chp-7, 9

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

​Chapter 7 & 9 .

1. The limitations of Per Capita Income Index are as follows:(i)A


rise in per capita income is due to rise in prices and not due to
increase in physical output, so it is not a reliable index of economic
development. (ii)It excludes all non-marketable goods and services,
even though they may be important for human happiness and
better quality of life. (iii)Rise in per capita income may be due to
use of modern capital intensive technology in production which
may be labour displacing in nature, thus, adversely affecting the
poor masses. (iv)If rate of population growth is higher than the rate
of growth of national income, it will lead to fall in per capita
availability of goods and services and economic welfare.
(v)Contribution of commodity to economic welfare may be higher
than its money value e.g., money value of salt, needle, thread, etc.
included in national income is lower than their contribution to
economy.

2. China , Norway, Australia.

3. Per capita income: When the total national income of the country
is divided by its population, we get the per capita income.(ii)Life
expectancy: It measures the average age of a person in a country. It
helps us to know the health facilities of the country. (iii)Literacy
rate: Education is also one of the most important criteria for the
development of a country.(iv)Gross enrolment ratio: It measures
the education gained at three levels—at the primary, secondary
and higher education level.

4. i)To provide better nourishment by providing people with more


nutritional and better food;(ii)Adequate clothing and housing;
(iii)Essential public services like pure drinking water, sanitation,
health, medical services; (iv)Better education; (v)Better living
conditions; (vi)More and better employment, particularly for the
low end poverty groups; (vii)Reduction in inequality by distributing
the benefits of economic development.
5. At the state level, there are wide disparities in the levels of
human development index. States such as Kerala, Delhi, Goa,
Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Tamilnadu, Maharashtra and Haryana
have better HDI. At the other end, state such as Bihar, Uttar
Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Odisha, Chhattisgarh,
Jharkhand and Assam had lower HDI. HDI is higher in Urban areas
as compared to rural areas. The relative positions of state have not
changed much since the early 1980’s. In general, HDI is better for
smaller states and Union Territories .

6. National Human Development Report for India has been


prepared by the Planning Commission. Its main findings are :(i)The
level of HDI is low, but it has improved over the years. (ii)HDI is
higher in the urban areas as compared to rural areas.(iii)At the
state level, there are wide disparities in the level of human
development.(iv)HDI is better for smaller states. (v)In general level
of human development is positively correlated with the level of
economic growth at the state levels.(vi)Inequalities in human
development are lower as compared to inequalities in income and
wealth.

7. .NITI Aayog: NITI Aayog stands for National Institution for


Transforming India. It is a
GovernmentofIndiainitiativetoreplace65year-old Planning
Commission on January 1, 2015. The NITI Aayog is headed by the
Prime Minister and has a Vice-Chairman and a CEO. The new body
has a governing Council comprising chief ministers of all states and
Lieutenant Governors of union territories. Niti Aayog is different
from the planning commission in terms of its main functions. The
two key activities of Planning Commission was to prepare and
implement the Five Year Plans and to allocate financial resources to
the states. Neither of these two activities form part of the activities
of NITI Aayog. The era of economic planning in India is over now.
Secondly, NITI Aayog does not allocate any financial resources to
states. NITI Aayog performs three main functions namely:(i)It
assists the central government in policy making.(ii)It serves as the
government’s think tank.(iii)It plays an important role in economic
federalism in the economy.
8. Bureaucratic Approach: Plan implementation has been affected
by bureaucratic approach. Because of various procedural and
bureaucratic bottlenecks, decision making process is slow in India.
Delay in decision making and follow up action leads to delay in
starting and completion of various projects. This results in cost
escalations, i.e., the actual cost of completion of projects turns out
to be higher than the estimated cost. Natural constraints: Natural
factors are also responsible for the limited success of planning.
Performance of agriculture in particular has been affected by
natural forces like drought and excessive rainfall. Despite various
technological developments in agriculture during the planning
periods, agricultural sector is still dependent on monsoon.
Financial Constraints: Planning is seriously affected by various
financial constraints. First, there is the problem associated with
resource mobilisation, both internal and external, Various projects
could not be undertaken because of limited resource availability.
Second, there is the problem of shortage of foreign exchange,
which at times has played havoc with the economy leads to delay in
starting and completion of various projects. This results in cost
escalations, i.e., the actual cost of completion of projects turns out
to be higher than the estimated cost.

9. The twelfth five year plan was started on 1 April 2012 and was
concluded on March 2017. This plan aimed at achieving an average
annual growth rate of 8% during the plan period. This plan laid
emphasis on inclusive growth rate so as to cover more poor and
marginal people under its coverage and on regional balanced
growth. It had targeted to reduce poverty by 10% in the five year
period. The plan also sought to generate 50 million more jobs. The
Twelfth plan focussed at increasing the growth rate in the
agricultural and manufacturing sectors in particular so as to revive
the growth rate in the Indian economy. This plan emphasised on
increasing investment in the infrastructure sector by encouraging
the private sector investment. It aimed at improving the education,
health and sanitation facilities. Indian economy realised an
average annual growth rate of about 6.67% during the plan period
which was below the target.

10. The success of economic planning of India can be judged upon


two broad factors- Achievement and Failures. Achievements of
economic planning are as follows:(i)Increase in national income:
An important aspect of progress of the Indian economy is
continuous increase in national income. The
growthraterosetoover5%during1974to1992. The rate of growth
during 1990 to 2002 wasaround6%.Thus,since1993economyhas
been growing. (ii)Growth in agricultural and industrial Production:
There has been an unmistakable upward trend in the agricultural
and industrial output since 1951. The growth rate
ofAgriculturaloutputhasbeenbetween2.5%and3.5%perannumdurin
gtheperiodofplanning. (iii)Changes in agriculture sector: The
production of commercial crops such as sugarcane, cotton, jute etc.,
has registered a large increase since 1950-51. Network of
agricultural research institutions in India has increased and it is
regarded as one of the largest in the world.(iv)Changes in industrial
scenario: The industrial structure has become highly diversified,
covering a wide range of industries producing consumer goods,
intermediate goods and capital goods.

You might also like