Nozzle Theory
Nozzle Theory
Nozzle Theory
Lecture 1
6
NOZZLES
▪ Aero gas turbines have an exhaust system that passes the turbine discharge gas to atmosphere at a velocity
and direction appropriate to the flight condition.
▪ The main components of exhaust system of a non-after burning engines are Tail cone & Exhaust duct, which are
referred to as Tail pipe & Exhaust nozzle
▪ Tail Pipe: straightens out the flow before the gases passes into the jet pipe.
▪ Along the tail pipe, flow area increases, reducing the flow velocity and hence friction losses.
▪ Exhaust nozzle: The velocity of exhaust gas is increased before discharge to atmosphere
Classification:
▪ Permit After burner (A/B) operation (if available) without affecting the main engine operation
▪ Do all the above with minimal cost, weight while meeting life and reliability goals
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Schlieren & Shadowgraph images from experiments 29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Thrust Reversal
41
Cascade and Clamshell Thrust reverser
42
43
Layout of a turbofan engine with two thrust reverse flow streams.
JET NOISE
44
Noise of the 1960s and 1990s aero engines
(Airbus Industries)
45
METHODS USED TO DECREASE THE JET NOISE Corrugated perimeter noise suppressor
(rear view).
1. Coating acoustically absorbent lining
2. Reducing the mixing region by increasing the contact area of atmosphere
with the exhaust gases by CORRUGATED or LOBE type noise
suppressors.
CORRUGATED nozzle:
• Breaks jet into smaller jet streams
• Increases the total perimeter of nozzle area
• Promote rapid mixing and
• reduces the size of eddies down linearly with the size of exhaust system
Effects:
• The change in frequency may put some high frequency noise above the
audible range of human ear
• High frequency audible noise are more highly attenuated by atmospheric
absorption than the low frequency noise. 46
METHODS USED TO DECREASE THE JET NOISE
LOBE type nozzle
• The exhaust gases are divided to flow through the lobes and a
small central nozzle.
• These form a number of separate exhaust jets that rapidly mix with
the air entrained by the suppressor lobes
• This principle can be extended by the use of a series of tubes to
give the same overall area as the basic circular nozzle.
• This type of noise suppressors was used by military aircraft and
early commercial aircraft.
Effects:
• But both these methods increased drag and reduced engine
performance, and the multitube approach also increased weight,
sometimes substantially.
47
METHODS USED TO DECREASE THE JET NOISE/ IR SIGNATURES
• Turbofan engines are quieter than turbojet engines as the exhaust velocities of both streams of turbofans
are less than those for turbojets.
• To reduce fighters’ infrared signature, nozzle designs were tested to reduce the fully expanded jet
velocity by mixing
(a) core flow with fan flow only,
(b) fan flow with ambient flow only, or
(c) both flows simultaneously.
• Depending on the type of mixing attempted, these designs fell into two broad categories: tabs and
chevrons
48
CHEVRON NOZZLES
49
METHODS USED TO DECREASE THE JET NOISE/ IR SIGNATURES
• Tabs are severe protrusions into the flow at the nozzle exit plane.
• Chevrons are also protrusions but of much less severity than tabs.
• The aggressive mixing produced by the tabs greatly reduced low-frequency noise but with the penalty of
tab-induced high-frequency noise.
• Chevrons, which provided a more balanced approach to mixing, reduced low-frequency noise without
significant chevron-induced high-frequency noise.
• Other nozzle designs attempted to shield the core flow by using a scarf fan nozzle and an offset fan
nozzle for mixed flow turbofan engines; mixing of both hot and cold streams greatly reduces the noise.
• Generally, the most successful method employed by numerous aero engine manufacturers is to mix the
hot and cold exhaust streams within the confines of the engine and expel the lower velocity exhaust gas
flow through a single nozzle.
• This single nozzle may also have the corrugated or lobe-type shape
50
Thrust vectoring
• The ability of an aircraft or other vehicle to direct the thrust from its main engine(s) in a direction other than parallel
to the vehicle’s longitudinal axis.
• “a maneuver effector which can be used to augment aerodynamic control moments throughout and
beyond the conventional flight envelop”
• Design challenge: developing a multi-axis thrust-vectored exhaust nozzle that can operate efficiently at all flight
conditions while satisfying the design constraint of low cost, low weight, and minimum impact on radar cross-
section signature
• The technique was originally envisaged to provide upward vertical thrust as a means to give the aircraft VTOL or
short takeoff and landing (STOL) capability.
• use of vectored thrust in combat situations enabled an aircraft to perform various maneuvers and have better rates
of climb not available to conventional-engined planes.
• thrust vectoring can control the aircraft by engine forces, even beyond its stall limit, that is, during “impossible”
post-stall (PS) maneuvers at extremely high nose turn rates
• It is also used as a control mechanism for airships, particularly modern nonrigid airships 51
Mechanical control
Thrust vectoring
Fluidic control
• Mechanical thrust vectoring includes deflecting the engine nozzle and thus physically changing the
direction of the primary jet.
• Fluidic thrust vectoring involves injecting fluid into or removing it from the boundary layer of a primary jet to
enable vectoring.
• Mechanical thrust vectoring system is heavy and complex, while fluidic thrust vectoring is simple, lightweight,
inexpensive, and free from moving parts (fixed geometry).
52
Thrust vectoring
engine/nozzle internal thrust vectoring (ITV)
Mechanical control
engine/nozzle external thrust vectoring (ETV).
56
Fluidic control Thrust Vectoring
• Fluidic nozzles, which divert thrust via fluid effects. Air forced into the exhaust stream can affect deflected thrust
of up to 15o.
• Use a secondary air jet to control the direction of the primary jet.
• Extensive experimental studies for utilizing a fluidic injection system (light weight and simple) instead of the
heavy and mechanically complex door system are being carried out.
• It has minimal aircraft observability penalty (or lower radar cross-section).
• Challenges with Fluidic vectoring are in obtaining an effective, efficient system with reasonably linear control
response.
• It has several types, namely, shock vector control, co-flow, counterflow, synthetic jet actuators, and sonic
throat skewing.
• The side onto which the jet attaches is controlled by tangential injection of a secondary jet of air upstream of the
surfaces.
where ax and ay are the acceleration in the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively
• The first acceleration (ax) controls the forward motion, while the second acceleration (ay) controls the rate of
climb or descent.
• The angle (θ) is the inclination of the exhaust jet stream from the axis of aircraft. For a vertical flight this angle is
90o.
• This angle also develops a pitching moment necessary for nose up or down depending on deflecting the jet
nozzle upward or downward
59
Nozzle performance is ordinarily evaluated by
NOZZLE COEFFICIENTS two dimensionless coefficients
𝑭𝒈
𝑪𝒇𝒈 =
Ls 𝑭𝒈 𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒂𝒍
• It account for the losses and directionality of the actual nozzle flow
• Thrust loss due to exhaust velocity vector angularity
• Thrust loss due to the reduction in velocity magnitude caused by friction in the boundary layers
• Thrust loss due to loss of mass flow between stations 7 and 9 from leakage through the nozzle walls
• Thrust loss due to flow nonuniformities 60
Nozzle Performance
• Gross thrust for a one-dimensional flow
• Ideal expansion (P9 = P0) gives a gross thrust coefficient of unity and that both underexpansion (P9 >
Po) and overexpansion (P9 < Po) reduces the gross thrust coefficient below unity.
Slight Amount Of Under Expansion Is Better Than Over Expansion In Nozzle Operation
61
Discharge or flow coefficient (CD)
• The ratio of the actual mass flow 𝑚ሶ 8 to the ideal mass flow 𝑚ሶ 8 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑙 called the discharge coefficient, CD
𝑃𝑡8 𝑃𝑡8
ൗ𝑃 ൗ𝑃
0 0
Convergent nozzle C-D nozzle 62
Velocity coefficient (CV)
63
Angularity coefficient (CA)
1
𝐶𝐴 = න cos 𝛼𝑗 𝑑𝑚ሶ
𝑚ሶ
67
68
ROCKET NOZZLES
❑ The principal difference in the different nozzle configurations is found in the diverging supersonic-
flow section
❑ The wall surface throughout the nozzle should be smooth and shiny to minimize friction, radiation
absorption, and convective heat transfer due to surface roughness.
❑ The first three sketches show conical and bell-shaped nozzles
❑ Although these last three have been ground tested, to date none of them has flown in a space
launch vehicle
❑ The objectives of a good nozzle configuration are to obtain the highest practical Is, minimize inert
nozzle mass, and conserve length (shorter nozzles can reduce vehicle length, vehicle structure, and
vehicle inert mass).
69
Bell, Contoured & Conical Nozzles
70
Bell, Contoured & Conical Nozzles
71
Bell-Shaped Nozzles
(1)
(2)
• Extendible nozzle
• Droppable insert concept
• Dual bell nozzle concept
Extendible nozzle
74