Contractor WRAC Guidance Sheet

This will assist in understanding tabs within the assessment which has been identified as
problematic in the past.
Read with the OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE (SS-ZA-PGM’s-PRO-SAF-
GOV-0005)

Cover Page
Complete the entire cover page, ensuring the title is relevant to the work being conducted. The date of the assessment is the day which the
assessment was conducted and not when the work is planned. The revision number starts at 0 and will increase as and when the assessment
is reviewed and re-signed.
The operation needs to be specific but should it be applicable to multiple operations and only one risk assessment will be used, you will
refer to the operation as PGM Operations. Reference numbers are speicific to each operation as well as the risk assessment. The reference
number can not be used among multiple / different risk assessments or operations. To obtain a reference number, please request it from
the Contractor Safety Department Supervisors.
The Approval needs to be done by the Contractor as well as legal appointees for the specific operation.

Overview

The overview is broken into two portions, firstly the Scope of the assessment where you identify all the activities / functions of the work you
will be doing and the second portion is any tools / equipment / material / etc. which you will be using. This must be used whilst completing
the WRAC Assessment to ensure all aspects is covered.

Team Members and Acknowledgement Register

The team members tab must include the members whom drafted and workshopped this risk assessment. It is not meant for persons to sign
after the fact.
Persons whom will participate in the work and may be affected by the activities needs to sign off on the acknowledgement register prior to
the work commencing. This is to ensure those persons are familiarised with the contents of this assessment.

WRAC
The WRAC needs to be completed systematically using information established in your overview. Covering all activities, task steps,
equipment, etc. The unwanted event needs to be specific in what can go wrong (Unwanted Event) during the activities, task steps, using
equipment, etc. It is a specific description of what can go wrong, indicating the hazard and possible contact point resulting in the
consequence or loss.
i.e. Whilst working ontop of the roof, the person slips and falls from height resulting in injuries. or Whilst the person is barring, a
rock dislodges from the hanging wall coming into contact with the person resulting in injuries.
Controls need to be specific to the event as well, what you have in place to prevent the event and also mitigate / reduce the consequence
should it happen.
The risk rating should be approached in a similar fasion, and be realistic. You need to consider the controls when rating both your likelihood
and consequence.
Events which is still high needs to be addressed immediatly and recommendations completed. For medium risks, you can either institude
History Log
additional controls and / or enforce the current controls which is in place.
You need to update the history log, everytime changes and ammendments is made after the first approval. This will require you to update
the cover page (Revision Number) and have it re-approved.

Revision Triggers
Revisions are not time based or "expiry" dates. Revisions are based on triggers;
- Serious accidents and injuries (internal and external),
- Change management for; new equipment, machinery, changes in procedures or method statements, trials, testing, products / service design,
construction,
- Section 54 stoppages,
- Legislation – including changes in legislation,
- MCOP reviews and new guidelines issued,
- Emergency situations,
- Permissions and exemptions,
- Alternatively, when management requests.
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Contractors Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment Title G
R
A
SS
GRASS CUTTING C
U
TT
IN
GRASS G
CUTTING

Contractor Name: SABATAU HOLDINGS

Operation Name: UG2-CRP

Document Reference Nr: GEN-0/1/1900-CRA-0258 Revision Number: ###

#REF!

Risk Assessment Date 25/06/2024

Approval - Contractor
This approval portion must be signed off by the legal appointees from the contractor.

Name & Surname Designation Company Name Signature Date

Approved By:

Approved By:

Approval - Operation
This approval portion must be signed off by the legal appointees of the mine.

Name & Surname Designation Operation Signature Date

Approved By:

COMMENTS

Approved By:

COMMENTS

Approved By:

COMMENTS

Approved By:

COMMENTS

Approved By:

COMMENTS

Approved By:

COMMENTS
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Overview
In accordance with Section 11 and 21 of the Mine Health and Safety Act, 29 of 1996, and Section 10 of the Occupational Health and
Safety Act, a Risk Assessment must be conducted to identify any potential hazards and evaluate the associated risks.

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to conduct a Risk Assessment study to identify and evaluate the potential operational hazards along with each
hazards' potential unwanted events and implement controls to reduce the potential risks.

Also to provide management with the necessary information to institute reasonably practicable measures to eliminate or minimise
the identified significant hazards and effectively manage them in order to protect employees, environment and the operation against
the potential consequences.

SCOPE

The scope is very important; it determines the parameter within which the Risk Assessment is conducted.
This Risk Assessment considers task based activities. All exclusions for this Risk Assessment should also be listed.

The Scope of this Risk Assessment includes the following:

1 Site access
2 Pre-work Preparations
3 Offloading tools
4 Cutting grass with Brush cutter
5 Over inspection
6 Housekeeping
7

TOOLS & EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (INCLUDING CHEMICALS)

List all tools and equipment being used in this task/ job. Separate normal hand tools and electrical/ pneumatic tools. Include all
chemicals used i.e. any glue, paint, degreaser etc.

1 Lawn Mower
2 Brush Cutter
3 Chain Saw
4 Shovels
5 Digging Folk
6 Rakes
7 Clear All
8 Petrol 93 and 2 Stroke

Overview 3 of 21
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Definitions and Abbreviations

TERM DEFINITION

Means an independent individual, company or other legal entity that agrees to supply goods, material,
Contractor equipment, personnel, and/ or services to Sibanye-Stillwater, including sub-contractors.
(Note: Contractors are subject to the same rules, regulations and other requirements as an employee)

A means to reduce the likelihood of a risk occurring and \ or minimise the consequences once an event has
Control occurred.

Employee/s All Sibanye-Stillwater PGM's employees, visitors and contractors.

The outcome of an event or situation expressed qualitatively or quantitatively, whether a loss, injury, health
Consequence or environment impact, or disadvantage, or a benefit, gain or advantage.

A source of potential harm to people, facilities, the environment or the community that, should it involve
potential damage, will be an ‘energy’ such as electricity, pressure, chemical, etc. The environmental term,
“aspect”, is synonymous with hazard. A hazard must be recognised and understood in order to manage the
Hazard related risk. Understanding a hazard includes the nature, magnitude, and potential consequences as well as
relevant “target” or impact characteristics, potential timeframes, pathways or mechanisms of its
manifestation and residual harm. Also, understanding sources of harm to the community may require
recognition of incentives.

Likelihood The probability or chance that and event will occur.

A combination of the likelihood of an occurrence of a hazardous event or exposure and the severity of the
impact (e.g. injury, illness, environmental impact) that may be caused by the event or exposure.
The effect of uncertainty on business objectives.
a) An effect is a deviation from the expected – positive and/or negative;
b) Risk is forward looking and refers to future events or circumstances;
Risk c) Risk is often characterised by reference to potential events, consequences, or a combination of these and
how they can affect the achievement of objectives;
d) Objectives can have different aspects such as financial, health and safety, and environmental goals and
can apply at different levels such as strategic, organisation-wide, project, product, and process;
e) Risk is often expressed in terms of a combination of the consequences of an event or a change in
circumstances, and the associated likelihood of the occurrence of the consequence.

A task oriented risk assessment which can be applied by a work team prior to undertaking a potentially
Job Risk Assessment (JRA) hazardous activity. It uses job observation and experience as the basis for identifying hazards and controls
to be used in the execution of the task.

A structured, measured set of tasks or activities designed to produce a specific output (service or product)
Process for a particular customer(s).

Task Piece of work to be done, an activity or set of activities that might be defined as part of a process.

Determination of the risk level associated with unwanted events by means of likelihood of occurrence and
Risk Rating consequences; normally use to prioritize risk management efforts.

Definitions & Abbreviations 4 of 21

Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Definitions and Abbreviations

TERM DEFINITION

An incident or situation which occurs in a particular place during a particular interval of time. Events
Unwanted Event involve releases or manifestations of, or exposures to the hazard.

Definitions & Abbreviations 5 of 21

Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Definitions and Abbreviations

TERM DEFINITION
These are controls that are currently in place and effective, these controls are put in place to reduce/
Current Controls mitigate the possibility of the unwanted event occurring. Examples: Daily Inspections, Monitoring, Guards
over motors, restricted areas etc.

Considering the presence and magnitude of the hazard/ energy and the exposure to that hazard (number of
Likelihood Rating people and frequency of the tasks exposing those people), also the status of existing controls.

Consider the maximum reasonable consequence of the unwanted event for each of the 7 Impact Types. If
Consequence Rating the unwanted event occurs what will be the outcome/ impact thereof; i.e. multiple fatalities, breach of
law with possible criminal prosecution etc.

Workplace Risk Assessment and A structured review technique to identify and analyse hazards in the workplace and to check the adequacy
Control (WRAC) of existing or planned hazard controls.

Definitions & Abbreviations 6 of 21

Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Risk Assessment Team Members

Risk Assessment Team Members

YEARS EXPERIENCE TOTAL YEARS

NAME & SURNAME DESIGNATION
IN FIELD SERVICE
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.2 (V8)

Sibanye-Stillwater Safety, Health and Environmental (SHE) Risk General Description Safety Health Environment
Matrix

Irreversible impact on
Consequences are health with loss of
5 10 15 20 25 5 severe and could not be
Multiple Fatalities
quality of life of a
Long term irreversible
liability / Significant
managed. The operation numerous group /
(Low) (Medium) (High) (High) (High) Catastrophic
may not recover population or multiple
loss of biodiversity
fatalities

Consequences are
Irreversible impact on
4 8 12 16 20 4
Significant
severe and manageable
to some extent, but the Fatality
health with loss of Irreparable damage to a
quality of life or single natural resource
(Low) (Medium) (Medium) (High) (High) operation would
fatality
recover.

Reversible impact on

Severity
Consequences would be
3 6 9 12 15 3 significant, but
Serious Injury
health (with lost time)
with a temporary
Medium to Serious
manageable to a large reparable damage
(Low) (Low) (Medium) (Medium) (High) Moderate
extent.
disability or loss of
quality of life

Reversible impact on
2 4 6 8 10 2
Low
Consequences would be
visible yet fully Lost Time Injury
health (with lost time) Minor damage / Minor
with no disability or reversible effects
(Low) (Low) (Low) (Medium) (Medium) managed.
loss of quality of life

1 2 3 4 5 1 Consequences would be
Minor (medical
treatment or first aid Temporary discomfort
Insignificant / Non
Negligible minimal. Conformance
(Low) (Low) (Low) (Low) (Low) case)

1 - Rare 2 - Unlikely 3 - Possible 4 - Likely 5 - Almost Certain

Probability / Time Frequency / Likelihood Score Rating Description

Risk with potential to lead to collapse of business and is fundamental to

the achievement of objectives OR Risk which can be endured but which
>20 Years 5-19 Years 1-4 Years Monthly Weekly 15-25 High (Catastrophic)
may have a prolonged negative impact and extensive consequences.
Immediate action and commitment from senior management required.

The risk may harm the objectives and functions resulting in loss of
Could conceivably occur but Could possibly occur but would Known to occur / would not be Medium (Moderate
Could occur but infrequently Occurs often / is to be expected 7-14 effectiveness and reputation to the department/operation. Management
would be extremely remote be rare surprising and Significant)
responsibility must be specified and accountability defined.

Low (Low and

1-6 Event which can be managed by routine processes and procedures.
Negligible)
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Contractors Risk Assessment (WRAC)

GRASS CUTTING
Consequence
(Residual Considering Controls)

Activity / Area / Function / What can go wrong? How can we Prevent it? Risk Rank
#
Process
Sub - Activity / Area / Function / Process
(Unwanted Event) (Controls)
Likelihood Safety Health Environment (Max Impact)
Shortcomings and Opportunities

Site Induction, Signs and designated 6

1 Site access Site access - Employees Use of non-designated walkways 2 - Unlikely 3 - Moderate
(Low) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
walkways with barricades.

Sibanye human resources policy substance

Employees under the influence of Alcohol and/ or Narcotic 6
2 abuse 24/7 alcohol testing at the security gate. 2 - Unlikely 3 - Moderate 2 - Low
(Low) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
drugs entering site
Proper supervision.

Site access will only be given after Full safety

Employees entering site without authorisation. Entering file has been approved and handed in 6
3 3 - Possible 2 - Low
(Low) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
without PDS. Supervision. PDS tags issuing station at the
entrance of the plant. PDS/VDS training.

Pre-entry checks at the weighbridge. Security 4

5 Site access - Vehicles Sub-standard vehicle entering site 2 - Unlikely 2 - Low 1 - Negligible
(Low) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
access control. Proper supervision.

Security access control. Proper supervision.

9
6 Vehicle entering plant without PDS PDS units to be obtained at the weighbridge 3 - Possible 3 - Moderate
(Medium) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
during pre-trip inspection checks.

Vehicle driver not complying with site traffic Management Driver attends site induction. Site traffic signs 4
7 2 - Unlikely 2 - Low 2 - Low
(Low) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
Plan and Procedure displayed. Traffic Management Procedure.

All vehicles have VDS installed on them

during pre-trip inspections. PDS/VDS 6
8 Interaction with other vehichles/TMM 2 - Unlikely 3 - Moderate
(Low) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
training. Reflective PPE. Tailings dams
Traffic Management Plan.

Contractor supervisor reports to site

4
9 Pre-work Preparations Report to site supervisor Employees starting work without authorisation. supervisor and obtain required permits before 2 - Unlikely 2 - Low
(Low) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
starting with the task.

Employees not doing the Continuous Risk Assessment All Members of the team trained on CRA
Conduct a pre work risk assessment for the 6
10 together, not being aware of the hazards involved in the done before work commences. Supervisor to 3 - Possible 2 - Low 1 - Negligible 2 - Low
(Low) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
task with the team.
task oversee.

WRAC 9 of 21
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Contractors Risk Assessment (WRAC)

GRASS CUTTING
Consequence
(Residual Considering Controls)

Activity / Area / Function / What can go wrong? How can we Prevent it? Risk Rank
#
Process
Sub - Activity / Area / Function / Process
(Unwanted Event) (Controls)
Likelihood Safety Health Environment (Max Impact)
Shortcomings and Opportunities

Supervisor oversee the conducting of the

CRA. All team members to be part of the
Failure to identify all the hazards and implement proper 9
11 process and sign the CRA to confirm 3 - Possible 3 - Moderate 2 - Low 2 - Low
(Medium) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
controls.
communication and understanding of the
CRA. CRA training.

CRA. No work to be conducted during very

Exposure to bad/excessive weather conditions.(Heavy rain, bad weather conditions. Employees evacuated
4
12 Working during bad weather conditions thunderstorms, Heavy winds + dust, etc) Head stroke during excessive heat and dust conditions. 2 - Unlikely 1 - Negligible 2 - Low 2 - Low
(Low) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
regular breaks fatique, * Drinking water staying hydrated Supervisor to over insp. Lightning detectors
and lightning shelters.

CRA controls implemented. Proper

communication whilst offloading tools. 10
13 Offloading tools Manual offloading of tools Hands and Back injuries due to manual handling. 5 - Almost Certain 1 - Negligible 2 - Low
(Medium) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
Visible supervision. Buddy system when
offloading heavy tools.

Tools pre-use inspections. Trained operator.

Regular maintenance/service done on brush
3
14 Tools inspection Substandard tools used. cutters. Pre-use inspection on the tools. All 3 - Possible 1 - Negligible
(Low) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
portable electrical tools/equipment inspected
and tagged by mine electrician.

Operator to ensure to refuel brush cutter in

Ignition source near flammable fuel caused by a spark can well-ventilated areas and not to spill 4
15 Fill up Brush cutter with oil-gasoline mixture 2 - Unlikely 2 - Low 2 - Low
(Low)
result in fire flammable fuel and never smoke when
refuelling. Trained employees.

Trained employees on the correct use of 9

16 Cutting grass with brush cutter Use the Brush cutter machine Use of Brush Cutter by incompetent operator. 3 - Possible 3 - Moderate 2 - Low 1 - Negligible
(Medium) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
Brush Cutter. Supervision.

Proper PPE, goggles overalls and safety shoes

Flying debris whilst cutting can hit a person or get into the 4
17 worn. Guard on the brush cutter to diverge the 2 - Unlikely 2 - Low 2 - Low
(Low) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
eyes.
debris.

All employees to report their known allergies.

Potential for allergy reaction from cutting grass with 4
18 Full PPE to cover the body, long trousers and 2 - Unlikely 1 - Negligible 2 - Low
(Low) Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
pollen content
long sleeves and goggles.

WRAC 10 of 21
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Contractors Risk Assessment (WRAC)

GRASS CUTTING
Consequence
(Residual Considering Controls)

Activity / Area / Function / What can go wrong? How can we Prevent it? Risk Rank
#
Process
Sub - Activity / Area / Function / Process
(Unwanted Event) (Controls)
Likelihood Safety Health Environment (Max Impact)
Shortcomings and Opportunities

Mandatory PPE respirator FFP2SL, earplugs.

Pre work checks for loose debris in working 9
19 Exposure to excessive dust 3 - Possible 2 - Low 3 - Moderate 1 - Negligible
(Medium)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
area. CRA, proper supervision, Dust
monitoring.

Cutting head should place cutters out of reach

Exposure to high speed rotating machinery, potential for of feet, Cutter always used with guard in 3
20 3 - Possible 1 - Negligible
(Low)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
severe cuts to operator place. Mandatory PPE, CRA, Trained
employees on the correct use of Brush cutter.

Mandatory PPE includes earplugs. CRA. 6

21 Exposure to noise above 85db. 2 - Unlikely 3 - Moderate 2 - Low
(Low)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
Supervision. Noise monitoring.

Contact Protection services control centre to

disconnect electric fence and get confirmation 6
22 Coming into contact with live electricity. 2 - Unlikely 2 - Low 3 - Moderate
(Low)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
of disconnection. Supervision. CRA. MCOP
Isolation and lockout.

Always wear correct PPE. In the case of

potential danger of snakes, safety gumboots
are very important. Be constantly on the
lookout for snakes. CRA. Any person
noticing a snake must immediately stop
working, move slowly to a safe distance and 6
23 Coming into contact with snakes 2 - Unlikely 1 - Negligible 3 - Moderate 2 - Low
(Low)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
report it immediately to his supervisor. The
supervisor must stop all work move away
from the risk area and inform protection
services to send a competent person to remove
the snake. Work can resume as soon as the
area is declared safe to work

Team do not go anywhere where bees or

wasps are identified. Any encounter with the
6
24 Coming into contact with bees or wasps. bees or wasps reported immediately. Full PPE 2 - Unlikely 2 - Low 3 - Moderate
(Low)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
to cover the body, long trousers and long
sleeves.

Pre work check of working area and PPE

Slips and trips from using brush cutter on uneven ground 6
25 includes safety gumboots i.e. adequate grip 2 - Unlikely 3 - Moderate
(Low)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
and off cut grass
and angle support. Supervision

WRAC 11 of 21
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Contractors Risk Assessment (WRAC)

GRASS CUTTING
Consequence
(Residual Considering Controls)

Activity / Area / Function / What can go wrong? How can we Prevent it? Risk Rank
#
Process
Sub - Activity / Area / Function / Process
(Unwanted Event) (Controls)
Likelihood Safety Health Environment (Max Impact)
Shortcomings and Opportunities

Brush cutter designed to minimize vibration 9

26 Prolonged use of brush cutter. 3 - Possible 3 - Moderate 3 - Moderate
(Medium)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
from OEM, CRA. Supervision

Brush cutter designed for low pollutant levels

9
27 Exposure to exhaust petrol fumes (OEM), Trained operators in the correct use of 3 - Possible 2 - Low 3 - Moderate
(Medium)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
Brush Cutter. MSDS. CRA

Operators trained on CRA. Supervision.

6
28 Exposure to bad weather conditions. Supervisor trained. Work halted during 2 - Unlikely 3 - Moderate 2 - Low
(Low)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
extreme weather conditions.

Uneven ground could cause the operator to slip and fall CRA. Supervision. Clear safe distance from 6
29 Brush cutting near open body of water 2 - Unlikely 3 - Moderate 2 - Low
(Low)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
into dam. dam edge.

CRA. Company safety rules. Induction. 6

30 Horseplay and running on sides. 2 - Unlikely 3 - Moderate 3 - Moderate
(Low)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
Signed acceptance register for company rules.

Mandatory PPE includes gloves and use

9
31 Re fuelling Spillage of petrol on the skin. funnel when re fuelling. CRA. Supervision. 3 - Possible 3 - Moderate 3 - Moderate 3 - Moderate
(Medium)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
MSDS

Trained employees on re-fuelling of Brush

6
32 Danger of fire from petrol Cutter. Petrol stored correctly. Supervision. 2 - Unlikely 3 - Moderate 3 - Moderate
(Low)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
MSDS. Warning signs. Fire extinguishers

CRA. Company safety rules. Induction. 6

33 Replacing of cutting attachment Coming into contact with hot parts on machine 2 - Unlikely 3 - Moderate
(Low)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
Signed acceptance register for company rules.

Instructions from OEM. Trained employees

9
34 Getting cut when replacing attachment on the correct use of Brush Cutter. CRA. 3 - Possible 3 - Moderate
(Medium)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
Supervision. PPE NB. Safety Gloves.

6
35 Fuel storage and transport Fuel container could rupture and cause fuel spill on vehicle Use SABS approved containers. MSDS. 2 - Unlikely 3 - Moderate 2 - Low 1 - Negligible
(Low)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.

WRAC 12 of 21
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Contractors Risk Assessment (WRAC)

GRASS CUTTING
Consequence
(Residual Considering Controls)

Activity / Area / Function / What can go wrong? How can we Prevent it? Risk Rank
#
Process
Sub - Activity / Area / Function / Process
(Unwanted Event) (Controls)
Likelihood Safety Health Environment (Max Impact)
Shortcomings and Opportunities

Inspection. Operators train on use and storage 9

36 Fuel not stored in a secure area 3 - Possible 3 - Moderate
(Medium)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
of fuel procedure. Supervision

Instruction from OEM. Trained employees on

6
37 Maintenance and repairs Brush cutter not regularly serviced and cleaned. the correct use of Brush Cutter. CRA. 2 - Unlikely 3 - Moderate 2 - Low
(Low)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
Supervision.

Trained employees on re-fuelling of Brush 9

38 Danger of fire from petrol 3 - Possible 3 - Moderate
(Medium)
Controls Adequate. Supervisor to over inspect.
Cutter. Supervision. MSDS. Warning signs

CRA. Company safety rules. Induction. 4

39 Good House Keeping Waste and materials left lying around. 2 - Unlikely 2 - Low
(Low)
Signed acceptance register for company rules.

40 #N/A

41 #N/A

42 #N/A

43 #N/A

44 #N/A

45 #N/A

46 #N/A

47 #N/A

48 #N/A

49 #N/A

50 #N/A

51 #N/A

52 #N/A

53 #N/A

54 #N/A

55 #N/A

56 #N/A

57 #N/A

58 #N/A

59 #N/A

WRAC 13 of 21
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Contractors Risk Assessment (WRAC)

GRASS CUTTING
Consequence
(Residual Considering Controls)

Activity / Area / Function / What can go wrong? How can we Prevent it? Risk Rank
#
Process
Sub - Activity / Area / Function / Process
(Unwanted Event) (Controls)
Likelihood Safety Health Environment (Max Impact)
Shortcomings and Opportunities

60 #N/A

61 #N/A

62 #N/A

63 #N/A

64 #N/A

65 #N/A

66 #N/A

67 #N/A

68 #N/A

69 #N/A

70 #N/A

71 #N/A

72 #N/A

73 #N/A

74 #N/A

75 #N/A

76 #N/A

77 #N/A

78 #N/A

79 #N/A

80 #N/A

81 #N/A

82 #N/A

83 #N/A

84 #N/A

85 #N/A

86 #N/A

87 #N/A

88 #N/A

89 #N/A

90 #N/A

91 #N/A

92 #N/A

WRAC 14 of 21
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Contractors Risk Assessment (WRAC)

GRASS CUTTING
Consequence
(Residual Considering Controls)

Activity / Area / Function / What can go wrong? How can we Prevent it? Risk Rank
#
Process
Sub - Activity / Area / Function / Process
(Unwanted Event) (Controls)
Likelihood Safety Health Environment (Max Impact)
Shortcomings and Opportunities

93 #N/A

94 #N/A

95 #N/A

96 #N/A

97 #N/A

98 #N/A

99 #N/A

100 #N/A

101 #N/A

102 #N/A

103 #N/A

104 #N/A

105 #N/A

106 #N/A

107 #N/A

108 #N/A

109 #N/A

110 #N/A

111 #N/A

112 #N/A

113 #N/A

114 #N/A

115 #N/A

116 #N/A

117 #N/A

118 #N/A

119 #N/A

120 #N/A

121 #N/A

122 #N/A

123 #N/A

124 #N/A

125 #N/A

WRAC 15 of 21
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Contractors Risk Assessment (WRAC)

GRASS CUTTING
Consequence
(Residual Considering Controls)

Activity / Area / Function / What can go wrong? How can we Prevent it? Risk Rank
#
Process
Sub - Activity / Area / Function / Process
(Unwanted Event) (Controls)
Likelihood Safety Health Environment (Max Impact)
Shortcomings and Opportunities

126 #N/A

127 #N/A

128 #N/A

129 #N/A

130 #N/A

131 #N/A

132 #N/A

133 #N/A

134 #N/A

135 #N/A

136 #N/A

137 #N/A

138 #N/A

139 #N/A

140 #N/A

141 #N/A

142 #N/A

143 #N/A

144 #N/A

145 #N/A

WRAC 16 of 21
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

History Log
Change description Reference of information
Indicator type
Date updated (New entry, changes to controls, (Internal/ external flash, HPI
(Leading / lagging)
events, actions etc) review, legislation etc)

History Log 17 of 21
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Record of Changes
Office use only: Each time the template is reviewed, reasons/ details will be included below

Changes made to template Reason Date changes made

Inclusion of New Risk Matrix and Coding Alignment of Matrices 19/03/2019

Updated with ORM Draft.
Updated Risk Matrix
ORM Review 05/03/2020

Updated Risk Matrix ORM Review 08/06/2020

Updated Matrix and Hazard Classification List

Included Action Plan
Included History Log
ORM Review 10/02/2021
PTO portion removed (separate forms)

Removed Process Map ORM Review - Duplication of information 22/06/2021

Included guidance tab, risk contact mail, seperated team member sign off from team
members to acknowledgement register and cover page contractor sign off Contractor dept. request. 12/07/2022
ammendments

Included guidance example of unwanted events. Contractor dept. request. 02/11/2022

Included revision triggers on Guidance tab.

Included the requirement to read the Operational Risk Management Procdure with the Contractor dept. request. 4/6/2023
WRAC Template on the Guidance Tab.

Updated guidance tab - Reference numbers to be obtained from the Contractors Dept.
and not from the Risk Department.
Process Change 10/11/2023

Record of Changes 18 of 21
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

POPIA Notification
PRIVACY NOTE

Sibanye-Stillwater is committed to protecting your privacy and to ensure that your personal information is collected, processed, stored and safeguarded in accordance with the requirements of
the Protection of Personal Information Act, 2013 (“POPIA”).
We will use your personal information only for the purposes for which it was collected.

For more information on the protection of your personal information, please visit our Privacy Statement on https://www.sibanyestillwater.com .

If for any reason you think that your information is not processed in the correct manner, or that your information is being used for a purpose other than for what it was originally intended, you
may contact us on [email protected] .

POPIA 19 of 21
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)
Reference Number: SS-ZA-PGM's-TEMPL-SAF-GOV-0005.5 (V8)

Acknowledgement Register
GRASS CUTTING
GEN-0/1/1900-CRA-0258
Team members acknowledgment of contents of this assessment.

NAME & SURNAME DESIGNATION COY NUMBER Date SIGNATURE