Sample of Chapter 2 and 3
Sample of Chapter 2 and 3
Sample of Chapter 2 and 3
CHAPTER 2
study that have been found and proven adequate for this
research.
Teaching Competence
program.
process.
process.
3
teachers.
4
teachers.
STEM education.
5
educational schools.
teaching development.
10
the NHI. The health care cost will be managed while also
competences.
was adopted and the census (all) sampling technique was used
the findings.
student success.
females ages 26-30 and 41-45 and they attended 1-5 LAC
Cell.
effectively.
24
growth.
professional growth.
teachers.
Training Design
teachers.
character values.
character values.
approach.
29
of evaluation.
a low mean and were close to the adjacent group scale of the
32
Rinconada District.
academic achievement.
professional competence.
of the teachers.
preceding this section, it was found out that not one had
35
District.
as shown in Figure 2.
learning.
Researcher’s Theory
Conceptual Framework
Mission
agreement on the rank Competence of the
orders of the teachers'
competence and
• DEPED MATATAG development through the Teachers towards
Agenda LAC Session among the
different schools.
• DO No. 12, s. Quality
Calculating the significant
2020 difference in the teachers'
Theories competence and Education
development due to their
Related personal and professional
Literatures and attributes.
Studies;
Respondents Crafting a training design
based from the findings of
Instrument Used; the study to improve the
and teaching competence of
the Mathematics teachers
Statistical towards quality education.
Tools Used
FEEDBACK
Figure 3
The Conceptual Paradigm
40
CHAPTER 3
Research Design
Sampling Design
Rinconada District.
Table 1
The Respondents of the Study
100
90
80
P
70
E
R
C
60
E
N
T
50
A
G
E
40
30
20
10
0
RESPONDENTS
Baao District Balatan District Bato District Buhi District Bula District Nabua District
Figure 4
The Respondents of the Study
45
Research Instrument
in data gathering.
gathering tool.
Table 2
Table of Specifications of the Questionnaire
Sub Total 55 50
Part III. Developed
Competence
10 56-65 11
1. Interpersonal
2. Work Ethics 9 66-74 11
3. Conducting Action
Research 10 75-84 11
4. Professional
Development 9 85-93 11
Sub Total 38 44
Grand Total 93
were observed:
go-signal from the Adviser and the Dean was considered before
𝑴(𝑵−𝑴)
r = 1 –
𝑵 (𝒔𝟐)
where:
r = reliability
N = number of cases/items
48
M = mean score
S2 = variance
1 = constant
where:
t = is unknown
Study Procedure
2020 2021
Research Timeline
FEBRRUARY
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
JANUARY
AUGUST
MARCH
APRIL
JUNE
JULY
MAY
1. Presented the Research Proposal
Figure 5
the committee.
the respondents.
graphs.
𝟏𝟐 ∑ 𝑫𝟐
W=
𝒎𝟐 (𝑵)(𝑵𝟐 −𝟏)
Where:
rated or ranked
(Siegel, 1988):
X2 = k (N-1)W
Where:
X2 is the unknown
2
(𝑂 − 𝐸)2
𝑥 = ∑
𝐸
Where:
∑ = summation
fe = expected frequency