Leps 207
Leps 207
Leps 207
2024-25
Indian approach
In studying the Indian Constitution and the process of nation-building
we have repeatedly come across one basic principle of the Indian
approach to diversity – the Indian nation shall not deny the rights of
different regions and linguistic groups to retain their own culture. We
decided to live a united social life without losing the distinctiveness
of the numerous cultures that constituted it. Indian nationalism
sought to balance the principles of unity and diversity. The nation
would not mean the negation of the region. In this sense the Indian Does it mean
approach was very different from the one adopted in many European that regionalism is
countries where they saw cultural diversity as a threat to the nation. not as dangerous as
communalism? Or may
India adopted a democratic approach to the question of diversity. be, not dangerous at
Democracy allows the political expressions of regional aspirations all?
and does not look upon them as anti-national.
Besides, democratic politics allows parties and groups
to address the people on the basis of their regional
identity, aspiration and specific regional problems.
Thus, in the course of democratic politics, regional
aspirations get strengthened. At the same time,
democratic politics also means that regional issues
and problems will receive adequate attention and
accommodation in the policy making process.
Such an arrangement may sometimes lead to
tensions and problems. Sometimes, the concern for
national unity may overshadow the regional needs
2024-25
Areas of tension
In the first chapter you have seen how immediately after
Independence our nation had to cope with many difficult issues
like Partition, displacement, integration of Princely States,
reorganisation of states and so on. Many observers, both within
the country and from outside, had predicted that India as one
unified country cannot last long. Soon after Independence,
the issue of Jammu and Kashmir came up. It was not only a
conflict between India and Pakistan. More than that, it was a
question of the political aspirations of the people of Kashmir
valley. Similarly, in some parts of the north-east, there was no
consensus about being a part of India. First Nagaland and then
Mizoram witnessed strong movements demanding separation
from India. In the south, some groups from the Dravid movement
briefly toyed with the idea of a separate country.
These events were followed by mass agitations in many parts
for the formation of linguistic States. Today’s Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, Maharashtra, and Gujarat were among the regions
affected by these agitations. In some parts of southern India,
particularly Tamil Nadu, there were protests against making
Hindi the official national language of the country. In the
north, there were strong pro-Hindi agitations demanding that
Why does the
challenge always
Hindi be made the official language immediately. From the late
come from the border 1950s, people speaking the Punjabi language started agitating
States? for a separate State for themselves. This demand was finally
accepted and the States of Punjab and Haryana were created
in 1966. Later, the States of Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand and
Jharkhand were created. Thus the challenge of diversity was
met by redrawing the internal boundaries of the country.
Yet this did not lead to resolution of all problems and for
all times. In some regions, like Kashmir and Nagaland, the
challenge was so complex that it could not be resolved in the
first phase of nation-building. Besides, new challenges came
up in States like Punjab, Assam and Mizoram. Let us study
these cases in some detail. In this process let us also go back
to some of the earlier instances of difficulties of nation building.
The successes and failures in these cases are instructive not
merely for a study of our past, but also for an understanding
of India’s future.
2024-25
Jammu and Kashmir Union Territories of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh
As you have studied in the
previous year, Jammu and
Kashmir had a special status
under Article 370 of the Indian
Constitution. However, in spite
of it, Jammu and Kashmir
experienced violence, cross
border terrorism and political
instability with internal
and external ramifications.
It also resulted in the loss of
many lives including that of
innocent civilians, security
personnel and militants.
Besides, there was also a
large scale displacement of
Kashmiri Pandits from the
Kashmir valley.
Jammu and Kashmir
comprises three social and Source: https://pib.gov.in
political regions — Jammu,
Kashmir and Ladakh. The Jammu region is a mix of foothills and
plains. It is predominantly inhabited by the Hindus. Muslims, Sikhs
and people of other denominations also reside in this region. The
Kashmir region mainly comprises of the Kashmir valley. It is inhabited
mostly by Kashmiri Muslims with the remaining being Hindus, Sikhs,
Buddhists and others. The Ladakh region is mainly mountainous.
It has very little population which is almost equally divided between
Buddhists and Muslims.
2024-25
indu
movement to Tamil Nadu.
The DK split and the political
pol icall legacy
olitittic leg accy of the
egac the
he
: The H
movement was transferred r ed to
rr to Dravida
D avvid
Dr da
Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). MKK).
)
Credit
The DMK made its
entry into politics
with a three pronged
agitation in 1953-54.
First, it demanded the
restoration of the original
name of Kallakudi railway
station which had been
renamed Dalmiapuram,
after an industrial house e
from the North. This demand d
brought out its opposition to
to
the North Indian economic mc
mi
and cultural symbols. The he
second agitation was for forr
1965
Nadu,
n in Tamil
indi agitatio
Anti-H
2024-25
2024-25
2024-25
2024-25
2024-25
2024-25
This of the Indian National Congress who however could not complete
is all about the term as president rule was imposed in the state in July 2008.
governments, officials, The next election was held in November-December 2008. Another
leaders, terrorists… but
coalition government (composed of NC and INC) came into power
what about the people in
Jammu and Kashmir? In headed by Omar Abdullah in 2009. However, the state continued
a democracy we must go to witness disturbances led by the Hurriyat Conference. In 2014,
by what they want, the state went into another election, which recorded the highest
shouldn’t we? voters’ turnout in 25 years. Consequently a coalition government
led by Mufti Mohammed Sayeed of the PDP came into power with
the BJP as its partner. After Mufti Mohammed Sayeed died, his
daughter Mahbooba Mufti became the first woman Chief Minister
of the state in April 2016. During the tenure of Mahbooba Mufti,
major acts of terrorism, mounting external and internal tensions
were witnessed. The President’s rule was imposed in June 2018
after BJP withdrew its support to the Mufti government. On 5
August 2019, Article 370 was abolished by the Jammu & Kashmir
Reorganisation Act 2019 and the state was constituted into two
Union Territories, viz., Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh.
Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh are living examples of plural
society in India. Not only are there diversities of all kind (religious,
cultural, linguistic, ethnic and tribal) but there are also divergent
political and developmental aspirations, which have been sought
to be achieved by the latest Act.
2024-25
2024-25
“
There is also
evidence to show that on
31-10-84 either meetings
hu Rai
were held or persons who
could organise attacks
Credit : Rag
were contacted and
continued for almost a week. More e
were given instructions than two thousand Sikhs were e
to kill Sikhs and loot killed in the national capital, the e
their houses and shops. area worst affected by this violence.
e.
The attacks were made Hundreds of Sikhs were killed in n
in a systematic manner other parts of the country, especially
ly
and without much fear in places like Kanpur, Bokaro and nd
“
of the police, almost
suggesting that they were
assured that they would
not be harmed while
committing those acts or
Chas. Many Sikh families lost their
male members and thus suffered
great emotional and heavy financial
loss. What hurt the Sikhs most was
eir
me
2024-25
“
I have
no hesitation in
Credit : Times of India
2024-25
The North-East
In the North-East, regional aspirations reached a turning point in
1980s. This region now consists of eight States. Arunachal Pradesh,
Assam, Nagaland, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Meghalaya, which
earlier constituted the North-East region, are often called “the seven
sisters”. Sikkim, which has been added to the list is – referred to as the
‘Brother’ to those seven states. The region has only 4 per cent of the
country’s population but about twice as much share of its area. A small
corridor of about 22 kilometers connects the region to the rest of the
country. Otherwise the region shares boundaries with China, Myanmar
and Bangladesh and serves as India’s gateway to South East Asia.
The region has witnessed a lot of change since 1947. Tripura,
Manipur and Khasi Hills of Meghalaya were erstwhile Princely States
which merged with India after Independence. The entire region of
North-East has undergone considerable political reorganisation.
Nagaland State was created in 1963; Manipur, Tripura and Meghalaya
in 1972 while Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh became separate
States only in 1987. The Partition of India in 1947 had reduced the
Note: This illustration North-East to a land locked region and affected its economy. Cut off
is not a map drawn to from the rest of India, the region suffered neglect in developmental
scale and should not be terms. Its politics too remained insulated. At the same time, most
taken to be an authentic
States in this region underwent major demographic changes due to
depiction of India’s
external boundaries. influx of migrants from neighbouring States and countries.
The isolation of the region, its complex social character and its
backwardness compared to other parts of the country have all resulted
in the complicated set of demands from
different states of the North-East. The
vast international border and weak
communication between the North-East
and the rest of India have further added
to the delicate nature of politics there.
Three issues dominate the politics of
North-East: demands for autonomy,
movements for secession, and opposition
to ‘outsiders’. Major initiatives on the
first issue in the 1970s set the stage
for some dramatic developments on the
second and the third in the 1980s.
2024-25
Regional Aspirations 127
There were opposition and protest riots throughout the State. Leaders
of the major tribal communities wanted to separate from Assam. They My friend
formed the Eastern India Tribal Union which later transformed into a Chon said that
people in Delhi know
more comprehensive All Party Hill Leaders Conference in 1960. They more about the map of
demanded a tribal State to be carved out of Assam. Finally instead of Europe than about the
one tribal State, several States got carved out of Assam. At different North-East in our country.
points of time the Central Government had to create Meghalaya, I think she is right at least
Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh out of Assam. Tripura and Manipur about my schoolmates.
were upgraded into States too.
The reorganisation of the North-East was completed by 1972. But
this was not the end of autonomy demands in this region. In Assam,
for example, communities like the Bodos, Karbis and Dimasas wanted
separate States. They worked for this demand by mobilising public
opinion and popular movement as well as through insurgency. Often
the same area was claimed by more than one community. It was not
possible to go on making smaller and yet smaller States. Therefore,
some other provisions of our federal set up were used to satisfy their
autonomy demands while remaining in Assam. Karbis and Dimasas
have been granted autonomy under District Councils while Bodos
were recently granted Autonomous Council.
Secessionist movements
Demands for autonomy were easier to respond to, for these involved
using the various provisions in the Constitution for accommodation of
diversities. It was much more difficult when some groups demanded
a separate country, not in momentary anger but consistently as a Laldenga
principled position. The country’s leadership faced this problem for a (1937-1990):
very long time in at least two States in the North-East. A comparison Founder and
of these two cases offers us a lesson in democratic politics. leader of the
Mizo National
After independence, the Mizo Hills area was made an autonomous Front; turned into
district within Assam. Some Mizos believed that they were never a a rebel after the
part of British India and therefore did not belong to the Indian union. experience of the
But the movement for secession gained popular support after the famine in 1959;
Assam government failed to respond adequately to the great famine led an armed
of 1959 in Mizo hills. The Mizos’ anger led to the formation of the Mizo struggle against
National Front (MNF) under the leadership of Laldenga. India for two
In 1966 the MNF started an armed campaign for independence. decades; reached
Thus, started a two decade long battle between Mizo insurgents and a settlement
the Indian army. The MNF fought a guerilla war, got support from and signed an
Pakistani government and secured shelter in the then East Pakistan. agreement with
The Indian security forces countered it with a series of repressive Prime Minister
measures of which the common people were the victims. At one point Rajiv Gandhi in
even Air Force was used. These measures caused more anger and 1986; became the
alienation among the people. chief minister of
the newly created
At the end of two decades of insurgency everyone was a loser. State of Mizoram.
This is where maturity of the political leadership at both ends made
2024-25
2024-25
but this was not acceptable to other rebels. The problem in Nagaland
still awaits a final resolution.
2024-25
r u
bu Math
Ramba on
of Carto
d it : H T book
Cr e
e
ok at th
s , h e r e is a lo ur regions...
the new rists in the fo am
To end ro or
s of ter lhi, Miz
activitie arjeeling, De
,D
Punjab
2024-25
Sikkim’s merger
At the time of independence, Sikkim was a ‘protectorate’ of
India. It meant that while it was not a part of India, it was also
not a fully sovereign country. Sikkim’s defence and foreign
relations were looked after by India, while the power of internal
administration was with the Chogyal, Sikkim’s monarch. This
arrangement ran into difficulty as the Chogyal was unable to deal
with the democratic aspirations of the people. An overwhelming Kazi Lhendup Dorji
majority of Sikkim’s population was Nepali. But the Chogyal was Khangsarpa (1904):
seen as perpetuating the rule of a small elite from the minority Leader of democracy
Lepcha-Bhutia community. The anti-Chogyal leaders of both the movement in Sikkim;
communities sought and got support from the government of founder of Sikkim Praja
India. Mandal and later leader of
The first democratic elections to Sikkim assembly in 1974 were the Sikkim State Congress;
swept by Sikkim Congress which stood for greater integration in 1962 founded the Sikkim
with India. The assembly first sought the status of ‘associate National Congress; after an
state’ and then in April 1975 passed a resolution asking for electoral victory, he led the
full integration with India. This was followed by a hurriedly movement for integration
organised referendum that put a stamp of popular approval on of Sikkim with India; after
the assembly’s request. The Indian Parliament accepted this the integration, Sikkim
request immediately and Sikkim became the 22nd State of Congress merged with the
the Indian union. Chogyal did not accept this merger and his Indian National Congress.
supporters accused the government of India of foul play and
use of force. Yet the merger enjoyed popular support and did not
become a divisive issue in Sikkim’s politics.
2024-25
2024-25
Regional Aspirations 133
133
Goa’s liberation
Although the British empire in India came to an end in 1947, Portugal refused to withdraw from
the territories of Goa, Diu and Daman which were under its colonial rule since the sixteenth
century. During their long rule, the Portuguese suppressed the people of Goa, denied them
civil rights, and carried out forced religious conversions. After India’s Independence, the Indian
government tried very patiently to persuade the Portuguese government to withdraw. There
was also a strong popular movement within Goa for freedom. They were strengthened by
socialist satyagrahis from Maharashtra. Finally, in December 1961, the Government of India
sent the army which liberated these territories after barely two days of action. Goa, Diu and
Daman became Union Territory.
Another complication arose soon. Led by the Maharashtrawadi Gomanatak Party (MGP)
one section desired that Goa, as a Marathi speaking area should merge with Maharashtra.
However, many Goans were keen to retain a separate Goan identity and culture, particularly
the Konkani language. They were led by the United Goan Party (UGP). In January 1967,
the Central Government held a special ‘opinion poll’ in Goa asking people to decide if they
wanted to be part of Maharashtra or remain separate. A referendum-like procedure was used
to ascertain people’s wishes on this issue. The majority voted in favour of remaining outside
of Maharashtra. Thus, Goa continued as a Union Territory. Finally, in 1987, Goa became a
State of the Indian Union.
2024-25
found.
3. What were the main provisions of the Punjab accord? In what way
can they be the basis for further tensions between the Punjab and its
neighbouring States?
5. Explain the internal divisions of the State of Jammu and Kashmir and
describe how these lead to multiple regional aspirations in that State.
6. What are the various positions on the issue of regional autonomy for
Kashmir? Which of these do you think are justifiable? Give reasons for
your answer.
2024-25
2024-25