Haditth Al-Ghadir
Haditth Al-Ghadir
Haditth Al-Ghadir
The Prophet (saw) completed his last and only Hajj Pilgrimage (Hujjat Al-
Wada) a year before he was martyred. Knowing that his (saw) time on
this earth was coming to an end, he stopped at a place which is known as
the pond of Khumm (Ghadeer Khumm) and gathered a large number of
Muslims to witness his sermon. Various Islamic sources have cited this
particular sermon – but the part that we wish to discuss in this article is
the direct quote from the Prophet (saw) in which he says, "Man Kuntu
Mawla Fa Aliyyun Mawla." This translates as, "Whosoever I am his Mawla
(i.e all real Muslims) then Alee (a.s) is his Mawla too." There really is no
real room for misinterpretation here as it was explicitly said in front of a
large crowd of people.
We shall address this issue more in-depth in this article whilst including
the common misconceptions posed by the so-called 'Ahl ul Sunnah' such
as, why do the Shi'a resort to Hadeeth Al-Ghadeer and not the Holy
Qur'aan to prove their point? What exactly does Mutawatir mean? And is
Hadeeth Al-Ghadeer Mutawatir?
The so-called Sunnis may not agree with the usage of Hadeeth Al-
Ghadeer as proof for the successorship of Imam Alee (a.s), and frankly
why would they? After all, it makes the very foundations of their faith a
joke. However, it must be stressed that this article is dedicated to prove
that Mawla Alee (a.s) was indeed the chosen successor of the Prophet
(saw) and hence, we are leaving other narrations and verses of The Holy
Qur'aan aside for another upcoming article - Insha'Allah Ta'ala.
Indeed, both Shi'a and Sunni schools of thought alike reject the notion
that hadeeth alone can establish beliefs. We find that both schools have
testified that both The Holy Qur'aan and hadeeth must be applied.
We also find that many statements have been made by the so-called
Sunnis in which they have declared Takfir against those who deny an
Islamic belief which was approved solely by Hadeeth and without The
Holy Qur'aan.
Ibn Uthaymeen:
O brothers, there are some people who interpret the statement of Allah
(swt): "And in no way is there a beast (moving) in the earth nor a bird
flying with its two wings except that they are nations like you. In no way
have We neglected anything whatever in the Book; thereafter to their
Lord they will be mustered"; interpret His statement: "In no way have We
neglected anything whatever in the Book" that the Book here is the Holy
Qur'aan.
Perhaps someone says: Where could we find the number of the five
prayers in the Holy Qur'aan? And the number of each prayer in the
Holy Qur'aan? And how could that we do not find the number of
each prayer mentioned in the Holy Qur'aan while Allah (swt) says:
"And We have been sending down on you the Book as an evident
(exposition) of everything?!"
The answer of which is that Allah (swt) has clarified for us in His
book that it is obligatory upon us to take what the Prophet (saw)
had uttered and what he pointed to. "Whoever obeys the
Messenger (saw), then he has already obeyed Allah (swt)," "And
whatever the Messenger (saw) brings you, then take it; and
whatever he forbids you, then give over."
In regards to the field of beliefs and the field of allowing and prohibition
(judging actions and acts as Halal and Haram), as well as other fields,
those two (i.e. Holy Qur'aan and Hadeeth) have the same status, wherein
referring to and taking them both is obligatory as well as depending on
them in issuing rulings of Halal and Haram.
As for His statement: "And We have been sending down on you the Book
as an evident (exposition) of everything," He explained in that verse that
He has been sending down on His messenger that great Book as an
evident (exposition) of everything, and He did that in other places too, as
in His statement: "In no way have We neglected anything whatever is in
the Book." If we are to accept that the Book here means the Holy
Qur'aan, and if we are to hold the opinion that it is the Preserved Tablet,
then the verse does not signify that. But, anyway, there is no doubt
that the Holy Qur'aan contains an evident (exposition) of
everything, and the whole Sunnah is included in one verse of the
Qur'aan, which is His saying: "And whatever the Messenger brings
you, then take it; and whatever he forbids you, then give over."
The saying of the enquirer: What is the wisdom behind the torment of the
grave not being mentioned in the Holy Qur'aan, despite the extreme
importance of knowing it and believing in it so one may be aware and
careful in regards to it?
An undisputed point among the Salaf that the Book is the Holy Qur'aan,
and the Wisdom is the Sunnah. Thus, what the Messenger (saw) had said
from Allah (swt) is mandatory to believe as God Himself has revealed to
us by His Messenger (saw). This is an assumptive essential belief among
Muslims, which no one denies except if he is not one of them, and the
Prophet (saw) said: "I was given the Book and something similar along
with it."
Once you hear a man who does not want Hadeeth while you bring
it for him, and he instead, demands (to prove your point by) the
Holy Qur'aan, then never doubt that he is a person who contains
Zandaqa (disbelief) within himself/herself, so leave him and keep
yourself away from him/her.
In one word, the proofs from both the Book (i.e. Holy Qur'aan) and the
Sunnah, the acts of the companions and the sayings of the scholars
obviously show, as we have explained before, the obligation of taking
the Ahaad Hadeeth in all aspects of Shari'ah, whether that be in
the aspect of beliefs, or in the aspect of worshipping-acts. Truly,
the differentiating between those two (Holy Qur'aan and Hadeeth)
is a Bid'ah that the Salaf did not recognize.
Question: What is the ruling on the one who denies the torment of
the grave, with the argument that those narrations regarding the
torment of the grave, are just Ahaad Hadeeths (i.e. Hadeeth which
do not fulfill all of the conditions necessary to be deemed
Mutawatir), and the Ahaad Hadeeth should not be taken seriously
at all. They (those who deny the torment of the grave) do not look
at the Hadeeth from the aspect of being Saheeh (Authentic),
Hasan (Good) or Dha'eef (weak), rather they look at it from the
aspect of being Ahaad or that it was narrated by different chains,
so, once they find out that it is an Ahaad Hadeeth, they do not take
it. What is the answer to those folks?
Answer: Thanks only be to Allah (swt), and blessings and peace be upon
His messenger (saw) and his companions, so: Once the Ahaad Hadeeth
has been approved that it was uttered by the Messenger (saw), it
becomes a Hujjah (proof) on what it shows, whether it is in the
field of beliefs or in the field of acts, with a consensus from the Ahl
ul Sunnah, and he who denies using the Ahaad Hadeeths after
establishing the proofs against him, is truly a disbeliever. Go back
(for further information) on that topic to the book Al-Sawa'iq by ibn Al-
Qayyim or its abridged version by Al-Mousli. And from Allah (swt) is the
success, and may Allah (swt) bless our Prophet Muhammad (saw), his
offspring (a.s) and his companions.
Aboo Al-Abbas Ahmad bin Sa'eed bin Uqdah Al-Hafidh, who was
endorsed and attested with his knowledge by the author of Tarikh
Al-Baghdad, had authored a book called, Hadeeth Al-Walayah. I
have found a manuscript of that book was written at the time of Abi Al-
Baas bin Uqda, the author himself, and it is dated back to year 330 A.H.
(941 / 942 C.E.), and its transmission is veritable. The handwritings of Al-
Tusi and some of the Shuyukh of Islam were on that manuscript. The
veracity of what that manuscript includes is not to be concealed
from wise people, and he narrates in it the appointment of our
master Alee (a.s) by the Prophet (saw) from 150 different chain of
narrators.
Here are the names of those who narrate the Hadeeth of the day of
Al-Ghadeer (as stated in the book of ibn Uqdah), and the
appointment of Alee (a.s) by the Prophet (saw), and declaring that
in front of all people. Some of the following, also, had
congratulated him (Imam Alee (a.s)) with that:
Then ibn Uqdah states there are 28 more men from the
companions, whom he did not mention and did not name.
Ibn Taymiyyah:
The chains of narrators are very numerous, and ibn Uqdah has
collected them in a separated book. Many of those chains are
Saheeh (Authentic) and Hasan (good).
Few 'Sunni' scholars find no way to answer Shi'a Muslims who use the
book of ibn Uqdah, so, therefore cast doubts concerning the author ibn
Uqdah, accusing him of being 'Zaydi Shi'a.'
The 81st way of (Shi'as' ways of) deception: It is that they narrate
narrations which match with their beliefs from books of men who are
mistakenly attributed to the Ahl us Sunnah, but in reality they are
not, such as ibn Uqdah who was a Jaroudi (a sub-sect of Zaydism) Rafidhi.
Source: Tohfa Ithna Ashari. Pg. # 148.
Response One
Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Nayzak bin Habib Al-Baghdadi, Aboo Ja'far,
better known as Al-Tusi. (...) Aboo Al-Abbas bin Uqdah said: There is
a doubt in regards to him. He has settled in Baghdad, and passed away
there.
Source: Tahdheeb Al-Kamal. Vol. 1, Pg. # 475.
Al-Dhahabi:
And on it (Year 353 A.H.), Aboo Is'haq bin Hamza bin Al-Hafidh (passed
away), and he is Ibraheem bin Muhammad bin Hamza bin Umara, in
Isfahan, in the month of Ramadhan, and he was in his eighties.
Aboo Nu'aym said: After Abdullah bin Mudhahir, there has not been seen
anyone like him in memorizing, where he compiled the Shuykh and the
Musnad both.
Aboo Abdullah bin Mandah Al-Hafidh said: I have not seen anyone more
retentive than him.
Ibn Uqdah said: Few are those whom I have seen like him.
Source: Al-Ibar Fi Khabar-i Man Ghabar. Vol. 2, Pg. # 91.
Al-Nawawi & Al-Suyuti:
Al-Suyuti:
Al-Suyuti:
Ibn Uqdah, the Hafidh of the era, the ocean-like scholar of Hadeeth, Aboo
Al-Abbas Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Sa'eed Al-Kufi. A servant of Bani
Hashim, his father was a righteous grammarian, and he was nicknamed
as Uqdah. He (Ibn Uqdah) heard (the Hadeeths) from uncountable folks,
and wrote every high and low (of narrations he heard) even (what he has
heard) from his own companions, and he had the extreme ability of
memorizing and the maximizing in narrating Hadeeths. His journeys and
travels are few. He authored and compiled (books). Al-Darqutni has
narrated from him, and said: People of Al-Kufah were in consensus that
there would not have been any retentive individual more than him from
the time of ibn Mas'oud (till now). And also he reports that he (Ibn
Uqdah) said: I memorize 100,000 Hadeeth's along with their chains of
narrators, and I can answer questions about 300,000 Hadeeths from the
Hadeeths of Ahlulbayt (a.s) and the clan of Bani Hashim. Aboo Alee said: I
have not seen any individual that is retentive of the Hadeeth's of the
people of Al-Kufah more than him, and he has a Shi'ite tendency.
He was born on 249 A.H., and passed away on Dhul-Qa'dah 323 A.H.
The answer is that the meaning of the term, 'Shi'a' according to Sunni
scholars is not the same as what is commonly exressed at present such
as, the 'Shi'a Rafidhis.' Referring to someone as 'Shi'a' in their utterance
does not necessarily make one 'Shi'a.'
It must be known that early Shi'as, who are actually the Sunni and
Tafdhili (i.e. Sunnis who believe that Imam Alee (a.s) is superior to
other Sahaba) sects were called Shi'a, and since Ghulat, Rafidhis,
Zaydis and Isma'ilis called themselves with that title, and it became a
signification for their evil and bad beliefs and deeds, and because of fear
of mixing the truth with the falsehood; Sunnis and Tafdhilis did not like
the title for themselves, and thenceforth, they have been called Ahl Al-
Sunnah Wa Al-Jama'ah. Now it has been clear that what is found in old
historical book that person X is of the Shi'as, or he is of Alee's (a.s) Shias,
meanwhile he being of the chief leaders of Ahl al-Sunnah Wa Al-Jama'ah,
that is true, and in Tarikh Al-Waqidi and Al-Isti'ab there are numerous
examples on that which attention should be paid for.
Source: Tohfa Ithna Ashari. Pg. # 25 - 26.
The Book Of Al-Tabari
Aboo Ja'far, Muhammad bin Jarir bin Yazid Al-Tabari, who is of the
greatest Sunni Hadeeth scholars and their diligent Imams,
authored a book regarding the chains (of narrators) of the
Hadeeth of Al-Ghadeer, as the author of the book Al-Umdah, may
his soul rest in peace, says: And Muhammad bin Jarir Al-Tabari,
the author of the history book (Tarikh Al-Tabari), mentioned the
narration of Al-Ghadeer's day with 75 different chains (of
narrators), and he dedicated a whole book for that, and he called it
'Kitab Al-Walayah.'
And his eminence, Sayed Alee bin Tawous, may Allah (swt) sanctify his
soul and shower His graces upon him, says in his book Al-Iqbal bi Salih
Al-A'mal: And from that, what Muhammad bin Jarir Al-Tabari, the
author of the voluminous book of history (Tarikh Al-Tabari) has
authored, and he called it Kitab Al-Radd 'Alaa Al-Harqousiya,
wherein he narrated there the Hadeeth of Al-Ghadeer's day, and
what the Prophet (saw) has declared of appointing Alee (a.s) with
the Al-Walayah and the dignified position, and he narrated that
(Hadeeth) from 75 differen chains (of narrators).
And in the book Al-Tara'if, he says: And Muhammd bin Jarir Al-
Tabari, the author of the history book, has narrated the Hadeeth of
Al-Ghadeer's day from 75 different chains (of narrators), and he
dedicated a whole book for that, and he called it Kitab Al-Walayah,
and I've looked at some of what Al-Tabari wrote in regards to the
veracity of the narration of Al-Ghadeer's day, that his book's name
is Al-Radd Alaa Al-Harqousiya (A Rebuttal to Harqouis), meaning
Hanbalis with that title, since Ahmad bin Hanbal is of Harqous bin
Zuhair Al-Khariji's offspring, and it was said that the reason
behind calling it with such a title is that, Al-Barbahari Al-Hanbali
had questioned some aspects of the Hadeeth of Ghadeer Khumm.
Aboo Ja'far bin Muhammad bin Jareer Al-Tabari, the author of the
History book and the Tafsir book, took care of that Hadeeth (the
Hadeeth of Al-Ghadeer), so he collected its chains and different
wordings in two volumes.
Some of the Shuyukh in Baghdad had denied (the incident of) Ghadeer
Khumm, and said that Alee bin Abi Talib (a.s) was in Yemen when the
Messenger of Allah (saw) was in Ghadeer Khumm. This man, in a dual
poem where he describes every single country and every single place, has
composed poetic verses which denotes the Hadeeth of Ghadeer Khumm,
where he says:
And then we have moved through Ghadeer Khumm, where they have
fabricated a lot of untruths about Alee (a.s) and the Ummi Prophet
(saw)...etc.
The news reached Aboo Ja'far, so he started to speak out about the
virtues of Alee (a.s), and he narrated the chains of the Hadeeth of
Khumm.
Here we would like to quote some Sunni scholars who attested the
Tawatur of the Hadeeth, although they are 'anti-Shi'a' themselves.
Mirza Makhdoom:
And so, I have compiled a book, and called it, Al-Fawa'id Al-Mutakathira
Fi Al-Akhbar Al-Mutawatira, where I have recorded what have been
narrated from ten companions or more, and made it comprehensive for
each Hadeeth's chains and its different wordings, so it became a
thorough book, which has no alike, but the multitude of the chains
recorded there, no one would be concerned to read it, unless he has a
high interest and concern in the science of Hadeeth, and those folks are
always few, so; I have decided to abridge its contents in that booklet so
its benefit become wider, in that way, I mention the Hadeeth and name
few of the companions who narrated it, followed by listing some of who
recorded it of the prominent Imams, and it would be sufficient for
knowledge seekers, and I called it, Al-Azhar Al-Mutanathira Fi Al-
Ahadeeth Al-Mutawatira.
- Al-Tirmidhi narrated it from Zayd bin Arqam, Ahmad bin Alee and Aboo
Ayub al-Ansari.
- Al-Bazzaz from Aboo Hurayra, Talha, Umara, ibn Abbas and Buraydah.
- Ibn Asakir narrated it from Umar bin Abdul-Aziz, who said: Many (of the
companions) informed that they have heard from the Messenger of Allah
(saw) saying; Man Kuntu Mawla Fa Aliyyun Mawla.
- Ibn Uqdah, recorded, in Kitab Al-Muwalat, that ibn Hubaysh said: Alee
(a.s) asked: "Who are here from the companions of Muhammad?" So,
twelve men, among whom are Qays bin Thabit, Habib bin Budayl bin
Warqa, and they all testified that they have heard the Messenger of Allah
(saw) saying, "Man Kuntu Mawla Fa Aliyyun Mawla." He also recorded it
as narrated by Ya'la bin Murrah, who said: When Alee (a.s) came to Kufa,
he asked from people, who have heard the Messenger of Allah (saw)
saying, "Man Kuntu Mawla Fa Aliyyun Mawla?" So, came to him ten and
few more men, among them are Yazid or Zayd bin Sharhabeel Al-Ansari.