Chapitre I.

Etude d’une dalle précontrainte

________________________________________________________

I.1 Introduction
Ce
 g= 1,45 KN/m
Q= 2,5 KN/m
L= 11,6 m
Fck= 35 Mpa
Fpk= 1860 MPa
Fpo= 1654 MPa Fctm= 3,21 Mpa
1) Combinaison I : Construction
σ1= -4,815 Mpa σ2= 21 MPa

enrobage = -3,21 MPa

σ2'= -4,815 MPa σ1'= 21 MPa

Mmin = GL²/8
Mmax= (G+Q)L²/8
ΔM = QL²/8
ΔM = 42,05 KN,m = 0,04 MN,m
Δσ = σ2 - σ2' = 25,815 Mpa
Igz/Vs >= ΔM / Δσ
0,001549
==> h²/6 >= 5 m3
==> h >= 0,096420539 m
soit h= 0,5 m
A= 0,5 m²
Poid Popre = 12,5 KN/m
G= Pp+g = 13,95 KN/m
Q = 2,5 KN/m
d= 0,19 m
section sous
critique
force de la précontrainte
P= ΔM / ρ*h + A/h *( σ2' * Vs + σ1 Vi)
ρ= 0,333333333 SU
 Vi =Vs = h/2 = 0,25 m
Igz =bh3/12 0,010416667 m4
A= 0,5 m²
=>
P= -2,1675 MN

L'excentricité E0
E0 = -C' - Mmin/P
C' = (ρ * Vi) (1- A*σ1/P) -0,00922722 m
Mmin = GL²/8= 234,639 KN,m
= 0,234639 MN,m

E0= 0,117480507 m E0<-(vi-d)

-(Vi-d) = -0,06 m
section sur critique
P =( Mmax + ρ .A.Vs. σ2') / ( ρ.Vs +Vi-d')

Mmax = ΔM + Mmin= 0,274639 MN

P= 0,516376744 Mn

Igz/Vs >= (P.ρ.h) / (σ2 + (VS/Vi) .σ2')

0,041666667 >= 0,005317442

L'excentricité E0
E0 = C' - Mmax/P
C' = ρ * Vs (1- A*σ2'/P) 0,471857802 m
E0 = -0,06 m
-(Vi-d) = -0,06 m

ACIER :
la force de la precontrainte : 0,516376744 Mn
 Soit la perte ΔP = 0,15xFpK
0,8Fpk = 1488
σPo= Min{ } = 1488 Mpa
0,9fpo0,1k = 1488,6
ΔσPo = 15%Fpk 279 Mpa
σP = σPo - ΔσPo 1209 Mpa
Pu = σP *Ap
choix acier : Toron Section :
T15 139 mm²
>>> Pu = 0,168051 Mn
Nombre de torons =
P/pu 3,072738301 >> 4
Préelle = Nt * Pu 0,672204 MN
1,1) verification des contrainte
: σ1 < σ(y) < σ2
fcm = Fck + 8 = 43 Mpa
fcm(20j) = βcc(j) x fcm
exp(Sx(1-√
βcc(j) = (28/j))
S= 0,25
βcc(j) = 0,955229179
fcm(20j) = 41,0748547 Mpa
fck (20j) = 33,0748547 Mpa
fctm(j) = 0,3x(fck(j)^2/3) Mpa
fctm(20j)= 3,09114861 Mpa
0,6 x fck(20j) = 19,84491282 Mpa
1,5 x fctm (20j)= -4,636722915 Mpa

P/B + (M+P x
σ(y) = e0)x(y/Igz)
((Pp + Qch) x
M= L^2)/8
Qchantier = 1 Kn/m²
 M= 227,07 KN.m
M= 0,22707 MN.m
P/B + (M+P x
σ(Vs) = e0)x(Vs/Igz)
σ(Vs) = 5,82611424 Mpa

P/B - (M+P x
σ(Vi) = e0)x(Vi/Igz)
σ(Vi) = -3,13729824 Mpa

P/B - (M+P x
σ(e0) = e0)x(e0/Igz)
σ(e0) = 0,268798502 Mpa

19,84491
σ(Vs) = -4,636722915 < 5,738850977 < 3
19,84491
σ(Vi) = -4,636722915 < -3,673344 < 3
< -0,096709909 19,84491
σ(e0) = -3,09114861 < 3
2) combinaison II
Quasipermanante
σ1= -4,815 Mpa σ2= 17,5 MPa

enrobage = 0 MPa

σ2'= -4,815 MPa σ1'= 17,5 MPa

verification des σ1 < σ(y) <

contrainte : σ2
fctm = 0,3x(fck^2/3)
fctm = 3,209962442 Mpa
M= ((Pp + g) x L^2)/8
M= 234,639 KN.m
M= 0,234639 MN.m
P/B - (M+P x
σ(e0) = e0)x(e0/Igz)
σ(e0) = 0,225201062 Mpa

P/B + (M+P x
σ(Vs) = e0)x(Vs/Igz)
σ(Vs) = 6,00777024 Mpa

P/B - (M+P x
σ(Vi) = e0)x(Vi/Igz)
σ(Vi) = -3,31895424 Mpa

σ(Vs) = -4,815 < 6,00777024 < 17,5

σ(Vi) = -4,815 < -3,31895424 < 17,5
σ(e0) = 0 < 0,225201062 < 17,5

2) combinaison II
Rare
σ1= -4,815 Mpa σ2= 21 MPa

enrobage = -3,21 MPa

σ2'= -4,815 MPa σ1'= 21 MPa

fctm = 0,3x(fck^2/3)
fctm = 3,209962442 Mpa
M= ((Pp + g + Q) x L^2)/8
M= 276,689 KN.m
M= 0,276689 MN.m
P/B - (M+P x
σ(e0) = e0)x(e0/Igz)
σ(e0) = -0,017006938 Mpa
 P/B + (M+P x
σ(Vs) = e0)x(Vs/Igz)
σ(Vs) = 7,01697024 mpa

P/B - (M+P x
σ(Vi) = e0)x(Vi/Igz)
σ(Vi) = -4,32815424 mpa

σ(Vs) = -4,815 < 7,01697024 < 21

σ(Vi) = -4,815 < -4,32815424 < 21
σ(e0) = -3,21 < -0,017006938 < 21