Literature - Review - 2024 10 24 - 04 35 45

Literature review Generated From
AskYourPDF
# Literature Review on the Role of ChatGPT as a Writing Assistant in Higher Education The emergence of
ChatGPT as an AI-driven writing assistant in higher education has prompted extensive scholarly inquiry into its
capabilities, implications, and the challenges it poses. As educational institutions increasingly integrate AI tools
into curricula, understanding the multifaceted role of ChatGPT is crucial for effective implementation. This
literature review synthesizes various findings related to ChatGPT's application in higher education, highlighting
its potential benefits, limitations, and areas for future research. ## Capabilities and Performance of ChatGPT
Numerous studies have underscored ChatGPT's versatility as an educational tool, particularly in generating
coherent and contextually relevant text across diverse subjects. For instance, Lo (2023) highlights its
effectiveness in fields such as economics, while its performance in more complex subjects like mathematics is
less satisfactory, indicating a variability in its utility. This inconsistency necessitates that educators adapt their
assessment methods and institutional policies to accommodate the nuanced capabilities of AI tools (Imran &
Almusharraf, 2023). In terms of writing assistance, Fitria (2023) points out that ChatGPT can produce coherent
essays, showcasing its potential to support students with writing tasks. However, this potential is
counterbalanced by concerns regarding the grammatical accuracy of AI-generated content, emphasizing the
need for critical evaluation by students and instructors alike. Furthermore, the ability of ChatGPT to assist in
literature searches and formulate Boolean queries demonstrates its utility in enhancing research efficiency
(Wang et al., 2023). Nevertheless, these applications require further validation to ensure reliability and
effectiveness. ## Student Engagement and Adoption Understanding student engagement with ChatGPT is vital
for its successful integration into educational practices. Crompton and Burke (2023) identify key predictors
influencing students' intentions to adopt ChatGPT, including habit, performance expectancy, and hedonic
motivation. This research underscores the importance of recognizing user motivations and behaviors in the
context of educational technology. Chan and Hu (2023) further emphasize the students' perceptions of
generative AI, documenting both the benefits and challenges they encounter. This dual perspective is essential
for educators aiming to foster an environment where students are motivated to leverage AI tools effectively. ##
Ethical Considerations and Academic Integrity The integration of ChatGPT into higher education raises
significant ethical considerations, particularly regarding academic integrity. Perkins (2023) discusses the
potential for AI-generated text to evade plagiarism detection, highlighting the need for clear policies governing
the use of AI in academic settings. This concern is echoed by Arif et al. (2023), who note that while ChatGPT
can enhance communication skills, it also presents challenges related to academic dishonesty. Therefore,
establishing guidelines for the responsible use of AI tools is imperative to maintain academic standards.
Moreover, the review by Malinka et al. (2023) outlines ChatGPT's dual role in education as both a beneficial
resource and a potential facilitator of cheating. This complexity necessitates ongoing dialogue among educators,
students, and policymakers to navigate the ethical implications of AI integration in learning environments. ##
Challenges in Integration and Training Despite the promising applications of ChatGPT, several challenges
hinder its effective integration into higher education. Strzelecki (2023) identifies the importance of professional
training for educators to navigate the complexities of AI tools. Effective training can empower instructors to
utilize ChatGPT in ways that enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. Furthermore, Fernández-
Batanero et al. (2021) highlight the psychological impact of educational technology on teachers, emphasizing
the need to address concerns related to anxiety and stress as educators adapt to new tools. ## Knowledge Gaps
and Future Research Directions While existing literature provides valuable insights into the role of ChatGPT,
several knowledge gaps warrant further exploration. First, there is a need for empirical studies that investigate
the effectiveness of specific training programs for educators in integrating AI tools into their teaching practices.
Additionally, research should focus on developing assessment methods that accommodate AI-generated content
while fostering critical thinking and originality among students. Furthermore, the exploration of the long-term
impacts of AI tools on academic performance and student learning outcomes remains under-researched.
Investigating the ethical implications of AI in diverse educational contexts, particularly in professional fields
such

Literature - Review - 2024 10 24 - 04 35 45

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Literature - Review - 2024 10 24 - 04 35 45

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Literature - Review - 2024 10 24 - 04 35 45

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Literature review Generated From

You might also like