Unit 1 Mid Sem

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Notes on Deforestation in Environmental Law

1. Definition and Scope


- Deforestation: The large-scale removal of forest cover, leading to loss of
biodiversity, disruption of ecosystems, and contributing to climate change.
- Environmental laws addressing deforestation aim to regulate activities that lead
to forest degradation and promote reforestation and sustainable forest management.

2. Causes of Deforestation
 Agricultural Expansion: Clearing forests for crops and livestock.
 Logging: Harvesting timber for commercial use.
 Infrastructure Development: Building roads, urban areas, and industrial
projects.
 Mining: Extracting minerals and resources from forested areas.

3. Environmental Impact
 Loss of Biodiversity: Extinction of plant and animal species.
 Climate Change: Reduced carbon sequestration and increased greenhouse gas
emissions.
 Soil Erosion: Loss of fertile topsoil, leading to reduced agricultural
productivity.
 Disruption of Water Cycles: Altered rainfall patterns and reduced water
quality.

4. International Frameworks
 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation):
An international effort to create financial value for the carbon stored in forests,
offering incentives for developing countries to reduce deforestation and invest in
sustainable forest management.
 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
- Aims to promote the conservation of biological diversity, sustainable use of its
components, and fair sharing of benefits arising from genetic resources.

5. Legal Framework in India

 The Indian Forest Act, 1927


o Regulates the rights of forest dwellers and the use of forest produce.
o Provides for the creation of reserved forests, protected forests, and
village forests.
 Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
o Requires prior approval from the central government for the diversion
of forest land for non-forest purposes.
o Aims to conserve forests by restricting their use for industrial or
construction purposes without proper assessment.
 National Forest Policy, 1988
o Emphasizes the conservation of forests and encourages afforestation
and social forestry.
o Advocates for maintaining one-third of the country's geographical area
under forest and tree cover.
 Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of
Forest Rights) Act, 2006 (FRA)
o Recognizes the rights of forest-dwelling communities to access and
manage forest resources.
o Aims to correct historical injustices faced by these communities by
providing them with legal rights over forest land.

6. Regulatory Mechanisms

 Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA): Mandatory for projects that


involve forest land diversion, ensuring that environmental impacts are
considered before project approval.
 Afforestation and Reforestation: Programs and schemes to promote tree
planting and restoration of degraded forest lands, such as the National
Afforestation Programme.
 Protected Areas: Establishment of national parks, wildlife sanctuaries, and
biosphere reserves to protect critical habitats and biodiversity.
Environmental Jurisprudence in India

1. Introduction

- Environmental jurisprudence in India refers to the body of laws, regulations,


policies, and judicial decisions aimed at protecting the environment.

- The Indian judiciary has played a proactive role in interpreting and expanding
the scope of environmental laws, often using constitutional provisions to bolster
environmental protection.

2. Constitutional Provisions

- Article 21: Right to life has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to include the
right to a healthy environment.

- Article 48A: Directive Principle mandates the State to protect and improve the
environment and safeguard forests and wildlife.

- Article 51A(g): Fundamental duty of every citizen to protect and improve the
natural environment, including forests, lakes, rivers, and wildlife.

3. Key Environmental Laws

 The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974

- Establishes regulatory frameworks to prevent and control water pollution.

- Central and State Pollution Control Boards (CPCB and SPCBs) are responsible
for implementation and enforcement.

 The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981

- Aims to control air pollution by regulating emissions from industrial plants and
vehicles.

 The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

- Provides a comprehensive framework for the protection and improvement of


the environment.
- Empowers the central government to set standards for emissions and effluents.

 The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

- Regulates the use of forest land for non-forest purposes, requiring prior approval
from the central government.

 The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972

- Protects wild animals, birds, and plants and provides for the establishment of
protected areas like national parks and wildlife sanctuaries.

4. Key Judicial Principles

 Public Trust Doctrine


o Originated from Roman law, this doctrine posits that certain natural
resources like air, water, forests, and seashores are held by the
government in trust for public use and enjoyment.
o Case Example: M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath (1997) applied this
doctrine to protect riverbeds from commercial exploitation.
 Precautionary Principle
o This principle advocates for preventive measures when there is a risk
of serious or irreversible environmental harm, even if scientific
certainty is lacking.
o Case Example: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India
(1996) established this principle as a part of Indian environmental law.
 Polluter Pays Principle
o The principle that the polluter should bear the cost of pollution
prevention and control measures.
o Case Example: Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of
India (1996) reinforced this principle by holding industries accountable
for pollution.
 Sustainable Development
o Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising
the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
o Case Example: Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India (2000)
highlighted the need to balance development with environmental
protection.
5. Judicial Activism and Landmark Judgments

- MC Mehta vs. Union of India (1986) (Oleum Gas Leak Case)

- Established the principle of absolute liability for hazardous industries.

-Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs. Union of India (1996)

- Introduced the "Precautionary Principle" and the "Polluter Pays Principle" as


essential components of sustainable development.

- Narmada Bachao Andolan vs. Union of India (2000)

- Addressed the environmental and social impacts of large dam projects.

Environmental jurisprudence in India has evolved to encompass a wide range of


issues, reflecting a growing recognition of the need for sustainable development and
the protection of natural resources for present and future generations. The combined
efforts of the legislature, judiciary, and civil society continue to shape and strengthen
the legal framework for environmental protection. The jurisprudence of
environmental protection in India reflects a dynamic interplay between legislative
enactments, judicial activism, and public participation. The proactive role of the
judiciary, combined with comprehensive environmental laws, has significantly
contributed to the development of environmental jurisprudence in India. Ongoing
efforts to strengthen legal frameworks and enforcement mechanisms, along with
greater public awareness and participation, are crucial for achieving sustainable
environmental protection.

You might also like