Euroncap 2017 Jaguar F Pace Datasheet
Euroncap 2017 Jaguar F Pace Datasheet
Euroncap 2017 Jaguar F Pace Datasheet
93% 85%
80% 72%
SPECIFICATION
Rating Expired
General comments
The Jaguar F-Pace shares much of its structure with the Range Rover Velar, tested by Euro NCAP in October 2017. Tests have been
performed where differences might be expected but in some cases the results of the Velar have been used for this assessment.
Version 040124
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
Frontal airbag
Belt pretensioner
Belt loadlimiter
Knee airbag
CHILD PROTECTION
Isofix/i-Size
Integrated CRS
SAFETY ASSIST
OTHER SYSTEMS
AEB Pedestrian
AEB City
AEB Inter-Urban
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
Fitted to the vehicle as standard Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
Version 040124
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack Not available Not applicable
Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier 7.4 Pts Frontal Full Width 7.2 Pts
Passenger Driver
Rear Passenger Driver
Performance: Good
Version 040124
Comments
The passenger compartment of the F-Pace remained stable in the frontal offset test. Protection of the knees and femurs was good for
both dummies and a similar level of protection is provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-
width rigid-barrier test, protection of the chest of the rear passenger was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of rib compression.
Otherwise, protection of the driver and rear passenger was good or adequate. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole
impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the F-Pace scored maximum points. Tests on the front seats and head restraints
demonstrated good protection against whiplash in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated
marginal whiplash protection. The F-Pace has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. Tests of the functionality of this
system at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur showed good performance, with collisions avoided at almost all test
speeds.
Version 040124
Crash Test Performance based on 6 & 10 year old children 23.0 Pts
Isofix
i-Size
Integrated CRS
Fitted to test car as standard Not on test car but available as option Not available
Version 040124
Install without problem Install with care Safety critical problem Installation not allowed
i-Size CRS
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize)
(rearward) (iSize) (forward) (iSize)
ISOFIX CRS
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX)
Comments
In the frontal offset test, protection of the 6 year and 10 year dummies was good or adequate, except for the neck of the 10 year dummy,
protection of which was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of neck tension. In the side barrier impact, protection was good for
all critical body areas of both dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in
that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of
the restraint types for which the F-Pace is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
Version 040124
Seat Position
Comments
In the frontal offset test, protection of the 6 year and 10 year dummies was good or adequate, except for the neck of the 10 year dummy,
protection of which was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of neck tension. In the side barrier impact, protection was good for
all critical body areas of both dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in
that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of
the restraint types for which the F-Pace is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
Version 040124
Additional Information Defaults on for every journey; operates above 40km/h and in low ambient light
PERFORMANCE |
Autobrake Function
Avoidance Mitigation
Running Adult crossing from Farside Collision avoided up to 40 km/h Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -25% Collision avoided up to 40 km/h Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -75% Collision avoided up to 40 km/h Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h
Running Child from behind parked vehicles Collision avoided up to 40 km/h Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h
Comments
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate over most of the bonnet surface, with
some weak and poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs while
protection of the pelvis areas was more mixed, with good and poor results recorded. The autonomous emergency braking system can
detect pedestrians and, in tests of this functionality, performed well, with scoring maximum points with collisions avoided or mitigated in all
Version 040124
test scenarios.
Version 040124
Visual
Audible
Warning Audible
PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE |
Comments
Tests of the autonomous emergency braking system at highway speeds demonstrated good performance, with collisions avoided or
mitigated in all tests. A seatbelt reminder is standard equipment for the front and rear seats, as is a driver-set speed limiter and lane-
departure warning system.
Version 040124
RATING VALIDITY
LHD RHD
* Tested variant