Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    Bioethics WA U7

    Uploaded by

    Ben Obi
    hh

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Bioethics WA U7

    Uploaded by

    Ben Obi
    14 views6 pages
    hh

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    hh

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    14 views6 pages

    Bioethics WA U7

    Uploaded by

    Ben Obi
    hh

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 6

    Written Assignment Unit 7

    University of the People

    HS 4812 - Bioethics

    October 23, 2024


    The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, which took place from 1932 to 1972, is one of the most

    well-known examples of unethical medical research in U.S. history. It involved 600 African

    American men from Macon County, Alabama, who were misled into thinking they were

    receiving free medical care for what was vaguely described as "bad blood." Of these participants,

    399 had syphilis, while the rest were used as a control group. Even though penicillin became the

    standard treatment for syphilis in 1947, the researchers intentionally withheld treatment, leaving

    the men to suffer and die, all to observe the progression of untreated syphilis. This study violated

    essential ethical standards, including the lack of informed consent and the intentional harm

    inflicted on the participants—both of which are now fundamental to ethical research practices, as

    outlined in documents like the Nuremberg Code and the Belmont Report.

    1. Informed Consent and the Tuskegee Study

    Informed consent is a key ethical principle that requires participants to be fully aware of the

    nature, risks, and benefits of a study before agreeing to take part. In the Tuskegee Study,

    informed consent would have meant telling the men that they had syphilis, explaining the

    progression of the disease, and informing them of available treatments like penicillin. Even if the

    researchers had secured informed consent, the study would still raise ethical concerns because

    the intention was to let the disease go untreated, causing harm to the participants. Simply getting

    consent does not justify unethical actions.

    2. Why African American Men Were Selected

    The decision to use African American men from rural Alabama for the study was influenced by

    several social, political, and cultural factors. These men came from poor, underserved
    communities, which made them vulnerable and easier to manipulate. At the same time, the

    systemic racism of the era, along with the deeply segregated healthcare system, meant that the

    lives and rights of African Americans were devalued. The researchers likely believed that they

    could get away with these violations because of the prevailing racial attitudes and the

    marginalized status of the participants.

    3. Failures in the Belmont Report’s Ethical Principles

    The Belmont Report outlines three main principles for ethical human research: respect for

    persons, beneficence, and justice. The Tuskegee Study violated all three.

    Respect for Persons: This principle requires that participants be treated as autonomous

    individuals capable of making informed decisions. The men in the study were deceived about

    their condition and the true nature of the research, which took away their ability to make

    informed decisions.

    Beneficence: Beneficence involves minimizing harm and maximizing benefits. Instead, the

    researchers caused deliberate harm by withholding treatment, leading to prolonged suffering and

    death.

    Justice: The principle of justice emphasizes fairness in distributing the risks and benefits of

    research. The Tuskegee Study targeted a specific, vulnerable group—poor African American

    men—who bore all the risks without receiving any benefit.


    Additional Considerations

    Justifications by Researchers: Some researchers argued that they were observing the "natural

    course" of syphilis. However, this reasoning was clearly unethical once a known treatment

    (penicillin) became available. The researchers prioritized their scientific curiosity over the health

    and well-being of the participants.

    Contributing Factors: Racial prejudice, lack of oversight, and the low social standing of African

    Americans during this period allowed the study to continue for decades without significant

    challenge. The intersection of poverty and race made the participants easy targets for unethical

    research practices.

    Consequences for Society: The Tuskegee Study had a profound impact on how African

    Americans viewed the healthcare system. The mistrust generated by the study continues to

    influence attitudes toward medical research and healthcare in Black communities today. This

    breach of trust also spurred reforms, leading to stronger protections for human research subjects.

    Positive Outcomes (if any): While the study itself was deeply unethical, it did lead to lasting

    changes in how medical research is conducted. The public outcry prompted the creation of

    institutional review boards (IRBs) and guidelines, like the Belmont Report, that ensure the

    ethical treatment of research participants moving forward.

    Compensation and Reforms: After the study was exposed in the 1970s, the U.S. government

    provided medical care and financial compensation to survivors and their families. This case also
    sparked significant reforms in the way medical research is regulated in the U.S., particularly with

    regard to informed consent and the protection of vulnerable populations.

    Conclusion

    The Tuskegee Syphilis Study is a stark reminder of the dangers of unethical research. The study's

    failure to respect the rights, health, and humanity of its participants underscores the importance

    of ethical principles like informed consent, beneficence, and justice in medical research. The

    lessons learned from this tragedy have shaped modern research ethics, helping to ensure that

    such violations never happen again.


    References

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022, December 5). The syphilis study at Tuskegee

    timeline. https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm

    The Tuskegee Institute. (1996, May 20). Final report of the syphilis study legacy committee.

    National Center for Bioethics in Research and Healthcare.

    https://www.tuskegee.edu/Content/Uploads/Tuskegee/files/Bioethics/SyphilisStudyCommitteeRe

    port.pdf

    U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. (1979, April 18). The Belmont Report.

    Office for Human Research Protections.

    https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/the-belmont-report-508c_FINAL.pdf

    You might also like