Nature of Moral Statement

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22

NATURE OF

MORAL
STATEMENT
Presented By : Group 1

BSCE 2C
OVERVIEW

• Nature of moral statement


• Moral statement as
Normative Statement
• Moral statement and Moral
standards
1
MORAL
STATEMENT
DASCO, SANDEL E.

2
MORAL STATEMENT
-assertions that express judgments
about what is right, wrong, good, or
bad in human behavior

-fundamental component of ethical


discussions

-play a central role in guiding


individual and societal actions
3
WHY DO WE NEED TO
UNDERSTAND THE
NATURE OF MORAL
STATEMENT?
DASCO, SANDEL E.

MORAL STATEMENT
2
✓ JUSTIFICATION
-how moral claims can be
supported

✓ EVALUATION
-to determine if moral
statement are acceptable or
unacceptable 3
IT WOULD SHED LIGHT ON
THE DIFFERENCE OF
MORALITY FROM LAW,
ETIQUETTE, AND
RELIGION
2
LAW
-system of rules created by authorities

ETIQUETTE
-social norms and more on manners

RELIGION
-system of beliefs and practices
related to faith
-based on religious teachings 3
MORAL STATEMENT
AS
NORMATIVE STATEMENT
NORMATIVE STATEMENT
NORMATIVE STATEMENT

Expresses an evaluation, saying that something is good or


bad, better or worse relative to some standard or
alternative
A moral statement is often considered a
normative
statement because it expresses a judgment about
what is right or wrong, good or bad. For example,
"Stealing is wrong" is a moral statement that
prescribes a standard of behavior.
Moral statements often derive from ethical theories or
cultural values and express judgments about specific
actions or behaviors.

Normative statements establish standards or ideals for


behavior and policies, often based on moral principles but
can include other considerations.
In summary, while all moral statements are
normative, not all normative statements are
strictly moral. Normative statements encompass a
wider array of values and principles.
MORAL STANDARDS
HOW CAN WE DISTINGUISH MORAL
STANDARDS FROM NON-MORAL
STANDARDS?
-Moral standards deal with matters that
we think can seriously harm or benefit
human beings. The conventional moral
norms against cheating, lying, and killing
deal with actions that can gravely hurt
people. Whether human dignity is
respected or degraded, work conditions
are safe or dangerous, and products are
beneficial or detrimental to our health
are matters that affect human well-being.
-Moral standards have universal
validity. They apply to all who are in
the relevantly similar sinuation. If it
is morally wrong for a person A to do
act X. then it is wrong to do X for
anyone relevantly similar to P. This
characteristic is exemplified in the
moral rule: "Do not do unto others
what you would not have them do
unto you."
-Moral standards are generally
thought to have a particularly
overriding importance, that is,
people feel they should prevail
over other values. A violation of
the moral rule against killing or
stealing is more important than a
violation of the rules of etiquette
or of grammar.
-Moral standards are not established by
the decisions of authoritarian bodies, nor
are they solely determined by appealing
to consensus or tradition. While laws and
legal standards are established by the
authority of the legislature, religious
beliefs and practices are taught by the
Church fathers and scholars, rules of
etiquette emanate from tradition and
consensus.
THANK YOU!

You might also like