人工智能的未来:星辰大海还是昙花一现
人工智能的未来:星辰大海还是昙花一现
人工智能的未来:星辰大海还是昙花一现
Silicon valley’s tech bros are having a difficult few weeks. A growing
number of investors worry that artificial intelligence (AI) will not deliver the
vast profits they seek. Since peaking last month the share prices of Western firms
driving the AI revolution have dropped by 15%. A growing number of observers
now question the limitations of large language models, which power services such
as ChatGPT. Big tech firms have spent tens of billions of dollars on AI models,
with even more extravagant promises of future outlays. Yet according to the
latest data from the Census Bureau, only 4.8% of American companies use AI to
produce goods and services, down from a high of 5.4% early this year. Roughly
the same share intend to do so within the next year.
Gently raise these issues with a technologist and they will look at you
with a mixture of disappointment and pity. Haven’t you heard of the “hype
cycle”? This is a term popularised by Gartner, a research firm—and one that is
common knowledge in the Valley. After an initial period of irrational euphoria
and overinvestment, hot new technologies enter the “trough of disillusionment”,
the argument goes, where sentiment sours. Everyone starts to worry that adoption
of the technology is proceeding too slowly, while profits are hard to come by.
However, as night follows day, the tech makes a comeback. Investment that had
accompanied the wave of euphoria enables a huge build-out of infrastructure, in
turn pushing the technology towards mainstream adoption. Is the hype cycle a
useful guide to the world’s AI future?
Although AI has not experienced a bust on anywhere near the same scale
as the railways or dotcom, the current anxiety is, according to some, nevertheless
evidence of its coming global domination. “The future of AI is just going to be like
every other technology. There’ll be a giant expensive build-out of infrastructure,
followed by a huge bust when people realise they don’t really know how to use AI
productively, followed by a slow revival as they figure it out,” says Noah Smith,
an economics commentator.
Is this right? Perhaps not. For starters, versions of AI itself have for
decades experienced periods of hype and despair, with an accompanying waxing
and waning of academic engagement and investment, but without moving to the
final stage of the hype cycle. There was lots of excitement over AI in the 1960s,
including over Eliza, an early chatbot. This was followed by AI winters in the
1970s and 1990s. As late as 2020 research interest in AI was declining, before
zooming up again once generative AI came along.
Anecdotes only get you so far. Unfortunately, it is not easy to test whether
a hype cycle is an empirical regularity. “Since it is vibe-based data, it is hard
to say much about it definitively,” notes Ethan Mollick of the University of
Pennsylvania. But we have had a go at saying something definitive, extending
work by Michael Mullany, an investor, that he conducted in 2016. The Economist collected
data from Gartner, which for decades has placed dozens of hot technologies where it believes
they belong on the hype cycle. We then supplemented it with our own number-crunching.
AI could still revolutionise the world. One of the big tech firms might make a
breakthrough. Businesses could wake up to the benefits that the tech offers them. But for
now the challenge for big tech is to prove that AI has something to offer the real economy.
There is no guarantee of success. If you must turn to the history of technology for a sense of
AI’s future, the hype cycle is an imperfect guide. A better one is “easy come, easy go”.