Untitled Document 19

INSTITUTE OF LAW, NIRMA UNIVERSITY
SUBMISSION OF SYNOPSIS FOR CE-COMPONENT
Divorce and Social Consequences - an exploration across

religious cultures
Submitted to – Shreya Srivastava
Submitted by – Aditya Rajpurohit (22BAL071)
Reet Pandher (22BAL109)

Divorce and Social Consequences - an exploration across religious
cultures
In contemporary society, the phenomenon of divorce has emerged as a

significant social issue, transcending cultural and religious boundaries. An
exploration of its implications reveals that divorce not only affects the
individuals involved but also reverberates through families and communities,
often reshaping social structures and relationships. The intersection between
religious beliefs and divorce creates a complex tapestry of values and
expectations, where cultural narratives can either stigmatise or support the
dissolution of marriage. This investigation aims to highlight the varied
perspectives across different religious cultures, illustrating how these belief
systems perceive the act of divorce and its subsequent social consequences. By
analyzing the nuances of religious doctrine and individual experiences, this
study seeks to enhance our understanding of how these factors contribute to
societal attitudes toward divorce, ultimately revealing the profound impact that
cultural narratives have on this personal and communal transition.
In examining the implications of divorce within contemporary society, it

becomes evident that this phenomenon transcends mere personal choice,
intricately interwoven with cultural and religious frameworks. Across various
religious cultures, the narratives surrounding divorce reflect divergent values
and beliefs, impacting individual and collective identity. For instance, within
Islamic contexts, divorce is often debated in relation to preserving familial
integrity and gender roles, respectively highlighting and challenging traditional
paradigms. This is particularly relevant in discussions of legal reform, where the
struggle manifests as a negotiation of cultural identity and modernity, as noted
in the Egyptian context where varying opinions on legal authority frame societal
debates ((Abu-Odeh et al.)). Furthermore, the second demographic transition
(SDT) theory posits that changing values toward family structure and
reproduction also correlate with shifts in attitudes toward divorce, suggesting a
complex interplay between personal agency and structural factors ((Sobotka T)).
Thus, divorce emerges not only as a social consequence but also as a catalyst
for cultural evolution across religious cultures.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The increasing rates of divorce have sparked debates about its implications for
social structures, individual well-being, and community cohesion. Despite the
growing prevalence of divorce, the understanding of its social consequences
remains underexplored, particularly across different religious cultures.
Each major religion approaches marriage and divorce with distinct beliefs,
practices, and social expectations. These religious frameworks profoundly
influence how divorce is perceived and experienced within their respective
communities.This discrepancy raises critical questions about the social
consequences of divorce, including the emotional impact on individuals, the
effects on children, and the broader implications for community dynamics.
Furthermore, the intersectionality of divorce with factors such as gender,
socioeconomic status, and cultural identity complicates the landscape, making it
essential to examine these issues from a multifaceted perspective.
The existing literature often focuses on divorce as a legal or psychological
phenomenon, with insufficient attention paid to the nuanced social
consequences that arise within specific religious contexts. This research aims to
fill this gap by exploring how different religious cultures shape the experiences
of divorce and its social ramifications, thus providing a comprehensive
understanding of this increasingly relevant issue in contemporary society.
RESEARCH QUESTION
1. How do different religious teachings and beliefs regarding marriage and
divorce influence the social stigma experienced by divorced individuals in
various religious communities?
2. What are the emotional and psychological consequences of divorce for
children in families belonging to different religious cultures, and how do these
consequences vary based on religious teachings about marriage and family?
3. In what ways do support systems and community responses to divorce differ
across religious cultures, and how do these differences impact the recovery and
reintegration of divorced individuals into their communities?
TENTATIVE CHAPTALIZATION
1. Introduction
● Overview of divorce in contemporary society and its relevance
across religious cultures
2. The impact of divorce on family structures

● A comparative analysis of family dynamics in different religious
contexts
●
3. Social stigmas and support systems surrounding divorce

● Examination of religious teachings and their influence on social
perceptions of divorce
4. Summary of findings and i plications for future research on divorce

across religious cultures
5. Conclusion
LITERATURE REVIEW
1. Evelyn L. Lehrer's study, Religion, Human Capital Investments, and the
Family in the United States,https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6411319.pdf
examines the role of religion in shaping economic and demographic decisions
throughout individuals’ lifecycles. This work explores the relationships between
religious affiliation and behaviors such as education, marriage, fertility, and
employment. It posits that religious norms shape the perceived benefits and
costs associated with key life decisions, which in turn affect various
interconnected outcomes, including family structure and labor market
participation.
The findings reveal that distinct religious groups exhibit varying behavioral
patterns. Conservative Protestants are more likely to marry and have children
earlier, avoid cohabitation, and engage in traditional gender roles, resulting in
lower educational attainment and household income. In contrast, non-Orthodox
Jews display higher educational achievements, delayed marriage, and elevated
female employment rates. Catholic behaviors have converged with mainstream
Protestant patterns following Vatican II, while Mormons exhibit high fertility
and marital stability. The paper also highlights that individuals with no religious
affiliation tend to have lower education levels and higher marital instability.
Lehrer emphasizes that religious participation not only integrates individuals

into supportive social networks but also influences personal outcomes, such as
marital stability, education, and health. The research highlights non-linear
effects, suggesting that moderate religious involvement has more beneficial
outcomes than either minimal or extreme participation.
Addressing anomalies, the paper notes that conservative Protestant adolescents
engage in higher rates of non-marital sex despite religious teachings, and
conservative Protestant regions in the U.S. exhibit unexpectedly high divorce
rates. The author attributes these outcomes to cultural tensions and
individualism embedded within religious contexts.
Lehrer calls for more nuanced statistical methods and further research into
contextual effects, interfaith relationships, and the shifting religious landscape,
particularly among racial minorities and unaffiliated groups. This study
contributes to understanding how religion influences individual behavior in the
complex interplay of economics, family, and demography in the U.S.
2. Mediating Multiculturally: Culture and the Ethical

Mediatorhttps://core.ac.uk/download/70374725.pdf
This work by Carrie Menkel-Meadow and Harold I. Abramson explores the

intersection of culture, ethics, and mediation, with a focus on the challenges of
cross-cultural dispute resolution. It emphasizes the increasing likelihood that
mediators will encounter parties from different cultural backgrounds and
highlights how cultural norms influence both negotiation styles and the ethical
dilemmas mediators may face.
The authors begin by defining culture as a framework shaping individuals'

perspectives, behaviors, and values. They illustrate how cultural differences can
impact mediation by examining dimensions such as individualism vs.
collectivism, power distance, and communication styles (e.g., direct vs. indirect
speech). These cultural factors affect how parties approach conflict, trust, and
compromise, complicating the mediator's task. The study stresses that mediators
need to develop cultural competency to manage such differences effectively.
The ethical dimension of mediation is particularly emphasized, with the authors

discussing scenarios where cultural practices may conflict with principles of
fairness or human rights. Ethical dilemmas arise when mediators must decide
whether to respect cultural norms that seem to disadvantage one party. The text
presents specific cases—such as disputes involving religious divorce laws—that
highlight the tensions between cultural relativism and universal ethical
standards. The challenge for mediators lies in finding a balance between
respecting cultural practices and avoiding complicity in outcomes that might
perpetuate inequality.
Menkel-Meadow and Abramson propose a structured four-step approach to

managing cultural differences: understanding one’s own cultural biases,
researching the other party’s culture, bridging cultural gaps, and considering
withdrawal if ethical compromises become untenable. They emphasize the
importance of maintaining process integrity and impartiality while
acknowledging that mediators are not neutral participants—they are shaped by
their own cultural and ethical frameworks.
The work concludes that cross-cultural mediation requires a delicate balance

between tolerance and ethical responsibility. Mediators must navigate between
cultural imperialism and extreme relativism to foster equitable outcomes
without undermining the integrity of the mediation process. This study offers
valuable insights for practitioners seeking to mediate effectively and ethically in
diverse cultural contexts
3.“You Have to Be Strong and Struggle”

https://core.ac.uk/download/480471618.pdf Stigmas as Determinants of
Inequality for Female Survivors of Sex Trafficking in Cambodia examines how
stigmatization profoundly affects survivors' reintegration and perpetuates
inequality. Drawing on longitudinal data from the Chab Dai Butterfly Research
Project, the paper explores the intersection of cultural, gender, and
socioeconomic stigmas. The authors argue that stigmas—related to gender, sex
work, socioeconomic status, and marriageability—are critical barriers to
survivors’ well-being and social mobility.
The research highlights how Cambodian cultural norms, rooted in honor, gender
roles, and hierarchical social structures, contribute to stigmatizing behaviors
toward survivors. These stigmas often result in emotional violence, social
isolation, and limited access to education, employment, and healthcare. Family
members and community members are frequently key sources of discrimination,
reinforcing the marginalization of survivors.
The paper also explores coping mechanisms employed by survivors, such as

secrecy, endurance, and reliance on religious faith, although maladaptive
strategies like substance use also emerged. Importantly, survivors face ongoing
stigma even after reintegration, including within marriages and employment,
impacting their psychological and social well-being.
This study provides critical insights into the complex challenges survivors
encounter and emphasizes the need for targeted interventions to address
structural and cultural stigmas in reintegration programs.
4.the Role of Religion in Marriage and Divorce
Amato, P. R. (2000). The Consequences of Divorce for Adults and Children. Journal
of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1269-1287.
Religion often dictates the moral framework within which marriage is

understood. Studies indicate that religious beliefs can either reinforce the
sanctity of marriage or provide pathways for divorce under certain
circumstances (Amato, 2000). For instance, while Christianity traditionally
upholds the indissolubility of marriage, some denominations allow for divorce
under specific conditions, such as adultery or abandonment (Baker, 2015). In
contrast, Islamic teachings permit divorce (talaq) but emphasize reconciliation
and mediation as preferred solutions (Esposito, 2016).
5.Social Stigma and Support Systems

Baker, C. (2015). Marriage and Divorce in the Catholic Church. Theological Studies,
76(3), 563-590.
The social stigma associated with divorce can vary significantly across cultures.
In some religious communities, divorce is viewed as a failure, leading to
alienation and social ostracism (Pew Research Center, 2019). Conversely, other
cultures may provide robust support systems for divorced individuals,
recognizing the emotional and practical challenges they face. For example,
Hindu communities often emphasize the importance of familial support during
divorce, although the stigma can still be pronounced (Rudra, 2018).

Untitled Document 19

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Untitled Document 19

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Untitled Document 19

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

INSTITUTE OF LAW, NIRMA UNIVERSITY

SUBMISSION OF SYNOPSIS FOR CE-COMPONENT

Divorce and Social Consequences - an exploration across

Submitted to – Shreya Srivastava

Submitted by – Aditya Rajpurohit (22BAL071)

Reet Pandher (22BAL109)

In contemporary society, the phenomenon of divorce has emerged as a

In examining the implications of divorce within contemporary society, it

across religious cultures

2. The impact of divorce on family structures

3. Social stigmas and support systems surrounding divorce

4. Summary of findings and i plications for future research on divorce

Lehrer emphasizes that religious participation not only integrates individuals

2. Mediating Multiculturally: Culture and the Ethical

This work by Carrie Menkel-Meadow and Harold I. Abramson explores the

The authors begin by defining culture as a framework shaping individuals'

The ethical dimension of mediation is particularly emphasized, with the authors

Menkel-Meadow and Abramson propose a structured four-step approach to

The work concludes that cross-cultural mediation requires a delicate balance

3.“You Have to Be Strong and Struggle”

The paper also explores coping mechanisms employed by survivors, such as

4.the Role of Religion in Marriage and Divorce

Religion often dictates the moral framework within which marriage is

5.Social Stigma and Support Systems

You might also like