3204 BENGALI: MARK SCHEME For The May/June 2008 Question Paper

w
w
w
.X
tr
me
eP
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS
ap
er
GCE Ordinary Level
s.c
om
MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2008 question paper
3204 BENGALI
3204/01 Paper 1 (Composition), maximum raw mark 90
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of
the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not
indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began.
All Examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated.
Mark schemes must be read in conjunction with the question papers and the report on the
examination.
• CIE will not enter into discussions or correspondence in connection with these mark schemes.
CIE is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2008 question papers for most IGCSE, GCE
Advanced Level and Advanced Subsidiary Level syllabuses and some Ordinary Level syllabuses.
Page 2 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper
GCE O LEVEL – May/June 2008 3204 01
Section A
Questions 1 and 2
Content (12 marks)
• 3 maximum marks available per bullet point.

• Do not give credit for any bullet point that is missed, even if a candidate replaces it with
another: the candidates have to refer to the rubric.
Language and Organisation (18 marks)
Use the banded descriptors for Language and Organisation (Questions 1 and 2).
Section B
Questions 3, 4 and 5
Use the banded descriptors for Questions 3, 4 and 5.
© UCLES 2008
Band Descriptors – Language and Organisation (Questions 1 and 2)
BAND MARKS DESCRIPTORS

• Very well arranged and paragraphed
• Fluent
• Very good to excellent linguistic ability
• No major errors, very few slips or minor errors
1 16–18 • Wide variety of apt vocabulary, sentence structure and linking devices
• Descriptions create atmosphere, shows observation and sensitivity
• Discussions present cogent argument with force and economy
• Narratives, where appropriate, show merits of structure,
characterisation, description, suspense, pace
• Well arranged and paragraphed
• Good to very good linguistic ability
Upper 13–15 • Vocabulary and sentence structure varied and appropriate but not
necessarily outstanding
• Few major errors, some slips and minor errors
2
• Reasonable arrangement and paragraphing
Lower • Varied vocabulary and sentence structure
10–12
• Few major errors, some slips and errors
• Free from monotonous repetition
• Some attempt to arrange ideas
• More major and minor errors than in Band 2 (Lower)
Upper 7–9 • Limited vocabulary but the meaning is clear
• Short and stereotyped sentences with some complex sentences
• Sentences correctly separated except for occasional slips
3
• Poor paragraphing
• Many grammatical and syntactical errors OR mainly correct language
Lower 4–6 as only simple language structures are used
• Errors in basic vocabulary and simple idioms
• Inability to form proper sentence structures
• Gross errors of all kinds
• Mistakes not easily definable, whole passages not making sense
4 0–3
• Chaotic word order, serious misspelling of simple words, serious errors
in other areas.
© UCLES 2008
Band Descriptors Questions 3, 4 and 5
BAND MARKS DESCRIPTORS

• Apart from very occasional slips, the language is accurate. Sentence
structure is varied and demonstrates the candidate’s skill to use
different lengths and types of sentences for particular effects.
Vocabulary is wide and precise.
1 54–60 • Punctuation is accurate and helpful to the reader. Spelling is accurate
across the full range of vocabulary used. Paragraphs have unity, are
linked, and show evidence of planning. The topic is addressed with
consistent relevance; the interest of the reader is aroused and
sustained.
• The language is accurate; occasional errors are either slips or arise
from attempts to use ambitious structures or vocabulary that may be
imperfectly understood. Vocabulary is wide enough to convey
intended shades of meaning with some precision. Sentences show
some variation of length and type, including the confident use of
2 47–53 complex sentences.
• Punctuation is accurate and generally helpful. Spelling is nearly
always accurate. Paragraphs show some evidence of planning, have
unity and are usually appropriately linked. The response is relevant,
and the interest of the reader is aroused and sustained through most
of the composition.
• Vocabulary and structures are mainly correct when they are simple;
mistakes may occur when more sophistication is attempted.
Sentences may show some variety of structure and length, although
there may be a tendency to repeat sentence types and ‘shapes’,
producing a monotonous effect. Spelling of simple vocabulary is
accurate; errors may occur when more ambitious vocabulary is used.
3 39–46
• Punctuation is generally accurate, although errors may occur when
more difficult tasks are attempted e.g. the punctuation of direct
speech. Sentence separation is correct. The composition is written in
paragraphs which may show some unity, although links may be
absent or inappropriate. The composition is relevant and will arouse
some interest in the reader.
• The meaning is generally clear. There will be patches of accurate
language, particularly when simple vocabulary and structures are
used. There may be some variety of sentence length and structure,
but the reader may not be convinced that this variety is for a particular
purpose. Vocabulary is usually adequate to convey intended meaning,
although it may be insufficiently developed to achieve precision. Idiom
may be uncertain at times.
4 31–38
• Punctuation will be used but may not enhance/clarify meaning. Some
sentence separation errors may occur occasionally. Simple words will
be spelt accurately, but more complex vocabulary may show some
spelling weakness. Paragraphs will be used but may lack unity or
coherence. A genuine attempt has been made to address the topic,
but there may be digressions or failures of logic. Compositions may
lack liveliness and interest value.
© UCLES 2008
• Meaning is never in doubt, but the errors are sufficiently frequent and
serious to hamper precision, and may slow down speed of reading.
Some simple structures will be accurate, but the script is unlikely to
sustain accuracy for long. Vocabulary may be limited, either too
simple to convey precise meaning or more ambitious but imperfectly
understood. Some idiomatic errors are likely.
5 23–30 • Simple punctuation will usually be accurate, but there may be frequent
sentence separation errors. Simple words will usually be spelt
correctly, but there may be inconsistency, and frequent mistakes in
the spelling of more difficult words. Paragraphs may lack unity or be
used haphazardly. The subject matter will show some relevance. The
incidence of linguistic error is likely to distract the reader from merits
of content.
• There will be many serious errors of various kinds throughout the
script, but they will be of the ‘single-word’ type i.e. they could be
corrected without re-writing the sentence.
• Communication is established, although the weight of error may
cause ‘blurring’ from time to time. Sentences will probably be simple
and repetitive in structure. Vocabulary will convey meaning but is
6 15–22
likely to be simple and imprecise. Errors in idiomatic usage will be a
significant feature.
• Spelling may be inconsistent. Paragraphing may be haphazard or
non-existent. There may be evidence of interesting and relevant
subject matter, but the weight of linguistic error will tend to obscure or
neutralise its effect.
• Sense will usually be decipherable but some of the error will be
multiple i.e. requiring the reader to re-read and re-organise before
meaning becomes clear. There are unlikely to be more than a few
7 7–14
accurate sentences, however simple, in the whole composition.
• The content is likely to be comprehensible, but may be partly hidden
by the density of the linguistic error.
• Scripts are entirely, or almost entirely impossible to recognise as
pieces of English writing. Whole sections will make no sense at all.
Where occasional patches of relative clarity are evident some marks
8 0–6
will be given.
• The mark of 0 is reserved for scripts that make no sense at all from
beginning to end.
© UCLES 2008

3204 BENGALI: MARK SCHEME For The May/June 2008 Question Paper

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

3204 BENGALI: MARK SCHEME For The May/June 2008 Question Paper

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

3204 BENGALI: MARK SCHEME For The May/June 2008 Question Paper

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

w

Content (12 marks)

• 3 maximum marks available per bullet point.

Language and Organisation (18 marks)

Use the banded descriptors for Questions 3, 4 and 5.

Band Descriptors – Language and Organisation (Questions 1 and 2)

BAND MARKS DESCRIPTORS

Band Descriptors Questions 3, 4 and 5

BAND MARKS DESCRIPTORS

You might also like