GSCM in Malaysia
GSCM in Malaysia
GSCM in Malaysia
Research Article
The Influence of Green Supply Chain Practices towards
Environmental Development: The Malaysian
ISO14001 Certified Manufacturing
Companies Perspective
Received date: 30 August 2017; Accepted date: 10 December 2017; published date: 13 July 2018
Copyright © 2018. Marini Nurbanum Mohamad and Charis Samuel Solomon Koilpillai. Distributed under
Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0
Abstract
This study examines the influence of green supply chain practices towards environmental
development. There has been an increasing interest among scholars concerning the influence of
green supply chain practices towards environmental development in the manufacturing
industry due to its vast environmental effect and the rising pressure from consumers that
companies should ‘go green’. A questionnaire was posted to 621 Malaysian ISO 14001 certified
manufacturing companies. A total of 146 usable questionnaires were received and the response
rate was 23.51%. This study identified that green purchasing and eco-design has a positive
effect towards environmental development. These findings provide significant proof of the
relationship between green supply chain practices and environmental development. Therefore,
the acceptance and application of green supply chain practices in manufacturing firms should be
required, not merely based on moral grounds, but also the progressive performance outcomes
companies’ gain.
Cite this Article as: Marini Nurbanum Mohamad and Charis Samuel Solomon Koilpillai (2018)," The Influence
of Green Supply Chain Practices towards Environmental Development: The Malaysian ISO14001 Certified
Manufacturing Companies Perspective ", Journal of Southeast Asian Research, Vol. 2018 (2018),
Article ID 497926, DOI: 10.5171/2018.497926
Journal of Southeast Asian Research 2
_____________________________________________________________________________
extends the environmental responsibility of 2010). Yet, the most vital and vigorous
organizations throughout their entire supply debate related to sustainable development is
chain. There has been an increasing interest the method and utility of assessment for
among scholars concerning the influence of future needs and desires by an organisation
green supply chain practices towards (Saaty, 2008). The requirements of upcoming
corporate sustainable development in the generations are an attached component of
manufacturing industry due to their vast the sustainable development idea (Orlitzky,
environmental effect and the rising pressure 2008). Thus, the primary worry to CSD is
from consumers that companies should go concerning the decision for forthcoming
green. generations’ essentials, where sustainability
decisions must have more than a superficial
Although green practices are well founded in assessment of upcoming necessities, because
developed nations, however, they are not intergenerational fairness is a difficult, vital
well established in developing countries and emotional notion that is important for
(Gonzales et al., 2010). Little is known about corporate sustainable development
the potential of green supply chain practices dimensions (Yam, 2012).
towards corporate sustainable development
in the Malaysian context. The increasing One of the broadly recognised CSD
number of ISO 14001 certification shows that frameworks explains the paradigms of CSD
Malaysian corporations aim to endure in the through three linked dimensions, identified
current highly-competitive contemporary as environmental, economic and social
business setting (Rahman, 2012). Hence, this developments (Erol et al., 2009). These three
paper seeks to investigate the effect of green extents of CSD are recognised respectively,
supply chain practices (green purchasing, environmental development through
eco-design, reverse logistics) towards cooperate environmental management for
environmental development. refining the ecosystem, economic progress
through firm value creation by refining the
Literature Review efficiency and effectiveness of services and
products, finally, social development through
Corporate Sustainable Development corporate social responsibility in terms of
increasing social wellbeing and encouraging
The WCED defined sustainable development
better societies (Bansal 2005). This study
as development that meets the requirements
adopts the works of Chow and Chen (2012)
of present-days without conceding with the
and defines CSD as the extent to which firms
abilities of the forthcoming generations to
are willing to adopt environmental, economic
meet their essentials which are concerning
and social development in their operations.
the integration of economic, environmental
This paper presents findings on the effect on
and social impacts of development (WCED,
environmental development.
1987). There are various viewpoints of
analysis in studies on Corporate Sustainable Environmental Development
Development (CSD). CSD is recognised as an
extensive notion because it comprises of an In general, the complexity in measuring
entire set of normative concerns associated environmental development is evident
with both the function of businesses in through the assortment of information
society and the natural setting (Sharma and utilized, from subjective indications, case
Ruud 2003). studies, and surveys to proprietary
information sources (Montabon, Sroufe and
The main purpose of CSD ought to be for the Narasimhan, 2007). Numerous researches
achievement of a firm’s economic have resolute to environmental development
performance at the same time considering by utilizing a survey due to its extensive and
the societal wellbeing and environmental merely perceptual view (Montabon, Sroufe
constraints (Sharma 2002; Osterle et al., and Narasimhan, 2007). But countless
______________
Marini Nurbanum Mohamad and Charis Samuel Solomon Koilpillai (2018), Journal of Southeast
Asian Research, DOI: 10.5171/2018.497926
3 Journal of Southeast Asian Research
_____________________________________________________________________________
studies have identified a list of items to As establishments that form a supply chain
measure environmental development, such become conscious of customer requirements
as decreasing water usage (Erol et al. 2009), for goods and services delivered without
recycling waste, reversing logistics and harming the environment, administrators
redesigning products (Prahinski and will make choices that support the
Kocabasoglu, 2006) and making green incorporation and organisation of GSC
purchases (Diabat and Govindan, 2011). practices along the supply chain (Vachon and
Klassen, 2008). It is commonly thought that
This study identified the characteristics of supply chains and establishments can
present dimensions and measured achieve competitive advantage by being the
environmental development from a rather pioneers to embrace environmental
broad and fundamental view. Numerous sustainability and adopt GSC practices (Green
taxonomies depict environmental et al., 2012). This study adopts the green
development, extending from reactive to supply chain practices that were identified by
proactive advances (Pradeep, 2012). In a Eltayeb (2009). They conducted a study by
majority of cases, the reactive advancement reviewing twenty one literatures on green
entails activities that could reduce the supply chain practices and determined that
environmental effect of products and the green supply chain practices can be
services through proper waste disposal categorised into three main practices,
(Schianetz and Kavanagh, 2008). On the namely; (1) green purchasing, (2) eco-design
other hand, the proactive advancement and (3) reverse logistics.
entails alternate fabrication procedures that
reduce waste and emissions (Bansal, 2005). Green Purchasing
Alternative processes includes, utilizing
minimum conventional fuels and reducing Green products purchasing is one of the
negative effects towards animals and the responses towards addressing
natural environments (Lindgreen et al., environmental concerns. As green goods are
2009). Also, they are practices that reduce somewhat new for Malaysian industries,
procurement of non-renewable resources, there are limited recognized studies about
chemicals, components and decrease energy green consumers, green marketing and green
utilization (Baumgartner and Ebner, 2010). product in Malaysia (Shahnaei, 2012).
Previous literatures in Malaysian identified
Green Supply Chain Practices cost reductions, marketing prospects and
financial earnings from the trade of green
In the 21st century, Green Supply Chain (GSC) goods, to be the key reasons organisations
has appeared as a significant element of the are implementing green practices (Eltayeb,
environmental and supply chain approaches Zailani and Jayaraman, 2009). Currently,
in many companies. GSC practices can be companies are gradually dealing with their
defined as applied organisational activities environmental performance to ensure the
motivated to allocate and circulate supplies and machinery utilized by them are
environmental management, in specific environmentally-friendly and are fashioned
progressive environmental managing from environmentally-friendly procedures.
practices, through the whole supply chain, by
extending relationships between large-sized Largely, green purchasing concentrates on
buying organisations and their suppliers assisting organisations attain savings in the
(Lee, 2008). In this context, supply chains long run by keeping them from any possible
attempt to preserve internal wellbeing and losses to their brand value (Shi et al., 2012).
environmental sustainability by the ability to In a wider context, green purchasing
self-regulate based on data from the external guarantees the commitment of supply chain
environment (Vachon and Klassen, 2006). managers towards sustainable development
by obtaining or purchasing environmental
friendly inputs to address the general
______________
Marini Nurbanum Mohamad and Charis Samuel Solomon Koilpillai (2018), Journal of Southeast
Asian Research, DOI: 10.5171/2018.497926
Journal of Southeast Asian Research 4
_____________________________________________________________________________
environmental concerns (Kumar et al., 2009). to close the supply chain by managing
Subsequently, when the virtuous of the product practicality while decreasing the
company overlaps with the benefit of the environmental effects of product life-cycle
society in which it functions, there is a (Zhu et al., 2008). Hence, environmentally
synergistic consequence. Therefore, the accountable design or eco-design is a crucial
company would benefit from improved GSC practice that assists firms towards
operations management combined with realizing their goals such as replacing
increased sales as the society shifts toward harmful and hazardous materials with
sustainability and consciousness for greener environmentally friendly substances,
products. decreasing resource usage, and increasing
organizational obligation towards their
In addition, green purchasing specifically products.
addresses the environmental concerns of
manufacturing firms and is intended to Due to standards and consumers’ increasing
significantly influence environmental consciousness of environmental concerns,
management (Diabat and Govindan, 2011). firms must change their daily actions from
Also, a study by Green et al. (2012) identified design to eco-design to remain competitive.
that green purchasing provides enhanced According to Lauring and Thomsen (2009),
economic and environmental management, the only manner to enhance corporate
this leads to enriched operating and sustainable development is to improvise.
organizational outcomes. Owing to this, That is, to move to more sophisticated types
businesses are aiming for green purchasing such as product differentiation and
among their consumers and implementations innovation through eco-design. However, a
of environmental management concepts in substantial reduce in environmental effect is
their manufacturing processes for not attained by merely including a ‘green’
sustainable development (Hajli and Hajli, limitation but then again environmental
2013). effect is reflected from the designing stage.
Eco-design includes activities that change the The concept of reverse logistics has been
resources and materials utilized throughout discussed in many past literatures and was
the manufacturing procedures to be less initially defined as “the function of logistics in
harmful and more environmentally friendly. product recovery is to decrease resources,
The main purpose of eco-design is to reduce reuse, substitute resources, recycle materials,
an item’s environmental effect throughout its discard waste, restore, remanufacture and
entire life cycle. The eco-design practise amend” (Lee, 2008). This decrease in
assimilates environmental features into the resources takes account of both the
product designing processes, keeping in reduction of resources utilized in goods and
mind the complete movement of the product the reduction of waste and energy attained
in its supply chain (Handfield et al., 2002). through the design of environmentally-
friendly goods (Gupta et al., 2013).
Eco-friendly or ecological design places Previously, when the alternative of
importance on investment recapture and is decreasing resource has been used
identified to positively affect environmental extensively, the subsequent intention was to
outcomes. This has been proven in a study by recycle materials, and to reuse discards
Cheng and Shiu (2012) where they identified, through reverse logistics. Yet in
in the manufacturing industry, teamwork organizations, reverse logistics was typically
with retailers and suppliers’ resulted in the last option employed (Gupta et al., 2013).
better environmental performance.
Therefore, eco-design facilitates corporations Through the changes of time, in the existing
to increase environmental performance and business setting, companies are not solely
______________
Marini Nurbanum Mohamad and Charis Samuel Solomon Koilpillai (2018), Journal of Southeast
Asian Research, DOI: 10.5171/2018.497926
5 Journal of Southeast Asian Research
_____________________________________________________________________________
competing on a producer to producer basis, large extent. The items were adopted from
but also on supply chain to supply chain Chow and Chen (2012). For green
basis. Somewhat, the real competitive purchasing, eco-design and reverse logistics,
encounter is between supply chains (Gupta this study uses a 5-point Likert scale. The
et al., 2013). Hence, establishments globally scales are from 1= not at all to 5= very high
have started understanding the significance extent. The items were adopted from Eltayeb
of reverse logistics towards corporate (2009).
sustainable development. Thus, companies
are required to deal with the reverted goods The questionnaires were e-mailed to the
in an efficient fashion to gain consumer's respondents. After three reminder emails,
relationship and reduce the related expenses two postal mails and in-person surveys, 146
(Yacob et al., 2012). Consequently, the completed questionnaires were received.
encouraging findings of reverse logistics With a total of 146 usable questionnaires, the
among businesses through waste response rate was 23.51%. The response rate
management provide hope to commercialize is considered adequate, given the low levels
this idea and are increase practical executed. of reply from mail and electronic mail
In a quantifiable manner, reverse logistics surveys (Sekaran and Bougie, 2013) and
are beneficial for the enhancement of generally low response rate for this sort of
sustainable development both at the correlational study in Malaysia. The response
individual businesses and supply chains level rate of this study is also recognised to be
(Starostka-Patyk and Grabara, 2010). satisfactory in relation to similar studies in
Malaysia, such as Eltayeb (2009) whose
Research Design and Methodology research on green supply chain initiatives
stated a 23.9% response rate and Vachon and
A survey was sent to 621 Malaysian ISO Klassen (2006) whose research on green
14001 certified manufacturing companies supply chain initiatives attained a response
from the Federation of Malaysian rate of 23%.
Manufacturers (FMM) directory 2014 of
Malaysian Industries (FMM, 2014). This SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science)
research was carried out using a 7-point software for Windows release 21.0 was used
Likert scale for environmental development. to analyse the data. The profile of responding
The scales are from 1= a small extent to 7= a
firms are shown in
Table 1. The table indicates that most and apparels and finally the other industries.
organisations (32.9%) are from the electrical From the table, it can also be observed that
and electronics industry and the second there are only a few newly started up
highest being from the wood and furniture organisations (5.5%) and most of the firms
industry at 17.1%. The remaining are well established and have been functional
percentages were distributed between the for more than 15 years (83.6%). Likewise,
metal and machinery, chemicals, food and most organisations are noticeably large firms
beverage, rubber and plastic, paper, textile with exceeding 250 employees (75.3%).
Table 1: Profile of Responding Firms
______________
Marini Nurbanum Mohamad and Charis Samuel Solomon Koilpillai (2018), Journal of Southeast
Asian Research, DOI: 10.5171/2018.497926
Journal of Southeast Asian Research 6
_____________________________________________________________________________
Paper 2 1.4
Textile & Apparels 1 0.7
Others 33 22.6
AGE OF FIRM Less than 5 years 8 5.5
5 – 9 years 5 3.4
10 – 15 years 11 7.5
More than 15 years 122 83.6
NUMBER OF Less than 100 14 9.6
EMPLOYEES 100 – 250 22 15.1
251 – 500 40 27.4
501 – 1000 40 27.4
More than 1000 30 20.5
______________
Marini Nurbanum Mohamad and Charis Samuel Solomon Koilpillai (2018), Journal of Southeast
Asian Research, DOI: 10.5171/2018.497926
7 Journal of Southeast Asian Research
_____________________________________________________________________________
______________
Marini Nurbanum Mohamad and Charis Samuel Solomon Koilpillai (2018), Journal of Southeast
Asian Research, DOI: 10.5171/2018.497926
Journal of Southeast Asian Research 8
_____________________________________________________________________________
______________
Marini Nurbanum Mohamad and Charis Samuel Solomon Koilpillai (2018), Journal of Southeast
Asian Research, DOI: 10.5171/2018.497926
9 Journal of Southeast Asian Research
_____________________________________________________________________________
for Malaysian automobile industry,’ Journal 20. Lindgreen, A., Antioco, M., Harness, D., and
of Advanced Computational Intelligence and van der Sloot, R. (2009) ‘Purchasing and
Intelligent Informatics, 14(1), 47-59. marketing of social and environmental
sustainability for high-tech medical
12. Green, K. W., Pamela J. Z., Meacham, J. and equipment,’ Journal of Business Ethics, 85,
Bhadauria, V. S. (2012) ‘Green supply chain 445–462.
management practices: impact on
performance,’ Supply Chain Management: An 21. Montabon, F., Sroufe, R. and Narasimhan,
International Journal, 17(3), 290 – 305. R. (2007) ‘An examination of corporate
reporting, environmental management
13. Gupta, V., Abidi, N., Bansal, T., and Jain, R. practices and firm performance,’ Journal of
K. (2013) ‘Green supply chain management Operations Management, 25, 998–1014.
initiatives by IT companies in India,’ IUP
Journal of Operations Management, 12(2), 6- 22. Orlitzky, M. (2008) ‘Corporate social
24. performance and financial performance: A
research synthesis,’ In A. Crane, A.
14. Hajli, M. and Hajli, M. (2013) McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, D. Siegel,
‘Organisational development in sport: co- (Eds.), 2008, The Oxford handbook of
creation of value through social capital,’ corporate social responsibility, (112-134).
Industrial and Commercial Training, 45(5), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
283-288.
15. Handfield, R. B., Walton, S. V., Sroufe, R. 23. Osterle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T.,
and Melnyk, S. A. (2002) ‘Applying Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H., Loos, P., Mertens,
environmental criteria to supplier P., Oberweis, A. and Sinz, E. J. (2010)
assessment: a study in the application of the ‘Memorandum on design-oriented
analytical hierarchy process,’ European information systems research,’ European
Journal of Operational Research, 141(1), 70- Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 7-10.
87.
24. Pradeep J. (2012) ‘Effect of environmental
16. Kersten, W. (2008) ‘Global logistics concern and social norms on environmental
management: Sustainability, Quality and friendly behavioral intentions,’ Business
Risks,’ Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH & Co KG. Intelligence Journal. 169-175.
17. Kumar, V., Choisne, F., Grosbois, D. and 25. Prahinski, C., and Kocabasoglu, C. (2006)
Kumar, U. (2009) ‘Impact of TQM on ‘Empirical research opportunities in reverse
company’s performance,’ International supply chains,’ Omega, 34(6), 519–532.
Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,
26(1), 23-37. 26. Rahman, M. N. (2012) ‘The effective
implementation of global supply chain
18. Lauring, J. and Thomsen, C. (2009) management in small to medium-sized
‘Collective ideals and practices in sustainable companies in Malaysia: An empirical study,’
development: managing corporate identity,’ International Journal of Management, 29(3),
Corporate Social Responsibility and 2.
Environmental Management, 16, 38-47.
27. Rao, P. (2006) ‘Greening of suppliers/in-
19. Lee, S-Y. (2008) ‘Drivers for the bound logistics in the South East Asian
participation of small and medium-sized context,’ In Sarkis, J. (Ed.), Greening the
suppliers in green supply chain initiatives,’ supply chain, Chapter 11, Springer, London,
Supply Chain Management: An International 189-204.
Journal, 13(3), 185–198.
______________
Marini Nurbanum Mohamad and Charis Samuel Solomon Koilpillai (2018), Journal of Southeast
Asian Research, DOI: 10.5171/2018.497926
Journal of Southeast Asian Research 10
_____________________________________________________________________________
28. Saaty, T. L. and Peniwati, K. (2008) ‘Group China,’ International Journal of Quality &
decision making: drawing out and reconciling Reliability Management, 25(8), 809-823.
differences,’ RWS Publication, Pittsburgh, PA.
36. Vachon, S. and Klassen, R. D. (2006)
‘Extending green practices across the supply
29. Schianetz, K., and Kavanagh, L. (2008) chain: The impact of upstream and
‘Sustainability indicators for tourism downstream integration,’ International
destinations: A complex adaptive systems Journal of Operations & Production
approach using systemic indicator systems,’ Management, 26(7), 795-821.
Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16(6), 601–
628. 37. Vachon, S. and Klassen, R. D. (2008)
‘Environmental management and
30. Shahnaei, S. (2012) ‘The relationship manufacturing performance: the role of
between demographic characteristics and collaboration in the supply chain,’
green purchasing of Malaysian consumers,’ International Journal of Production
Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Economics, 111 (2), 299-315.
Research in Business, 4(3).
38. WCED (1987) ‘Our Common Future: The
31. Sharma, S. (2002) ‘What really matters: Brundtland Report,’ Oxford University Press,
Research on corporate sustainability?,’ In S. Oxford.
Sharma & M. Starik (Eds.), Research in
corporate sustainability: The evolving theory 39. Yacob, P., Makmor, M. F. M., Zin, A. W. B.
and practice of organizations in the natural M., and Aziz, N. S. B. (2012) ‘Barriers to
environment (1–29). Northampton, MA: reverse logistics practices in Malaysian
Elgar. SMEs,’ International Journal of Academic
Research in Economics and Management
32. Sharma, S. and Vredenburg, H. (1998) Sciences, 1(5), 204-214.
‘Proactive corporate environmental strategy
and the development of competitively 40. Yam, S. (2012) ‘The practice of corporate
valuable organizational capabilities,’ social responsibility by Malaysian
Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729– developers,’ Property Management, 31(1),
753. 76-91.
33. Shi, V. G., Koh, S.C. L., Baldwin, J. and 41. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J. and Lai, K.H. (2008)
Cucchiella, F. (2012) ‘Natural resource based ‘Green supply chain management
green supply chain management,’ Supply implications for ‘closing the loop,' Transport
Chain Management: An International Journal, Research Part E, 44(1), 1-18.
17(1), 54–67.
______________
Marini Nurbanum Mohamad and Charis Samuel Solomon Koilpillai (2018), Journal of Southeast
Asian Research, DOI: 10.5171/2018.497926