Summer Internship Comprehensive Report

Submitted to Amity University, in partial fulfillment of the requirement

for the Degreein Law

SUBMITTED BY:
Tavisha Sapra
A3221622022
Under the supervision of:
Amit Aggarwal
Name of the Faculty Guide
Ms Sarita Godara
Year-2024

CERTIFICATE OF THE FACULTY SUPERVISOR

It is to certify that Mr./Ms. Tavisha sapra is pursuing (Course Name with
course code) BCOM LLB from Amity LawSchool, Amity University
Uttar Pradesh and has completed his/her Summer Internship under my
supervision. During his/her internship training she learnt various court
craft. The comprehensive report submitted is found to be original and
suitable for submission.

Date: Name of the Faculty SARITA GODARA

Signature MS SARITA
-------------------------------------

Designation – ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

DECLARATION

I, Tavisha Sapra pursuing BCOM LLB (H) from Amity Law School,
Amity University Uttar Pradesh, do hereby declare that the
Comprehensive Report submitted by me of my Summer Internship is an
original work and has not been submitted, either in part or full anywhere
else for any purpose, academic or otherwise, to the best of my
knowledge.

I have quoted all case analysis that have been witnessed by me during
my internship. I have not submitted anything that comes under the
confidentiality clause of my Industry Guide. I have not infringed any
copy rights.

Signature----------------------------------------
th
Date: 6 July 2024 Name of the Student- Tavisha Sapra
Enrollment No. A33221622022
Program and Batch- BCOM LLB(h)
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT

I take this opportunity to express our profound gratitude and deep regard
to our guide Ms Sarita Godara for his/her exemplary guidance,
monitoring and constant encouragement throughout the course of this
term paper. The invaluable suggestions and inputs given by her from
time to time have enabled me to complete this term paper with ease.

I am obliged to staff members of Amity University, for the valuable

information provided by them in their perspective fields. I am grateful to
this cooperation during the period of my assignment.

Last but not the least, I thank almighty, my parents and my friends for
their constant support and encouragement without which this research
work would not be possible.

Signature of the Student---------------------------------

Name of the Student – Tavisha Sapra
Enrolment No. A33221622022
Date- 6th July 2024

INDEX
S.NO. CONTENTS Number Page
of pages number
1. Certificate

2. Declaration
3. Acknowledgement

4. Certificate of Internship

5. Introduction & Background of Study

6. Objective & Significance of Study

7. Introduction to the place of internship

8. Weekly Internship Duties and

Responsibilities with proof
(annexures)

9. Case Analysis

10. Course learning outcomes

11. Annexures
 TABLE OF CASE ANALYSIS

S No Name of the Case Name of the Court

Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
Case 4
Case 5
Case 6
Case 7
 INTRODUCTION TO THE PLACE OF
INTERNSHIP

I, Tavisha Sapra am currently pursuing BCOM LLB(H) from

Amity University, Noida. For my summer internship program, I did
my internship under a law firm named ADG Legal, Advocates &
Consultants ("ADG Legal") headed by Achint Singh Gyani. My
mentor during the internship was Mr. Amit Aggarwal. ADG legal is
a full service legal practice with attorneys, ca’s, cs and consultants
with specialized knowledge of particular industries.

ADG Legal, which is headquartered in New Delhi, maintains a

network of affiliated offices all throughout India. The head of ADG
Legal is Achint Singh Gyani. Dispute resolution, general corporate
and commercial consulting, transactional support, intellectual
property and confidentiality, including the protection and
enforcement of intellectual property, and labor and employment law
are among the firm's primary professional areas.

The firm specializes in-

 Criminal law- ADG LEGAL provides legal guidance at every

stage, defense against criminal charges, post-conviction reliefs, etc.
 Joint Venture Disputes- It provides legal aid to parties who
enter into a joint venture agreement and faces legal disagreement.
 Commercial litigation
  Corporate law- It helps with business formation,
Contracts and commercial agreements, corporate
governance, merges and acquisitions, etc.
 Debt Recovery-
 other areas of conflict resolution.

ADG Legal provides-

Counsel, support, and representation to international companies
and organizations in India's courts and legal forums regarding
delicate and complicated matters.

During the internship I learnt a lot of things there like drafting

letters to higher authorities, presenting ppts to other associates,
working on legal policies of various schools and drafting policies for
various international school.

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND OF STUDY:

I, Tavisha Sapra am currently pursuing BCOM LLB(H) from

Amity University, Noida. For my summer internship program, I did
my internship under a law firm named ADG Legal, Advocates &
Consultants ("ADG Legal") headed by Achint Singh Gyani. My
mentor during the internship was Mr. Amit Aggarwal. ADG legal is
a full-service legal practice with attorneys, ca’s, cs and consultants
with specialized knowledge of particular industries.

During my internship I got the opportunity to visit Saket court,

mediation center, tis-hazari, Patiala high court. I also got the opportunity
to attend various meetings with international schools like THE
KOTHARI INTERNATIONAL, BILLABONG HIGH
INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, VIDYA MANDIR CLASSES. I even
got the opportunity to draft the updated privacy policy of VMC
according to dpdp act 2023.

BACKGROUND OF STUDY

The main fields of law which I studied and found interesting were
corporate law and acts and policies regarding running of schools with a
slight interest in criminal law as well.

CORPORATE LAW-

The main fields of law which I studied and found interesting were
Mternity Benefit act and
Duties-
WEEK1
WEEK2
WEEK3

WEEK4
Case 1
MANISH ARORA VS ONKAR INFOTECH

Name of the Case: MANISH ARORA VS ONKAR INFOTECH

Name of the court in which the case is listed: SAKET HIGH COURT

Facts of the Case:

 Manish Arora(plaintiff) was an employee as Onkar infotech pvt
ltd.(defendant)
 He was employed at the firm in 2013 as a travel agent on the salary
Rs45000
 After sometime his salary increased to Rs68000
 Manish Arora the plaintiff filed a suit against onkar infotech under
order 39 rule 1 and 2 seeking an injunction against onkar infotech.
 In his suit the plaintiff alleges that he faced arbitrary salary, mental
harassment and forgery of documents by the defendant.
 However during the trial the plaintiff failed to provide any
substantial evidence to support his claim.
 While on the other hand the defendant provided evidence to the
court to support his arguments.
Legal Issues:
1) Order 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CODE, gives the power to court grant temporary injunction
and to order the detention of a person in civil prison for
disobeying those injunctions.
2) Defamation- due to the suit filed on the defendant (Onkar
infotech ) the company faced a downfall in the goodwill in the
market which lead to monetary loss.
3) The case revolves around the plaintiffs allegations of wrongful
actions by the defendant and the defendants counter-claims
regarding the plaintiff’s conduct.
Current Position of the Case: UNSOLVED

Case 2

Name of the Case: Munni vs IBHAS

Name of the court in which the case is listed: State Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission

Facts of the Case:

1. Munni admitted her 17 year old daughter in IBHAS for treatment
of seizure.
2. The daughter of the complainant was given intervenial injection on
the left hand
 3. After several minutes the arm turned blue as well as the fingers
4. They were immediately referred to GTTB hospital
5. GTTB stated that they don’t have professionals to treat after which
they were transferred to AIIMS
6. AIIMS also stated the same thing and was transferred to
Safdarjung hospital where it was treated and found out the veins of
the left hand of neeru was blocked due to the injections were given
7. The case was so severe that her left arm had to be amputated
8. Munni the complainant filed a compensation of 1cr.

Legal Issues:
Due to the negligence of IBHAS neeru’s whole life was destroyed.
Neeru basic right to medical assistance was infringed which harmed her
life due to the negligence of the doctors.
After several proofs provided by the complaint SMT MUNNI , it was
declared that it was IBHAS fault which harmed neeru life.
IBHAS has to pay compensation of 1cr to MUNNI

Current Position of the Case: SOLVED

Case 3

Name of the Case: QUANTUM COMMUNICATION VS MINISTRY

OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS GOVT OF INDIA.
Name of the court in which the case is listed: HIGH COURT NEW
DELHI

Facts of the Case: In July 2016, the Respondent published a request for
proposal for selection of a Professional Communications Agency for
Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India. The main
objectives of the said proposal are described in the file itself.
In response to the abovesaid RFP, the Claimant submitted its bid and the
same was accepted by the Respondent vide letter of intent dated
19.09.2016.
The Claimant and the Respondent entered into a Professional Service
Agreement dated 29.09.2016 hereinafter referred to as “Contract dated
29.09.2016”. The Scope of work and the deliverable and timelines were
stipulated in Schedule 3 of the Contract dated 29.09.2016.
It is highlighted that the Claimant was selected by the abovementioned
letter of intent dated 19.09.2016, through a competitive bidding process
by receiving maximum technical marks and least cost (L1) amongst all
the bidders. As per the contract, the payment to be made to the Claimant
consisted of "Fixed Charges" which were decided on the basis of rates
determined for deliverables and the manpower being deployed for the
performance of the works within the Schedule of Work, and also as per
the Contract, for items over and above the works mentioned in the
Schedule of Work, additional consideration was agreed to be paid to the
Claimant as per the agreed Rate Card (provided in Schedule 3 of the
Contract dated 29.09.2016).
Subsequently, the claimant delivered its services and raised invoices as
per the contract, which were paid by the Respondent upon approval. All
the invoices which were issued by the claimant, for the months of
October 2016 to July 2017 were duly paid by the respondent.
Based on the increased quantum of work, a request was made to increase
the manpower to the JS, SBM. A committee was formed by the
Respondent for the Revision of Scope of Work.
Mr. Vinod Jindal (JS, SBM) called the claimant in his office and
informed them on revised scope of work, change in number of
deliverables, and revision of rate card. The JS in this meeting explicitly
informed them that there was no need to increase the manpower as
payment for extra work as per the rate card has already been provided in
the original contract. He also explained to us that a new contract is not
required in this case as the scope of work is reduced and is well within
the scope of the existing contract.
On this basis the Claimant was raising the bills for over 4 years, from
June 2017, which were scrutinized, approved, sanctioned, and paid by
competent authorities at various levels.
However, the payment for the bills for September 2020- December
2020, for an amount of Rs.1,75,86,230/- were not released despite
Ministry’s sanction letter no. 13/01.2016-SBM-II dates 9th February
2021, and January 2021- May 202, without any justifiable basis

Current Position of the Case: ONGOING

Case 4

Name of the Case: M/S SETH THAKURDAS KHINVRAJ RATHI

V/S M/S CAL REFINERS LTD.
Name of the court in which the case is listed: NATIONAL
COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI BENCH II
FACTS

Current Position of the Case: SOLVED

CASE 5: SACHIN JAIN VS ONKAR INFOTECH

Name of the court in which the case is listed: PATIALA HIGH

COURT
FACTS
 Sachin Jain (plaintiff) was an employee as Onkar infotech pvt ltd.
(defendant)
 Sachin Jain the plaintiff filed a suit against onkar infotech under
order 39 rule 1 and 2 seeking an injunction against onkar infotech.
 In his suit the plaintiff alleges that he faced arbitrary salary, mental
harassment and forgery of documents by the defendant.
 However during the trial the plaintiff failed to provide any
substantial evidence to support his claim.
 While on the other hand the defendant provided evidence to the
court to support his arguments.
 The case was then referred to Patiala court mediation center.
 However the parties could not come on same terms

Legal Issues:
4) Order 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CODE, gives the power to court grant temporary injunction
and to order the detention of a person in civil prison for
disobeying those injunctions.
5) Defamation- due to the suit filed on the defendant (Onkar
infotech ) the company faced a downfall in the goodwill in the
market which lead to monetary loss.
 6) The case revolves around the plaintiffs allegations of wrongful
actions by the defendant and the defendants counter-claims
regarding the plaintiff’s conduct.
Current Position of the Case: ONGOING
 COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES

This internship has been an informative experience that has helped me

comprehend numerous legal ideas and learn a lot practical expertise. As
I became more familiar with corporate world, Saket court and Patiala
high court’s operations. I increased my exposure there. Throughout the
period of my internship, my mentor and seniors gave me advice,
supported me, and were always there to answer my questions.
Law internships provide invaluable experience for aspiring lawyers. In
addition to giving me a chance to see if I enjoy the daily grind of legal
work, my internship helped me develop a number of important skills.
Here are some of the key learnings outcomes:
 EXPOSURE TO DIFFERENT AREAS OF LAW
 PROFESSIONALISM AND ETHICS
 COMMUNICATION SKILLS
 CRITICAL THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING