Nonlinear Fractional Partial Differential Equations
Shehu Maitama* and Ibrahim Abdullahi
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Northwest University, Kano, Nigeria

Received: 2 May 2016, Revised: 15 Jul. 2016, Accepted: 18 Jul. 2016


Published online: 1 Oct. 2016

Abstract: In this paper, a new analytical method called the Natural Homotopy Perturbation Method (NHPM) for solving linear and
the nonlinear fractional partial differential equation is introduced. The proposed analytical method is an elegant combination of a well-
known method, Homotopy Perturbation Method (HPM) and the Natural Transform Method (NTM). In this new analytical method, the
fractional derivative is computed in Caputo sense and the nonlinear terms are calculated using He’s polynomials. Exact solution of
linear and nonlinear fractional partial differential equations are successfully obtained using the new analytical method, and the result is
compared with the result of the existing methods.

Keywords: Natural homotopy perturbation method, He’s polynomials, Mittag-Leffler function, linear and nonlinear fractional partial
differential equations.

1 Introduction

In recent years, there is a rapid development in the concept of fractional calculus and its applications [1,2,3,4]. The
fractional calculus which deals with derivatives and integrals of arbitrary orders [5] plays a vital role in many field of
applied science and engineering. The linear and nonlinear fractional partial differential equations have wide applications
in fluid mechanics, acoustic, electromagnetism, signal processing, analytical chemistry, biology and many other areas of
physical science and engineering [6]. In last few decades, many analytical and numerical methods has been developed
and successfully applied to solve linear and nonlinear fractional partial differential equations such as, Adomian
Decomposition Method [7,8,9,10,11], G’/G-Expansion Method [12], Homotopy Analysis Method [13], Jacobi Spectral
Collocation Method [14], Laplace Decomposition Method [15], and New Spectral Algorithm [16]. Moreover, Homotopy
Perturbation Method [17,18], Yang– Laplace Transform [19], Local Fractional Variational Iteration Method [20,21],
Cylindrical-Coordinate Method [22], Modified Laplace Decomposition Method [15], Spectral Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto
Collocation Method [23,24], Homotopy Perturbation Sumudu Transform Method [25,26], and Fractional Complex
Transform Method [27] are applied to linear and nonlinear fractional partial differential equations.
However, despite the potential of the numerical methods, they can not be considered as universal methods for solving
linear and nonlinear fractional partial differential equations because of many deficiencies and some computational
difficulties such as unnecessary linearization, discretization of variables, transformation or taking some restrictive
assumptions.
In this paper, a new analytical method called the Natural Homotopy Perturbation Method (NHPM) for solving linear and
nonlinear fractional partial differential equations without the above-mentioned deficiencies is introduced. The
constructive analytical method is applied directly to linear and nonlinear fractional partial differential equations. The
proposed analytical method gives a series solution which converges rapidly to an exact or approximate solution with
elegant computational terms. In this new analytical method, the nonlinear terms are computed using He’s Polynomials
[28,29,30]. Exact solution of linear and nonlinear fractional partial differential equation are successfully obtained using
the new analytical method. Thus, the proposed analytical method is a powerful mathematical method for solving linear
and nonlinear fractional partial differential equations and is a refinement of the existing methods.
∗ Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected]
c 2016 NSP
Natural Sciences Publishing Cor.
248 S. Maitama, I. Abdullahi : A new analytical method for solving linear and nonlinear ...

2 Natural transform
In this section, the basic definition and properties of the Natural transform are presented.
Definition: The Natural Transform of the function v(t) for t ∈ (0,∞) is defined over the set of functions,
|t|

A = v(t) : ∃ M, τ1 , τ2 > 0, |v(t)| < Me τ j , i f t ∈ (−1) j × [0, ∞) ,
by the following integral:
1 ∞ −st
Z
N+ [v(t)] = V (s, u) = e u v(t) dt; s > 0, u > 0. (1)
u 0
Here s and u are the Natural transform variables [31,32].
The basic properties of the Natural transform method are given below.
Property 1: If V (s, u) is the Natural transform and F(s) is the Laplace transform of the function f (t) ∈ A, then N+ [ f (t)] =
V (s, u) = 1u 0∞ e− u f (t) dt = 1u F us .
R st 

Property 2:RIf V (s, u) is the Natural transform and G(u) is the Sumudu transform of the function v(t) ∈ A, then N+ [v(t)] =
1 ∞ −t ut 1 u

V (s, u) = s 0 e v s dt = s G s .
Property 3: If N+ [v(t)] = V (s, u), then N+ [v(α t)] = α1 V (s, u).

Property 4: If N+ [v(t)] = V (s, u), then N+ [v′ (t)] = us V (s, u) − v(0)


u .

s2
Property 5: If N+ [v(t)] = V (s, u), then N+ [v′′ (t)] = u2
V (s, u) − us2 v(0) − v (0)
u .

Remark: The Natural transform is a linear operator. That is, if α and β are non–zero constants, then
N+ [α f (t) ± β g(t)] = α N+ [ f (t)] ± β N+ [g(t)] = α F + (s, u) ± β G+ (s, u).
Moreover, F + (s, u) and G+ (s, u) are the Natural transforms of f (t) and g(t), respectively [31].
Table 1. List of some special Natural transforms
Functional Form Natural transform Form
1
1 s
u
t s2
1
eat s−au
t n−1 un−1
(n−1)! , n = 1, 2, ... sn
u
sin(t) s2 +u2

3 Basic Definitions of Fractional Calculus


In this section, the basic definitions of fractional calculus are presented.
Definition 1: A function f (x), x > 0 is said to be in the space Cαm , m ∈ N {0}, if f (m) ∈ Cα .
S

Definition 2: A real function f (x), x > 0 is said to be in the apace Cα α ∈ R if there exist a real number p (> α ) such
that f (x) = x p f1 (x) where f1 (x) ∈ C[0, ∞). Clearly Cα ⊂ Cβ if β ≤ α .
Definition 3: The left sided Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator of order µ > 0, of a function f (t) ∈ Cα , and
α ≥ −1 is define as [10,33].
f (τ )
Z t
−µ 1
Dt f (t) = d τ , µ > 0, t > 0, (2)
Γ (µ ) 0 (t − τ )1−µ

D0 f (t) = f (t). (3)


Definition 4: The (left sided) Caputo fractional derivative f , f ε C−1
m , mε N {0}, is defined as [4,5].
S

( µ −m h ∂ m f (t) i
µ Dt , m − 1 < µ < m, m ∈ N,
Dt f (t) = ∂ m f (t) ∂ t
m
(4)
∂ tm , µ = m.

Note that [6,10,4,5]:


Γ (γ + 1) γ +µ
D− µ t γ = t , µ > 0, γ > −1, t > 0. (5)
Γ (γ + µ + 1)

c 2016 NSP
Natural Sciences Publishing Cor.
Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl. 2, No. 4, 247-256 (2016) / www.naturalspublishing.com/Journals.asp 249

m−1
µ tk
D−µ Dt f (t) = f (t) − ∑ v(k) (0+) k! , m − 1 < µ ≤ m, m ∈ N. (6)
k=0

Definition 5: The Natural transform of the Caputo fractional derivative is defined as:

sα m−1 α −(k+1)
s
N+ [Dtα v(t)] =

V (s, u) − ∑ uα −k v(k) (0+), (7)
k=0

(m − 1 < α ≤ m).
Definition 6: Mittag-Leffler function Eα with α > 0 is defined by the following series representation, valid in the whole
complex plane [5]:

zk
Eα (z) = ∑ , α > 0, z ∈ C. (8)
k=0 Γ (α k + 1)

4 Analysis of the Method

In this section, the basic idea of the Natural Homotopy Perturbation Method is clearly illustrated by the standard nonlinear
fractional partial differential equation of the form:

Dtα v(x,t) + M(v(x,t)) + F(v(x,t)) = g(x,t), (9)

subject to the initial condition


v(x, 0) = f (x). (10)
∂α
where F(v(x,t)) represent the nonlinear terms, Dtα = is the Caputo fractional derivative of the function v(t),
∂ tα
M(v(x,t)) is the linear differential operator, and g(x,t) is a source term.

Applying the Natural transform to Eq. (9) subject to the given initial condition we get:

1 uα uα
V (x, s, u) = f (x) + α N+ [g(x,t)] − α N+ [M(v(x,t)) + F(v(x,t))] . (11)
s s s
Taking the inverse Natural transform of Eq. (11), we have:
 α 
u
v(x,t) = G(x,t) − N−1 α N+ [M(v(x,t)) + F(v(x,t))] , (12)
s

where G(x,t) is a term arising from the source term and the prescribed initial condition.

Now we apply the Homotopy Perturbation Method.



v(x,t) = ∑ pn vn (x,t). (13)
n=0

The nonlinear terms F(v(x,t)) is decomposed as:



F(v(x,t)) = ∑ pnHn (v), (14)
n=0

where Hn (v) is the He’s polynomial and be computed using the following formula:
" !#
1 ∂n n
Hn (v1 , v2 , · · · , vn ) = F ∑ p vj
j
, n = 0, 1, 2, · · · (15)
n! ∂ pn j=0 p=0

c 2016 NSP
Natural Sciences Publishing Cor.
250 S. Maitama, I. Abdullahi : A new analytical method for solving linear and nonlinear ...

Substituting Eq. (13) and Eq. (14) into Eq. (12), we get:

∞ ∞ ∞
uα +
" " ##!
∑ p vn (x,t) = G(x,t) − p
n
N −1

N ∑ p M(v(x,t)) + ∑ p Hn (v)
n n
. (16)
n=0 n=0 n=0

Using the coefficient of the likes powers of p in Eq. (16), the following approximations are obtained:

p0 : v0 (x,t) = G(x,t),
 α 
u
p1 : v1 (x,t) = −N−1 α N+ [M(v(x,t)) + H0 (v)] ,
s
 α 
u
p2 : v2 (x,t) = −N−1 α N+ [M(v(x,t)) + H1 (v)] ,
s
 α 
u
p3 : v3 (x,t) = −N−1 α N+ [M(v(x,t)) + H2 (v)] ,
s
..
.,

and so on.
Hence, the series solution of Eq. (9) is given by:
N
v(x,t) = lim
N→∞
∑ vn (x,t). (17)
n=0

5 Applications
In this section, the application of the Natural Homotopy Perturbation Method to linear and nonlinear fractional partial
differential equations are clearly demonstrated to show its simplicity and high accuracy.
Example 1Consider the following linear fractional partial differential equation of the form:

Dtα v − 2vxx − 2vyy = 0, −∞ < x, y < ∞, t > 0, (18)

subject to the initial condition

v(x, y, 0) = sin(x)sin(y), vt (x, y, 0) = 0, α ε (1, 2). (19)

Applying the Natural transform to Eq. (18) subject to the given initial condition, we get:

sin(x)sin(y) uα +
V (x, y, s, u) = + α N [2vxx + 2vyy ] . (20)
s s
Taking the inverse Natural transform of Eq. (20), we get:

uα +
 
v(x, y,t) = sin(x)sin(y) + N−1 N [2v + 2v ]
yy . (21)

xx

Now we apply the Homotopy Perturbation Method.



v(x, y,t) = ∑ pn vn (x, y,t). (22)
n=0

Then Eq. (21) will become:

∞ ∞ ∞
uα +
" " ##!
∑ p vn (x, y,t) = sin(x)sin(y) + p
n
N −1

N 2 ∑ p vnxx + 2 ∑ p vnyy
n n
. (23)
n=0 n=0 n=0

c 2016 NSP
Natural Sciences Publishing Cor.
Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl. 2, No. 4, 247-256 (2016) / www.naturalspublishing.com/Journals.asp 251

Using the coefficients of the like powers of p in Eq. (23), the following approximations are obtained:

p0 : v0 (x, y,t) = sin(x)sin(y),


 α 
1 −1 u +
p : v1 (x, y,t) = N N [2v0xx + 2v0yy ]

(4t α )
= −sin(x)sin(y) ,
Γ (α + 1)

uα +
 
p2 : v2 (x, y,t) = N−1 N [2v1xx + 2v1yy ]

(4t α )2
= sin(x)sin(y) ,
Γ (2α + 1)

uα +
 
3 −1
p : v3 (x, y,t) = N N [2v2xx + 2v2yy ]

(4t α )3
= −sin(x)sin(y) ,
Γ (3α + 1)

uα +
 
p4 : v4 (x, y,t) = N−1 N [2v3xx + 2v3yy ]

(4t α )4
= sin(x)sin(y) ,
Γ (4α + 1)
..
.

and so on.
Then, the series solution of Eq. (18) is given by:
N
v(x, y,t) = lim
N→∞
∑ vn (x, y,t) (24)
n=0
= v0 (x, y,t) + v1 (x, y,t) + v2 (x, y,t) + v3 (x, y,t) + · · ·
(4t α ) (4t α )2 (4t α )3 (4t α )4
 
= sin(x)sin(y) 1 − + − + + ···
Γ (α + 1) Γ (2α + 1) Γ (3α + 1) Γ (4α + 1)

(−4t α )m
= sin(x)sin(y) ∑
m=0 Γ (mα + 1)
= sin(x)sin(y)Eα (−4t α ).

When α = 1, we obtained the following result:


N
v(x, y,t) = lim
N→∞
∑ vn(x, y,t) (25)
n=0
= v0 (x, y,t) + v1 (x, y,t) + v2 (x, y,t) + v3 (x, y,t) + · · ·
(4t) (4t)2 (4t)3 (4t)4
 
= sin(x)sin(y) 1 − + − + + ···
1! 2! 3! 4!
= sin(x)sin(y)e−4t ,

which is the exact solution of Eq. (18).


The exact solution is in close agreement with the result obtained by (HPSTM) [26].

c 2016 NSP
Natural Sciences Publishing Cor.
252 S. Maitama, I. Abdullahi : A new analytical method for solving linear and nonlinear ...

Example 2Consider the following nonlinear fractional partial differential equation of the form:

Dtα v − 6vvx + vxxx = 0, (26)

subject to the initial condition


1
v(x, 0) = (x − 1). (27)
6
Applying the Natural transform on both sides of Eq. (26), we get:
1 uα
V (x, s, u) = (x − 1) + α N+ [6vvx − vxxx ] (28)
6s s
Taking the inverse Natural transform of Eq. (28), we get:
 α 
1 −1 u +
v(x,t) = (x − 1) + N N [6vvx − vxxx ] . (29)
6 sα
Now we apply the Homotopy Perturbation Method.

v(x,t) = ∑ pn vn (x,t). (30)
n=0

Then, Eq. (29), will become:


∞ α ∞ ∞
" " ##!
1 u
∑ pn vn (x,t) = 6 (x − 1) + p N−1 sα N+ 6 ∑ pn Hn(v) − ∑ pnvnxxx (x,t) , (31)
n=0 n=0 n=0

where Hn (v) is a He’s Polynomial which represent the nonlinear term, vvx .

Some few components of the He’s Polynomials are given below:

H0 (v) = v0 v0x ,
H1 (v) = v1 v0x + v0 v1x ,
H2 (v) = v0x v2 + v1x v1 + v2x v0 ,
H3 (v) = v0x v3 + v1x v2 + v2x v1 + v3x v0 ,
..
.,

and so on.
Using the coefficient of the like powers of p, in Eq.(31), we obtained the following approximations:
1
p0 : v0 (x,t) = (x − 1),
6 
α 
1 −1 u +
p : v1 (x,t) = N N [6H0 (v) − v0xxx ]

hu i
= N−1 N+ [6v0 v0x − v0xxx ]
s


(x − 1)
= ,
6 Γ (α + 1)

hu i
p2 : v2 (x,t) = N−1 N+ [6H1 (v) − v1xxx ]
h us i
−1
=N N+ [6(v1 v0x + v0v1x ) − v1xxx ]
s
t 2α
 
(x − 1)
= ,
6 Γ (2α + 1)

c 2016 NSP
Natural Sciences Publishing Cor.
Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl. 2, No. 4, 247-256 (2016) / www.naturalspublishing.com/Journals.asp 253

hu i
p3 : v3 (x,t) = N−1 N+ [6H2 (v) − v2xxx ]
h us i
−1
=N N+ [6(v0x v2 + v1x v1 + v2x v0 ) − v2xxx ]
s
t 3α
 
(x − 1)
= ,
6 Γ (3α + 1)
..
.,
and so on.
Therefore, the series solution of Eq. (26) is given by:
N
v(x,t) = lim
N→∞
∑ vn(x,t)
n=0
= v0 (x,t) + v1 (x,t) + v2(x,t) + v3 (x,t) + · · ·
tα t 2α t 3α
 
(x − 1)
= 1+ + + + ···
6 Γ (α + 1) Γ (2α + 1) Γ (3α + 1)
(x − 1) ∞ (t α )m
=
6 m=0 ∑ Γ (mα + 1)
(x − 1)
= Eα (t α ).
6
When α = 1, we obtained the exact solution of Eq.(26) as:
 
1 x−1
v(x,t) = , |t| < 1. (32)
6 1−t
The exact solution is in close agreement with the result obtained by (ADM) [11] and (NDM) [34].
Example 3Consider the following nonlinear time-fractional Harry Dym equation of the form:
Dtα v(x,t) − v3(x,t)Dx v(x,t) = 0, 0 < α ≤ 1, (33)
subject to the initial condition
√ ! 23
3 b
v(x, 0) = a− x . (34)
2
Applying the Natural transform to Eq.(33) subject to the given initial condition, we get:
√ ! 23
1 3 b uα
+ α N+ v3 (x,t)Dx v(x,t) .
 
V (x, s, u) = a− x (35)
s 2 s

Taking the inverse Natural transform of Eq.(35), we get:


√ ! 23  α 
3 b u
+ N−1 α N+ v3 (x,t)Dx v(x,t) .
 
v(x,t) = a− x (36)
2 s

Now we apply the Homotopy Perturbation Method.



v(x,t) = ∑ pn vn (x,t). (37)
n=0

Then Eq.(36) will become:


√ ! 23 "
α
"

##!
3 b −1 u
∑ p vn(x,t) =
n
a−
2
x +p N

N ∑ p Hn (v)
+ n
, (38)
n=0 n=0

c 2016 NSP
Natural Sciences Publishing Cor.
254 S. Maitama, I. Abdullahi : A new analytical method for solving linear and nonlinear ...

where Hn (v) is the He’s polynomials which represent the nonlinear term v3 (x,t)Dx v(x,t).
Some few components of the He’s polynomials are given below:
H0 (v) = v30 Dx v0 ,
H1 (v) = v30 Dx v1 + 3v1v20 Dx v0 ,
H2 (v) = v30 Dx v2 + 3v1v20 Dx v1 + 3v0 v21 + 3v20v2 D3x v0 ,


..
.,
and so on.
Using the coefficients of the like powers of p in Eq.(38), we obtained the following approximations:
√ ! 23
0 3 b
p : v0 (x,t) = a − x ,
2
 α 
1 −1 u +
p : v1 (x,t) = N N [H0 (v)]

 α 
−1 u + 3
 
=N N v 0 Dx v 0

√ !− 31
2 3 b tα
= −b 3 a − x ,
2 Γ (α + 1)

uα +
 
p2 : v2 (x,t) = N−1 N [H (v)]

1
 α 
u
= N−1 α N+ v30 Dx v1 + 3v1v20 Dx v0
 
s
√ !− 34
b3 3 b t 2α
=− a− x ,
2 2 Γ (2α + 1)

uα +
 
3 −1
p : v3 (x,t) = N N [H2 (v)]

 α 
−1 u + 3 2 2 2
  3 
=N N v0 Dx v2 + 3v1v0 Dx v1 + 3v0 v1 + 3v0v2 Dx v0

√ !− 37 
15 Γ (2α + 1) t 3α

9 3 b
= b2 a − x − 16 ,
2 2 2(Γ (α + 1))2 Γ (3α + 1)
..
.,
and so on.
Then, the series solution of Eq.(33) is given by:

v(x,t) = ∑ vn (x,t) (39)
n=0
= v0 (x,t) + v1 (x,t) + v2 (x,t) + v3(x,t) + · · ·
√ ! 32 √ !− 31
3 b 2 3 b tα
= a− x − b3 a − x
2 2 Γ (α + 1)
√ !− 34 √ !− 37 
b3 t 2α 15 Γ (2α + 1) t 3α

3 b 9 3 b
− a− x + b2 a − x − 16 ···
2 2 Γ (2α + 1) 2 2 2(Γ (α + 1))2 Γ (3α + 1)

c 2016 NSP
Natural Sciences Publishing Cor.
Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl. 2, No. 4, 247-256 (2016) / www.naturalspublishing.com/Journals.asp 255

When α = 1, we obtained the exact solution of Eq.(33) as:


√ !2
3
3 b
v(x,t) = a− (x + bt) . (40)
2

The exact solution is in close agreement with the result obtained by (ADM) [25].

6 Conclusion
In this paper, Natural transform method (NTM) and Homotopy Perturbation Method (HPM) are successfully combined
to form a powerful analytical method called the Natural Homotopy Perturbation Method (NHPM) for solving linear and
nonlinear fractional partial differential equations. The new analytical method gives a series solution which converges
rapidly to an exact or approximate solution with elegant computational terms. In this new analytical method, the
fractional derivative are handle in Caputo sense and the nonlinear term are computed using He’s Polynomials. The new
analytical method is applied successfully and obtained an exact solution of linear and nonlinear fractional partial
differential equations. The simplicity and high accuracy of the new analytical method is clearly illustrated. Thus, the
Natural Homotopy Perturbation Method is a powerful analytical method for solving linear and nonlinear fractional
partial differential equations.

Acknowledgment
The authors are highly grateful to the editor and the anonymous referees’ for their useful comments and suggestions in
this paper.

References
[1] K. S. Miller and B. Ross, An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations, New York: Johan Willey
and Sons, Inc. 2003.
[2] K. B. Oldham and J. Spanier, The fractional calculus, New York: Academic Press 1974.
[3] K. Diethelm and N. J. Ford, Analysis of fractional differential equations, J. Math. Appl., 265 229–48 (2002).
[4] S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas and O. I. Marichev, Fractional integrals and derivatives: theory and applications, Yverdon: Gordon and
Breach 1993.
[5] I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations, Academic Press, San Diego 1999.
[6] B. J. West, M. Bologna and P. Grigolini, Physics of fractal operators, New York: Springer 2003.
[7] S. S. Ray, Analytical solution for the space fractional diffusion equation by two-step Adomian decomposition method, Commun.
Nonlinear Sci. Simul. 14, 1295–1303 (2009).
[8] K. Abbaui and Y. Cherruault, New ideas for proving convergence of Adomian decomposition methods, Comput. Math. Appl. 32,
103–108 (1995).
[9] S. Momani and Z. Odibat, Analytical solution of time-fractional Navier-Stoke equation by Adomian decomposition method, Appl.
Math. Comput. 177, 488–494 (2006).
[10] H. Jafari and V. Daftardar-Gejji, Solving linear and nonlinear fractional diffusion and wave equations by Adomian decomposition,
Appl. Math. Comput. 180, 488–497 (2006).
[11] A. M. Wazwaz, Partial differential equations and solitary waves theory, Springer–Verlag, Heidelberg 2009.
[12] A. H. Bhrawy, M. A. Abdelkawy, A. Alshaery and E. M. Hilal, Symbolic computation of some nonlinear fractional differential
equations, Rom. J. Phys. 59(5), 433–442 (2014).
[13] M. Ganjiana, Solution of nonlinear fractional differential equations using homotopy analysis method, Appl. Math. Model Simul.
36, 1634–1641 (2010).
[14] A. H. Bhrawy, A Jacobi spectral collocation method for solving multi-dimensional nonlinear fractional sub-diffusion equations,
Numer. Algoritm. DOI: 10.1007/s11075-015-0087-2 (2016).
[15] H. Jafari, C. M. Khalique and M. Nazari, Application of the Laplace decomposition method for solving linear and nonlinear
fractional diffusion-wave equations, Appl. Math. Lett. 24, 1799–1805 (2011).
[16] A. H. Bhrawy, A new spectral algorithm for time-space fractional partial differential equations with subdiffusion and
superdiffusion, Proc. Rom. Acad. A. 17, 39–46 (2016).
[17] P. K. Gupta and M. Singh, Homotopy perturbation method for fractional Fornberg-Whitham equation, Comput. Math. Appl. 61,
250–254 (2011).

c 2016 NSP
Natural Sciences Publishing Cor.
256 S. Maitama, I. Abdullahi : A new analytical method for solving linear and nonlinear ...

[18] S. Momani and Z. Odibat, homotopy perturbation method for nonlinear partial differential equations of fractional order, Phys.
Lett. A. 365, 345–350 (2007).
[19] Y. Z. Zhang, A. M. Yang and Y. Long, initial boundary value problem for fractal heat equation in the semi-infinite region by
Yang-Laplace transform, Thermal Sci. 18, 677–681 (2014).
[20] X. J. Yang and D. Baleanu, Fractional heat conduction problem solved by local fractional variation iteration method, Thermal Sci.
17, 625–628 (2013).
[21] X. J. Yang, D. Baleanu, Y. Khan and S. T. Mohyud-Din, local fractional variation iteration method for diffusion and wave equations
on Cantor sets, Rom. J. Phys. 59, 36–48 (2014).
[22] X. J. Yang, H. M. Srivastava, J. H. He and D. Baleanu, cantor-type cylindrical-coordinate fractional derivatives, Proc. Rom. Acad.
Series A. 14, 127–133 (2013).
[23] A. H. Bhrawy and D. Baleanu, A spectral Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto collocation method for a space-fractional advection equations
with variable coefficients, Rep. Math. Phys. 72, 219–233 (2013).
[24] A. H. Bhrawy, A new Legendre collocation method for solving a two-dimensional diffusion equations, Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014,
Article ID: 636191 1–10 (2014).
[25] D. Kumar, J. Singh and A. Kilicman, An efficient approach for fractional Harry Dym equation by using Sumudu transform. Abstr.
Appl. Anal. 2013 Article ID 608943, 1–8 (2013).
[26] A. Atangana and A. Kilicman, The use of Sumudu transform for solving certain nonlinear fractional heat-like equations, Abstr.
Appl. Anal. 2013, Article ID: 737481 1–12 (2013).
[27] B. Ghazanfari and A. G. Ghazanfari, Solving fractional nonlinear Schrodinger equation by fractional complex transform method,
Int. J. Math. Model. Comput. 2, 277–281 (2012).
[28] J. H. He, Homotopy perturbation technique, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 178, 257–262 (1999).
[29] J. H. He, Recent development of the homotopy perturbation method, Topolog. Meth. Nonlinear Anal. 31, 205–209 (2008).
[30] J. H. He, The homotopy perturbation method for nonlinear oscillators with discontinuities, Appl. Math. Comput. 151, 287–292
(2004).
[31] F. B. M. Belgacem and R. Silambarasan, Theory of natural transform, Mathematics in Engineering, Science and Aerospace 3,
99–124 (2012).
[32] F. B. M. Belgacem and R. Silambarasan, Advances in the natural transform, AIP Conference Proceedings; 1493 January 2012;
USA: American Institute of Physics 106–110 (2012).
[33] K. Sunil, K. Deepak, A. Saied and M. M. Rashidi, Analytical solution of fractional Navier-Stoke equation by using modified
Laplace decomposition method, Ain Shams Eng. J. 5, 569–574 (2014).
[34] M. S. Rawashdeh and S. Maitama, Solving PDEs using the natural decomposition method, Nonlinear Stud. 23, 1–10 (2016).

c 2016 NSP
Natural Sciences Publishing Cor.

You might also like