Geotech Report Template
Geotech Report Template
Geotech Report Template
Engineering New Zealand, in collaboration with the New Zealand Geotechnical Society (NZGS), the Engineering
General Practitioners Group, Structural Engineering Society New Zealand (SESOC), and engineers from
Christchurch and Tauranga councils, has produced this guideline and report template to be used by engineers
to communicate geotechnical findings to other disciplines on simple, low-risk projects.
This is only a template report – it isn’t a substitute for professional engineering advice or judgement. It includes
geotechnical considerations and issues that generally need to be addressed to support typical residential
development projects. Other geotechnical issues and risks that have not been included in this template may
need to be addressed. Care should be taken that the template is adequately adjusted for every project’s specific
requirements and geological–geotechnical conditions.
Acknowledgements
Ayoub Riman
ENGEO and the New Zealand Geotechnical Society (NZGS)
Craig McGhie
Seajay Consulting Engineers and the Engineering General Practitioners Group (EGP)
John Tait
Lewis Bradford Consulting Engineers
Marie-Claude Hébert
Christchurch City Council
Michael Sheridan
Tauranga City Council
REQUIREMENTS OF A REPORT
A geotechnical report should:
• provide an appropriate level of geotechnical advice and recommendations concerning the specific project
requirements at the proposed project’s location, and
• meet the needs of the other stakeholders (eg BCA, architect, client, structural engineer).
Communication
Geotechnical reports will vary depending on the specifics of each project but should typically contain the information
in the following template. It’s unlikely that every part of the template below will be exactly applicable to each project.
The template provides a communication tool for stakeholders to collaborate and convey important information.
This guideline is a good starting point for forming the geotechnical brief and confirming the required scope.
Relevant information
It’s likely that some additional material not included in this template may be required to satisfy local regulatory
requirements or reflect project- or region-specific variables. The report’s author is responsible for adding sections
as appropriate so that these aspects are appropriately addressed.
Similarly, the review and acceptance of such reports from the Consenting Authorities should be carried out by
adequately qualified geotechnical professionals also experienced in the specific conditions expected for the project.
For instance, if a retaining wall is planned, the geotechnical engineer may do specific investigations at the location
of the proposed retaining wall. They can then detail geotechnical parameters to be considered by the structural
engineer for retaining wall design.
Alternatively, the client may need to understand the site’s geotechnical conditions before they can plan their
project. The geotechnical engineer should plan to be involved over multiple stages: early in the project and
later, once the project is detailed and specific geotechnical recommendations can be provided.
Early engagement
Overall costs are reduced when engineers are engaged early in the project and work collaboratively. International
research shows that the costs of a quality ground investigation are repaid – often by a factor of over 10 – in savings
on projects or reductions in cost overruns caused by unforeseen conditions.1
The structural and geotechnical engineers need to agree early on who will be signing the PS4 for geotechnical-
related work and who will be undertaking construction monitoring.
Temporary stability during construction and permanent stability of the site should be considered in the inspections
proposed by the geotechnical engineer/engineering geologist.
Geotechnical Database
We encourage engineers to upload the results of geotechnical investigations into the New Zealand Geotechnical
Database (NZGD). Approval from a client can be incorporated into contract documentation for a project.
1 www.building.govt.nz/building-code-compliance/b-stability/b1-structure/practice-advisory-17
REVISION NUMBER 0
PREPARED BY N Gineer BEng FEngNZ
REVIEWED BY P Erson CPEng no. 76543
DATE 01/01/2020
JOB NUMBER 12345
COMPANY DETAILS 123 Physical Street, Placeville, 04 123 4567, [email protected]
5. Geotechnical investigations
5.1 Previous site investigations
5.2 Current site investigations
• Logs should be done to NZGS Field Description of Soil and Rock.
• Investigation locations should be included in a site plan either in the body of the report
or in the appendices.
7. Geotechnical hazards
These should be included as appropriate to the site and development. If analysis or detailed assessment
is undertaken, such as liquefaction analysis, the details must be included.
7.1 Liquefaction potential and effects
7.2 Lateral spreading potential and effects
7.3 Expansive soils
7.4 Compressible soils
7.5 Mass movement, including rockfall and landslide risk
7.6 Uncontrolled fill
7.7 Stability of existing slopes
7.8 Erosion and drainage
7.9 Sensitive and collapsible soils
7.10 Contamination
7.11 Falling debris
7.12 Subsidence
7.13 Slippage
7.14 Inundation
7.15 Other relevant information
9. Conclusions
Discuss the risks to understand how the engineer concluded the recommendation/design.
Discuss Safety in Design as required.
10. Limitations
11. References
12. Appendices
For examples of good practice, see the New Zealand Geotechnical Society.
• Drawings: Site plan showing footprint of proposed works (if available at the time of reporting) and location
of geotechnical investigations.
• Investigation logs: Logs of all investigations carried out.
• Analysis outputs: Liquefaction analysis logs, slope stability assessment logs, static settlement calculations.
• Geotechnical cross sections: Useful to the structural engineer and regulatory checkers. Cross sections must
show the relevant investigation points to scale on the section and note their offset from the drawn section. The
section should also show the proposed location of the structure or development, pre- and post-development
ground levels, and site boundaries.
• Safety in design: The Safety in Design risk register, which should align with the conclusions.
• Statement of professional opinion: as required.