Is Einstein Theory of Relativity Correc
Is Einstein Theory of Relativity Correc
Is Einstein Theory of Relativity Correc
May Einstein Theory of Relativity be valid for all the physical phenomena?
Jose N. Pecina-Cruz
Department of Physics and Geology the University of Texas- Pan American
1201 W. University Dr., Edinburg, Texas 78539-2999
Jpecina2@utpa
And
Roger M Pecina EVETech Corp. CEO
401 North Congress Ave. Suite 1540, Austin Texas 78701
Abstract
From the foundations of physics this paper discusses if Lorentz invariance holds for any event.
For instance, the speed of neutrino is an event that violates Einsteins theory of SR and so
Lorentz invariance. SR will recuperate its faithfulness in the limit as 0
2
2
because
like time is x x x x s .. .. 0 ) ( ) (
2 0
2
0
1
2
2 1
PACS: .02.20.-a, .03.65.Fd, 14.60.Lm, 14.60.St
Introduction
Section 1, discusses why the Lorentz transformations are violated by the Heisenberg uncertainty
principle. That is how the uncertainty in the velocity of a particle affects
the Lorentz transformations laws of the motion of a particle. Invalidating the Einstein postulate
of constancy of speed velocity of light in inertial reference frames, as a matter of fact the speed
of the particle is greater than light.
1. Particles with speed faster than light
2
The Heisenbergs uncertainty principle and the space-like unitary irreducible representations of
the Poincare group invalidate Lorentz transformations in the quantum World. The E. Wigner[1]
and V. Bargmann[2] procedure to construct unitary irreducible representations of the Poincare
group allow particles with imaginary mass (whose square is negative) and are confined to the
space-like region of the light-cone. Hence, they can reach speeds greater than speed light. This
speed is completely in agreement with Heisenbergs uncertainty principle. Particles wandering
around the walls of light-cone can jump from the time-like to space-like regions back and
forth[3]. Einstein never accepted quantum mechanics as a theory to describe a physical
phenomenon. This led him to prevent a possible flown in one of his postulates of the Special
Theory of Relativity.
The uncertainty principle for an interval S in the space-time is [5]
p
S
A
= A
. (1)
2
2
2 2 0
2
0
1
2
2 1
) ( ) ( ) (
m
p
x x x x
=
A
s . (2)
This is the probability that a particle of mass m tunnel from the time-like to the space-like
regions in the light-cone. In other words, according with Heisenberg, a particle at position x
1
at
time t
1
has an uncertainty in its velocity. One observer in an inertial reference frame sees a
particle emitted at x
1
and absorbed at x
2
another observer in an inertial reference frame may see
the particle absorbed at x
2
at time t
2
before the time t
1
it is emitted at x
1
. This is a violation of the
causality principle. Therefore, the Laws of Physics are not the same in all inertial reference
frames neither the velocity of light is the upper limit of velocities in the universe. If
2
2
m
-> 0
The Einstein postulates are valid and the special theory of relativity is recovered. In the same
way that if c-> Newtons mechanics is applicable.
Therefore a revision in the heart of physics is necessary before intending to perform the
quantization of gravity. Similar review is recommended for other theories whose predictions do
not fit the real world behavior.
Conclusion
We have found that neutrinos can be identified as the space-like unitary irreducible
representations of the Poincare group[3]. Then the elusive neutrino has imaginary mass and its
speed can be higher than light. This is the comportment of the neutrino that we observe in the
laboratory [4]. We emphasize that, contrary to the current literature the mass of an elementary
particle is an eigenvalue with operator is not a Casimir invariant, since it does not commute with
3
all the generators of the Lie algebra of the group Poincare. What is a Casimir invariant is p
2
| >
= m
2
| > where p
2
it is a Poincare Casimir invariant with eigenvalue m
2
. This operator c
1=
p
2
commute with the generators of the Lie algebra. Therefore the square of the mass is the
invariant.
Acknowledgments
We are also in debt to Dr. Carlos Castro Perelman for his brilliants suggestions to this work.
References
E. P. Wigner, Ann. Math. 40, 149 (1939).
2. V. Bargmann Ann. Math. 59, 1 (1954).
3. J.N. Pecina-Cruz, arXiv:physics/0604003 (2006).
4. http://s13.invisionfree.com/DozensOnline/ar/t436.htm
Endi - September 24, 2011 08:53 PM (GMT).
5. S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology, Ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p. 61-63.