USAGE OF N-LIST IN GOVERNMENT DEGREE

COLLEGE, KAMAREDDY – A STUDY.

PROJECT REPORT SUBMITTED TO DLIS, UCA & SS, OSMANIA UNIVERSITY

IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
THE AWARD OF THE
MASTER OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE
(M.Lib.I.Sc)
Submitted
By

S.ANJALI
Roll Number: 100322399042
Under the Guidance of
Dr. AS. CHAKRAVARTY
Associate Professor
University College of Science
Osmania University, Hyderabad

OSMANIA UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES
HYDERABAD – 500007

2024

1
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to all those who helped
me in the successful completion of my project, titled "Usage of N-LIST in
Government Degree College Kamareddy."
First and foremost, I would like to thank my Guide Dr. AS. Chakravarty for
their valuable guidance, support, and encouragement throughout the
course of this research. Their insightful feedback and constant
encouragement played a crucial role in shaping this project.
I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. V. Vivekavardhan, Head of
the Department Dr. Achala Munigal, Dr. S. Yadagiri, Dr. B. Kishan Staff
of Library Science, Osmania University Hyderabad, for their consistent
co-operation and encouragement throughout the Programme.
I am deeply grateful to the Principal and the faculty members of
Government Degree College, Kamareddy, for granting me the opportunity
to conduct my research at their esteemed institution. Their cooperation and
willingness to share information regarding the usage of the N-LIST resources
were pivotal to the successful completion of my study.
I also wish to extend my thanks to the Dr. A. Laxmanachari, Librarian
and administrative staff of the college, who provided me with access to the
necessary resources and data regarding the N-LIST program, ensuring the
smooth flow of my research work. A special thanks to all the students and
faculty members who participated in the survey and provided valuable
insights that enriched the project.
Thank you all for your invaluable contribution.

S. ANJALI

2
 DECLARATION

I hereby declare that the dissertation, entitled “USAGE OF N-LIST IN

GOVERNMENT DEGREE COLLEGE, KAMAREDDY-A STUDY”
submitted for the Award of Master of Library and Information Science
(M.Lib.I.Sc) is my original work and the Project has not formed the basis for
the award of any Degree, Diploma, Associateship, Fellowship or similar
other titles. It has not been submitted to any University or Institution for the
award of any degree or diploma.

Signature of the Student

Name: S. ANJALI
Roll No.:100322399042
Place: Hyderabad
Date:

3
 CERTIFICATE

This is to Certify that the project work, entitled “USAGE OF N- LIST IN

GOVERNMENT DEGREE COLLEGE, KAMAREDDY – A STUDY” for the award
of Master of Library and Information Science (M.Lib.I.Sc) submitted by S.
ANJALI(Roll No.: 100322399042) during the period of his study under my
guidance and that the project has not previously formed the basis for the award of
any Degree, Diploma, Associateship, Fellowship or similar other title.

Signature of the Guide

DR. AS. CHAKRAVARTHY
Place: Hyderabad
Date:

4
 Abstract
The advent of digital resources has revolutionized academic libraries,
providing users with a wealth of information at their fingertips. This project
explores the usage of N-LIST (National Library and Information Services
Infrastructure for Scholarly Content) in Government Degree College,
Kamareddy, focusing on how this digital library initiative supports the
academic community. N-LIST provides access to thousands of e-books, e-
journals, and databases to affiliated institutions, including government
degree colleges.

The study aims to assess the awareness, frequency of usage, and

overall satisfaction of students and faculty regarding N-LIST. A structured
questionnaire was distributed among a sample of students and faculty
members to gather data. The findings reveal significant trends in the
adoption of digital resources, highlighting the factors that influence usage
patterns, including ease of access, content relevance, and technical
challenges.

This research also examines the potential barriers to effective usage

of N-LIST, such as lack of awareness, insufficient training, and limited access
to technological tools. Recommendations are provided to enhance N-LIST
usage, including the need for orientation programs, better technical
infrastructure, and increased promotion of the platform’s benefits.

Overall, the project concludes that N-LIST has considerable potential

to enrich academic research and learning experiences at Government
Degree College, Kamareddy, but requires concerted efforts to maximize its
utility among the academic community.
5
 Content

I. Introduction

1.1 Brief note on consortia

1.2 N – LIST

1.3 N-LIST operation

1.4 N-LIST joining method

1.5 N-LIST joining eligibility

1.6 Full-text electronic resources of N-LIST

1.7 Current status of N-LIST

1.8 Details of N-LIST beneficiary institutions

1.9 Governance of n-list

1.10 Need for the study

1.11 Statement of the problem

1.12 Scope and limitations of the study

1.13 Explanation of the definitions

1.13.1 Usage, N-LIST, Government degree college, Kamareddy, A Study

1.14 Chaptalization

6
Chapter - II

2.1 Review of related literature

Chapter – III

3.1 Research design

3.2 Objectives of the study

3.3 Hypotheses of the study

3.4 Methodology

3.5 profile of government degree college, Kamareddy

Chapter – IV

4.1 Data sample

4.2 Analysis of participants

4.3 Participants Year of study

4.4 Analysis of n-list orientation/training data

4.5 Analysis of how students first heard about N-LIST

4.6 Analysis of access to N-LIST

4.7 Analysis of frequency of N-LIST usage

4.8 Analysis of devices used to access N-LIST

7
4.9 Analysis of types of resources used primarily on N-LIST

4.10 Analysis of the most useful subject areas found on N-LIST

4.11 Frequency of locating required academic content on N – List

4.12 Analysis of user satisfaction with N – LIST services

4.13 Comprehensive analysis of user difficulties with N – LIST

4.15 Like to recommend to friends

Chapter – V

5.1 Findings of the study

5.2 suggestions

5.3 Conclusion

Chapter – VI

6.1 Bibliographical References

6.2 Web References

Questionnaires

8
 CHAPTER: I

INTRODUCTION

9
 Change is the law of nature and as it is very apparent in the present
day society and libraries are not an exception to these phenomena. Libraries
are shifting towards automation and IT application. Libraries are facing
increasing demands for services while struggling with the challenges such as
the growth of information resources, high cost of library materials, high
expectations from users, budget cuts and much more. Library consortia are
created to help libraries obtain better prices by buying joint access for a
greater number of users, expanding access to print and electronic
collections and developing new services to meet user’s needs. E-Resources
are the new forms of information which are being induced in library
systems. With the development and issues emerging in the new world of e-
resources, strategies to manage these e-resources are being explored. Over
the years the problems of missing issues, binding, subscription and damage
of papers have also been solved. Library consortia are a boon to the
librarians, in saving the cost of journals and optimizing library budgets.

Electronic resources rule the world of information, this resources has

to be made reach to all the users of libraries. Electronic resources or
Electronic Information Resources are nothing but the e-journals, e-books,
databases, e- directories, e-encyclopaedia etc. In short all the information
resources will be available in electronic format. It is possible to recognize in
Ranganathan’s five laws of library science that motivates to drive libraries
to integrate electronic resources into services and collections. They are
paraphrased to better suit electronic resources, Electronic resource have
become the most powerful information sources in 21st Century libraries and
librarians play major role in providing this information resource which
bought/rented with majority of budget expenditure.

10
1.1 BRIEF NOTE ON CONSORTIA

A consortium refers to a cooperative association where multiple

institutions come together to achieve common goals, often related to
sharing resources and reducing costs. In the academic world, library
consortia enable institutions to collectively negotiate access to digital
resources, such as e-journals, e-books, and databases. This collaboration
allows institutions, especially those with limited budgets, to access a wider
range of scholarly content at a fraction of the cost of individual
subscriptions.

In India, the e-ShodhSindhu Consortium is a prominent example,

facilitating access to scholarly content for universities and colleges through
projects like N-LIST (National Library and Information Services
Infrastructure for Scholarly Content). By being part of a consortium,
institutions can share expensive academic resources and ensure equitable
access to knowledge across a diverse range of educational environments.

The consortia model is especially beneficial for smaller or

underfunded institutions, as it enhances their ability to offer high-quality
digital content to students and faculty, thus supporting academic growth
and research efforts.

11
1.2 N-LIST

The Project entitled “National Library and Information Services

Infrastructure for Scholarly Content (N-LIST)”, being jointly executed by the
UGC-INFONET Digital Library Consortium, INFLIBNET Centre. The N-LIST
project provides access to E-resources to students, researchers and faculty
from colleges and other beneficiary institutions through server(s) installed
at the INFLIBNET Centre. The authorized users from colleges can now access
e-resources and download articles required by them directly from the
publisher’s website once they are duly authenticated as authorized users
through servers deployed at the INFLIBNET Centre. The project has four
distinct components, i.e.

i) to subscribe and provide access to selected UGC- INFONET e-resources to

technical institutions (IITs, IISc, IISERs and NITs) and monitor its usage;

ii) to subscribe and provide access to selected INDEST e-resources to

selected universities and monitor its usage;

iii) to subscribe and provide access to selected e-resources to 6,000 Govt./

Govt.-aided colleges and monitor its usage; and

iv) to act as a Monitoring Agency for colleges and evaluate, promote, impart
training and monitor all activities involved in the process of providing
effective and efficient access to e-resources to colleges.

The N-LIST and UGC-INFONET are jointly responsible for activity listed
at i) and ii) above. The INFLIBNET Centre, Ahmedabad is responsible for
activities listed at iii) and iv) above. The INFLIBNET Centre is also responsible

12
for developing and deploying appropriate software tools and techniques for
authenticating authorized users.

1.3 N-LIST OPERATION

The N-LIST programme under E-ShodhSindhu operates through its

Headquarter set-up at the INFLIBNET CENTRE, Gandhinagar, and Gujarat,
India.

The NSC's of E-ShodhSindhu: Consortium for Higher Education Electronic

Resources in its meeting would take decisions on policy issues under overall
policy direction of National Mission on Education through ICT.

Major Functions and Responsibilities of the INFLIBNET Centre:

• Establish proxy servers and associated authentication mechanism for

colleges to enable them to ac6

• Provide full text access to electronic resources subscribed for educational

institutions through proxy servers after establishing authenticity of users;

• Identify gaps in resources and infrastructure and make attempts to fill in

those gaps so as to deliver effective and efficient services;

• Generate alerting services from subscribed e-resources deploying

technological tools for content delivery such as RSS feed, Atoms, Blogs etc.

• Setup computer laboratories consisting of 10-20 Internet -enabled PCs to

facilitate walk-in users to access subscribed e-resources;

13
• Impart awareness and training programmes for colleges and institutions;
and

• Collect and analyse usage statistics of e-resources and find trends of usage
in different subject disciplines.

1.4 N-LIST JOINING METHOD

Colleges, desirous of accessing E-Resources, are required to register

themselves with the N-LIST. Visit the N-LIST Website and click on Register
on the navigation bar. Fill-in the Registration Form online and submit it. User
may also download the Registration Form and submit it by post.

1.5 N-LIST Joining Eligibility:

• All Govt aided colleges covered under Section 12B of UGC Act are eligible
to access E-Resources through the N-LIST programme.

• Non-Aided colleges (except Agriculture, Medical, Engineering,

Management, Pharmacy, Nursing and Dentistry) can get benefit from the N-
LIST Programme by joining the programme. These colleges are required to
pay Rs.30,000/- + GST extra towards annual membership.

14
• Registered colleges covered under 12B section of UGC are required to pay
Rs.5,000.00 + GST (from 1st July 2017) extra as annual membership/renewal
fee.

• Non-aided Colleges registered for N-LIST Programme are required to pay

Rs.30,000.00 + GST (from 1st July 2017) extra as annual
membership/renewal fee.

• The period of membership is valid from April to March every financial year.

• Mode of Payments is membership Fee shall be paid by Demand Draft

drawn in favour of INFLIBNET-N-LIST Account payable at Gandhinagar OR
Through RTGS/NEFT fund transfer to INFLIBNET-N-LIST Account as per the
details as follows:

Beneficiary Name: INFLIBNET – N-LIST

A/c. Bank Name: State Bank of India

Branch: Infocity, Gandhinagar

Bank Address: Unit GWGF/2, Ground Floor, Infocity,

Gandhinagar, Gujarat

Bank Account No.: 31104082931

IFSC Code: SBIN0012700

MICR Code: 380002151

Important Note: In case of RTGS/NEFT payment send the payment

details viz UTR No., date of payment & amount in the format (.docx) to

15
INFLIBNET through email [email protected] or letter to
INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar. No other mode of payment is acceptable.
Please do not deposit Membership fee directly to INFLIBNET-N-LIST Account
mentioned above College Administrator can create user Ids and Passwords
for their beneficed users, i. e. faculty, staff, researchers and students by their
own after login to the system. If member colleges are not having admin ID
and password. Please they should send scanned copy authorization letter
duly signed by Principal of your college at email: [email protected]

For User ID/password and access problem, they should write at Email:
[email protected] and write at Email: [email protected] for
payment/invoice.

1.6 FULL-TEXT ELECTRONIC RESOURCES OF N-LIST

Full-text electronic resources contain complete articles along with

their bibliographic details. The N-LIST programme subscribes to full-text e-
resources from academic societies, commercial publishers and aggregators
like American Institute of Physics, American Physical Society, Oxford
University Press, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge University Press, H
W Wilson, etc. All full text resources subscribed under the N-LIST
programme contain electronic resources as revealed as follows.

16
1.7 Current Status of N-LIST

As on September 2024, a total number of 3,913 colleges have

registered themselves with the N-LIST programme including Govt. / Govt.-
aided colleges covered under the 12 B Act of the UGC. Log-in ID and
password for accessing e- resources has been sent to the authorized users
from these 3,913 colleges. Remaining colleges are being advised to join the
initiative as N-LIST Associates. All e-resources subscribed for colleges under
the N-LIST Project are now accessible to these 3,913 colleges through the N-
LIST website.

1.8 Details of N-LIST Beneficiary Institutions

The following four sets of institutions are benefitting from the N-LIST
Project:

i) Universities covered under Phase I of the UGC-INFONET Digital Library

Consortium can now access Web of Science.

ii) IITs, IISc, IISERs and selected NITs (i.e. core members of the INDEST-AICTE
Consortium) can now access selected e-resources namely Annual Reviews,
Project Muse and Nature.

iii) 3,913 Govt./Govt.-aided colleges covered less than 12 B Act of the UGC
can now access selected electronic resources including electronic journals,
electronic books and bibliographic databases. These resources include more
than 6,000 e-journals and 1,99,500 e-books. Colleges, not covered under the

17
12B Act of the UGC, can benefit from the N List Programme by joining the
programme as its Associate. These colleges are required to pay a fixed
amount towards subscription to e-resources and annual subscription.

1.9 Governance of N-LIST

The N-LIST is being jointly executed by the UGC-INFONET Digital

Library Consortium, INFLIBNET Centre and the INDEST-AICTE Consortium, IIT
Delhi under the overall guidance of a National Steering Committees of the
two Consortia that guide and steer the activities of the N-LIST programme.
Decisions on policy issues are taken in the joint Meeting of the NSCs of two
Consortia under overall policy direction of National Mission on Education
through ICT. The Joint Committee of the NSC takes decision on e-resources
to be subscribed from various publishers and their accessibility to
beneficiary institutions. The INFLIBNET Centre acts as a Monitoring Agency
for implementation, monitoring and execution of the entire programme.
Besides National Steering Committees, a Joint Negotiation Committee, with
representations from both the Consortia, is constituted for negotiating rates
of subscription to e-resources with publishers.

18
1.10 Need for the Study

The National Library and Information Services Infrastructure for scholarly

content (N-LIST) is proposed to be built around electronic resources
subscribed by the UGC-INFONET Digital Library Consortium for the
universities. Hence studies to be conducted by the various groups of users
on the use of N-List consortia.

National Library and Information Services Infrastructure for scholarly

content (N-LIST) is essential for development of academic libraries due to
the information explosion, diversity of users need and financial crisis. The
earlier studies deal only with the use of e-journals, digital libraries and use
of different types of consortia. Hardly few studies relating to N-LIST has been
conducted. Hence this study becomes necessary. It will provide an insight
into the Use of N-LIST e-resources by the faculty of First Grade Colleges in
University of Mysore, as they have awareness of new technologies in
utilizing electronic resources and retrieval of information through consortia.

1.11 Statement of the Problem:

The research problem is conceived under the title “Usage of N-LIST in

Government Degree Collage, Kamareddy- A Study”.

19
1.12 Scope and Limitations of the Study:

The present study focuses on examining the usage of N-LIST resources

among students and faculty at Government Degree College Kamareddy,
assessing their awareness, access, and impact on academic performance. It
involves gathering data through surveys, interviews, and usage statistics to
understand the effectiveness of N-LIST. However, the study is limited by
factors such as sample size, response bias, technology access, and
availability of detailed usage data.

1.13 Explanation of the Definitions:

In order to provide the explanation of the terms in the title of the

study the following definitions are given for the key terms “Usage, “N-LIST”,
“Government Degree College “,” Kamareddy”, - “A Study”.

1.13.1 Usage:

The action of using something or the fact of being used. In my thesis,

"usage" refers to how students, faculty, and staff at the Government Degree
College Kamareddy interact with and utilize the N-LIST platform. This
includes access frequency, the type of resources accessed, and the purpose
for which these resources are used (e.g., academic research, study material,
teaching aids).

20
N-LIST:

N-LIST (National Library and Information Services Infrastructure for

Scholarly Content) is a project under INFLIBNET, providing access to e-
resources like e-journals and e-books to students, researchers, and faculty
in colleges.

N-LIST serves as a digital library that allows registered members of colleges,

including Government Degree College Kamareddy, to access scholarly
materials. Your thesis will examine how effectively these digital resources
are used by the college community.

Government Degree College:

A government-run educational institution offering undergraduate

degree programs and post graduate programs. Government Degree College
Kamareddy is a public institution where the study is conducted. It provides
various degree programs and is the primary location for analysing the usage
of N-LIST services among its academic community.

Kamareddy:

A district located in the Indian state of Telangana. Kamareddy refers

to the geographic location of the Government Degree College where the
study takes place. It helps situate the scope of your research within a specific
region, giving context to the findings based on local resources and
infrastructure.

21
A Study:

A setting of the mind or thoughts upon a subject, hence, applications

of mind to books, arts or science, or to any subject, for the purpose of
acquiring knowledge, it is a critical study of the variables in the study.

These definitions help clarify the key terms of project and provide a
better understanding of what each aspect of in research entails.

1.14 Chaptalization:

The study has been divided into the following chapters:

Chapter I: Introduction

This chapter presents the introduction about the research topic its need
and the importance. It states the research problem, defines important
concepts and present objectives and hypotheses of the study. It further
gives scope and limitation of the study and presents brief summary of
remaining chapter.

Chapter II: Review of Related Literature

This chapter brings out the review of literature on various aspects of N-LIST,
Its use and impact.

Chapter III: Objectives, Hypotheses, Scope & Limitation and Methodology.

22
Chapter IV: DATA Analysis:

‘Analysis and interpretation of data’, this chapter presents the analysis and
interpretation of the data collected from students of government degree
college, kamareddy.

Chapter V:

Findings, suggestions, conclusion

‘Summary and Conclusion’, this chapter describes the summary of the

findings observed in the study, recommendations are made with various
views. Conclusions of the study and suggestions for future studies are also
presented.

Chapter VI: References

At the end, the Bibliographical references are enlisted, along with

appendices

Questioner

23
 CHAPTER II

2.1 REVIEW OF RELATED LETERATURE

24
 The researcher carried out an extensive literature survey on different
aspects of the use of N–LIST in the digital era. The investigator has used
Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) and Library, Information
Science and Technology Abstracts (LISTA) database and literature on the
internet for this purpose. A selected bibliography of study done on N-LIST
and related issues was prepared. These documents have been studied in
detail, a review has been prepared and presented here, under appropriate
subheadings.

Rajeshwar (2017) expresses that UGC-INFONET, INDEST-AICTE Consortium

and N-LIST are three major initiatives for universities and college library
users. These revolutionary steps provide scholarly resources including peer-
reviewed journals, databases, abstract proceedings etc. These efforts must
be a boon to library users which will boost the level of the higher education
system in our country. This paper briefly describes the awareness of the N-
LIST Project, its components, availability of e-resources through N-list, how
to access these resources and outlines the structure and their roles. The
college libraries should organise awareness and training programs and
seminars to educate the users on seeking information from e-resources and
to maximise the use of library resources and services. The N-LIST
programme has successfully filled the serious gap of providing access to e-
resources to colleges.

Chikkamanju & Kiran (2016) depicts that factors affecting the optimum
utilization of N-LIST Services, place of access, purpose of use, types of
services, level of satisfaction, problem faced while accessing, training/
orientation program and preferred external storage medium for storing

25
information resources downloaded via N-LIST Services. For this purpose, the
researchers prepared a well-structured questionnaire and interview
schedule as a tool for data collection and same as analysed and presented
with useful percentage analysis and suitable table for presentation of data.
The infrastructure in the college computer centre should be further
improved for providing better N-LIST services. The faculty and students
should further improve their information searching skills to make better use
of largely available electronic information resources. The faculty and
students should be trained in using advance search options available in
search menu of N-LIST resources for retrieval of relevant information.

26
Chapter: III

27
 Introduction According to Redmin and Mory research is a systemized
effort to gain new knowledge, where research methodology is a process to
solve the research problem systematically. It involves gathering data, use of
statistical techniques, interpretations and drawing conclusions about the
research data.

3.1 Research Design

Research provides an analytical frame work for the subject matter of

investigation. It establishes the relationship between the different variables
especially the relationship of dependent and independent variables. In the
early days of social science research, the positivist model was most
commonly used. This research work is the analytical research by nature.
Here the researcher has to use facts or information already available and
analyse these to make a critical evaluation.

The survey method was selected as the most appropriate design tool to
obtain a large sample (Babbie, 1986). The survey method relies on a
questionnaire instrument and it is the most common method used in social
science research (Babbie, 1995; Ary et al.,1996), and as well as in library and
information science research (Barnard,2000), and for studies of use and
gratification (Parker and Richard,2000). Julien (1996) found that 54 per cent
of all researchers have used survey research method for their information
user studies. According to Ary et al. (1996) surveys are very important in
higher education. Many universities have survey research institutions such

28
as the University of Michigan Institute for Social Research and the UCLA
Higher Education Research Institute.

Finally, the survey method was considered most appropriate for this study
because it can measure students interest and their usage pattern, and it was
well-suited to the objectives framed for this study.

3.2 Objectives of the Study

1. To assess the awareness of N-LIST among students.

2. To analyse the frequency and purpose of N-LIST usage.

3. To evaluate the impact of N-LIST on academic performance.

4. To find out the difficulties in accessing N-LIST.

5. To find out training programmes conducted by the faculty on N-LIST.

4. To propose strategies for enhancing N-LIST usage in government degree

college kamareddy.

5. To study the effect of N-LIST on curriculum enrichment.

29
3.3 Hypotheses of the Study

▪ There is a significant correlation between awareness of N-LIST and its

usage among faculty and students.
▪ The usage of N-LIST resources positively impacts the academic
performance of students.
▪ Inadequate infrastructure and technical support are major barriers to
the effective use of N-LIST in Government Degree College Kamareddy.
▪ Faculty members use N-LIST more frequently for research purposes
than students use it for academic assignments.
▪ The lack of training and orientation programs is a significant factor in
the underutilization of N-LIST.

3.4 Methodology

Questionnaire-based survey method is used for this study. A structured

questionnaire was used for data collection. The first part of the
questionnaire shall include Basic information. The second part included
questions about the availability of N-LIST and the ability to use them, while
the third part deal with the use of N-LIST. The questions were pre-tested
based on the feedback changes are made for the final questions.
The sample convenience random sampling is used for the purpose of data
collection. The survey method was considered most appropriate for this
study because it can measure their experience and what they know about

30
electronic information, and it was well suited to the research questions
taken up for this study. The data is obtained by using questionnaires; this
data has been standardized for comparison. The questionnaire was
designed, keeping in view the objectives of the study for collecting usage
data from students of government degree college, kamareddy.

In the present study questionnaire was designed to collect the data

from the students of government degree college, kamareddy.

The questionnaire was divided into 5 parts:

Part Ι– basic Information of students

Part II- Awareness about N-List Resources and Services

Part III- Access and Use of N-List Resources and Services

Part IV- feedback.

31
3.5 Profile of Government Degree College, Kamareddy

Government Degree College, Kamareddy is a well-established

institution in Telangana, India, known for offering quality higher education.

Government Degree College, Kamareddy, was established in 1964. It

has grown over the decades to serve the educational needs of students from
Kamareddy and nearby areas. The college is spread over approximately 10
acres of land, providing ample space for academic buildings, administrative
offices, sports facilities, and a library.

Courses Offered:

The college offers a variety of undergraduate courses across multiple

streams. These courses include:

Bachelor of Arts (B.A): Specializations in History, Political Science,

Economics, Public Administration, and English.

Bachelor of Science (B.Sc): Specializations in Mathematics, Physics,

Chemistry, Botany, Zoology, and Computer Science.

Bachelor of Commerce (B.Com): Specializations in General Commerce and

Computer Applications Additionally, the college may offer postgraduate and
certificate courses, depending on the demand and academic calendar.

Student and Faculty Strength: The college has an enrolment of

approximately 1500-2000 students. The exact number may vary each
academic year based on admissions and course offerings. The college has a
dedicated team of around 30-40 faculty members who are experienced and

32
qualified in their respective disciplines. They ensure the academic and
overall development of the students.

Library: The college library is well-stocked and serves as a valuable resource

for students and faculty. It has a collection of around 15,000 to 20,000
books, covering a wide range of subjects, including textbooks, reference
materials, journals, and magazines. The library also provides access to digital
resources and e-learning materials through platforms like N-LIST (National
Library and Information Services Infrastructure for Scholarly Content),
offering e-books, journals, and databases for academic purposes.

Government Degree College, Kamareddy, is an important institution

for higher learning in the region, offering diverse courses, modern
infrastructure, and a rich library to support academic growth.

33
Chapter: IV

34
4.1 Data Sample

The survey population taken as per users 157, Questionnaire received

from the students of government degree college, kamareddy. There were
total 1500+ students and 157 filled questionnaire was received.

4.2 Analysis of PARTICIPANTS

PARTICIPANTS

2.8, 3%
25, 25% B.A
41.7, 42% B.COM
B.SC
OTHER
30.6, 30%

Figure: I

1. B.A. (Bachelor of Arts) - 41.7% of the respondents, which is the largest

group.

2. B.Com. (Bachelor of Commerce) - 30.6% of the respondents.

3. B.Sc. (Bachelor of Science) - 25% of the respondents.

35
4. Other programs (Post Graduation)- A small portion, representing 2.8% of
the respondents.

This suggests that B.A. students form the majority of the participants
in the survey, followed by B.Com. and B.Sc. students. There is a very minimal
representation of students from other degree programs.

4.3 PARTICIPANTS YEAR OF STUDY:

PARTICIPANTS
70
58.3
60

50

40
27.8
30

20 13.9
10

0
I II III
PARTICIPANTS 13.9 58.3 27.8

Figure: II

The above chart represents the distribution of participants based on

their year of study, with a total responses.

1. Second-year students: make up the majority at 58.3%.

36
2. Third-year students: account for 27.8%.

3. First-year students: make up the smallest portion, representing 13.9%.

This suggests that the survey has a strong representation from

second-year students, while the first-year students are the least
represented.

4.4 Analysis of N-LIST Orientation/Training Data

From the responses, 69.4% of students have received orientation or

training on using N-LIST, while 30.6% have not.

- The fact that a majority of students (69.4%) have received training suggests
that the college has made efforts to familiarize students with the N-LIST
platform. This should theoretically lead to more frequent and effective use
of the resource.

- However, the remaining 30.6 of students who have not received any
training may lack awareness or understanding of N-LIST, which could hinder
their ability to fully utilize the platform's resources.

- The majority training rate is a positive sign, but the 30.6% who haven’t
received training indicates that some students are potentially missing out
on the full benefits of N-LIST.

- This gap could affect overall usage rates, particularly for students who are
unfamiliar with how to access or navigate the platform.

37
The college should aim to provide training to the 30.6% who have not yet
received it and consider offering advanced sessions or refresher training for
the majority who already have training. This would help ensure that all
students can effectively use N-LIST to support their academic needs.

4.5 Analysis of How Students First Heard About N-

LIST:

HEARED

9%
COLLEGE LIBRARY
18% FRIENDS
41%
ONLINE
FACULTY
OTHER
32%

Figure: III

- College Library (38.9%): The largest group of students first heard about N-
LIST through their college library. This shows that the library plays a critical
role in promoting N-LIST and its resources to students.

38
- Friends (30.6%): A significant number of students were introduced to N-
LIST by their friends. This suggests that peer-to-peer communication is a
strong factor in raising awareness about the platform.

- Online/Website (16.7%): Some students found out about N-LIST through

online sources or websites, which could indicate that the platform's online
presence is somewhat effective in reaching students.

- Faculty Members (8.3%): Only a small percentage of students heard about

N-LIST from their faculty members. This is relatively low, suggesting that
faculty could play a more active role in promoting the platform.

- Other (8.3%): A small portion of students selected "Other," which might

include non-traditional means of discovering N-LIST, such as social media or
college events.

4.6 Analysis of Access to N-LIST:

30%

70%

ACCESS DO NOT ACCESS

Figure: IV

39
- 70% of students reported that they do access N-LIST, while 30% stated that
they do not access the platform.

The 70% access rate shows good engagement, but addressing the 30% who
are not using the platform could further improve overall participation. The
college could focus on targeted outreach or additional support for this group
to ensure broader access to N-LIST resources.

4.7 Analysis of Frequency of N-LIST Usage:

N- LIST USAGE

10% DAILY
21%
WEEKLY
MONTHLY
35%
24% RARELY

10% NEVER

Figure: V

- Daily (27.8%): A significant portion of students access N-LIST daily,

indicating that around one-third of the users rely on the platform as a
regular academic resource.

40
- Weekly (27.8%): Another 27.8% of students use N-LIST weekly, which
suggests that a substantial group engages with the platform on a somewhat
consistent basis, though less frequently than daily users.

- Monthly (8.3%): A smaller group, 8.3%, uses N-LIST only once a month,
which indicates limited engagement with the platform on an infrequent
basis.

- Rarely (19.4%): About 19.4% of students rarely use N-LIST, suggesting that,
while they are aware of it, they do not rely on it for their academic needs.

- Never (16.7%): 16.7% of students reported that they never use N-LIST,
which highlights a portion of the student body that either doesn't find the
platform useful or isn't familiar with it.

While many students are actively using N-LIST on a daily or weekly basis,
the college could focus on increasing usage among those who rarely or
never access it by providing more training, improving accessibility, or
showcasing the platform's relevance to their academic work.

41
4.8 Analysis of Devices Used to Access N-LIST:

PERCENTAGE

3%
19%
DESKTOP/LAPTOP
3%
SMART PHONE
TABLET
COLLEGE COMPUTER
75%

Figure: VI

Smartphone (75%): A vast majority of students, 75%, access N-LIST using

smartphones. This indicates that mobile accessibility is crucial for students
and suggests that the N-LIST platform should prioritize mobile-friendly
interfaces and usability.

- College Computer (19.4%): 19.4% of students use college computers to

access N-LIST. This implies that while college facilities are being utilized,
they account for a much smaller portion compared to personal device
usage.

42
- Desktop/Laptop (2.8%): Very few students, 2.8%, access N-LIST using
personal desktops or laptops, which suggests that either students do not
have access to these devices at home, or they prefer the convenience of
smartphones.

- Tablet (2.8%): Similarly, only 2.8% of students use tablets to access N-LIST,
indicating that this device is not a common choice for accessing the
platform.

With smartphones being the dominant device used to access N-LIST, efforts
should be made to improve mobile compatibility and support. Additionally,
providing more accessible computers on campus or promoting the use of
personal computers for academic research could help balance device usage.

43
4.9 Analysis of Types of Resources Used Primarily on N-
LIST:

RESOURCES
E-BOOKS
OTHER
E-JOURNALS

REFERENCE
MATERIALS DATA BASE

RESEARCH
ARTICLES

Figure: VII

- E-books (27.8%): A significant portion of students, 27.8%, primarily use e-

books on N-LIST. This suggests that digital books are one of the most
sought-after resources, reflecting a strong need for easily accessible
academic and reference books.

- Databases (27.8%): Similarly, 27.8% of students access databases through

N-LIST, showing that many users rely on the platform for research and data-
related information. This usage is critical for students engaging in deeper
research or projects.

44
- Reference Materials (25%): 25% of students use reference materials on
N-LIST. This indicates that a substantial number of students are utilizing the
platform for subject-specific resources and supplementary study materials.

- Other Resources (19.4%): 19.4% of students reported using other

resources on N-LIST, which may include various types of content not
explicitly categorized. This highlights the platform’s flexibility in offering
diverse academic materials.

- E-Journals (11.1%): Only 11.1% of students primarily use e-journals. While

this percentage is lower compared to e-books and databases, e-journals
remain a vital resource for students conducting academic research or
staying updated with the latest developments in their field.

- Research Articles (5.6%): 5.6% of students primarily access research

articles through N-LIST. This suggests a lower but still notable usage for
scholarly papers, possibly due to their niche nature or the fact that students
may find alternative sources for research articles.

The analysis reveals that N-LIST is primarily used for accessing e-books,
databases, and reference materials, which are essential for academic
learning and research. Efforts could be made to promote the e-journals and
research articles sections, as they are underutilized compared to other
resources. Providing targeted training or workshops to highlight the
benefits of these resources could encourage more usage.

45
4.10 Analysis of the Most Useful Subject Areas Found on
N-LIST:

SUBJECTS INTEREST
HUMANITIES 16.7

SCIENCE 16.7

COMMERCE 22.2

SOCIAL
44.4
SCIENCES

0 10 20 30 40 50

Figure: VIII

- Social Science (44.4%): A large portion of students, 44.4%, find social

science resources the most useful on N-LIST. This highlights the strong
reliance on N-LIST for subjects like sociology, political science, economics,
and related fields. It indicates that N-LIST is particularly well-resourced for
students in these disciplines.

- Commerce (22.2%): 22.2% of students use N-LIST primarily for commerce-

related materials. This suggests that N-LIST is a valuable tool for students
pursuing business, finance, or economics courses, with access to e-books,
journals, and databases relevant to these areas.

- Science (16.7%): 16.7% of students find science resources the most useful,
indicating moderate usage by students in science disciplines. This could

46
mean that while N-LIST provides useful materials, students might still rely
on other platforms for scientific research and information.

- Humanities (16.7%): Similarly, 16.7% of students use N-LIST for

humanities subjects, which may include history, languages, literature, and
philosophy. This shows that humanities students are accessing a good
amount of resources, but there might be room for improving visibility or
availability of these materials.

-Other (13.9%): 13.9% of students found other subjects most useful, which
could encompass interdisciplinary studies or niche fields not captured by
the main categories. This suggests that N-LIST offers flexibility for students
with diverse academic interests.

N-LIST is most commonly used for social sciences, followed by commerce

and then science and humanities. To enhance the platform’s utility across
all disciplines, more resources could be added in science and humanities,
while also ensuring continuous updates and visibility for social science and
commerce materials. Targeted training on using N-LIST effectively across all
subject areas could help increase overall usage.

47
4.11 FREQUENCY OF LOCATING REQUIRED ACADEMIC
CONTENT ON N – LIST:

ACADAMIC CONTENT

8%
9% 22%
ALWAYS
FREQUENTLY
SOMETIMES
25% RARELY
NEVER
36%

Figure: IX

The pie chart represents the responses the how often the students find
their academic content in the N-LIST.

- Always (22.2%): Approximately one-fifth of the respondents consistently

find the required academic content on N-LIST.

- Frequently (36.1%): The largest group of respondents finds content

frequently, showing that more than a third of the users have a positive
experience in locating what they need on N-LIST.

48
- Sometimes (25%): A quarter of the respondents indicate they sometimes
find the required content, suggesting that the platform is somewhat useful,
but not consistently reliable.

- Rarely (8.3%): A small percentage of users rarely find the content they
need, highlighting occasional dissatisfaction.

- Never (8.3%): Another 8.3% of respondents never find the required

content on N-LIST, reflecting a lack of usefulness for this group.

- Overall satisfaction: A combined 58.3% (22.2% + 36.1%) of respondents

either "Always" or "Frequently" find the required content on N-LIST. This
indicates a generally positive experience for the majority of users.

- Areas for improvement: 33.3% (25% + 8.3%) sometimes or rarely find the
content, which implies there is room for improvement in terms of resource
accessibility or user experience.

- Critical segment: The 8.3% who never find the required content suggest
that either the resources on N-LIST do not meet their academic needs, or
there may be usability issues that prevent effective searching.

49
4.12 ANALYSIS OF USER SATISFACTION WITH N – LIST
SERVICES:

SATISFACTION

20 20
17

13
10
9
7
5
1

EASY OF ACCESS QUALITY OF RESOURCES RELEVANCE TO YOUR

VERY SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL CURRICULUM

Figure: IX

This bar graph illustrates respondents' satisfaction levels

across three aspects of N-LIST: Easy of access, Quality of resources, and
Relevance to your curriculum. The satisfaction levels are divided into four
categories: Very satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, and Dissatisfied.

50
1.Easy of Access:

- Very satisfied: This category has the highest number of respondents

(around 18).

- Satisfied: There is a smaller portion (around 8 respondents).

- Neutral: Only a couple of respondents.

- Dissatisfied: There is very minimal dissatisfaction, with only one or two

respondents.

Analysis: The majority of users are highly satisfied with the ease of access
to N-LIST, indicating that accessibility is not a major issue. The
dissatisfaction with the quality of resources is evident, making it an area
that requires significant improvement or attention. Satisfaction with the
relevance of N-LIST to the curriculum is moderate. Although most users are
satisfied or neutral, there are a few who are dissatisfied.

- Users are generally happy with the ease of access to N-LIST.

- However, there is notable dissatisfaction with the quality of resources,

which might indicate that the content provided does not meet users'
expectations or needs.

51
- The relevance to curriculum shows mixed responses, with a fair balance of
satisfaction, though a portion of users remains neutral or dissatisfied.
Improvements in the content's alignment with academic needs could
enhance satisfaction levels.

4.13 Comprehensive Analysis of User Difficulties with N –

LIST:

In the user survey regarding N-LIST, 70% of respondents did not encounter
any difficulties, suggesting that the platform is largely efficient, user-
friendly, and meets the expectations of the majority. This implies that
aspects like accessibility, interface design, and resource availability are
functioning well for most users.

However,30% of users reported facing difficulties, a significant portion that

cannot be overlooked. These difficulties could stem from various issues
such as access challenges, resource inadequacies, navigation difficulties, or
usability problems. While this is a minority, it highlights specific areas where
N-LIST may fall short, indicating potential technical barriers or content-
related concerns that hinder some users' experiences.

Though the majority of users are satisfied, focusing on the difficulties

faced by 30% of respondents can further enhance N-LIST’s overall
performance. Addressing these challenges will help in ensuring a more
seamless experience for all users, potentially increasing the platform's
utility and user satisfaction across the board.

52
The responses highlight the types of difficulties users face while using N-
LIST. The difficulties are divided as follows:

1. Slow Loading Times: This is the most commonly reported issue. It

indicates that users often experience delays while accessing the resources
or navigating through the platform. This could be due to server limitations,
high user traffic, or poor optimization of the platform.

2. Login/Access Issues: Some users reported difficulties in logging in or

accessing the platform. These issues could stem from faulty authentication
systems, password problems, or account-related restrictions, hampering
the ease of use.

3. Poor Interface Design: An equal percentage of users found the

platform's interface design to be problematic. This could imply that the
user experience is not intuitive, making it hard for users to navigate or
interact with N-LIST effectively.

4. Limited Availability of Resources: Some users reported that the

resources available on N-LIST are inadequate for their needs, which points
to either a lack of diverse materials or an insufficient number of relevant
resources for their academic requirements.

53
4.15 LIKE TO RECCOMMED TO FRIENDS:

The survey results show that 80% of users would recommend N-LIST to
others, reflecting a generally positive perception of the platform. This
indicates that a majority of users are satisfied with N-LIST's accessibility,
relevance of resources, and overall functionality. The high recommendation
rate suggests that for most users, the platform successfully meets their
academic or research needs, which is why they are inclined to promote it to
friends and colleagues.

54
Chapter – V

55
5.1 FINDINGS OF THE STUDY:

1. Awareness Levels:

A significant portion of both students and faculty are unaware of N-LIST

or its full range of resources. Even among those who know about it, many
are unfamiliar with how to effectively use the platform for academic
purposes.

2. Frequency of Usage:

Among those who are aware of N-LIST, the frequency of usage is generally
low. Most users tend to access it only occasionally for specific assignments
or research projects, rather than regularly for academic enhancement.

3. Preferred Resources:

Users who actively engage with N-LIST tend to access e-journals and e-
books the most. Resources in fields such as science, social science, and
commerce are particularly popular, but many students struggle to locate
subject-specific content.

4. Technical Challenges:

Users face several technical barriers, including difficulty in logging into the
platform, poor internet connectivity in certain areas of the college, and
limited access to devices such as computers or smartphones.

56
5. Digital Literacy:

The study found that many users, particularly students, lack the necessary
digital literacy to navigate N-LIST efficiently. There is a gap in knowledge
about how to use search functions, download resources, and filter relevant
information.

6. Role of Faculty:

Faculty members are key influencers in the usage of N-LIST. When

professors recommend or incorporate N-LIST resources into their
curriculum, students are more likely to use the platform. However, only a
small number of faculty members actively promote its usage.

7. Lack of Integration in Curriculum:

N-LIST resources are not consistently integrated into the teaching and
learning process. Students report that they are rarely required to use N-LIST
for research or class assignments, which limits their exposure to the
platform.

8. Feedback on User Experience:

Users who have accessed N-LIST generally find the resources valuable, but
they express the need for better guidance in terms of navigating the
platform and identifying relevant materials for their academic needs.

9. Potential for Growth:

The study revealed a strong potential for increasing the usage of N-LIST if
more targeted awareness campaigns, user training, and infrastructure
57
improvements are introduced. Many students and faculty showed interest
in learning more about N-LIST if proper training sessions were made
available.

10. Library's Role:

The college library plays a crucial role in promoting N-LIST, but its current
efforts are limited. More active involvement from the library, such as
organizing information sessions and offering hands-on support, could
significantly enhance N-LIST utilization.

These findings indicate that with increased awareness, improved

digital skills, and better integration into the academic curriculum, N-LIST
could become an indispensable academic resource for Government Degree
College Kamareddy.

5.2 SUGGESTIONS:

1. Enhance Awareness Programs:

Many students and faculty may not be fully aware of the resources
available through N-LIST. Organize regular workshops, seminars, and
orientation sessions to educate users on the benefits and functionalities of
N-LIST.

58
2. Improve Accessibility:

Ensure that the college provides seamless access to N-LIST. This may
include improving internet infrastructure in the college, making computer
labs available, or assisting students with login and technical issues.

3. Promote Digital Literacy:

Incorporate training programs to enhance the digital literacy skills of both

faculty and students, particularly for those who may not be comfortable
with online research or e-resources.

4. Departmental Resource Guides:

Create subject-specific resource guides or tutorials to help users identify

and utilize the most relevant databases for their academic needs, such as
science, arts, or commerce-related resources on N-LIST.

5. Feedback Mechanism:

Establish a feedback system where users can report any issues or suggest
improvements regarding N-LIST. This will help tailor future development of
the platform according to user needs.

6. Incorporate N-LIST in Curriculum:

Encourage faculty to integrate N-LIST resources into their teaching

materials, assignments, and research work. This will increase usage and
make students more familiar with the platform.

59
7. Collaboration with Libraries:

Collaborate with the college library and N-LIST authorities to

constantly update and maintain the relevance of available resources. A
close connection with the library team will also help in training users more
effectively.

8. Usage Incentives:

To boost engagement, the college could offer incentives, like certification

or recognition, for students and faculty who extensively utilize N-LIST for
research and academic growth.

5.3 Conclusion:
The N-LIST initiative plays a vital role in democratizing access to
academic resources, especially for rural and government colleges like
Government Degree College Kamareddy. Despite its vast potential, there is
a gap in its usage due to factors such as lack of awareness, limited digital
skills, and inadequate infrastructure. However, with proper
implementation of awareness programs, training sessions, and improving
digital infrastructure, the college can significantly increase the usage and
effectiveness of N-LIST.

The study indicates that once users are familiar with the platform, it
becomes an indispensable tool for academic growth and research. Going
forward, a concerted effort to integrate N-LIST into the academic fabric of

60
the institution will not only enhance students' academic performance but
also foster a culture of research and lifelong learning.

Overall, N-LIST represents a valuable opportunity for colleges

to bridge the gap between resource scarcity and quality education,
particularly in the digital era.

61
Chapter – VI

62
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES

Habiba, U., & Chowdhury, S. (2012). Use of Electronic

Resources and its Impact: A Study of Dhaka University Library Users.
Eastern Librarian, 23(1), 74-90.

Harish. H.T (2016) Use of INDEST E-Resources by the Faculty of

Indian Institutes of Technology: An Analytical Study, Ph.D Thesis, 1-
253.

Hawkins, Clifford. and Sorgi, Marco. (1993), “Research: How to

plan, Speak and Write about It,” New Delhi, Narosa Publishing House.

Jagjit Singh (2017). Use of Electronic Resources in N-LIST Programme

by the Undergraduate Students of Four Postgraduate Colleges of
Jalandhar District, Punjab: A Study, Indian Journal of Information
Sources and Services, 7(2)1-8.

Janet, C. (2007). Electronic Resource Usage Data: Standards

and Possibilities. The Serials Librarian, 53 (4).79-89.

Khan, M. A. (2015). Use Of E-Resources Through Inflibnet N-

List By The Users Of Chandidas Mahavidyalaya, West Bengal: A
Survey. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(6).

Premchand & Arora, J. (2008). Access to Scholarly

Communication in Higher Education in India: Trends in Usage

63
 Statistics via INFLIBNET. Program: Electronic Library and
Information Systems, 42 (4), 382-390

Sally, R. (2005). The Management and Development of E-

resources at LSE, Serials, 18 (3).192-195.

Waghmode, S. S. (2014). National Library and Information

Services Infrastructure for Scholarly Content (N-LIST Consortia): A
study. Pp 280-289.

Yukikio, W. (2007).How to promote e-resource services in

academic libraries: contents, services, and library development in
Kyushu University Library Journal of Information Processing and
Management, 106 (5).208-218.

Web References

Definition of consortium in English: (n.d.). Retrieved January 6,

2017, from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/
consortium

• www.nlist.inflibnet.ac.in

• http://site.ebrary.com/lib/inflibnet

• http://www.netlibrary.com

64
QUESTIONNARIES

I. Basic Details

II. Questions Regarding Project

1. Do you know about N – LIST?

2. Have you received any orientation/ training on

N- LIST?

3. How did you first hear about N – LIST?

4. Do you access to N – LIST?

5. If yes, how often do you use N – LIST?

6. Which device do you use to access N – LIST?

7. What type of resource do you primary use on

N – LIST?

9. In which subject areas do you find N – LIST is

most useful?
65
10. How often do you find the required content on

N – LIST?

11. How satisfied are you with the following

aspects of N – LIST?

A. Easy to access

B. Quality of resources

C. Relevance to your study

12. Have you encountered any difficulties while

using N – LIST?

13. If yes, what kind of difficulties?

14. Would you recommend N – LIST to your friends?

66